Russian JDAM Kits v2

Russia's dollar tree JDAM kits had so many catastrophic malfunctions that the russian government had to take the rare step of promising fixes in the Mk II. Here it is. Brain of the new and improved УMПК / UMPK glide bomb kit. V2 on the left, V1 on the right.

Previously: Russian JDAM Kits
https://desuarchive.org/k/thread/60480358

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    v1 specimen

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      my personal pick for the most Eeyore-esque dud

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        It looks like it's trying to impregnate the bomb anon

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          the face is on the right

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Richard Scarry tier shit. Just needs a tired expression with tongue out.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      What the frick? I have a guitar pedal from the 80s with more circuitry in it than that

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >serial port
      SOVL

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Those gps/glonass antenna are actually a rather high quality American made product, kinda impressive they used good parts for once

  2. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Are these things just like JDAM, ie, can be strapped on to any ol’ FAB and turned into a PGM?

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yes they can be strapped onto many things. No the JDAMsky references aren't accurate, just usefully familiar for many people. They started with no active guidance whatsoever and they've since been upgraded. The process has been chaotic and YMMV greatly as a pilot who has to drop these. The tendency of VKS pilots to use the glide kit purely as a stendo buffer for AD so they can lob bombs from further away has also been counterproductive. I suspect airforce command applied more pressure on pilots for closer bombing runs during the avdiivka debacle, which might help to explain the crazy aircraft loss rate.

  3. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    that archived thread is really interesting

  4. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >V2 on the left, V1 on the right
    I might be a blind moron, but aren't those two the same board with some cum on the "old" one?

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      The later revisions are very difficult to tell apart by eye. Since integrating the LM2596 they've been mostly stable, resizing the board for whatever reason and making individual part swaps.

      I shouldn't call the older specimen "v1" really. More like 1.5

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        The braided covers look so out of place but its a subtle touch

  5. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    This looks like the megasquirt board I soldered together in high school to manage the fuel injection on my Volvo 240

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      are they unable to source connectors? those cables should end in a plug, it looks like that was the original intent as they are soldering directly to surface mount pads. if they were planning on using wires they should have through holes which would at least make the solder job a bit easier. still stupidly labor intensive. also the random through hole diode is odd. what's up with the jumper wires? the pcb looks the same, could they not get a new board at least?

      The soldering looks like shit

      What the frick? I have a guitar pedal from the 80s with more circuitry in it than that

      Which electronic parts came out of the washing machines?

      could be worse

  6. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >babushka employment program

  7. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >milled aluminum box
    Woah isn't that expensive?

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah, and heavy. Makes me wonder why it wasn't just bent sheet metal or a die-cast box.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        >aluminum
        >heavy

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          Yes anon, aluminum is a lightweight alloy. But that box is still a lot thicker than it needs to be.

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            maybe they have a warehouse full of these boxes

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              Possible, but not all that likely. Those look relatively freshly machined, the surface hasn't had a lot of time to oxidize yet.
              But the same principle applies: maybe they've got plenty of CNC mill time but no bending brake?

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                military procurement is sometimes inefficient and can yield nonsensical results? with incomplete information, occam's razor seems useful here.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Idt that they're making enough of those kit to justify that, unlike the metal-folded Kometa-B that's being 'mass' produced because they're using it in several drones including the geran 2.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                I'm more wondering why they don't use off-the-shelf boxes? These kinds of things are common in industry, labs, etc:
                https://www.hammfg.com/electronics/small-case/general-purpose/1411-1412
                or
                https://www.hammfg.com/electronics/small-case/diecast

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Shhht...don't give away those low level technical tricks.

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              I'm gonna throw my two cents in amd say someone high up in the procurement process owns the factory that makes these

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah, you are probably correct lol, I bet too, that is some relative or a close friend of someone higher-up at Rosoboronpostavka that sell that shit. This is how everything works in the russian kleptocracy system.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                This b***h Nadezhda Sinikova (Federal Agency for the Procurement of Armaments), she must getting some sweet,sweet $$ in kickbacks. I wonder how many houses she own in Plyos, or how many dachas in Rublevka.

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            > But that box is still a lot thicker than it needs to be.

            Not if you want it to deal with conditions relating to temperature fluctuations, resonance, the usual military shit.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        USSR MIC was about producing a lot but cheap, even if it's shit and has bad tolerances, bit factor are actual manually operate mills and such. This model of work collapsed in the 90s because no more money, no more mill operators.
        When money re-appeared in 2000s, it was impossible to replicate due to economy, demography, society, etc. A choice to fund purchase of western CNCs and such, make less stuff, with more automation, even if it means that it costs more. So yes, they'd mill a stupid box and it would be expensive, because setting up presses or die cast shit is too expensive / too time consuming / not relevant for the amounts made.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      One on the right looks die-cast

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Both are cnc milled I can assure you. Quality is higher on v1 as far as the box is concerned. They have run a chamfer over the edges properly.

        For these things you need to make it from alu and if you're cncing a bunch of them together it's not so bad in terms of cost considering the potential value-add to already existing munitions.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      aluminium is really annoying to machine
      starts gumming up when it gets too hot and tends to come away in flakes and chips that get stuck to everything

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        ...... Cooling fluid my dude. If you're dye grinding use the solid lubricant to keep the alu from sticking to your tools, but it's going to get on everything else (But is easy to clean up).

  8. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    ThE_GhOsT escribe mas en el hilo de FC so guarra.

    Fdo: Ilitri

  9. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    why do you guys always argue about boxes in these threads

  10. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    are they unable to source connectors? those cables should end in a plug, it looks like that was the original intent as they are soldering directly to surface mount pads. if they were planning on using wires they should have through holes which would at least make the solder job a bit easier. still stupidly labor intensive. also the random through hole diode is odd. what's up with the jumper wires? the pcb looks the same, could they not get a new board at least?

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      no one in the chain of production has some way to grift off importing molex connectors and ethernet plugs or other worthless pieces of plastic
      instead the assembling factory has been RAKING it in having some dude solder 85 loose wires and then bind them into some ghetto loom

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Oh holy shit I didn't even notice that, good lord. I hope the space they're soldering these in is well ventilated.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Oh holy shit I didn't even notice that, good lord. I hope the space they're soldering these in is well ventilated.

      >actual loose wires soldered to surface mount pads
      holy fricking shit

      by the way is this please wait before posting thing new?

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      I can see what look like some soldering bridges on the newer board?

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah, There's definitely some details here that make v2 emphatically 'theoretically' better.

  11. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >hand soldered wiring attached to a chinese pcb
    really reminds me of soviet computers, where they basically got a mishmash of random counterfeit and domestic-produced parts and just connected them together with wires

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      this almost looks like its made from salvaged parts. I ve built a few simple boards from scavenged bits and pieces before, these components are not new.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        It legitimately looks like a high level hobbyist project. Like if you go over to the drone thread on PrepHole you would see someone posting this there and it wouldn't be out of place.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          Cheap matters more to the higher-ups than whether it functions.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >a mishmash of random counterfeit and domestic-produced parts and just connected them together with wires

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        >you can almost see the electrons flying off [/communism/] those sharp corners

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        what the hells going on with all the jumper wires?

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          Design revisions, did you not pay attention in KhTZ engineering college?

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          Back in the day 2D lattice programs (Or human computers) used to make these things couldn't always handle every connection, so they'd just use jumpers for the few they couldn't get working.
          I've done it when I did customer laptop repairs, nothing really terrible about it on a disposable product really other than being another low likelyhood point of failure.
          You don't see it on non disposables because some technician could bump or knock off the wire and it's fricked, but for one time use it's really just whatever works for the 80's and I'm whatever about it.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        YOU JUST KNOW that 04 86 is the date of production.
        ngl I wouldn't mind owning some genuine CCCP tech.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          It's a ham radio diy project for a Soviet magazine, so, yeah.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          >04 86 is the date of production.
          It is yeah, its one of their Radio-86RK personal computers from the 80's, it was a DIY affair, to assemble a computer, it was necessary to purchase the necessary radio components, make two printed circuit boards and mount all the components on them. In addition, it was necessary to use a hand-held programmer to write the firmware into two chips erasable ROM , and also to manufacture a power supply, keyboard and computer case.

          What you got was:
          • Processor KR580IK80A or KR580VM80A (8bit, 2 - 2.5Mhz)
          • RAM: 16-32 kB, ROM: 2 kB, expandable
          OS RAM monitor (with RK-DOS 2.95 drive)

          You can read more about how delightful it was here:
          https://www.wikiwand.com/ru/%D0%A0%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%BE-86%D0%A0%D0%9A
          Its not BAD per se, its a better PC than the ZX-Spectrum for example, its just more of a hobbyist thing, aimed at people who want to learm more about assembly and coding themselves.

          It has been remade and de-jankified by 3rd party sellers and retro hobbyists since then, pic related.

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            It's funny watching not just zoomers, but very late zoomers/early gen alphas realize, in real time, that people used to physically put computers together by hand. You would think it'd be common knowledge but apparently not. Can't wait until they figure out what Windows 1.0 actually was.

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              I remember playing Dune 2 on a 286 through DOS.
              I think that's the oldest "proper" game I can remember playing. Then Aces Of The Pacific after that I think. It was a long fricking time ago.

            • 3 months ago
              OP

              >be OP
              >be zoomer
              Your scenario would be great. I fully expect most zoomers to be befuddled by anything that isn't an assembled consumer product for the rest of their lives.

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            Its the sort of thing that I would probably find enjoyable now, with the internet handy to help troubleshoot what you're doing wrong, but back in the day it would have been a complete ballache to figure out that you'd mounted one component back to front.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Not bad for DIY actually. I think it was published in "Cдeлaй caм"

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          This is neat: https://github.com/skiselev/radio-86rk

  12. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    does anyone else see that big hole in that gray chip on the left image? that looks like a parts failure to me.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://files.catbox.moe/iv1eay.pdf

  13. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    The soldering looks like shit

  14. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Lockheed Martin is shaking right now

  15. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Very typical Russian board layouts
    >Western boards
    Components are laid out in the order of systems are logically built out
    Power -> Main CPU -> Auxiliaries (USB, sensors, etc)
    All of the runs are hand optimized
    >Chinese boards
    All of the components are thrown on there at once and as tight as assembly machine tolerances allow.
    All of the runs are auto routed and make no sense to the human
    >Russian layout
    Components are grouped by similar type, boards get really big physically to compensate for bad run layout. Everything has to be manually routed because of the weird component placement.

  16. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Which electronic parts came out of the washing machines?

  17. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >No western counterparts

  18. 3 months ago
    MsomeDICk
  19. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Lmao, they went from tie-downs to some sort of paste for holding their wires down. Must have had an issue with the wires coming loose

  20. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    I would love to see a piece by piece comparison of a Iskander and a KN-23, i fully expect the Nork missile to be of better manufacturing quality.

  21. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    why are there suddenly 5 threads on FABs?

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Fun, isn't it?

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        people are asking stuff like "can I get a qrd on these?" in the other threads, too. electronics thumbnail = invisibility cloak kek

  22. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Oooooh frick no chamfered edges on those tapped mounting points on the V2 box. My boss would have my head. Also I think V2 hasn't been cleaned out very nicely for assembly, unless that's just fibres from the cable insulation.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *