Pick One

It is 1986 and the Cold War kicks off, you are an Infantryman in the US Army and after months of hard fighting it finally comes time to clear out Berlin. During your time on the front line you managed to capture an East German paratroopers MPI AKS-74N and associated equipment, the question is do you use your M16A2 to clear out the Urban hellscape that is the old Soviet block apartment buildings or do you use the shorter more maneuverable AK.

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    I'l stay with the M16A2. Probably not the most popular take, but i will stay with the less-optimal weapon for sake of uniformity and familiarity with the weapon system. Picking up enemy gear is not generally advisable as it might be boobytrapped and it might make you prone to 'friendly' fire. Back in Fallujah the marines had to make some creative alterations to how they normally used their rifles while clearing houses, but they managed.

  2. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Give me a G3.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Based

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        >ptr
        El oh el

  3. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    I probably use the M16, because my issued pouches fit M16 mags. Sure the AK74 might be more suitable for the immediate circumstances, but if I carry that then I've got to lug around the M16 as well so its just an added burden either way.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      You don't have to carry the M16 with you it's just one or the other and you captured an East German chest rig off the dead guy.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        >East German chest rig
        homie are you trying to commit suicide by friendly fire here?

  4. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    I ship the ak 74 back home in pieces.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      only proper answer ITT. If your grandchildren don't inherit an entire VDV squad's worth of weapons was it really worth it all?

  5. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >after months of hard fighting
    Trick question, I am hallucinating triumphantly clearing Berlin as I drift in and out of consciousness 14 hours after the start of WW3, dying from ARS in the ruins of some remote farm house in what remains of Germany.
    I pick the M16 which is shooting out eagles and lazer beams for some reason.

  6. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    The A2 every day. Wire stock cheek welds are unbelievably cancerous.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah, I was between the East German wire folder and a Russian triangle folder kinda wish I went with the latter for this scenario.

  7. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    what kind of stupid question is this
    you stick with the gun that your side uses rather than the one the enemy uses

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      That's not how things work in my video games. I get to choose what gear I use instead of licking the boots of some moron general who thinks they know whats' best for me

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      It could be a life or death decision not to take the weapon that's a little more optimal for the scenario you're in.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah having logistics compatibility, operating familiarity (assuming I am a US soldier in 1986), being the rifle which won't get me chewed out by my superiors, and not having a muzzle report which will get me mistaken for an enemy combatant isn't a "little more optimal", it's fricking a lot more optimal

  8. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Your scenario is dogshit anon. There's a "correct" answer and an "I am a dribbling moron" answer, it's not a matter of opinion.

  9. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    I’ll take the M16 just to make sure I don’t get hit by friendly fire

  10. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    5.45 has no advantage over 5.56 and you're risking fratricide by using the enemy's weapon.

    >It is a little shorter for room clearing
    Considering it is 1980s the M3 grease gun is still available.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Considering it is 1980s the M3 grease gun is still available.
      and 45 aarp won't destroy your hearing like 223 in a room will

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        >and 45 aarp won't destroy your hearing like 223 in a room will
        It'll still give you a day-long deafness and a week-long EEEEEEEEEE
        >dipshit buddy ND'd his 1911 right next to me in the drinking shed

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Drinking shed
          Hell yeah. Wish I had one of those.

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            Here's the trick: it's just a normal shed with normal shed things, a window, and a heater

            >drinking shed
            is that what you tell the wife goes on in there?

            It's none of her damn business what goes on in there. Picrel

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              is that deer ok?

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          >drinking shed
          is that what you tell the wife goes on in there?

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        >and 45 aarp won't destroy your hearing like 223 in a room will
        It's not going to be making you deaf and neither will 5.56.

  11. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Using a captured weapon is rarely a good idea.
    Anyways, the stock-extended AKS-74 is only 2 inches shorter than an M16A2, so no real difference in maneuverability.
    The wire stock AKs are better tanker weapons though.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Really? Warsaw length stocks are more than an inch and a half shorter than the A2 stock is, plus the 4 inch barrel difference.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Literally go look up the overall length for both.

  12. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    This scenario is beyond moronic. Using captured enemy equipment is only viable if
    >your country has captured enough arms and ammo to keep you supplied and is willing to do so
    >you're only using it extremely temporarily and can keep replenishing ammo off dead enemies
    >enemy supplies keep coming in while friendly supplies are not and yoi can reliably replenish from captured supplies or dead enemies
    You're opening yourself up to friendly fire and if you're too unfamiliar with the system you're in for a world of hurt when the weapon malfunctions and/or when you need to clean it
    The russians have been boobytrapping dropped magazines with toepopper mines in Ukraine for example, because both sides use AKs it's tempting for the Ukrainians to pick these up and they get their fingers blown clean off if they decide to pick them up

  13. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    AK74 is a better gun
    but the ridiculous way you framed this question belongs in >>>PrepHole or >>>/tg/

  14. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Hmmmmmmm...Now where have I seen 20 inch M16s being used in brutal urban hellscapes, before?

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Hmmmmmmmm

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/i5rH5aP.jpg

      Hmmmmmmmm

      Yet they were totally replaced by M4s. People cleared rooms with M1 Garands, it doesn’t make them the best choice for it.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        The choice is between an m16a2 and some piece of shit homosexual wire stock AK LITERAL TRASH.

        Try to stay on topic.

  15. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    M16. That AK wire stock are garbage.

  16. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    I'd just use the one I'm more familiar with, all that shit like weight and length are going to make so little difference as to be nullified by having endless training on the other gun, unless you're a gun fanatic who has used both types extensively. Send the AK home as a keepsake, use the M16.
    No chance of calling in some fire support instead? Give them a salvo of artillery before moving in? That'll make more difference than a shorter gun.

  17. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    People who obsess over room clearing tactics are the lamest most pathetic looser on the internet, more pathetic than freaks that cum on toys in jars or stick pencils up their dicks
    frick you Op get your gay ass video game brain outa here

  18. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    the only people who would ever choose a rifle with a folding wire stock are certified noguns

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      I've never had any issues with my tantal, is there something significantly worse about the other wire stocks?

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        put a real stock on it and you'll know
        >t. tantal owner

  19. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Frankly if we're talking about brutal urban fighting and clearing buildings room-by-room in Berlin then I'm much less concerned about my rifle choice than I am about securing a large and steady supply of grenades to fling around corners and through doorways; sheltering civilians be damned

  20. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    In 1986 a US Army Infantrymen would almost certainly be rocking an M16A1. The Army had only recently adopted the M16A2 and most units would still have the A1 into the early 1990s.

    Also sound was very important in target recognition back then since radios weren't as widespread as they are today. Using an enemy weapon would put you at higher risk of getting killed by your own side.

  21. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    MP5
    >what abou-
    MP5
    >but-
    MP5
    I will not elaborate

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >MP5
      >against flak jackets
      Ooooooooooooooof

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        >doesn't train to only make headshots
        Never gonna unlock all the camo's. Sad

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          >not rocking the skorpion
          Hardcore mode is a completely different mode
          >AK with rapid fire
          I've had people accuse me of hacking.

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            It just now occurred to me that there's an alternate timeline where WW3 popped off and rear echelon dudes would've been using skorpions to fight off breakthroughs of guys with actual rifles. Kindakek

  22. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    M16A2. The only time that you should pick up enemy weapons is that you are completely out of ammunition, at the time plate armor wasn't a concern so dumping a lot of rounds center mass wasn't needed, and 3 round burst is unjustly hated due to (ironically) lack of training.

  23. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    FAL

  24. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Not using heck of a shotgun to clear rooms in Berlin like it's 1945
    Time is a flat circle

  25. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    MP5 or barring that as Uzi. SMGs would be ideal.

  26. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Your scenario is clearly weighted in the M16's favor. Let's do one without the worry of friendly fire and ammo availability.
    East German AK74 or M16A2 in a cave fight against Goblin Slayer-type goblins? You get a basic combat load, Cold War period correct webbing, and a bayonet for both.

  27. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    M14

  28. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Para FAL.
    It's sex. No other reason.

  29. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >1980s Cold War scenario

  30. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    /qa/ won

  31. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *