Storm Shadow

Russians are struggling to cope with this British weapon: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12197545/Russia-admits-British-supplied-Storm-Shadow-missiles-nightmare-Putins-forces.html

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Send in TAURUS and ATACMS.

  2. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Renault with Rover engine, quality stuff.

  3. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    From my poor understanding storm shadows are a much higher price than himars. Not that surprising that one on one a storm shadow is more effective

  4. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    HIMARS is more important. Storm shadow is good against deep static targets. Now that we are in the counterattack phase we saw the HIMARS effortlessly switch to closer more mobile targets like SPGs.

  5. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >US bomb is called the: bomb, exploding, long range
    >UK: Alright lads let's send a shipment of our new weapon the dragon slayer merlintodger ghost demon double Black person footie murder death impoliteness smash bash crash murder 6000

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      While actually it's more like
      >US: we want a cool name for our bomb, like Merlin better backronym it to Major Early Ranged, Long Interdiction Black personthrasher. MERLIN. Awesome.
      >UK : Lol, lets just call it Merlin after the arthurian legend

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        More like
        >US
        >M1 air to surface bomb

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        So the US is the K.N.D.?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Does Ukraine have Hellfire (US) AND Brimstone (UK) yet, lol?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        It’s like a fireworks stand

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          What are the dead vatniks then?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Hemorroid Holocaust Black person Death 3000

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Germans "Sd.Lmfz. A. B" for sonder Luftminenflugzeug Ausführung B

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        what's wrong with the germans?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      I'm all on board with naming a new cruise missile design "the Dragontodger." Layering humiliation on the enemy in addition to massive damage is fair war tactics.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Look at this magnificent landscape!
      >the vast open spaces, the clear blue skies, the hordes of poisonous spiders, the giant, jumping furry rat things
      >This place reminds me of Wales, but only the southern parts

  6. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    With a British warhead, which is what actually fricks up the target. Sans that, all you’re launching is a very expensive, highly sophisticated paperweight. Neither part of the equation is effective without the other.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      What, no, not at all. I don't know whether it's a good missile or not, seems like yet another missile to me, but the warhead is the dumbest part. The vector of delivery is what matters. Why the frick do you think we barely give a shit about Best Korea or other shithole countries that still somehow managed to develop nukes, like Pakistan. That's because their vector of deliveries are utter shit. Otherwise we would still use good old bombers like it's 1945.

  7. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >dailymail.Uk
    >HIMARS getting all the love for pivoting towards the counterattack
    >b…but our missiles are harder to deal with!
    The insecurity of bongs never fails

  8. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    imagine when the first Challenger CLAPS a whole group of slavshit tanks... Brits truly are the gods of war

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Challengers aren’t on the front lines. They’re a reserve unit they most likely won’t see combat because the chances of Russians breaking ukranian lines are slim to none

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        The unit Challenger2's are in is 100% not a reserve unit. It's full of Marders and mobile artillery.
        It is one of the largest and best equipped with western gear.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Chally 2 being used as a heavy breakthrough tank in a Kampfgruppe of german shit?

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Why would it matter? It's not like Marder and Stryker share parts with each other or any other western MBT's.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          It’s towed artillery. It’s not mobile like the SPGs in the frontline units

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Holy shit this is moronic.

            Just to be clear you think the shorter ranged arty with the smaller logistical footprint will be further away from the front than the long ranged 155mm SPG's with a frick huge logistical requirement?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Brits aren’t known for good military gear. The challenger 2 was evaluated but never adopted by a foreign government. The fact that Ukraine isn’t using them where the fighting is the heaviest speaks to this

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Obviously they’re going to push with their best gear. Leopards and Bradleys will take the brunt of the losses because they are doing the most fighting, but it’s silly to assume they aren’t going to use the challengers when a breakthrough has been made. 14 tanks is still 14 tanks

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        the challenger 2 isnt as good as a modern leopard or abrams but that doesnt mean its bad.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Isn't the challenger 2 literally worse than the Italian ariete?

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Stop being a Black person, warriortard. And if you're not warriortard, why would you be trying to emulate the most pathetic user of this board?

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              I'm not emulating anyone anon, just asking a question.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            I don’t think so.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            i dont believe so? i dont think i have ever seen a trial with both of those.

            the ariete isnt half bad either.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >modern leopard
          debateable, its slower but better armoured

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >The challenger 2 was evaluated but never adopted by a foreign government.
        Oman adopted it, but the lack of export success was mostly due to production capacity and commonality with NATO ammunition. Vickers was never going to be able to compete with GD or KMW when it came to churning out 1000+ tanks for export and not using the Rhieinmetall L44/55 made a big difference to potential NATO-aligned buyers. There's nothing actually wrong with CR2 as a tank, it's just old and the powerpack isn't great.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Powerplant isn't great

          What's wrong with it?

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            It’s underpowered compared to the big 2

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Challenger2 is 20 years newer than Abrams.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            You’re going to pretend that abrams hasn’t been upgraded. You’re also going to pretend challenger 2 has been upgraded

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              >You’re also going to pretend challenger 2 has been upgraded
              but it has seen progressive upgrades over the years its been in service, updated optics and sensors, up armour packages and remote weapons.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                And the abrams has seen way more. The challenger 2 is 20 years behind modern abrams and leopards

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >And the abrams has seen way more. The challenger 2 is 20 years behind modern abrams and leopards
                I'd ask for a citation but i already know you wont have one...

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                It has had some upgrades but not to the level of the Abrams or Leopard. The main improvements are the RWS thermal that can be used as an ersatz CITV and the additional protection to the lower glacis but the 2A7 and newer M1A2 packages are still more mobile and have better FCS/battle management systems. CR3 will close the gap hopefully

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              >You’re also going to pretend challenger 2 has been upgraded
              yeah it is called Challenger 3

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        My homie they’re the third largest exporter- you don’t shift that volume of product without it being good

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          No they aren’t. They dropped to 7th

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Brexit/inflation.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/uk-defence-and-security-exports-for-2021/uk-defence-and-security-export-statistics-2021

            on a rolling 10-year basis, the UK remains the second largest global defence exporter after the USA
            in 2021, the value of UK security export sales was £8.22 billion, with the UK third place in the rankings

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >never adopted by a foreign government
        >Oman: Royal Army of Oman – 18 purchased in 1993
        do you ever get tired of being wrong?

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >b…but consider omans 18 tank purchase
          kek

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            He proved you wrong anon, no need to seethe

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Omanlets

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Who are the white guys with those Brits? I dont recognize the flag

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            I chuckled

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Germany produced over a thousand Leopard 2s then downsized its military and sold them for peanuts about the same time everyone was in the market for tanks. Thats why the Leclerc, Challenger or Abrams got a foot in the door. Learn about a subject before parroting bullshit moron.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >> near future
      >> after getting into actual combat, Challengers proceed to blow Akula's long, rigid Vikhrs even harder than Leopards
      /k/ sure doesn't learn...

  9. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    The only thing you're hacking is the trouser seat of a new recruit to get at his tight young boyhole, ziggergay.

  10. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Remember when people were arguing who the spearhead would be and one guy swore it would be the challengers. Show yourself I know your in here

  11. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    So if Ukraine launched a HIMARS as well as a Storm Shadow at the SAME time on the same target, what would be the time gap on impact, lol?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Himars gets there first, but they are different weapons for different targets, Storm Shadow is cruise missile designed to take out hardened targets and is best used against targets deep behind the lines and is broadly a strategic weapon, HIMARS is shorter ranged and has smaller warheads and isnt capable of the same degree of penetration and destruction as Stormshadow against a single hardened target, however it is a faster system to set up and operate and is well suited to striking targets on the front lines or within about 75km of those lines

      the storm shadow can hit targets the HIMARS as supplied to ukraine cannot, and can hit any target that HIMARS can, but costs much more per shot.

  12. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    BORIS JOHNSON!!!!

  13. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Odds Vickers ends up snatching up some military contracts in Ukraine assisting in Ukrainian tank production (mainly via upgrades & design guidance)?

  14. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    [...]

    [...]
    Renault with Rover engine, quality stuff.

    So this is what bongs and frogs are capable of when working together...
    ugh... what could have been...

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      But competition is healthy. We need more of that in our own arms industry.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      that's pussy shit, we used to make some seriously good shit like the Concorde

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Well SCALP is an accronym that actually mean something, storm shadow is just an edgy name they pulled out of their ass

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      England losing the Hundred Years War was truly one of the greatest tragedies in history.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        if only henry V hadnt gotten dysentery

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        More like not letting a brainlet like John be king and lose the Angevin holdings in France instead of the rightful twink becoming king and ruling as Arthur I of England, Brittany and Aquitaine assisted William The Marshal

        My favourite CK2 save was correcting this mistake and eventually England, Ireland and every french kingdom including getting Arles from the g*rmans.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          John might have been a bad king, but his problem was merely being a bad king in a time you desperately need a good one
          His position was severely untenable from day 0
          The civil wars of his brothers really didn't help, nor did the absolute shitshow of a drain on the country that was Richards reign (after he hounded his father to death basically)
          You needed another Henry I, or Henry the younger to survive to navigate out of the shit he was in, the nation was economically fricked (again with a lot of fault on Richard) and was politically unstable with its absolutely insane court

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            https://i.imgur.com/5aZynVp.gif

            More like not letting a brainlet like John be king and lose the Angevin holdings in France instead of the rightful twink becoming king and ruling as Arthur I of England, Brittany and Aquitaine assisted William The Marshal

            My favourite CK2 save was correcting this mistake and eventually England, Ireland and every french kingdom including getting Arles from the g*rmans.

            John wasn't great but he basically took the fall for Richard bankrupting the crown with his crusade adventures and subsequent ransom.

  15. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    It's "we intercepted 142 of the 90 fired Tomahawks" all over again.

  16. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Why does Russia seethe about the Brit’s more than any other Euro?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Ass hurt from the great game still.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      UK: United Kingdom
      UK: Ukraine
      Their bug brain cant tell the difference, plain and simple

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      They seethe at Poland more.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      The UK has been very stalwart and consistent in their support for ukraine from the start. Even if you discount the raids led by BoJo

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Russians never managed to get revenge on the British Empire for anything and this feeds into the Russian prison culture/self image that they have of an inferiority and superiority complex. With other enemies they have at least either nominal or real victories so they can say "Well they won at X, but we fricked them at Y, so it's okay" with the Japs, Krauts, Poles, Turks etc Russians can point at history and claim victories.

      On the other hand, whenever Brits confronted Russia, they did what they wanted and the Russians had to take it up the arse. Both in open war and wars where Britain wasn't fighing like when the Second Pacific Squadron fricked up. It's a prison culture thing where they were made b***h and never had an opportunity to rise back up. More modernly, since the collapse of the USSR, Britain has been going round all the former USSR making friends with all the nations there recently celebrating 30 years of relations with nations like Kyrgyzstan, and it just brings back to the Russian memories of the Great Game which they also lost.

      To make matters worse for the Russian, during WWII not only did Britain always fight Germany for longer and never had a treaty with them, they sent a lot of material support that prevented Russia from running out of food, raw materials, weapons, and tanks, the Matilda was actually the best tank on the Eastern Front but the Russians will never admit that. Russians like to imagine themselves as strong so resent charity espeically when they hate the people giving it. Then during the Russian Civil War, Whites hated and distrusted the British so they cut relations with the British because of Russian schizophrenia that Britain was going to steal the Donbass coal mines and Crimea so Britain gave up on them.

      For a Russian aware of his nation's history, Brits are the ultimate boogeyman, worse than the Americans because they serve the British agenda, look at Dugin and his Anglo-Saxon Atlantic World.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        A quality post.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        And unsurprisingly the Brits loathe them right back.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        *laughs in Anglo*

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Matilda was actually the best tank on the Eastern Front
        may I see it?

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Russians never managed to get revenge on the British Empire for anything and this feeds into the Russian prison culture/self image that they have of an inferiority and superiority complex. With other enemies they have at least either nominal or real victories so they can say "Well they won at X, but we fricked them at Y, so it's okay" with the Japs, Krauts, Poles, Turks etc Russians can point at history and claim victories.

          On the other hand, whenever Brits confronted Russia, they did what they wanted and the Russians had to take it up the arse. Both in open war and wars where Britain wasn't fighing like when the Second Pacific Squadron fricked up. It's a prison culture thing where they were made b***h and never had an opportunity to rise back up. More modernly, since the collapse of the USSR, Britain has been going round all the former USSR making friends with all the nations there recently celebrating 30 years of relations with nations like Kyrgyzstan, and it just brings back to the Russian memories of the Great Game which they also lost.

          To make matters worse for the Russian, during WWII not only did Britain always fight Germany for longer and never had a treaty with them, they sent a lot of material support that prevented Russia from running out of food, raw materials, weapons, and tanks, the Matilda was actually the best tank on the Eastern Front but the Russians will never admit that. Russians like to imagine themselves as strong so resent charity espeically when they hate the people giving it. Then during the Russian Civil War, Whites hated and distrusted the British so they cut relations with the British because of Russian schizophrenia that Britain was going to steal the Donbass coal mines and Crimea so Britain gave up on them.

          For a Russian aware of his nation's history, Brits are the ultimate boogeyman, worse than the Americans because they serve the British agenda, look at Dugin and his Anglo-Saxon Atlantic World.

          He should have said "for a brief period in 1941-early 1942". The T-34 had a lot of advantages but wasn't available in sufficient numbers plus the Matilda's build quality was substantially better and more reliable.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            you fricking made him make another thread damnit.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Good, it's another place I can go and humiliate him.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                lel

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          A third of the tanks in the Defence of Moscow were Matildas which was almost as many T-34s and KV-1s.

          Russia is an easy one to understand but there's a few nations which have always been odd to me in their hatred of Britain. Iran for example is a strange one.

          Iran is an easy one and it largely got done in by Britain because of Anglo-Russia competition in the Great Game and both keeping it partially neutral but also a region they could use to fight each other if they needed to, and then Britain decided at one point it quite liked having Iran as a petrol station:
          >Britain cucked them out of Afghanistan 1857
          >Britain cucked them with contracts to essentially make them a protectorate in the 19th century
          >Khuzestan and Bushehr amongst others occupied by Britain for decades
          >Britain doing the 1921 Coup on them to install the Pahlavi dynasty
          >Britain controlling most of the Iranian oil industry through its near puppet government
          >Britain formally invading Iran during WWII
          >Britain and America doing the 1953 coup to remove the nationalist government of Iran
          >General British support for Israel and Iranian schizophrenia about the Great Satan and Devils of America and Britain
          >Britain fighting Iranian back insurgents in Iraq following the invasion
          Essentially, any country that doesn't like Britain is because Britain invaded it at least once.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            he talked about beign the best tank in eastern europe

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Russia is an easy one to understand but there's a few nations which have always been odd to me in their hatred of Britain. Iran for example is a strange one.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Britain is to much of the 3rd world what israelites are to /misc/. An ever present bogeyman orchestrating the evils that plague them. To an extent that might have been true during, say, the imperial century. But I'm not sure it is now.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            this. nothing represents da evil whitey more then bings do.
            >rich
            >probably ruled your shithole at some point
            >outwardly silly and quaint
            >still bends you over and perfidously fricks you when the moment strikes
            bongs being the israelites to Black folk and shitskins is unironically a perfect description of them. you could even tack in the whole amerigolem argument if you reach far enough, and vatniks love reach arounds.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Russia is taking land in imperial aggression right now, today. They don't have to brag about doing it 100+ years ago. So they represent evil whitey more than you.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                sure but they steal land from white western aligned countries which is why 3rd worlders cheer them

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yet 3rd worlders still can't governance. South Africa is collapsing, China is stagnating at best, Brazil is declining, India is tearing itself apart, etc.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Iran have some historic grudges like stealing of oil but Britain and Iran have fully normalized diplomatic relations unlike the Great Shaitan.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          it's easy to understand but that doesn't make it less schizo. people like dugin think they're in a new great game or something

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Bongland was going to land in Finland to support them against the USSR while at war (alone) with germany

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      As far as I can tell, it's because the bongs continuously outmatched them in the past, and they never got any real victories that they can point to and claim they got even with.
      By rules of Russian prison culture (and thus Russia as a whole) you cannot take any shit whatsoever from anyone beneath you in the social heirarchy, and if you're unable to put them back in their place then you get downranked to their status; this fact is therefore a point of great insecurity for anyone who wants to imagine Russia as "superior". They might justify it as because of imperialism or whatever but in truth they're just mad that it wasn't a Russian flag at the top.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Great Game butthurt. Did you know there are Russians who believe the USSR was a crypto-colony of the UK?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      every euro seethes about bongs, theyre an almost unconquerable land and engage in tomfoolery against any major power

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Why does Russia seethe about the Brit’s more than any other Euro?
      its the final battle for
      >"who is the REAL Rome"
      and it looks like Constantinople is about to win the big one

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Bongs have spent less time larping as Romans than basically any other European empire
        And idk why you bring Constantinople into this

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >And idk why you bring Constantinople into this
          last true
          the daughter of the last emperor of "Rome" married the Russian Tsar

          this pissed ~~*historians*~~ off so severely, they tried to strike all knowledge of this from the records, and deem it "myth"

          i dont think you realize how "deep" this entire fricking rediculous conflict goes

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Maybe, but calling yourself an empire is inherently claiming lineage of Rome
          And even as the parliament driven constitutional union of kingdoms it minted kings with laurel wreaths, and we both know why

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Maybe, but calling yourself an empire is inherently claiming lineage of Rome

            No, using the word empire means that your langue has roots in Latin and both languages use the same word for the same thing.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Maybe today
              You think everyone who used the title empire started shitting eagles everywhere for no reason?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Deep down Russia knows they are illegally squatting on English soil.
      The original New England was located in Crimea, a gift from the Byzantine Emperor to English refugees after the Norman Conquest.
      The Russians fear us more than any other because we are the rightful owners of their country. Even the Windsors are the legitimate inheritors of the Russian crown and all its associated domains after the murder of their cousins the Romanovs.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Hard to say.
      >The demilitarization of the Black Sea was a major blow to Russia, which was no longer able to protect its vulnerable southern coastal frontier against the British or any other fleet... The destruction of the Russian Black Sea Fleet, Sevastopol and other naval docks was a humiliation. No compulsory disarmament had ever been imposed on a great power previously... The Allies did not really think that they were dealing with a European power in Russia. They regarded Russia as a semi-Asiatic state... In Russia itself, the Crimean defeat discredited the armed services and highlighted the need to modernize the country's defences, not just in the strictly military sense, but also through the building of railways, industrialization, sound finances and so on... The image many Russians had built up of their country – the biggest, richest and most powerful in the world – had suddenly been shattered. Russia's backwardness had been exposed... The Crimean disaster had exposed the shortcomings of every institution in Russia – not just the corruption and incompetence of the military command, the technological backwardness of the army and navy, or the inadequate roads and lack of railways that accounted for the chronic problems of supply, but the poor condition and illiteracy of the serfs who made up the armed forces, the inability of the serf economy to sustain a state of war against industrial powers, and the failures of autocracy itself.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah, it's not like they learned absolutely nothing from this and continue to make the same mistakes, repeatedly.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Dang GB had some sharpshooters

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Many reasons. One example is they basically sold us Alaska because they feared the Brits were just going to take it and they'd be impotent to stop them.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Look at the differences in size here. The UK is vastly smaller than Russia (and ergo more beatable), yet at the same time the Anglo influence in the world has been by far the greatest of the European nations. Russia considers itself the defender and exporter of civilisation, but they have consistently underperformed while this sceptred isle remains worldbeaters in culture, military, and economics with only a fraction of the resources. They are a constant reminder of how pathetically Russia has underperformed in history.

      Russians never managed to get revenge on the British Empire for anything and this feeds into the Russian prison culture/self image that they have of an inferiority and superiority complex. With other enemies they have at least either nominal or real victories so they can say "Well they won at X, but we fricked them at Y, so it's okay" with the Japs, Krauts, Poles, Turks etc Russians can point at history and claim victories.

      On the other hand, whenever Brits confronted Russia, they did what they wanted and the Russians had to take it up the arse. Both in open war and wars where Britain wasn't fighing like when the Second Pacific Squadron fricked up. It's a prison culture thing where they were made b***h and never had an opportunity to rise back up. More modernly, since the collapse of the USSR, Britain has been going round all the former USSR making friends with all the nations there recently celebrating 30 years of relations with nations like Kyrgyzstan, and it just brings back to the Russian memories of the Great Game which they also lost.

      To make matters worse for the Russian, during WWII not only did Britain always fight Germany for longer and never had a treaty with them, they sent a lot of material support that prevented Russia from running out of food, raw materials, weapons, and tanks, the Matilda was actually the best tank on the Eastern Front but the Russians will never admit that. Russians like to imagine themselves as strong so resent charity espeically when they hate the people giving it. Then during the Russian Civil War, Whites hated and distrusted the British so they cut relations with the British because of Russian schizophrenia that Britain was going to steal the Donbass coal mines and Crimea so Britain gave up on them.

      For a Russian aware of his nation's history, Brits are the ultimate boogeyman, worse than the Americans because they serve the British agenda, look at Dugin and his Anglo-Saxon Atlantic World.

      Also this.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        I mean, realistically you have to include at least these.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Anglos are more intelligent than Baltoid-Slavs which is reflected in a sense of adventure and curiosity. Even if the British Empire had never existed, Anglos would still have ventured to new lands and established new nations.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      The Russians used to have an expression back in the Tsar's time that translated to:
      "An Englishman is a israelite"

  17. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    puccia is grabbing the storm shadow wiener and squeezing it hard into the bears mouth

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Lost

  18. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >We
    Sadly you're definitely a larping, homosexual American anon
    Why you want to larp as a pidor I'll never understand though

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      easy (You)s.
      It's easier to get them here than by making a pro-EV thread on PrepHole

  19. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    [...]

    >warriortard doing his dumb routine
    meh

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      This warriortard cope shit doesn’t work anymore. The missile is French and the fact that you can only respond with warriortard cope just makes it that much more apparent

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >you know what, i'm not even going to pretend that i'm not warriortard
        good for you pal

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous
      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        https://www.thecomet.net/news/23515804.mbda-stevenage-built-missiles-sent-ukraine/
        shush

  20. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I feel like Russia's already well established hatred of the UK must have increased to new heights during this conflict

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      They’re like Hitler with the last israelite in the world

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      They are being moderate and diplomatic still.

      >Britain always has been, is now, and will be our eternal enemy. At least until such time as their arrogant, despicably dank island sinks into the abyss of the sea from a wave triggered by a cutting-edge Russian weapons system
      >We’re not even talking about a specific ‘case,’ but about their fervent belief that this is a dreadful punishment and that Russian officials will writhe in hysterics because of it. After all, it’s evident that the conflict between an obsolete form (the degenerating British monarchy) and ridiculous content (just look at the faces of their recent prime ministers <...>) has given rise to some rather bizarre creatures

      OK, so we've broken Medvedev's mind into a thousand crazy pieces.

  21. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    You can't jam a weapon that gets to it's target with INS and terrain profile matching then uses an IR seeker to perform it's terminal attack.

    if if the launch aircraft is jammed and can't give an accurate starting position all you need to do is launch from a known location/terrain feature and the missile will figure out where it is even if the launch point isn't exactly where it thought it would be.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >if if the launch aircraft is jammed and can't give an accurate starting position
      all fighter aircraft can perform navigation fixes, among other ways this can be done by having a waypoint in the jet's navigation system set to a real world landmark then, with the waypoint selected, selecting the radar return/targeting pod spot of the landmark

      so like the bomb isn't even going to be that far off, even if you're operating completely without gps and have to make a prolonged flight on ins

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      don't you start alligning the INS as soon as you go in to the wienerpit?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        In a western aircraft yes, in a soviet era su-24... nah. There's a reason so many Russian aircraft fly around with civilian grade garmins attached to the wienerpit.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          NOT hotrodder enough! You gotta attach spoilers to the end of your aircraft and shove underlights inside the wienerpit. Light the interior up like it's fricking Christmas. Then you gotta break the warrant on the engine by illegally upgrading the engine and tampering with the muffler so the noise is deafening. And then install subwoofers so loud, the wienerpit shakes. Poser Vatniks.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Yes but it naturally drift miles out of alignment without GPS updates. Back in the day (or in a war with GPS jamming) you would place a waypoint over a known landmark and as you fly over the landmark you would fix the position of the waypoint. If an aircraft had air to ground radar and isn't too worried about emissions they also could usually align the INS by putting a waypoint on a cape/headland(which is the easiest to see on radar) and lining the waypoint up on the right point on the radar.

  22. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Well what would YOU have called the missile wise guy

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      The once and future king, Saber.
      After my wife.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      I dunno, something like CLOBB (Continental Long-range Ordinance Ballistic Bomb) so that way we can say we clobbered the frick out of them

  23. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    The only thing being jammed is Chechen wieners down mobis throats.

  24. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >see thread
    >pop in
    >armatard/warriortard seething
    christ on a bike.

  25. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Russians are struggling to cope with this British weapon
    Good morning sir, Russia has shot down 90% of Storm Shadows. We will be asking bloody bastard frogs for a refund and build an indigenous superior cruise missiles for our Rafales

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      I fricking hate poojeets

  26. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >like we did with himar
    So... You're being massacred?

  27. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Isn’t stormshadow a French missile with a British warhead
    the french version is called scalp

  28. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >jamming an inertially guided weapon
    Holy shit, vatniks have reality modifying weapons that remotely alter spacetime. It's ogre.

  29. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >We are jamming most of them
    Up your butthole maybe

  30. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >jamming signals
    >Hacking missiles on the fly.
    What episode of Knight Rider were you watching?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Wouldn't mind a KITT tbh. but the headlights are bleh.

  31. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Russian research institutes are already analyzing remains of the anglo-saxon rocket Storm Shadow and are developing technology not only to counter but also duplicate with superior characteristics. The resulting Russian rocket will have no western analogue. NATO mate a catastrophic mistake by providing Russia with the opportunity to reverse engineer its most secret weapons and all this during a simple special military operation. The Russian strategic genius once more demonstrates itself through this brilliant move that will be studied for centuries to come.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >anglo saxon
      Who talks like this lmao

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Continentals, namely the French, Romance peoples, and their many shades of mystery meat.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      You gotta have the INDUSTRY to do that, Vatnik. We aim to dismantle it, lol.

  32. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    How many Storm Shadows could the Ukrainians have fired? Unless they're expecting to get ATACMS before too long they'd want to ration them for only the highest value targets.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      ATACMS isn't a replacement for a bunker busting cruise missile.

      As for how many used, I struggle to imagine Ukraine having more than 2-4 launch platforms for a maximum of 8 launched a day - they clearly haven't been using them this regularly as we have videos of 3 strikes with probably single digit missiles expended in total.

      UK keeps numbers of weapons in the inventory pretty tight, but it could supply a number in the low hundreds (2-300) and still maintain most for itself.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      pretty sure they are only using it for hardened C3 targets. There isn't a juicier target

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        railways would be a pretty good target too. russians are 100% reliant on railways for logistics.

  33. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    The only thing the Russian military is jamming is their dicks in conscript's butts.

  34. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >we've learned how to shoot down HIMARS
    >shit ton of filmed HIMARS strikes in the last week
    hmm...

  35. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Can we ban warriortard pls. He shits up every thread with his autism.

  36. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >we

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Is he ok?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        We'll need a Doctor to go out and do a proper checkup to know for sure.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah, he’s just sleepin

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        he's a bit depressed

  37. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >We
    post hands

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      thats it!
      call him brown
      call him a chinx
      you said to post hands, this means youre winning!

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >15 months into a 3 day smo

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          I don;'t think I could live with as much cognitive dissonance as this guys does

  38. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    The engineers who designed HIMARS and Storm Sonichu might puke if they could see them being given to a corrupt Ukrainian regime. The same country who probably sent the phishing emails and ransomware attempts to those guys while they were working on it. And there is not only the potential for marking them as used then selling to China during or after the war, they are feeding them to Russian air defense a little at a time to learn countermeasures.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Lmao my dad works on the Patriot system and is happy its being used succesfully to protect civilians from Russian terror attacks.

  39. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >bong tabloid writing about the superiority of bong weaponry

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >warriortard drooling on himself and seething

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        call everyone 'warriortard' or 'armatard' as if anyone outside of your homosexual goverment intel opp has any clue what that fricking means

        who gives you homosexuals orders?
        who taught you to talk like this?
        what powerpoint slide were you awake for?

        is the warriortard in the room with you now?

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Why do you always get super butthurt about being called warriortard if it means nothing to you?

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            not one person on this board even fricking knows what that means
            same with
            >peterdorski
            >wumao
            >armatard
            or any of the other inexplicable vocabulary you homosexuals introduced here

            everythread all across this website, nonsense word-salad spews out of your mouths, turning you into glowing radioactive homosexuals, spotted a mile out

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Aren't you busy having a meltdown in the F22 thread Warriortard?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                You just outed yourself as a vatnik. The f22 is still the best fighter in service anywhere in the world

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                I prefer the F35 but thanks for confirming my suspicions.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                You hinted at someone getting BTFO in the f22 thread. The implication was that the f22 was bad. I just had to correct you

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >The f22 is still the best fighter in service anywhere in the world
                -zero kills
                -zero combat sorties
                -canceled 10 years ago
                -cant even keep the ones they got airworthy
                >LOL

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Delicious seethe

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              this. getting screeched at with nonsense words like glavset or pidorashka by people who seem persistent like they're being paid is funny if not a bit sad.

  40. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    who writes these stupid fricking articles... glownigs?

  41. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Jamming them
    The only people jamming himars in Ukraine are the Ukie operators jamming them into groups of hundreds of mobiks.

  42. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >storm shadow
    Did they really name it after a G.I. Joe ninja?

  43. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Fricking how? Just shoot down the Storm Shadows with anti missile tech! None of these frickers should be getting through the Russian Phalanx of antimissile weapons!

  44. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    The sad thing to think about is how many Storm Shadows were wasted against ISIS bunkers and cranes (yes) for no reason.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *