Russians are making a new lancet version designed for autonomous swarm attack. Each drone will prioritize certain targets wit specific types of warheads.
Russians are making a new lancet version designed for autonomous swarm attack.
Russians are making a new lancet version designed for autonomous swarm attack. Each drone will prioritize certain targets wit specific types of warheads.
>Each drone will prioritize certain targets wit specific types of warheads.
Civilians? Specific warheads for killing old people, pregnant women or children?
Yes. Orphanages too. Next time don’t blow up the bridge for no reason
lmao if hitting the bridge baits Russia into wasting their ammo like this it should be under constant fire
Are you moronic ? This bridge is main supply line.
The rail bridge is intact, luckily. We’re gonna ship in so many trainloads of CHECHEN BVLLS to deflower ukrainian newborns. My wiener is leaking precum just from the thought of it
It makes my wiener and my nipples hard as frick
>no reason
Finally, are now at the point where we can start sending attack drone swarms into the Russian territory? I now have hopes that I may see Moscow burn in my lifetime if we are able to continue on this path
>Literally greatest supply line to reinforce the southern front.
>No reason
What tactical advantage does nuking puppy orphanages have, Suckodick?
They said the n word.
why cant they use anymore shaheds
Source: zigger ass
>spamming actually prevents people from disliking you
Are they actually this fricking moronic?
>Are they actually this fricking moronic?
Yes
>picrel
Looks like a Russian clone of China's clone of the Israeli Hero system.
When did Danny DeVito start building drones?
The payload is TRASH. It hits the target and explodes in TRASH. There will be TRASH everywhere.
The Lancet really has been the star of the show in this conflict, why not build upon its success? Seems like a good winner.
kek
>3 kg
you can shit something bigger everytime you go to the toilet
The shaped charge seems pretty effective based on the footage of it engaging armoured vehicles.
it's a soviet-era device, too.
>КЗ-6 shaped charge.
only rated for up to 15–50 mm armor penetration, depending on blast scenario. in soviet doctrine, demolition teams were expected to use 8 of them at a time to effect any real damage to military equipment or standing structures.
the explosive is "TГ-40"
>40:60 ratio of TNT:RDX
based autist
>battery powered
>3kg payload apart from avionics and camera
At that point you might as well make run it on fricking nitromethane
>ikea launcher
It will do none of that lmao. This will be the entire result of the project.
No the guy in charge of the project will get a new yacht.
Somehow I doubt Russia has the tech for something like that.
Think again hohol
why are russians so incredibly moronic
Every russian with a brain left decades ago
My favorite part about that video is that Peskov is standing next to it. It’s poetic.
breddy gud
there are also Geramismov and Rogozin
This is pure poetry. The down syndrome robot cruising at walking speed, the burning car in the background, the fat Russian mumbling nonsense into the radio for the cameras, Putin's slight affirming nod...
No matter how many times I see this video get posted, I watch it again and laugh my ass off.
yeah
>new lancet version designed for autonomous swarm attack
Are you ESL? Remote controlled ≠ autonomous. In fact, it's the exact opposite.
The tricky part is doing this without a human operator
Inb4 they install SkyNyet
before the war, morons like you doubt about Russian´s drones in general. And now Lancet are changing the battlefield while AeroVironment Switchblade can´t do shit. And now you believe Russian can´t into swarm and datalink technology when the soviet already did with p-700 missiles. Get out of /k/ope for a moment and check some real military forums.
>changing the battlefield
Topkek you'd think you moronic Black folk would've learned something by now. The Lancet is the only precision munition Russia can use with enough range. They don't have GMLRS, long range precision arty, relevant air launched missiles and so on. After years and years or you tards shilling for their shit weapons like thermobarics because big booms, turns out precision munitions were what mattered.
The Lancet sucks ass, it's all Russia has though so with enough of them they can lose a bit slower.
>The Lancet sucks ass
cry a river
why are ruspigs destroying their own equipment?
The ol' ruskie cut technique
Hard to tell how long or how many attempts they took to set one empty truck on fire.
>no fire from first explosion in back of empty truck
>cut to gas on fire
Whats funny is what set the truck on fire was actually just spare fuel kek. These things have been attacking loads of things and in a few cases they have use fire as evidence for destruction on things like tanks when really it's just covered in diesel burn marks kek.
Well, outside of light stuff anyway
>only damages one vehicle
>haha rossya strong
Kek this really isn't helping your argument. Russia can't into guided munitions.
>The Lancet sucks ass
yes moron shill
>before the war, morons like you doubt about Russian´s drones in general.
Textbook strawman.
before the war, morons like you doubt about Ukrainian being able to last more than 3 days.
>Ukrainian being able to last more than 3 days.
How long did it take Ukraine to ask NATO for help? 2 days? kek
And morons like you thought NATO would just let Russia frick around for the 7th time? It almost seems as if it is actually Russia who's slowly encroaching toward NATO's borders.
when will ruspigs stop retreating moron shill?
How long did it take NATO to enter the war? 2? 3 years? By then russian army was already no more and it was nothing but a Special Military Operation on the territories of the former so-called "russian federation".
So, a shitty copy of the Switchblade 600?
https://nitter.cz/AirPowerNEW1/status/1680776642099298305?s=20
Cruciform wings aren't that great. Nominally, they provide some low-speed maneuverability advantages; but if you actually do the math it's minimal. The point is making it easier on your programmers writing the flight control module.
That's what they get for copying chinks and israelites lel.
>26lb drone does more damage than a 4-6lb drone
Tell me more, anon.
It's a shitty chink copy of a Hero 120 since israelite engineers are greedy fricks.
>It's a shitty chink copy of a Hero 120 since israelite engineers are greedy fricks.
Yeah, I know about the israelites getting caught selling it to the chinsects.
https://breakingdefense.com/2022/01/us-warned-israel-over-chinese-push-to-get-defense-tech-sources
https://www.timesofisrael.com/10-israelis-set-to-be-indicted-for-illegally-exporting-missiles-to-china/
>Combined by a Neural network
Literal buzzword moron, there is no AI in that at all kek
Why waste what little industry they have on random r&d when they could use it to pump out proven designs for the war effort?
that's because their proven designs were proven to be shit
This got to be the 8th thread about it.
it's the same shill
go outside buddy,
Go and tell this OP who probably made the majority of the 8 or so same threads.
they converted a shopping center into a drone factory with 8000 workers.
>need more lancets to pawn the piggies
>totally convert shopping center into factory
>it is supper dupper effective because they can keep dozens of drones on racks out side of their packaging
>and they totally aren't props for the camera so the owner can keep scamming money from the defense budget
No one believes vatBlack person fantasies
notice mirror columns, to make illusion that there are more lancets
If it was a shopping center, those were already there.
so how many yachts for the oligarchs are we talking about here?
>they converted a shopping center into a drone factory with 8000 workers.
>shopping center
>8000 workers
I worked for an MIC aerospace company and we had thousands of employees in a campus with 3 large buildings. One much bigger and deeper than any shopping mall. There is no way a shopping center )unless it's maybe the mall of America) could have 8,000 workers in it along with the product and machinery.
>Drone swarms
>When your ISR sucks and your drones cant detect targets for shit and can only engage targets of opportunity that stick out like a sore thumb
>pic related when russians are wasting money and cink chips with 300x markup price on swarm munitions when they should be cooking arty shells like hotcakes and improving their ISR with purpose made drones at squad level
Thats the reason why nobody is going all in on loitering munition spam and partly the reason why switchblades arent getting delivered anymore and the 600 version wasint even given to ukies. Its because the logistical burden of producing and employing them is 20 times more expensive than a dumb arty shell strike. Swichblade tier drones are niche use for SOF units that want to ACK somebody behind the lines while minimizing the chance to reveal their position. Drones only make sense as arty FOs, preferbably with thermals and laser designators for laser guided shells
The drones will turn on the Russians on accident. Check em
>cink chips with 300x markup price
>chink
>he doesn't know
https://www.google.com/url?q=https://sundries.com.ua/en/russian-kamikaze-drone-lancet-equipped-with-nvidia-jetson-tx2-computer-and-xilinx-zynq-chip/
https://developer.nvidia.com/embedded/jetson-tx2
>war how it means to be played
>brought to you by NVIDIA (c)
>implying that cinks dont buy the entire stock of those via shell companies and then sell them to russia at ridiculous prices
They are defacto cink supplied chips, so my point stands, cant fricking buy them anywhere god damn it, same with RPI4s
Ukraine has switchblade 600
Belgorod residents are shaking in their boots
>"And so then you and friends go in swarm to hohols."
>[FLY INTO BUSHES?]
>"No blyat, listen my son. You and brothers go and kill many Leopard and Bradley in beautiful swarm!"
>[DOES NOT COMPUTE. EXPLOSIVE CAN'T PENETRATE DRYWALL AND GLONASS SYSTEM IS ACTUALLY DISHWASHER CHIP]
>"...my dear son, I not make of rules. Just do best, please."
>[FATHER MY WINGS ARE FRICKED]
>"-sigh- I know, dear son, I know..."
>on this episode of it's always sunny in the Oblast"
>24 february 2022 + x
>russians are saying
yeah no. those days are over.
Is it true that Israelis showed the Russians how to make the Lancet? These loitering munitions DO look suspiciously like Israeli ones. Although this new one kind of looks fake with that Tupperware launcher.
Still, it’s a fact that they make Lancet and various types of drones before that. Why isn’t Ukraine manufacturing their own designs? Do they have any companies working on that?
Damn, I thought we were on shillcon 5 because of the bridge but this Black person has been at it for days.
You believe the same person make those threads?
that's nice sweetie
>implying Russia can into the advanced electronics needed for this
LMAO
No they aren't.
Frick off.
I've seen videos of Lancets and Switchblade. Biggest difference I've noticed is that Switchblade does majority of busy work for you, you point a target, it tracks him and constantly adjusts drone for maximum hit probability. Lancet has none of it, you have to completely manually steer it to target, which is why there's multiple videos where Lancet gets misses by 5+ meters to the side, overshoot the target or wind just blows drone to the side.
Russians are 30 years behind Brimstone missiles and Switchblade tech
give it to me straight. what is so special about lancet? do shills love it so much because it's the only precision munition russia has? it's just a loitering munition (and not even a good one at that when compared to ones like harop) there's absolutely nothing special about it.
>do shills love it so much because it's the only precision munition russia has?
Yes, I'll tell you more. This is literally ONLY counterbattery asset Russia has(this is even pointed out by Russian milbloggers with more than two brain cells about absolute state of Russian artillery), nothing else, not tube artillery nor rocket artillery posses threat Ukrainian artillery
i for one can't wait for GLSDB kino. there's supposedly an insane number of them. we've seen what. GMLRS has been doing to russian supply trucks and artillery assests as of recent. imagine the same thing but at a longer ranger for less cost. even then morons will screech about how lancet is great
>GLSDB
Where are they? Why Americans still dragging feet with them, they were announced 6 months ago
i have no idea why they are taking so long. they were included in a package at some point but this was pulled back. according to pentagon officials, they will be in ukraine by september
While the concept existed for a while already, the US never had any impetus to actually mass produce GLSDBs since they primarily launched SDBs from the air, anyways. Six months sounds like the right amount of time for them to set up an assembly line to crank them out.
Shills love the Lancet because the Lancet has no native target imaging and must receive laser designation from an ORLAN or similar to strike a target. This means that every lancet mission has footage from a second drone unless the designating drone is killed before it can return to Puccian lines.
Yes, every mission. Think about what that means in term of the volume of lancet footage good enough to use for a perception campaign, lmao.
it's getting extremely tedious to have this constantly recurring pattern of people who just learned something from a perun video turning around and immediately regurgitating that thing as smuggie trivia in threads where people who actually know the subject matter are posting.
this war will be hot for a long time yet. it's ok to not have something to say about any given topic.
arent lancets stopped but fishing nets still?
>Rossiya 1
LMFAO
>Each drone will prioritize civilian targets wit specific types of warheads.
ftfy
>r*ssians building something this advanced
so its either renamed israeli tech or it does not exsist
>r*ssians
you are a moron
wasn't that the goal of the program from the start? that's why every lancet carries nvidia jetson instead of a simpler and cheaper industrial computer
Russians probably didn't have any homegrown AI vision specialists willing to work on target recognition, so that part of the program was never finished, but with sanctions and draft, top dog programmers became more eager to work for a lower salary :^)
Ok, but where is Mizintsev?
Surovkin status?
mutted
I had a design years ago for a drone that deploys a swarm out of it from above a target, made a prototype for a launch mechanism, wish i had the money to build it out and make a full prototype.
>wish i had the money to build it out
you don't need a full prototype if you can get the design in front of uav dev people. put it into a repo somewhere and people can send it around.
I sleep.
im sure they do
im sure they will
how is there not a tank mounted laser countermeasure yet that simply blinds the drone's sensor in the front? It seems like that would defeat 99% of these suicide drones
try aiming a laser on the sensor of a small moving target far away
Can't wait for these to be paired with the armata!
New kino. Can someone id the vehicle? OSA maybe?
>RIA (russian state media)
>uploads two lancet videos
>one is named osa1.mov
>other is lancet2.mov
>both encoded at same datetime
>both use the same cover/thumb
>thumbnail of both is an OSA
>telegram post text explicitly IDs target as OSA
>lancet2.mov isn't even about a strike on an OSA
>metadata directly reveals these are from april
anon is there anything you might want to tell us? like, perhaps, whether it's very super duper important that we recognize this lancet clip as an OSA kill and spread this message far and wide?
stooge
milinfo, a longstanding milblog, identifies the struck vehicle as a strela-10.
https://t.me/milinfolive/103805
>GRAU: 9K35
>NATO: SA-13 "Gopher"
And ruzzoids even ask why nobody likes them, I hope for more NATO help to eradicate this decease.