Russia just underwent through a humiliating defeat in Bakhmut

Probably, nobody expected bakhmut to last this long. The city was expected to be taken within the early days of the invasion and had Ukrainian troops fall behind another line of defense. Bakhmut is essentially a buffer between that line of defense and RU forces.

i have already told you i do not care. fuck off

Let it go Anon. Vatnik shills need something for copium after a year of contant failures.

You entered this conversation gay.

>has zero confidence in his beliefs
>knows his beliefs can’t hold up to the most basic of criticisms
>bitches and moans before rage quitting the argument after getting bent over and fucked like a cheap whore via basic follow up questions

Cya gay, don’t come back

At the end of the day, Russia is conquering territory, which is precisely their plan.

if i was a betting anon i'd say those sneaky ruskies might just use the methods they're already using. their troops and supplies aren't getting tossed out of planes quite yet and things aren't exactly spawning in either. so whichever supply lines they already have will probably be how they reinforce the area

I thought the plan was to prevent NATO expansion not revitalize it

Our plan is to push NATO back!

>NATO Casualties: 0
Russian casualties: Many fields full

Might wanna rethink fighting NATO

I thought it was De-Nazifaction, or De-Satanifcation? The SMO goals changed again?

How so? If they succeed in denying NATO access to eastern Ukraine, the Dniepr will act as a formidable natural border.

Cope, gay

Look at a map of Finland….retard

Russia is not fighting nato or shit like you would have been jdam'd

> Also, its insignificant only for russia
So it’s a significant loss for Ukraine?

> If Russian troops are bogged in one area, then they will not advance in another area.
You said bakhmut has no strategic value for Russia. How can that be, if taking the city lets them advance in other areas? Why is your PrepHoleope so bad, is this a false flagging Z troll?

> The city itself holds no significance aside from bogging down Russian forces from spreading to other areas in Donetsk
So it’s strategically significant for Russia to get un-bogged down in bakhmut? Or winning in bakhmut is not strategically significant? Which one is it, Down’s syndrome boy?

You claimed Bakhmut is keeping Russians bogged down from advancing in other areas. In light of this, how is winning in Bakhmut not strategically significant for Russia? Keep embarrassing yourself with this Ukrainian shill script that is clearly not up to the task lol

>Bakhmut delayed the Russian offensive enough for us to build real defenses elsewhere

Because Russia has lost the war. It can no longer conduct offensive operations, it cannot do the last logistical leg to supply its massive front line because it is out of lorries and tankers. Every day from now on Russia deliver less and less food fuel and ammunition to its front line troops. They are already trying o move artillery shells in scooby doo vans. Its over. The first Russian troops on the front line will be starving by may at this rate. The Russians squandered their last offensive capable units on nothing. The war is over. Ryssia lost. Russia is Ukraines bitch now, the mud is in early, the front won;t move for 30 days because of that. The Russian troops won;t even be able to do counterbattery. Russia has lost the war.

>Russia can no longer conduct offensive operations
It’s like Schrödingers PrepHoleope in here

Are you going to call off the defensive lines being constructed north of Kiev if they can’t even conduct offensives any more?

>Are you going to call off the defensive lines being constructed north of Kiev if they can’t even conduct offensives any more?
might as well actually. Russia has lost the war.

>It can no longer conduct offensive operations
18.02 GMT
Russia loses at least 130 tanks and APCs in Vuhledar in 'biggest tank battle in Ukraine war' – report
Russia has lost at least 130 tanks and armoured personnel carriers in a three-week battle in the town of Vuhledar in southern Ukraine, according to Ukrainian officials.

Ukrainian officials said the “epic” fight on a plain near Vuhledar produced the biggest tank battle of the war so far and a stinging setback for the Russians, the New York Times reports.

Both sides sent tanks into the fray, “with the Russians thrusting forward in columns and the Ukrainians manoeuvring defensively, firing from a distance or from hiding places as Russian columns came into their sights”, the paper writes.

When it was over, not only had Russia failed to capture Vuhledar, but it also had made the same mistake that cost Moscow hundreds of tanks earlier in the war: advancing columns into ambushes.

The remains of the Russian tanks, blown up on mines, hit with artillery or destroyed by anti-tank missiles, now litter farm fields all about the coal mining town, according to Ukrainian military drone footage.

Russian troops also suffered a lack of experienced tank commanders in Vuhledar, and many of the fighters consisted of newly conscripted soldiers who had not been trained in Ukraine’s tactics for ambushing columns, the paper says. Ambushes have been Ukraine’s signature tactic against Russian armoured columns since the early days of the war.

By last week, Russia had lost so many machines to sustained armoured assaults that they had changed tactics and resorted only to infantry attacks, Ukrainian commanders said.https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2023/mar/01/russia-ukraine-war-live-finland-mps-to-vote-on-nato-bid-blinken-warns-central-asia-against-ignoring-russian-aggression

>It can no longer conduct offensive operations
lmao

Isn't the capture of Artyomovsk precisely a successful offensive operation?

It is pushing the front closer to where Russia wants it and further away from where Ukraine wants it.

It's not a strategic advantage, just a strategic gain.

>Isn't the capture of Artyomovsk precisely a successful offensive operation?
No its not these losses

>It can no longer conduct offensive operations
18.02 GMT
Russia loses at least 130 tanks and APCs in Vuhledar in 'biggest tank battle in Ukraine war' – report
Russia has lost at least 130 tanks and armoured personnel carriers in a three-week battle in the town of Vuhledar in southern Ukraine, according to Ukrainian officials.

Ukrainian officials said the “epic” fight on a plain near Vuhledar produced the biggest tank battle of the war so far and a stinging setback for the Russians, the New York Times reports.

Both sides sent tanks into the fray, “with the Russians thrusting forward in columns and the Ukrainians manoeuvring defensively, firing from a distance or from hiding places as Russian columns came into their sights”, the paper writes.

When it was over, not only had Russia failed to capture Vuhledar, but it also had made the same mistake that cost Moscow hundreds of tanks earlier in the war: advancing columns into ambushes.

The remains of the Russian tanks, blown up on mines, hit with artillery or destroyed by anti-tank missiles, now litter farm fields all about the coal mining town, according to Ukrainian military drone footage.

Russian troops also suffered a lack of experienced tank commanders in Vuhledar, and many of the fighters consisted of newly conscripted soldiers who had not been trained in Ukraine’s tactics for ambushing columns, the paper says. Ambushes have been Ukraine’s signature tactic against Russian armoured columns since the early days of the war.

By last week, Russia had lost so many machines to sustained armoured assaults that they had changed tactics and resorted only to infantry attacks, Ukrainian commanders said.https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2023/mar/01/russia-ukraine-war-live-finland-mps-to-vote-on-nato-bid-blinken-warns-central-asia-against-ignoring-russian-aggression

>18.02 GMT
>Russia loses at least 130 tanks and APCs in Vuhledar in 'biggest tank battle in Ukraine war' – report
>Russia has lost at least 130 tanks and armoured personnel carriers in a three-week battle in the town of Vuhledar in southern Ukraine, according to Ukrainian officials.

Were the end of Russias ability to fight offensive manoeuvre warfare. Last wasteful push and the really notable thing was that these were teh Russian Navy Marines and you know what some of them were in? Old Russian reserve T62s. That's the best a supposedly elite unit could be given for a major offensive.? Russia has lost the war. Its over. The Ukrainians could go home now and logistic weakness in the Russian forces in fuel and ammunition transport to frontline units would mean they collapse anyway by summer (May actually). Russia has lost the war. There are two kinds of Russian troops in Ukraine today those who will die there or be taken prisioner and those that ill try making it back to Russia. I'm far more interested in how Russia controls a routed chaotic mob of 100,000 cold hungry and terrified men with small arms arriving on food in Belogrod Oblast thjis summer who are all on paper deserters and criminals. Russia has no force left that can even impose order there. If the fat drunks in the
Rosgvardiya try fighting them its civil war and
Rosgvardiya won't last a week.

Your damage control is why people on other boards make fun of PrepHole. Russia is tasked with liberating the entire territory of the DPR, why should they think Bakhmut doesn’t matter? It’s just something you squeak because Ukraine is losing it.

It’s like someone is conquering South Dakota (about DPRs population), and the idea that taking Rapid City (about Bakhmuts population) would somehow be embarrassing for the invader. You are a joke.

Because bakhmut does not provide an advantage in the grand scheme of things to focus alot of your invading force there, retard. If russia wants to take over donetsk, it will not be making retarded decisions like doubling down on a strategically insignificant city. If you focus on other areas of strategic significance, then you can make it more easier to capture the city and the rest of the story. You're now making WW1 tier of copes on how its significant to capture a worthless pile of land while you lost 1500 in a single day.

You do realise that Russia has lost the war anon?

>Opinion article by some literally who 5th columnist

NAFO sisters I’m so demoralized

>please let me win

Literally, he has no say or control over Ukraine coming and gong as they please right now. He knows that the Ukies have a planned fallback position that is beyond his grasp to dream about taking. When Ukraine falls back to its true line of defense, this shitlicker will claim "it was a gesture of goodwill."

Screencap this.

>anyone that disagrees with me is a heckin' 5th columnist contrarian vatmoron.

Gaining land means fuck all if you can't find a strategic significance to it.

Because Ukraine can make russia bleed while taking it. For an invading force, its not significant aside from being a shooting gallery for the defenders.

Where did I say that? Does russia win in the long term? How does the city itself provide a strategic advantage in the long term?

Pyrrhic victory is your script from severodobetsk . “It was just to keep Russia bogged down” is your Mariupol cope . Combine the two for double strength Bakhmut PrepHoleopium.

And your script has gone from
>Just a week to Kiev, and another to the Rhine. Russia strong!
To
>Sure it took us 8 months to seize a single town, and we had to recruit prisoners so that the population wouldn’t get upset about sending Moscow babies in human waves, but grand victory!

Back to 4chan gay

>Having to change strategies to a grinding war of attrition against your impoverished neighbor

That’d be like if America invaded Mexico and had to send waves of prisoners recruited in Blackwater to seize Sabinas. Oh and Mexico also sank the USS Gerald R Ford in the Gulf

Post El Chapo

>WE WILL BE GREETED AS LIBERATORS!

First thing I read was 100% Aryan and stopped to laugh, I can't finish that bullshit

>Were totally Aryan and White.

>Average “white” 4chan user

Ethiopia - August 8, 2020
and? even the nogs see how based he is

>Is this image satire?
Virgin vs. Chad meme is by its very nature satirical. Do anons not understand how memes work?

hilarious and factual

And what you're poor right?
It's like being black member of kkk.

>The Right, Principals
Now that's a good joke.

>Laughs as the cartel flays the skin off of billy's face with a boxcutter

I know torture gets Vatniks ducks hard but come on stop projecting

Not all of them, the ones you actually hear about probably not on the team. But like I said if the US actually does invade they will all just probably rebrand to some "Mexican freedom front" or something and take over Mexico so their activities will be completely legal and open instead of just understood.

Cartels have a defacto rule of not fucking with the U.S. government directly.

>El Chapo
i didnt realize that he ran all the cartels. sure would be funny if russia decided to help them coup the gov and armed them
poetic one might say

I know what you're hinting at, but there was no coup in Ukraine.
>b-b-but
No.

Is this bro serious?

Are you stupid to think that every revolution is somehow CIA or foreign government instigated? By your logic, every revolution in history is inorganic.

Organic revolutions are big and has lots of support. Inorganic revolutions have little support and influence. A revolution will not work if it doesn't have the support of the people.

Uncle Adolf

>every revolution is somehow CIA
Just the ones that are instigated by the U.S. State Dept. and the CIA, my gaslighting anon

>Your idea of an organic revolution
I can't help it if you are historically illiterate.

Soros’ own group—IRF or International Renaissance Foundation—admits in its 2015 annual report that it has spent more than $180 MILLION in Ukraine since 1990.

NED or National Endowment of Democracy is a US taxpayer-funded group that specialises in … ahem … regime change. Its chief, Carl Gershman, wrote in a Washington Post op-ed in 2013 (just before the protests) that “Ukraine is the biggest prize.”

>A coup would involve the change in all of the government, illegally
not necessarily, also it was a chimpout because of Tymoshenko(pro eu) getting voted out

Michael McFaul—US Ambassador to Russia, 2012–2014—wrote an op-ed in WaPo in 2004 where he asked, “Did Americans meddle in the internal affairs of Ukraine?” Then he answered it, “Yes.”

Why did McFaul write the article? Because in 2004, Soros and other NGOs fomented the Orange Revolution in Ukraine. Basically, the election was won by a pro-Russia guy. So people protested and demanded a new election. Then, a month later, the pro-US guy won the new election with 52% of the votes. Democracy, America-style.

BTW, that guy—Yanukovych—who lost the election in 2004 … ran again in 2010 and won fair and square. That’s why we had Euromaidan

hows langly this time of night?

Well, has anyone heard of Brzezinski, the geopolitical expert who influenced US foreign policy for 40 years? He came up with the idea of Mujahideen in Afghanistan to fight the USSR, created Al Qaeda, and then repeated the same strategy of using Islamic terrorists in the Balkans, the Caucasus, Libya and Syria. Brzezinski explained in The Grand Chessboard that “Ukraine is a geopolitical pivot. Without Ukraine, Russia ceases to be a Eurasian empire.” He also said that Ukraine must be brought into NATO by 2010.

In 2013, Soros, NED and other NGO’s riled up some ordinary people in Kyiv. (BTW, outside Kiev, there were no protests. In many parts of Ukraine, people are very pro-Russia and were happy with President Yanukovych).

Then Neo-Nazi thugs acted as provocateurs and attacked the police with metals, chains, fire-bombs, guns and grenades.

Yea, unlike you.

>Yea, unlike you.
shills are getting lazy and tired.

lol fuck off moron

Anon why is it illegal to question the holocaust in Russia?

Only Russia and Germany outlaws the denial of holocaust. Putin also outlawed the depiction of Mohammed because it was "offensive"

>Only Russia and Germany outlaws the denial of holocaust.
Wrong, retard.

>outlawed the depiction of Mohammed because it was "offensive"
Then you better not look at how hate crime laws are enforced in the U.K. Get better material retards

>muh whataboutism
I am sorry if someone responds to the retarded distraction shit that you brought up in a way that proves you wrong.

mentions problems about russia and germany
>>B-but what about the UK?????????
moron brain retard.

https://i.imgur.com/PDzcAwS.jpg

Distraction?

https://i.imgur.com/PDzcAwS.jpg

Distraction?

>Distraction?
>DAAAA JOOOOOOOOS

Distraction?

https://i.imgur.com/K1SKWEi.jpg

wasnt he from austria?

>we have an unironic russian shill here
How's the morning in moscow?

Thats not evidences of anything aside from making predictions and suggestions from the whole situation.

Yes, making predictions and suggestions is nothing new. Whats next? Going to claim sports are rigged because people placed bets on who will win the most?

Concession accepted. Schizophrenia is a serious mental disorder btw.

US/EU officials engineered protests and chaos and drove a democratically elected president out of the country. Then, without an election, new oligarchs—a billionaire and an IMF guy—were handpicked by the West to become the President and the Prime Minister of Ukraine! Democracy in action!

That’s the truth about the coup in Ukraine, and it hasn’t benefited anyone other than the warmongers. Ukraine is split in half and stuck in a frozen civil war; its debt-to-GDP ratio has doubled; pensions, social services and minimum wages ($140 a month) have been slashed; and the people are still ruled by corrupt oligarchs. The regime change ops also ignited a chain reaction of needless hostility, hysterical Russophobia and crippling sanctions. EU has lost more than $100 billion in trade with Russia in the last four years; and the US has pushed Russia deep into China’s orbit. Just like the neocon adventures in Iraq and Syria, the meddling in Ukraine will go down as another disastrous US foreign policy.

Yea, no. Not every revolution is artificial. And if it is, it would not be this big and successful.
>muh Rusophobia
Holy fuck, you gays really are no different than liberals.

totally normal guiz

Yea, unlike you.

It's not a disaster just yet, but it will be. The longer this drags on the longer CIA will lose control of the situation and corporate lobbyists will wedge themselves into this mess to profiteer off it for whoever they represent. It'll be just like Afghanistan with no strategy but all the spending.

Spoken like a true russian propagandist
>Russia deep into China’s orbit
Why the fuck does that matter? Why do you care about a nation, with similar ambitions to china, get closer to china? Russia being an ally is impossible.

Ally with russia is impossible. Russia has its own ambitions, its own goals in regards to how they handle geopolitics. Russia is fundamentally different from the west and cannot comes to terms with it because russia is looking for a master slave relationship, not partnership. Any ambitions about "muh russian" ally is a pipe dream.

>I am russian and think you're a gay.
I am American and don't think much of you at all
>The west and russia will never be friends.
You did not understand my point at all. Germany was plenty interested in buying Russian energy, and that was enough to make U.S. neocons piss their pants. Now Russia can sell energy to China, who is more than fine with supplying them with mfg's goods in exchange.

>You seem too retarded
No U , you fucking moron. Why were nordstream pipelines built in the first place you fucking mongrel? You can't even understand the obvious.

>Simple, to gain more leverage over those stupid germans.
You are a mental midget.

What’s the official narrative about the events in late 2013 and early 2014 in Kiev, Ukraine? There was the spontaneous and peaceful Euro-maidan “revolution” by the great freedom-loving people, which forced the corrupt Ukrainian President to flee the country, right? Not so simple. There are many intriguing facts about geopolitics, 70 years of US meddling in Ukraine, and covert regime-change operations.

First, objectively speaking, it’s curious that a US Senator (John McCain) and the US Assistant Secretary of State (Victoria Nuland) repeatedly attended political protests in another country. Oh, Nuland is also the wife of a prominent warmongering Neocon, Robert Kagan.

Victoria Nuland also admitted during a speech in 2014 that the US had spent $5 BILLION since the 1990s to spread “democracy” in Ukraine.

>US Assistant Secretary of State (Victoria Nuland) repeatedly attended political protests
She just happened to be in the neighborhood to drop off muffins and bottled water, nothing to see here goyim.

the citizenry would do fine against the cartels. lucky for the cartes, the US government hates their citizens and oppress them at every opportunity. harm a hair on a cartel members head and prepare to have the full weight of the US government brought down upon you.

And what if russia didn't win, what will you do?

And if it does?

He knows. That's why xir is being such a whiny moron.

False equivalency, gay. If you are invading those states, then you need to capture strategic areas to make it more easier to capture the rest. Bakhmut is an example of sunk cost fallacy on a military level.

After losing izyum and lyman, yes its insignificant. Whats the point if you don't have the territories to make it significant?

>other boards
You mean just 4chan and really just them seething and shitting in their sheets and streets? And why the fuck did they fight harder for Bakhmut than Kherson?

>only to get their shit slapped back
Then why are you here today doing damage control about cities in Ukraine being taken by Russian forces?

>how is winning in Bakhmut not strategically significant for Russia?

Because Russia has lost the war. It can no longer conduct offensive operations, it cannot do the last logistical leg to supply its massive front line because it is out of lorries and tankers. Every day from now on Russia deliver less and less food fuel and ammunition to its front line troops. They are already trying o move artillery shells in scooby doo vans. Its over. The first Russian troops on the front line will be starving by may at this rate. The Russians squandered their last offensive capable units on nothing. The war is over. Ryssia lost. Russia is Ukraines bitch now, the mud is in early, the front won;t move for 30 days because of that. The Russian troops won;t even be able to do counterbattery. Russia has lost the war.

>Because Russia has lost the war.

Bakhmut does not provide a strategic advantage. You think this is a game, but seiging a city will cost alot of resources. If the city provides no significance, then it will just lead to your forces suffering from stagnation in their offensive operations. Russia winning in bakhmut does not have any strategic significance and nothing in that city will help their momentum in other areas.

Because russians are bad at war.

Sunk cost fallacy. Originally, it was important until the kharkiv offensive took territories that made bakhmut significant.

>Why does Russia want it then

This has been a subject of debate for months. Nobody knows what Russia is trying to do with Bakhmut. The amount of men and material lost in trying to take this dumb fucking town doesn't make any sense.

It doesn't have a large population, whatever infrastructure it once had is completely destroyed, it has no natural resources, it has nothing. Tankies, Russians, and Russian apologists think there is some huge 5D Chess/Galaxy brain IQ behind the assault.

The truth however is that it was a town that was close to Russian supply routes so it made sense to try and take it. But the UA army had no intention of giving up any ground to the Russians without a fight. Russia continued to attack with their army being made up mostly of Wagner PMCs and Russian convicts so to the Russian leadership not much was being lost. But at this point Russia has lost hundreds of vehicles and equipment trying to take it and Putin is desperate for a win, even if it's for a ruined town like Bakhmut. Russia will likely take the town but the cost has been fucking enormous and it will be a pyrrhic victory.

Then why did they give up Kherson?

Let's just cut to the chase and have some Ohio-class submarines surface offshore near St. Petersburg

https://i.imgur.com/lllc8OW.png

The Russian performance in Ukraine is very similar to the US in the Korean war:
>The original plan for Operation Showdown called for simultaneous attacks on both Triangle Hill and Sniper Ridge. One battalion from the US 31st Infantry Regiment, 7th Infantry Division would take Triangle Hill from Gimhwa-eup, while one battalion from the ROK 32nd Regiment, 2nd Infantry Division would attack Sniper Ridge along a parallel northbound route. UN planners expected the operation to last no more than five days with 200 casualties on the UN side.
>The immediate UN objective was Triangle Hill (38°19′17″N 127°27′52″E), a forested ridge of high ground 2 kilometers (1.2 mi) north of Gimhwa-eup. The hill was occupied by the veterans of the PVA's 15th Corps. Over the course of nearly a month, substantial US and Republic of Korea Army (ROK) forces made repeated attempts to capture Triangle Hill and the adjacent Sniper Ridge. Despite clear superiority in artillery and aircraft, the escalating UN casualties resulted in the attack being halted after 42 days of fighting, with PVA forces regaining their original positions.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Triangle_Hill
Both "military superpowers" greatly underperformed despite having clear superiority in firepower against supposedly "weaker" opponents (Ukraine now and China back in Korea)

>This fucking false equivalency. Again.
I forget, how many casualties did the combined UN/south Korean forces suffer during this controlled retreat? And, how many Chinese/North Korean casualties were there in the bugstorm meatwave?

Please refresh my memory. Last I heard, China doesn't occupy South Korea, either.

Seriously PrepHole, you want to knock a massive army off balance? Strike the Logistics.

Ukraine War has shown us this a thousand times over.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Pusan_Perimeter_logistics

what's done is done. go ahead, move more ukrainians into bakhmut to grind up those russian invaders. wait... oh wait... oh my... oh no that's right you can't anymore.

Go ahead, take the city back. What's stopping Ukraine from taking the city? Ukraine is so big and powerful, go ahead and push those Russians right back to Moscow. Come on, when are they going to do it? It has been a year of Russian humiliation, but Ukraine still hasn't pushed them completely out of their country yet so what gives.

>Anyone who follows it and is not a Russian propagandists knows Russia has lost.

>humiliating

>Embarrassing

Because Bakhmut has already served it purpose for months, to delay the advance of Russian troops to build defenses behind it. The fact it’s held out this long is an embarrassment

>embarrassment

>Embarrassing

https://i.imgur.com/brQHONi.jpg

>Your damage control is why people on other boards make fun of /k
lol no. Everyone laughs at 4chan (you) for being a bunch schizo retards who hooked their horse to wrong wagon, for no reason other than pure contrarianism, and now refuse to back down at of stubborn autism.
>Russia is tasked with liberating the entire territory of the DPR
Yeah. "Liberating". Not because they tried to conquer the entirety of Ukraine only to get their shit slapped back.
>would somehow be embarrassing for the invader.
It is embarrassing. Just as Hostomel was embarrassing. Just as Moskva was embarrassing. Just as the 40km convoy was embarrassing. Just as this entire war has been one big, giant embarrassment for Russia.
>You are a joke.
The only joke is that you vatniks somehow still think that anyone takes you clowns and circus a country seriously.

>It is embarrassing. Just as Hostomel was embarrassing. Just as Moskva was embarrassing. Just as the 40km convoy was embarrassing. Just as this entire war has been one big, giant embarrassment for Russia.
It's funny how in the middle of a war, all one side can think about embarrassment, and humiliation. Neither are military factors, or objectives. I guess Russia is supposed to pack up and leave from embarrassment?

The definition of pyrrhic victory is best defined by the battle of bakhmut and mariupol. Whats up with russia and them making obvious strategic fuck ups?

>The definition of pyrrhic victory is best defined by the battle of bakhmut and mariupol.
Interesting how Russia manages successive pyrrhic victories.

Some chuds and the NAFO founder explain in this 2 minute video. They are trying to use humor as a weapon lol

nice gaslighting you fucking gay. have a nice day

>muh optics
obvious leftist gay. Go back.

>debate me!
No. You redbit tourists are so fucking transparent and pathetic.

>projecting this hard

>nafo chud out of responses, only left with “no you”

PrepHole is such shit now that they send the B squad trannies

When did I defend them, gay? All I said is being mindbroken by a group of trannies to the point of strawmanning is funny. Not even defending them because they are gays, like you.

>projecting this hard

Never claimed that

Says the one that is trying to strawman.

You tards were calling yourselves that up until last September when someone figured out how ridiculous it made you trannies look

Are my knuckles bloody from crushing the skull of some freakshow? No? Then I guess not.

I don't speak fairy and have zero idea what this psychobabble means

Lol, trannies mad. No, I will not go harass upstanding gay folk on your behalf. It's funny how they find you just as creepy as I do.

>larping
if I'm larping then it's super weird that my dick smells like butt

Post (1) example

>he can't

What?

Post (1) example of this magical place calling themselves Nafo, bonus if its not satire

i accept your concession

I am a nazi

Twitter and social media are not a representation of everyone. This is exactly how misinterpretation of election results in both 2016 and 2020 happened. Because people assume social media support is automatically a representation for all.

Twitter represents a significant amount, but not all. And twitter is not the only social media platform.

>I guess Russia is supposed to pack up and leave from embarrassment?
It would be the best decision they could make right now.

>more dead goblins
>more dead orcs
Sounds like a win-win to me

Why would Ukraine risk capturing bakhmut after its been captured? Thats a good way to strain your forces. Do you know how much resources it takes to seige and take over a city?

>shuts down negotiations because fuck Russia
>gets ass kicked by Russia
I'm a victim. Give me money!

Then just force them out. You kill or injure the robber that invades your house. Are you going to let someone invade your house and rape your wife as an exchange for peace?

Either way you're at their mercy.

>at their mercy
You fight back to retain your land, property and culture. The robber is there to steal that, so you fight back. Are you this much of a cuck to just let people waltz in to your home, rape your wife and steal your belongings in exchange for peace? Mext time someone invades your home, don't fucking bother fighting back.

Yes, russians are invading and are suprised to see a form of resistance.

>b-but
If someone invades your home, you're automatically the victim. You have all rights to defend your property and land from unlawful invaders.

Russian invasion of Ukraine is not justified by any means, retard.

Mostly, yes

Then just force them out. You kill or injure the robber that invades your house. Are you going to let someone invade your house and rape your wife as an exchange for peace?

An option to force someone out is always on the table.

No evidences to support this. Majority of none military deaths were associated with mines, why do you morons keep spreading this?

So not a single human life lost? based
>the west giving Ukraine cold war leftovers is destroying the collation of Russia, India, Iran, North Korea, and Israel while scaring China out of invading Taiwan
double based