Russian copecrete bunkers spotted in southern ukraine

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It looks like a water pipe someone cut some holes into
    Oh dear

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I'm looking forward to the humorous nickname these will get if this is real. Ruskie roasters? Borscht boilers?

      It's a fricking concrete pillbox. It's a bunker. It was preformed and hardened somewhere else and is being transported to the front where it will probably be buried.

      They aren't planning on driving around that shit on trucks fighting from it.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        precast garbage like that doesn't resist .308. It's drainage pipe with some slots in it.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Depends what kind of steel reinforcement it has which you can't see in this image. But this is Russian engineering so there's a good chance this is precast just concrete with zero steel incorporated.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            homie look at the suspension on that truck. Do you see it sag? No. That means that thing is concrete only. Anything heavier and you'd notice it on the truck carrying it.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          you know that is not true

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            It's 100mm thick 2.5 meter precast. If you dropped one 30 cm onto its side it would fold flat. The top is even thinner. These are absolutely deathtraps and nothing more. I've made better bunkers for paintball fields.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Good thing basically nothing fires 308

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Its pretty shitty as a bunker then. Does it even have steel rebar in it? Solid concrete doesn't really stop bullets. I guess if it's half buried and used as like part of a trench system it would be ok.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >They aren't planning on driving around that shit on trucks fighting from it.
        We'll see about that. I give it month at best.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >They aren't planning on driving around that shit on trucks fighting from it.
        You say this now.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >They aren't planning on driving around that shit on trucks fighting from it.
        They're gonna do this now and then you'll claim there was never any shit in the wagon to begin with

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >its a bunker

        With a 4 inch wall.
        Yeah, those things are not going to stop anything. And judging for the windows, they are not going to bury them deep enough

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Are we talking small arms here or heavier weapons? Shrapnel from exploding shells might slide off the side since it's round. Also we do not know to what extend it's steel reinforced.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >They aren't planning on driving around that shit on trucks fighting from it.
        T-they're gonna do it aren't they?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >They aren't planning on driving around that shit on trucks fighting from it.
        You sure about that?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >They aren't planning on driving around that shit on trucks fighting from it.
        I invoke Vatnik Law of Stupidity and declare that you've just predicted the future.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        looks about 200mm thick concrete. so no more than a fricking house. useless for modern warefare.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          OK. I just checked and Siegfried line bunkers had wall thickness of 1.5 meter. And that was 75 years ago.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          They probably cover from small arms fire, frags, sun and rain pretty well, and if it was some competent army manufacturing those i would probably say it's for establishing places where a soldier can sit for a while, eat, drink some tea or chill while nothing happens, being protected from sudden shelling or enviroment. It's russia tho, so they'll probably drop it with vdv

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >They aren't planning on drive around that shit on trucks fighting from them.
        Coming soon to a T-62 near you...

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I mean they aren't completely useless. Will probably stop 5.45 with ease and keep you safe from a dji with a mortar round being dropped from it. But no, against a Javelin, HIMARS, Grad, BTR, T-80, etc.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          A mortar round will cave that thin roof with no fail.
          And the roof is flat instead of domed, which is terrible against that sort of attack

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        > They aren't planning on driving around that shit on trucks fighting from it.
        Don’t ruin my hopes of technicals with pillboxes equipped

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          It has been done and it was a really shit idea, done of course the connoisseurs of bonkers shit
          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bison_concrete_armoured_lorry
          Think the bong-tank museum might have a vid on them as well

          >Honestly I think zee germans if they ever landed would have found themselves attacked with vats of boiling oil, weaponised car tyres and a brick on a stick

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Difference is the Bison wasn't meant to protect against heavy weapons, but against paratroopers who were lightly armed (for obvious reasons). They were meant to be moved to cover landing areas where they'd expect German paratroopers and in general to prevent static defences being destroyed (again, the assumption was the Germans would be uncontested in the skies).

            In WW2, it is 100% a good idea, because the paratroopers weren't going to be rocking many heavy weapons and any heavy weapons they did have lacked the range to be of much use. In the modern era where any bumfrick with a RPG or whatever you can get through the concrete.

            The funny thing is, in half a dozen wargames since the end of WW2, every time they have done an invasion of UK by German forces, the Germans lose 90% of their troops in two weeks. Even with British handicaps (total German air superiority). Simply because the Germans weren't equipped to do amphibious invasions on the tier needed (D-Day) to attack a nation that had shit loads of defensive lines and was willing to stretch the Geneva Convention to its limits (for example they planned to drop banned gas on German landing beaches... before they got there, meaning the Germans would land on gas and die, which is not against the convention as it was not used 'directly')

            Finally, that was a nation trying to find ways to defend itself, not a nation on t he offensive having to resort to shit in an era which makes it pretty shitty.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >They aren't planning on driving around that shit on trucks fighting from it.
        This frickin guy

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah I worked in precast concrete, it’s dogshit. Poured walls are used for foundations for a reason, while precast are used for external walls.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >They aren't planning on driving around that shit on trucks fighting from it.

        I'm guessing that the Russian weren't planning on sending T-62s to the front either, but here we are.

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I'm looking forward to the humorous nickname these will get if this is real. Ruskie roasters? Borscht boilers?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Cauldrons

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous
      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Mfw the Russians are in the cauldron now
        >Mfw the cauldron collapses to well aimed MG sprays and a frag

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Concrete coffin

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      cement cemetary

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        This. Its just a cement graveyard.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >could have gone with cement cemetary
          >fricking didn't

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      cope crib

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Vatnik Vat

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Bunker troony

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Putin Palaces

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >cue Barry Manilow
      Cope Cabanas

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Winrar

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      They're literally already called pillboxes

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        The point is, a box with a doorway in it and a window, that you can shit in, or not, or take pills in, or not, is not a strategic asset, unless it is.

        which is why we are wondering, what is it?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Definitely an upgrade this tells me the Russians are willing to dig in for the long haul. They are going to start building a trench system probably 20-25 miles back from their current front lines. Defense in depth and just wait the world out. They're hoping we get tired along with the Ukrainians and just say frick it you get what you are currently occupying and no more.

          with the amount of artillery and small ordinance dropped by drones I can actually see these things being relatively useful more so if they reinforce them with sandbags and shit
          also I imagine it makes whatever line they're making relatively flexible for now while the ukrainians are dug in with more defensive but also static trenches

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Chapkrete, a chapka made of concrete.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Cossack Cave
      Gopnik Gopher Hole
      Slave Snail Shell

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      commie cauldron
      bolshevik boiler
      pol pot
      Krusty Komsomol

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Banaan Boiler

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Ho Hole

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      kopek kan

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Banan kotel

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Bunker traktor

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >portable pillbox
    Not a bad idea for reinforcing trenches.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I agree place one of these every 25 or so yards away try and maintain over lapping fields of fire. Plus these things are dirt cheap and miles better than anything made from sandbags and wood.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >better than anything made from sandbags and wood
        Are they?

        Maybe they don't have the manpower to create conventional entrenchments, or it's unfeasible under current/modern bombardment, so that's why they're trying with pre-fab stuff.

        Considering their track record I would wager that they're brittle, ineffective pieces of shit like everything else.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Plus these things are dirt cheap and miles better than anything made from sandbags and wood.
        No, absolutely not. I could use an excavator and 10 meters of 25cm thick logs to make a better, larger bunker in about the time it would take me to dig the hole this goes in, lift it off the truck, and then rebury this (for the sake of the poor dumb bastards that are going in these, they better rebury these with thick packed earth in front of them, but I know they won't because tamping earth in close proximity to unsupported precast like this will break it every time.

    • 2 years ago
      Based Charlie Magne Poster

      look at the openings - that cement is 3 inches thick. there is nothing on the battlefield that can be stopped by that thing. it's literally a cope bunker.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Especially with Ukraine fielding man-portable DShKs now kek

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It'll be hilarious when the winning side doesn't both to dig them up afterwards and makes Albania v2

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      imagine being so technologically shite that your invasion resorts to trench warfare in 2022

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah, the idea is sound and the French pioneered it during WW1, but this looks like relatively thin precast pipe/culvert.
      This thing is going to be shredded by 12.7mm, anything with explosive filler is guaranteed death. Hell, it might not even stop 5.45.
      I would much rather be in a concealed trench.

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >4 inches of chinese concrete and skimped on the chinese rebar
    it isn't stopping anything bigger than shrapnel.

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I'm no expert but I feel like a perimeter of concertainers would be better than a little concrete cuck shed.

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    great
    we've reached Makeshift Maginot

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Makeshift Maginot

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The Aliexpress Siegfried Line

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Second-rate Siegfried Line

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Silly Siegfried

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The Aliexpress Siegfried Line

      >The Goodwill Gustav Line

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      SOMEone MAKE AN EDIT NOW

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Oh for fricks sake "COPECRETE"? YOI FRICKING c**tS WOULDNT KNOW GOOD MILITARY ATRATEGY IF IT BIT YOU IN THE ASS

    HOW THE FRICK DO YOU EXPECT TO HOLDAND WITHOUT DEFENSES YOU FRICKING TRANNJES A MOBILE DEFENSE IS IMPERIATIVE TO KEEPING THE LAND YOU HOHOLS

    FUXK YOU

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Hah

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      No, they're for rolling down hills at the holohols like in donkey kong

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      oh hi mars

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      he is mad

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The 1850s called, they said "holding land" by means of static defenses was obsolete.
      The 1700s mentioned something about "already having suspected that".

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    wonder what it's like to get beaten to death by non hardened concrete fragments as you get shot at with hmg's and 30mm shells

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Everyday these guys just sink lower and lower

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Looks like HIMARS is getting thermobaric warheads soon.

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Yes, that's typically how you move prefab concrete objects.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      make sure you dont use colors that contrast well against the background for your text.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Yes, that's typically how you move prefab concrete objects.

      Russia can't into forklifts, but they'll magically scrounge up enough cranes to build the Leaning Tower of Luhansk?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        cranes are everywhere in militaries

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Not in Russia, speaking from experience.
          They will have managed to scrounge up something civilian though, there ought to be enough in the occupied territories.

          Prefab bunkers are fine, however:
          >microscopically thin, separately cast, flat roof
          >walls so thin the thin you can punch through them with a pickaxe
          >that fricking texture
          These are absolute shit and will be the death of anyone dumb enough to hide inside.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            how else do you maintain heavy vehicles? the russian army is heavily motorized

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >Russia
              >mantain vehicles

              I think its easier to abandon them and get another one from storage.

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    So uhh.. if russia is doing so badly, why can't ukes actually hold the line?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      How's that Kyiv front going?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Russia is occupying less land than they did last month

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        April was 2 months ago anon, russnogs have been pushing forward ever since

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >russnogs have been pushing forward ever since

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        You like to make shit up?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        They have increased over last month but a percentage point or two

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      They've actually been holding remarkably well given the sheer volume of fricking artillery. Getting pushed back in the north east after forcing russia to turn it's gains into rubble isn't the L you think it is. Defense in depth wins campaigns dingus.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Ah yes, the ever so successful defense in depth strategies of, C.S.A, France in the Franco Prussian war, Poland in WW2, Germany in WW2, Japan in WW2, Kuomintang in the Civil War, South Vietnam, and Armenia.. so glad those guys won with such an OP strategy

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >what about...
          good one man

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >defense in depth always wins!!
            >shows it always fails
            >"that's a fallacy"
            This is an +18 board, xir.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Most of those countries never used defense in depth

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >if I plug my eyes and ears and go LALALALALALALAL that means it didn't happen
            Meds.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Most of those countries just fricking lost, they didn't use defense in depth. Losing ground by fricking up royally isn't defense in depth

              >what is the Russian campaign

              It beat fricking napoleon

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          The successful defense in depth at Kursk?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Poland didn't use defense in depth in ww2, what the frick are you, moronic? Literally the biggest critique of ww2 poland right after that they didn't mobilize, is that they fought over every piece of land on their border.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          you've watched defense in depth work this war under kyiv moron, russians pushed almost to the city borders and still got rekt in the end

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            So Russia's going to stop taking land any day now, right?

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine wasting a javelin on this
    It works

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Even a LAW would be overkill

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    They are finally back...

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      At least those could stop most of the weapons of the day.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      These were actually well thought out and manned by skilled and dedicated troops. Pussians can only dream about getting on the level of Hussites.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Look at that dude down the bottom dabbing on the enemy with his two-handed flail

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    whats the tactic here?
    are they running out of men?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Sit in defense, let Ukes bash themselves to death trying to break through, Ukes retre-er I mean "fighting withdraw" another 25km, pick up mobile bunkers and plant on the new front.
      Rinse and Repeat
      Ez clap
      No rematch

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I look forward to buying your sister for a days wages while you die of AIDS/liver failure russkie boy

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I'm sure you'll get a way better deal with buying some banderite prostitute after we're done with her, we'lll even throw in some oil for the deal. Since you need it more than us 😉

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            They are already all here lmao. You ain't getting shit.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          its unlikely youll meet his sister but yours is already giving out blowjobs for 5$s a nut out in germany

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >copecrete bunkers
    from a third world country
    that shit looks like a septic tank

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    ukraine has been steadily losing territory and cities for the past two months and are about to lose siverk and bakhmut. meanwhile all /k/ope can do is impotently seethe about every single thing the russians do. good luck with that whole cherson meme offensive weve been hearing about for the past month.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >steadily losing territory and cities for the past two months
      Anon there are actual, literal glaciers in Europe moving faster than the russian army has over the past two months
      That's not a joke and it's not hyperbole, faster glaciers can reach nearly 30m a day under the right conditions which puts them noticeably ahead of the russian advance

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Don't you know that Russia is running out of ammunition by next Sunday?

  18. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Transporting pre-formed concrete structures seems like a logistical nightmare and would tie up a lot of trucks. One trick carrying hesco wire and one truck carrying an excavator would make more sense

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It really doesn't make sense, so giving their usual incompetence the benefit of doubt there might be something preventing them from digging the real deal, or enough of it.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      this feels like someone sold the army on a new easy way to make fortifications that just coincidentally happens to come from their uncle who owns a septic tank company

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        This is your bunker after 80% goes to kickbacks and someone stole 90% of the concrete

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Ironic considering russian cement manufacturers are shutting their plants due to sanctions.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Why?
          They have an overabundance of raw materials now and plenty of demand with the supposed rebuilding of "liberated territories" coming any day now.
          Are they unable to service their industrial machinery, or were they affected by the inexplicable "cannot pay factory workers" epidemic?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Are they unable to service their industrial machinery
            Correct, as a member of the Duma recently mentioned Russia doesn't even make nails any more.

  19. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Oh no no no

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Nyet nyet nyet
      Do not reverse search pic

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        And do not Google "concrete septic tank"!!

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          those are actually better, because the top lid is not some thin concrete as the russian "bunkers" that will buckle from one scoop of dirt on it
          i don't want to be the vatnik inside when a 500€ drone drops a mortar on that, and concrete fragments from the thin lid shred me into pieces

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/F3d6LZN.jpg

        And do not Google "concrete septic tank"!!

        oh my fricking god...this war is not fricking real!

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        > COX
        > out
        What is this, some kind of deception? We all know the cox will be coming in.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/2VNZcBd.jpg

      Nyet nyet nyet
      Do not reverse search pic

      >Russians are human shit
      >Get killed in literal septic tanks
      Sometimes the world is too good

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        It's like how they were using that dumpster truck as a troop transport. It's like pottery

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/2VNZcBd.jpg

      Nyet nyet nyet
      Do not reverse search pic

      https://i.imgur.com/F3d6LZN.jpg

      And do not Google "concrete septic tank"!!

      It's a literal fricking septic tank with a window cut and door cut in it bros... They used the same mold and everything

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Best place for Russian feces

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Ach, meine sides

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >I pay to enter your concrete bunker for an hour at a time - 150RUB (Kherson Oblast)

      >Some might judge me for this but it's what I enjoy. I pay you 150RUB an hour to bring my kit in and gain access to your bunker. I then have my associate close the bunker after I have set my Nagant and Orlan 10 up. Believe it or not, it's a great place to reflect.

      >Thank you for your time and please don't contact me with judgemental assumptions

      >SERIOUS INQUIRIES ONLY PLEASE

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/2VNZcBd.jpg

      Nyet nyet nyet
      Do not reverse search pic

      https://i.imgur.com/F3d6LZN.jpg

      And do not Google "concrete septic tank"!!

      lol. lmao.

  20. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Frick, I could watch Russians die all day, I don't give a shit about you half monkey Black folk of Europe. Yeah yeah Ukraine can't hold out forever blah blah blah, I'm just enjoying watching you subhuman trash eat dirt.

  21. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    So they’ve decided to harden their southern holdings? Looks like they’re going to move onto the next operation in the east and finish taking the major gas deposits.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >noooooooo it didn't count because they lost!!!!!!!
      Not sure if b8, or just underage. You'll get no more (you)s from me, regardless

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        What are you… talking about? Lost what? Not baiting you. What did Russia lose, exactly? And how is that "loss" relevant to trench fortifications in the south?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >What did Russia lose, exactly?
          economy, progress and prosperity for the next 50 years

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          30k men. Most of "non-cold war era" weapon systems. Economy. Credibility. Neutral border country in the north.

  22. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    doesn't this just prove that they aren't going to try to take Odessa and that they are digging in for the long run with the territory they already control?
    How are Chugsters coping with this?

  23. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    How sturdy can it really be if a (very shitty vatnik-tier) fricking pickup truck can transport it around?

    It looks like it would stop intermediate rounds, but repeated rifle rounds would penetrate after a few in the same couple inches diameter. Basically, they're vulnerable to a machine gun.

    these look nothing like the ones the allies faced on the beaches of normandy in 1944, those took a BEATING

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Those were real bunkers, thick as frick and heavily entrenched into the coast. These are fricking concrete septic tanks.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >concrete septic tanks
        i am still trying to figure out the basic function of these, and how it's even remotely useful in 2022 warfare.

        It looks like it's meant for one person, and has a bunch of slits at roughly eye level for firing out of with a rifle. It has no room for heavier weapons. What good is that? Having a guy plink a few shots at someone if they're unlucky enough to even come into view of those slits?

        Just "armored" observation posts? a dude in camo laying in the shrubs would be harder to notice. someone please fill me in. Could they possible be... armored outhouses? especially after the one video of the homemade drone dropping a bomb on someone taking a shit

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I think you are on the right track with the outhouse idea

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I assume it's shit they're giving you Donbabweans and Lulgandans to use and is probably intended to like go in the corner of a trench chamber or something, buried on the outside at least up to that window. It's better than nothing I suppose.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      They’re going to plug them into trenches. The purpose is to improve survivability from shell splinters and HE. Ukrainians suffered greatly in their shallow trench dugouts.

      Probably some construction oligarch’s storage of septic tanks he decided to convert to trench bunkers to sell (or give away for rep points with Putin).

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        well this makes perfect sense and i feel moronic, thanks

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >They’re going to plug them into trenches.
        Better idea, but in that case they wouldn't have a firing port.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          They’ll be partially buried. Beats the shallow dugouts used by ukorps. This is a modest but still meaningful upgrade to the trench line. I bet they’ll cover the top part with dirt and foliage, maybe camo netting. Giving a machine gunner better cover.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Definitely an upgrade this tells me the Russians are willing to dig in for the long haul. They are going to start building a trench system probably 20-25 miles back from their current front lines. Defense in depth and just wait the world out. They're hoping we get tired along with the Ukrainians and just say frick it you get what you are currently occupying and no more.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Yeah, that's not going to work unless Ukrainian artillery is destroyed, which Russia seems to have serious difficulties with.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Well they can't leave. They have to at least "liberate" Donbabwe and Luganda and ideally I believe they want a land bridge to Crimea as well, so they have to at least get that far. And Zelensky can't just capitulate either. There are far too many Western interests there now in aiding Ukraine to allow that. They're both in for the long haul. Russians can continue to whittle away at them I suppose but they'll grow tired of it eventually. But they aren't leaving with nothing and the Ukrainians for sure as frick aren't retaking Crimea. It's just a question of how long it takes them to consolidate control in the east and south and establish a hard front that they continue to push farther.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            They all use about the same depth of trenches from the footage I've seen.
            Anyway, this isn't a serious fortification and won't be more than a speed bump in a proper offensive. No one is crossing fields with unsupported light infantry.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Russians do.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            those are just another targets for artillery with confirmed 3-5 people insde

            I'm looking forward to the humorous nickname these will get if this is real. Ruskie roasters? Borscht boilers?

            Poo Tins

  24. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    can't wait to see ukrainian corpse piles in a empty field next to these bunkers once YET ANOTHER epic kherson counteroffensive takes place

  25. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I think the idea is kind of ok, but only if they are going to bury them like 10 feet underground.
    A nice cozy shelter to rest and sleep.
    But judging by the windows, probaly they are going to use it as a bunker and die inside it.

  26. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Not all Russian areas use outhouses. They have a little of every type of sewage disposal throughout the Federation, including just holes in the ground like this.

  27. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    are Russians squat-shitters?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Ones in rural areas without sewage systems probably are.

  28. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    sorta the right size and shape for a subsurface utility;
    sorta the right size and shape for a supportive bridge pylon;

    >sorta the right size and shape for

  29. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    maybe its bunkers for the frontline generals

  30. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Look like good aiming points for missiles and drones. Another moronic move by the Russians.

  31. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    There's another negative you pleb Ukie shills didn't notice so I'm going to let you in. The trucks are not particularly loaded down yet carry 2 each. This implies a low rebar content. Ideally there could be up to 80% steel composition and they might be pretty good then - but its a lot less obviously.

  32. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    A little thin? The roof on particular appears really fragile. I suppose it will be more or less immune to 5.56 M855 or 7N6/7N10, and small fragments. Anything else will penetrate at combat distance.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Russians are gonna put 3 feet of dirt on them, moron

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        And how do they plan on seeing out of those windows they've cut into the things once they do that?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          timbers to hold back the earth id imagine

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >3 feet
        regulations say 6 feet for shallow graves, but I guess Russia wants the feet poking out for comedic effect

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous
  33. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    They are obviously worried about a potential counter attack if theyre willing to go to the effort of emplacing these while in artillery range

  34. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I sincerely doubt those are supposed to be pillboxes or bunkers. They're way too small to do anything practical and if a trucks hauling them there's no way they were meant to be used for fortification. They're probably for some infrastructure project or some shit.

  35. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Isnt this stuff about to last 3 days before getting shelled?

  36. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The roof looks really bomb resistant.

  37. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    if they are going to be buried, why does the roof have the thinnest amount of concrete?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Maybe I take the concrete money for me and Natasha.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      You doubt the stopping power of four inch concrete cieling?

  38. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >You will live in the cope pod
    >You will eat the vatniks

  39. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    that's some Enver Hoxha tier autism
    vatniks moved to post WWII Albania

  40. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Christ those are thin roofs. Utter deathtrap.

  41. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    we had those in UK, ours were made out of steel

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous
      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous
  42. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Why does the Kremlin hate Russian soldiers?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      They don't, they just don't care about the minority peasants which make up the large majority of troops.

  43. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    In my language, "Žumpa" means cesspool. It looks exactly like the those things only it's burried and feces go in.

    More like Ž

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      In English it is called a "septic tank"
      A cesspool is a related thing that performs a similar function for treating sewage but is just an open topped pool rather than a tank.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >similar function for treating sewage
        Nah mate a cesspool is not for any sort of treatment. Shit is piped in and drained by trucks once it's full, off to be treated elsewhere. Just a shit container.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          No it totally does perform a function, and a vital one at that
          A cesspool (or septic tank) is where the sewage undergoes separation, the first stage of treatment. Inside the pool, desner fluids and particulates sink to the bottom, while "clean" water floats to the top. This phenomenon enables you to siphon of the clear water for further treatment/recyling and is the first step in the overall sewage treatment process
          Cesspools in particular have additional advantage of exposing the water to UV light, which kills off some bacteria at the cost of evaporation

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >A cesspool (or septic tank)
            You're mixing up two separate concepts. A septic tank is what provides such basic treatment. A cesspool is literally a big container for feces, it doesn't treat waste.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cesspit

            vs

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Septic_tank

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              I finished a uni course on this not too long ago, the process occurs in both and both are used for it. The confusion may stem from another term used for them which is "settling pool"
              Hell, this entire argument might be why people started calling them that in the first place

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cesspit
              >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russia

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >similar function for treating sewage
        Nah mate a cesspool is not for any sort of treatment. Shit is piped in and drained by trucks once it's full, off to be treated elsewhere. Just a shit container.

        No it totally does perform a function, and a vital one at that
        A cesspool (or septic tank) is where the sewage undergoes separation, the first stage of treatment. Inside the pool, desner fluids and particulates sink to the bottom, while "clean" water floats to the top. This phenomenon enables you to siphon of the clear water for further treatment/recyling and is the first step in the overall sewage treatment process
        Cesspools in particular have additional advantage of exposing the water to UV light, which kills off some bacteria at the cost of evaporation

        >A cesspool (or septic tank)
        You're mixing up two separate concepts. A septic tank is what provides such basic treatment. A cesspool is literally a big container for feces, it doesn't treat waste.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cesspit

        vs

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Septic_tank

        I finished a uni course on this not too long ago, the process occurs in both and both are used for it. The confusion may stem from another term used for them which is "settling pool"
        Hell, this entire argument might be why people started calling them that in the first place

        >/k/ sewage & water treatment

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >innaground
          >filled with waste
          Frankly, it's the most /k/ think since katanas.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >similar function for treating sewage
        Nah mate a cesspool is not for any sort of treatment. Shit is piped in and drained by trucks once it's full, off to be treated elsewhere. Just a shit container.

        No it totally does perform a function, and a vital one at that
        A cesspool (or septic tank) is where the sewage undergoes separation, the first stage of treatment. Inside the pool, desner fluids and particulates sink to the bottom, while "clean" water floats to the top. This phenomenon enables you to siphon of the clear water for further treatment/recyling and is the first step in the overall sewage treatment process
        Cesspools in particular have additional advantage of exposing the water to UV light, which kills off some bacteria at the cost of evaporation

        >A cesspool (or septic tank)
        You're mixing up two separate concepts. A septic tank is what provides such basic treatment. A cesspool is literally a big container for feces, it doesn't treat waste.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cesspit

        vs

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Septic_tank

        I finished a uni course on this not too long ago, the process occurs in both and both are used for it. The confusion may stem from another term used for them which is "settling pool"
        Hell, this entire argument might be why people started calling them that in the first place

        to further add to the confusion those sewage boxes can somehow function as an anaerobic digester tank if they are closed (and aerobic if open). regardless it's much more efficient to just transport the sewage to a treatment plant.

        No it totally does perform a function, and a vital one at that
        A cesspool (or septic tank) is where the sewage undergoes separation, the first stage of treatment. Inside the pool, desner fluids and particulates sink to the bottom, while "clean" water floats to the top. This phenomenon enables you to siphon of the clear water for further treatment/recyling and is the first step in the overall sewage treatment process
        Cesspools in particular have additional advantage of exposing the water to UV light, which kills off some bacteria at the cost of evaporation

        UV light? that kind of process usually happens in tertiary treatment iirc. primary treatment is physico-chemical (filters, coagulation, settling, pH adjustment n shit) then next is secondary treatment which is mostly biological (where you use microbes to treat your waste). after that is tertiary treatment which really depends in each facility - UV sterilization, ozone/chlorine sterilization, decolorization n shit happens in this step.

        and i am still wondering how a sewage plant can be weaponized. maybe the sewage treatment microbes could be weaponized?

  44. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
  45. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    This is probably a dumb observation but - do the doors & windows look photoshopped to anyone else?

  46. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    If they're light enough to be carried on a truck like nothing than it probably won't provide enough fortification.

  47. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The saddest part? This thing was showcased on multiple expo's in the '90s, supposedly.

    Essentially, in is an ancient CROWS-like remote weapon turret, that can drop down and button up. Has a crew of like 1 person.
    Weapons:
    >30 GMG
    >7.62 MG
    >gayot ATGM

    When closed, resistant against 155mm HE impacts. When open, small arms fire.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I want to appreciate your optimism, but I don't see any weapons station. Just a leaky a septic tank.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Putin's Russia is not the USSR.
      It's much worse in every regard.

  48. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    How many Donbabweans do they need to unload this?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Frick, I forgot to attach the video

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        kek
        Meanwhile the world in Russia:

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          HAHA holy shit how is this real!?
          This makes FoxNews and CNN look like absolute fricking geniuses.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Worst part is, while this sounds absurd, it seems to stick if you do it for 10 years.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >do it for 10 years
              They've been doing it over 100 years and they won't do anything about it, that's why Russians are so pathetic. They know they government is lying but they are so assbroken that they don't do anything about it.

  49. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I see they're finally ready to install the designated shitting trenches

  50. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Everyday I'm more convinced I that /k/ is filled with children that come here just to meme. It could be summergays, but still.

  51. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Somewhere, Enver Hoxha is smiling.

  52. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    You guys laugh, but we literally have these all over the northern coast of Taiwan. If you use Google Maps to look around the beach at Shimen (the rock arch on the coast) you'll find one.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I'd think what you have is more like what the UK had during WW2.
      Proper fortifications, not just thin concrete pipes you can load multiple of into a truck

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Those are actual pillboxes, if you've ever been to Albania you know the difference.
      These things are a joke.

  53. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Putin's Potty Pillboxes

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *