>passes extreme NATO torture tests with flying colors better than any other service pistol
>my firing pin and retaining roll pin were reduced to dust (on this and my rami) within 300 rounds and mild dry fire, this is apparently a very common issue
Wtf, they can't both be true
as another p01 owner cz is full of shit and i had small parts breakages well before their claimed parts life
Both of you are lying SUCK Sour shills
>1911 fires over 6000 rounds without a misfire for military trials
Should have just gone with what John Moses Browning decided was peak firearm design.
I should've just bought a fricking glock 19
This is why I shit on Springfield XD's. The striker retaining pin isn't hard enough to handle dry fire. I thought it was a meme and drove the pin out. In two fricking pieces. Striker was fine tho, but I contacted SA and they sent me two. So i dunno. Maybe just accept that if it has that kind of pin/striker retention, you need to use snapcaps. Snapcaps are consumables also, you only get so many hits.
>XD
Gaiagays need to leave now
Maple Story friends can stay, right?
>I should've just bought a Sig P226
*ftfy
1911 enthusiasts will tell you they made them differently back then and the knowledge of how to do it right has been lost.
I think it was just a lot of hand-fitting compared w/ modern manufacturing techniques. The gun design needed adapted for automation probably.
The problem is tighter specs. The 1911 was designed to be hand fit, yes, but with looser tolerances than they are currently made to. Ever held one of the service pistols? They've got more play than your current production gun. As usual, competition shooters were trying to squeeze out every last drop of accuracy, and made the gun super tight at the cost of reliability. Then it became the standard and sloppy 1911's were a sign of being poor.
TWO WORLD WARS
SIMPLE AS
______________________________________________
-Sent from my Huawei P20 using Tapatalk
Army MOS 92S, 1997-1998
Honorably discharged, and awarded Purple Heart for cholesterol-induced stroke
M16? More like MATTEL TRASH
M14? Now that's a MAN'S RIFLE
Got a complaint? Register it by kissing my ass
Proud father of two ex-Marine sons who died defending America's freedom in Ukraine
Personal donations to Ukraine to date: $25,983.36
The thin blue line... because the Democrats are hiding the rest of the paint
All Russians are devil loving communists; FACT
I've dry fired my CZ-75B a few thousand times now and it all seems intact
I'll let you know if it fires when I can find a range out here (there are a couple of good old boy clubs but I don't know any members directly)
>dry fired my CZ-75B a few thousand times now and it all seems intact
>I'll let you know if it fires when I can find a range
At this point just pre-order a replacement, worst case you've got a replacement ready.
This has pissed me off and I can neither confirm nor deny my next course of action
Beretta 92 and Makarov chads win again.
>small part breakage
what's that?
>laughs in USP
>$1200 Tupperware with $50 mags that's frickhuge and relatively low cap
No thank you
>relatively low cap
Yeah 17 and 24 round .45 pistol mags for the USP aren’t industry leading in capacity or anything.
Black person, there's 24 and 30 round glock mags for $20 A pop,
The HK mags are $50+, and the largest capacity (other than promag, and extensions) is 17.
Cope and seethe that you fell for the HK meme.
What's the point of having a mag capacity of 33 rounds if your Glock jams after two shots?
>he fell for the HK meme AND the fuddy-five meme
My brother actually has a USP. Will fingerfrick it soon.
Though I have to say, my Mak and Beretta were dirt cheap and have been unshakingly reliable.
CZ simultaneously makes some of the most rugged firearms on the market yet have chinesium tier breakages.
Never seen anyone in Europe complain about their CZ guns. I'm beginning to suspect CZ-USA is up to no good.
>none of the citizens who either can't have a gun, or if they get one, can only realistically put 100 rounds through it a year, and euro police and military forced to carry it with no other options or ability to use anything else don't seem to complain.
>or if they get one, can only realistically put 100 rounds through it a year
lmao
>jam-o-matic made of fragile parts
>shills always mention this mysterious "nato test" and never post source
>need to pay some random cajun bubba for a part that doesn't break
The absolute state of CZ
Revolverchads win again.
when i first got into guns i went on reddit to see what handgun to get and they said the cz 75b is the best by far
I remeber one of the larger training Academies keeps track, and they said the CZs had the highest failure percentage of any guns that come through.
“Extreme NATO torture test” … yeah ok sure what ever you want to believe.
At most they were torturing CZ’s bottom line to save money. Milspec doesn’t mean what it should, or what’s really being implied.
Got pictures?
$50 per nude.
I like how it wasn't NATO testing at all and CZ just announced Czech police testing the P-01 and the P-01 getting its NSN in the same press release.
>replace two small pins
>???
Lol. No it didn't homosexual or you'd show your gun instead of some stock image. Gun is fine.
Well, supposedly the reason is that it's an inbetween transition gun from old to new, yeah it has Double Action, but it's really a single action gun with double action as bonus in emergencies.
I do wonder if the Browning High Power has similar issues since the CZ75 is just that with some modern features.
It's based on relatively old design and construction practices which are robust against round count and environmental wear BUT specifically aren't designed to be fired without a cartridge to react against the firing assembly. I don't know why people think this is a complex topic.
>passes extreme NATO torture tests with flying colors better than any other service pistol
source: my ass
>dogshit mushy trigger with a longer reset than a DA revolver
>rattlecan-quality finish
>no optics-ready model in 2022
Sold a P-01 after owning it for years. Can't trust a pistol that has broken several roll pins and a slide stop. Wanted to love it because it looks sick and checks all the boxes on my list. But I didn't account for the cheap-ass materials CZ makes their handguns out of (even their $3k+ competition models). As a legitimate tool for defensive use, you're better off with a Glock or anything else.