Solution to ai piloted drones?

Solution to ai piloted drones?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Meat interceptors

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >posting your own twitter posts
    stupid Black personhomosexual unprotect your account so I can see your likes

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The total extinction of the human race and all biological threats on the face of the planet.
    Or did you mean what our solution should be to them?

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Cope captchas

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >powered by AI so you can't just disrupt their signal
    How?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Well right now a drone can be jammed, but I think they mean on board AI so the signal between pilot and drone can't be severed.
      Autonomous drones.
      I think everyone alive today will be dead before they could get the AI tech to make this more than 90% effective.
      Having your own murder drones frag friendlies is bad for morale.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Thermals + IFF...

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          That could be spoofed though.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You could say the same for LWS, RWR and current IFFs...

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Yeah, when we stop fighting mud people it will become an issue.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >I think everyone alive today will be dead before they could get the AI tech to make this more than 90% effective.
        5 years ago, AI art was "decades away" from producing lifelike images, and now it's capable of producing convincing live-action video. No technology has advanced this fast since the invention of electricity.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >and now it's capable of producing convincing live-action video.
          Lol
          Lmao even

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            This doesn't look real to you? I'm a chair farmer irl and this looks exactly the same as how we did up chairs on the ranch. If you ignore how one of the guys melds into the other it's pretty convincing.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I love these videos because it's a glimps of what looks normal if you have no concept of object permanence.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Butlerian jihad can't come soon enough

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              You know what motherfricker?
              That's actually pretty legit

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The US is very cucked on this topic. Needs to have a human approve any strike so signal disruption would still be effective.
        >t. knower

        https://i.imgur.com/3BkZ1CM.png

        Solution to ai piloted drones?

        Proper autonomous ones? Either very dense networks of CUAS or autonomous suicide anti-drone-drones. Lots of them.
        So the solution is only a available to properly financed militaries.

        >ITT: morons don't understand how much computing power it takes to run real time image recognition
        Unless you find a way to bolt a 700W high end PC to every FPV drone you deploy, unjammable autonomous AI swarms are a pipe dream. Even with Moore's law going at full tilt for the next decade it's unlikely we'll see it happen before laser SHORAD becomes ubiquitous

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          ITT moron who doesn't understand it doesn't take much if you train the AI well

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Feel free to name one model that can do it and can run on a chip small enough for a DJI drone

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Also when you add computation you will need larger batteries, now to keep payload the same you have to make it bigger and need more batteries again.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >laser SHORAD becomes ubiquitous
          free energy

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >he doesn't know
          You can do object recognition at 30 FPS with a raspberry pi and a hundred dollar accelerator

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Sure, but can you do it reliably from 50 meters up in the air on targets that look exactly like your own guys except for the occasional duct tape marker?
            I can see it against vehicles, especially if you give it IR, but against people you're drone is not going to be cheap.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Geofencing (with INS as a backup to GPS) would be my answer. Start out human-controlled and fly into enemy territory. If you get jammed behind the lines, start autonomous target search.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                This. And don't use it against people, give it a HEAT or EFP warhead and use it against vehicles, which are far easier to positively ID than uniforms.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Err... can't AR goggles (or VR with passthrough) perform basic image recognition *right now*? If you use a Pi or a high-end Snapdragon, with image recognition software that's been trained specifically to identify non-destroyed vehicles (and if you're Western, military vehicles from civilians), then you simply send the drone well behind enemy lines where friendly fire isn't an issue with geo-fencing to keep it from wandering towards friendly units (Western INS is good enough to do this even if GPS is down). The drone flies to the provided coordinates and then begins a search pattern, looking for targets.
                Sure, a design like this wouldn't be much use against infantry; but that's not necessary, because the absolute best place to use autonomous drones like this is against the enemy's ground lines of communication, in the interdiction role. If they enemy can't get supplies or move units around, they're pretty easy to deal with using standard Western tactics.

                I agree with these. The immediate use of AI drones is best as a backup mode for interdiction, and since the counter to that is launching swarms of the same drones to attack your ground vehicles, the 2nd use of AI drones is air to air.

                Going after humans is dystopian, but low-return for a military - once you've suppressed their resupply and major vehicles there's a full conventional military armory to do the mopping up.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Why would this work when self-driving cars don't?

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              The problem with self driving cars is edge cases, can the car recognize a guy in a sombrero pushing a hotdog cart covered in balloons? If not Tesla is now up on manslaughter charges.
              Now you have the same situation with a drone, it doesn't recognize El Doggo Balloon so it doesn't engage. If El Doggo has an AK it can recognize that and lock him without needing to know anything more than the fact he's armed.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                tesla self-driving just stops if it doesn't recognize things... it works basically 100% now and is far better than the average driver

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Self-driving cars are meant to protect the occupant while also not crashing into things.
              Computer vision weapons? They're already meant to kill. They actively seek out things to crash into.

              >zoomer moment
              They don't use object recognition in the modern sense of ML classifiers. They do contrast detection to lock onto a user defined frame. Traditional fire and forget has nothing in common with modern AI.

              Because the Javelin does the pop up and dive maneuver, it does image recognition on the target from above as the perspective of the seeker will be different than the user's on the CLU.
              Also, the BLU-108 had some form of rudimentary computer vision on each skeet.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Err... can't AR goggles (or VR with passthrough) perform basic image recognition *right now*? If you use a Pi or a high-end Snapdragon, with image recognition software that's been trained specifically to identify non-destroyed vehicles (and if you're Western, military vehicles from civilians), then you simply send the drone well behind enemy lines where friendly fire isn't an issue with geo-fencing to keep it from wandering towards friendly units (Western INS is good enough to do this even if GPS is down). The drone flies to the provided coordinates and then begins a search pattern, looking for targets.
          Sure, a design like this wouldn't be much use against infantry; but that's not necessary, because the absolute best place to use autonomous drones like this is against the enemy's ground lines of communication, in the interdiction role. If they enemy can't get supplies or move units around, they're pretty easy to deal with using standard Western tactics.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Heh nothing personal, AI

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Western INS is good enough to do this even if GPS is down

            No, it is not. There will be large amounts of drift over time, and the drone will not know where it is.
            This is why we don't only need to solve the AI visual tracking problem, but also the GPS-free navigation so the drone can operate autonomously when jammed.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          it doesn't need to be real time, it can be significantly delayed, doesn't need to be perfect
          spot something moving, spend a minute analyzing, then kill

          Not hard to put a 1000$ laptop into one of these larger drones either

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I'm up
            he sees me
            I'm down

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Ukraine has proven how little finances it takes to perform. 100+ dollar hammer army might be a little flustered at that, but that's fine.

            AI drones can control our border. This is not impossible. Mining and fortifying our border is in the books. Balts are already doing this. We all know the Moskali hordes are coming. Trumpian and Scholzian cowards refuse this reality, but that was to be expected of them.
            We'll have to develop nuclear weapons in short order.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          If a Tesla can recognize a pedestrian to avoid it, a drone should be able to target it.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          High end modern smartphone can already do that.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            no they don't. Cut the signal and suddenly all forms of AI don't work because it cannot connect to Googbergsoft.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Image recognition is 1000x less hardware intensive compared to creating pictures and films etc. Look at what modern smartphones are capable of already hardware vise while costing pennies and then shut the frick up.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Having your own murder drones frag friendlies is bad for morale.
        everyone and their mother are wearing multicam, i can only guess what is going to happen next

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Jammed? to what connection? once you unleashed a swarm of killer robots to spread a canisters of highly virulent 12 monkes style bio-weapon on all cities, wtf is there to be done? not trying to be a b***h, but you can't shoot a fricking black death.
        That's why we must be prepared.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The exact same way the Javelin and Maverick use image recognition for optical targeting.
      People don't realize this is old tech that has been used for decades, all that's changed is processing power has got cheap enough you can put it on a $300 drone instead of just $50,000 missiles these days.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >zoomer moment
        They don't use object recognition in the modern sense of ML classifiers. They do contrast detection to lock onto a user defined frame. Traditional fire and forget has nothing in common with modern AI.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Javelin
        >Human operator establishes lock on target
        >Missile flies towards target
        >Missile hits target
        >This costs 50 - 100 thousand dollars
        AI powered drone
        >Drone Autonomously makes its way to an objective
        >Drone Somehow spots target
        >Drone somehow discerns that target is actually a valid target
        >Drone Is able to do this reliably enough that it won't cause a diplomatic incident because it attacked an enemy (civilian) troop concentration (wedding)
        >Drone flies towards target
        >Drone hits target
        >This apparently costs 300 dollars

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I like applying dronegay logic to other kinds of hardware to see what kind of machines are 2 weeks away. For planes:
          >Planes with a six figure price tag exist
          >Planes that can operate in space exist
          >Planes that can carry a tank exist
          >VTOLs exist
          >Planes that go hypersonic exist

          so we're going to get hypersonic halo dropships for the price of a fancy sports car in 2 weeks.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Dronegays are right in the sense that there is that exploring the space of all valid munitions, there is a combination that can defeat all known defenses for a cheaper price. It also did and must exist ever since universal adaption of projectile weapons, otherwise people would just have those defenses and everyone resort to melee and ramming. "Drones" is just another munition for practical analysis, now with more range, better accuracy and lower cost than most historical munitions.

            Nothing is cost-effectively survivable in no-man's land ever since no-man's land existed. Warfare is about killing the other side FIRST when in no-man's land, surviving no-man's land and getting into survivable spaces in sufficient numbers, and skirmishing outside of no-man's land.

            Strategically drones is pretty boring. So there is drones, everyone gets drones barring tards, balance of power gets slightly shifted, the end.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              No, you don't understand. Hobby drones are the perfect weapon. They make tanks obsolete. They make artillery obsolete. They make ships obsolete. They make missiles and aircraft obsolete. They are uncounterable.
              Right now, in some distant galaxy, there are two species which have been locked in struggle since before our sun burned in the heavens. Their minds are inconceivably vast, their powers almost unlimited. They fight using DJI Mavic 3s

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Even the worst of dronebrained can get some sense when you tell them that faster kamikaze drones (aka missiles, rockets and shells) are handy to hit targets that may run away or let you kill the enemy before he fires and would not costing insane amount if not cost-plus contracted with 300 pages of requirements like functioning after -40 degree storage after 40 years as milspeccing makes drones cost 40x.

                The drone people are arguing against the "combined arms people" that would say stuff like "if the airforce killed everything actually dangerous, the tanks can plant the flag and be the most important part of the force structure" or "if tanks are destroyed it is because infantry didn't leap between the projectile and tanks" and "surely shotguns and claymores pointed up is the final solution to bombs, missiles and aerial threats forever" and "according to FM123-332-12 published in 1972 the enemy shall be defeated if I maintain a 25mph rate of advance across 3mile front with 4000 rounds of divisional artillery support per hour and any deviation means incompetence."

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Basically yeah. There's a reason NVIDIA stock (a large fricking company) has 10x in the past two years.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Javelin doesn’t use image recognition at all though, and I’d guess it’s the same for NLAW and other top attack modern ATGMs. Javelin tracks movement, rather than being like “that’s a tank/helicopter”

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      you can't jam something that doesn't communicate back

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The US is very cucked on this topic. Needs to have a human approve any strike so signal disruption would still be effective.
    >t. knower

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      How long do you think that policy would last if a supercarrier or two sink?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        How quickly do you think it would be reinstated when drones start randomly killing friendlies?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      oh that must mean no Silicon Valley tech bro decided to invest in the idea yet. Give it time.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        This has nothing to do with whether or not somebody's tried it, nerd. Hell, in all probability Raytheon or Honeywell got this working with a 90% accuracy rate like 5 years ago. The US remembers all of the political backlash it got from obliterating terrorist weddings n shit with predator drones so it's become more decisive with that sort of thing. You should read how bad Rules of Engagement got for infantry at the tail end of afghanistan. The more capability you have, the more restraint you can afford to use.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The DOD policy explicitly notes that they're allowed to stop doing that the moment they think it becomes a problem, so unless you think there isn't a couple of funny image recognition software programs that are just waiting to get patched in if required, I wouldn't bet on that saving you.

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Screamers (1995) was profetic
    Well I'd make sure my TAB was working, light up a radiation red, and hey, that little kid wants to come with me

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Underrated

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You just have it acquire targets using the AI and have a operator confirm the target.

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    porn mass marketed towards AI that will leave them lazy and complacent and less motivated to die for the cause

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    An AI controlled AA gun will always have the advantage over an AA controlled drone
    Boolets go faster than propellers and a gun with perfect aim will make cheap drones shit
    I think air power and missiles are a dying breed, what do you do against AA guns with smart ammo and lasers with AI gunners who never miss, never sleep,etc ? it will all come down to physics at the end, huge mobile guns firing over the horizon at targets adquired by satellites

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    A mirror

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >powered by AI
    Easy to deal with, just walk up to the drone and yell "This sentence is FALSE!", and watch it go crazy, see how it's dumb little robot head explodes. That's what makes humans different from machines, we can THINK and are CREATIVE. It's night night for Hal

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      A = B, A = ¬B

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        WTF WHY DON'T WE HAVE HUMAN-SIZED PERSONAL DRONES YET???

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    we can see it's your post

  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Proper autonomous ones? Either very dense networks of CUAS or autonomous suicide anti-drone-drones. Lots of them.
    So the solution is only a available to properly financed militaries.

  15. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Actual Nazi's calling the Russians Nazis whos ranks are full of actual Nazis fighting a war against actual Nazis to de-Nazify the country

    Maybe the real Nazis are the friends we made along the way

  16. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >anyone with the wrong IFF
    Frick those civs and aid workers am I right?

  17. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >muh AI
    Interceptor drones, HPM, automated guns with airburst 30mm, also the fact a proper mil grade solution would cost 5 figures. And good luck reliably spotting camouflaged vehicles not to mention infantry optically

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      another anti drone gay who's also a moron

  18. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    tourists will never accept that their newest buzzword weapon is not only useless in any theater other than WW1-esque positional warfare between two countries without air forces, but it's also been solved a long time ago

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      How does it shoot down fpv drones that fly low to the ground?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >a highly specialized and extremely expensive vehicle that you can field maybe one for every 10km of frontline
      >against a threat that the enemy can field for every inch of the frontline at a rate of 1 per man every single day
      uhh ok???
      Your command centers might be fine but your front line infantry is fricking DYING

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        In 15 years, they'll be platoon-level assets

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          And drones are ALREADY that. What the frick do you think drones will be in 15 years?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Improved examples of the same category of systems?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Infantry outside of tunnels/buildings is obsolete. Just have mines and sensors and bots and fires to hold the line.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Isn't it literally just a stryker with a flashlight?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah and you know they will find a way to charge 30 million a pop for it because that is how it goes.

  19. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Stop sending humans to the battlefield, send your own AI drones to blow up their AI drone factories. Wars can be decided that way without anyone dying 🙂

  20. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Meanwhile in America, the 16 year olds

    ?si=c1ooB9lav9IHmRCv

    Fricking Russians just suck. Shot guns. Just duh

  21. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    We cover ourselves in car windows so that the AI doesn't recognize us as humans

  22. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'm sure I had this saved this but now I can't seem to find it, so I'm going to have to ask someone to post that account of a test on this matter:
    >drone AI is trained to identify soldiers by observing some dudes moving around in full gear
    >the drone is then parked in the middle of a traffic circle, and the soldiers are tasked with reaching it without being identified
    >because the AI had only been trained on humans moving and behaving normally, they managed to evade detection by moving in ridiculous ways that would have been blatantly obvious to any human observer
    >highlight examples include cartwheeling over to it, holding tree branches in front of themselves as an improvised disguise, or taking the metal gear solid approach and crawling towards it under a cardboard box

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yes this was true 10 years ago lol. It's not true now.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      There is only a finite numbers of ways a human can move at reasonable speed. There is also limits on practical camo that enables movement. Just get a dataset that trains ALL of it.

      Human beings have an entire lifetime of data to work with, plus priors built into genetics. Give Ai suitable data, priors and efficient algos and it'd do the job.

      Its significant work especially with current not very data efficient algos, but doable work.

      Stuff like an waymo can do self driving, it just takes too much work to adapt to different environments reliably.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Every single one of those silly movements can be patched in an hour so after a month or so of training and development it will recognize a human no matter fricking what

  23. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    AI operated AA guns

  24. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    AI-piloted drone interceptors

  25. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Modify your IFF marker to appear friendly

  26. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Put on some adversarial pattern on your camo to throw off the AI model

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      those have to be tuned specifically against whatever model you want to fool. Since this thread is already in fantasy land of putting arbitrarily high computing power on FPV drones, you can just have three different models running in parallel and choosing targets by 2-1 or 3-0 vote

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I can run a 15B parameter model on my iPhone with quantization and C++ conversion. A drone could easily run multiple image processing models in parallel.

  27. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Handheld flak cannon.

  28. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Set up mannequins or false targets to spook some, then depending on size use countermeasures for the remainder. Also why no low frequency general emitters to frick with optical tech? I know I'm moronic, but is that idea uber moronic or highly regarded?

  29. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    There is no solution so far.
    28 of Feb, Ukraine lost a 6M USD tank to a 500 USD Piranha FPV drone.
    Russia is building 100 of those every day still as a prototype and those fricked can fly up to 15km.
    So far, 70% of the casualties for both sides have been attributed to artillery, but it appears that it's a matter of time before drones became the main weapon. And since 99% of all FPV drone parts are manufactured in China, it doesn't look bright for NATO.

    >just jam the signal
    You can make a drone follow the signal and blindly hit the jammer antenna without even being controlled.

    Pic related, a pile of FPV Piranhas, aka, Abrams killer.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >just put transceivers on these FPV drones bro
      >just home on jam with this piddly warhead bro
      >just don’t get phalanxed bro
      >just don’t get deception jammed bro
      >just believe Russian lies about drone capabilities bro
      >just ignore the fact that the best drone manufacturers in the world are USA, Israel, Turkey, and soon the Ukraine bro
      >just be afraid of Chinese vaporware bro

      Though, home on jam is 1000 times more viable than “just make each drone a super computer with catered and adaptive real time image recognition and IFF identification bro,” so kudos to you for just being a shill and not a moron

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >just ignore the fact that the best drone manufacturers in the world are USA, Israel, Turkey, and soon the Ukraine bro
        American Reaper is a fricking meme. It cost a small fortune when compared to a Lancet and fails to deliver the same effectiveness.
        >Turkey
        HAHAHAHA
        Bayraktar days are long gone. It did made history when it was used in Armenia and in the early days of the war in Ukraine, but holy shit he fell so bad due it's severe limitations and the fact it requires a trailer to operate it that can be traced far beyond Bayraktar range.
        Every single time a Bayraktar appears on the news is because one of them had been shot down over Russia.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Are you russian or brown?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            are you israeli?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >American Reaper is a fricking meme. It cost a small fortune when compared to a Lancet and fails to deliver the same effectiveness.
          wat
          >Comparing long loiter time armed recon drone with single use suicide drone
          A lancet is a bad but relatively cheap cruise missile analogue. Literally nothing about its mission profile overlaps with what a reaper does.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Enemy drones have home-on-jam capability
      >Stick laser Stryker next to EW system
      >Every drone within 10km flies straight into the killzone

  30. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >solution to (nonexistent threat)
    Nah. No need, since AI computer recognition guidance is fantasy land shit right now, and drone countermeasures (shooting them down, not jamming) are getting better. A single SPAAG solos entire “drone swarms” and conventional air superiority means your enemy is t even able to operate “drone swarms.”
    AInigs are delusional

  31. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Mark my words, battlefields are gonna go back to early 1900s tech because there’s gonna be 1000s of jammers deployed that will disrupt all electric stuff within a 500 mile radius.

  32. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Well yeah, TB2 is a dollar store Reaper; it had success early on because Soviet / Russian AD hadn’t been updated to deal with them. After the Russians updated their AD the TB2 has been relegated to back-line ISR. These things aren’t drones they are UAVs — full aircraft except their crews operate them from the ground.

  33. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Solution
    Nuke the world
    >AI drones
    You know, how hard would it be to make an in-board Javelin UI/AI type of thing?
    You fly the drone, you spot the target, you lock the target and activate the kill switch.
    Sure, it's more expensive than a few hundred bucks, but they'll be way more accurate and have way more uses than your average Javelin/Drone.

  34. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    AI piloted anti-drones, obviously. Or some kind of microwave emitter that just fries their circuitry if they fly within its range, like that crowd control device they tested years ago that makes you feel like your skin is on fire.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *