I loved his face of mild consternation.
That's some advanced vranyo. >the government knows it's lying >you know they're lying >they know you know they're lying but can't do shit about that >now the dictator realized on camera they're lying to him but can't do shit about that because it's day 483 of the 3-day military operation and he's committed way too far to pull out
>cum/chug/gers actually believe there's a Maginot tier first, second, etc "line of defense" and not just hastily dug trenches and sparse minefields for Russian troops to retreat behind
Why is russia fighting so much before their defensive lines? If you have some epic bannanerheim-line build up doesnt it make sense to fight there? I get harassing the approach TO the line but at some point you gotta retreat to make use of defenses otherwise you take casualties for no reason.
I imagine those 300 ossetians could have made use of a big defensive line to hold.
(Unless of course the ukrainians ARE fighting the first defensive line and this secret super first line in the back is just cope, but that would mean russia is lying and when have they ever done that?)
We are now approaching month eight of Russia's successful blitz on Vuhldevar, in which they have already legally, morally and technically totally annexed it, and only a stubborn Ukrainian occupying force delusionally claim otherwise
They also nailed 1000+ Bradleys, 500 HIMARS, 200 F-16s secretly transferred as well as a NATO Submarine squad in the Black Sea. They also killed two and a half Zelenskyys.
>There are practically no fundamental distinctions between fighting against strategic drones like the US Reaper (MQ-9) or Turkey’s operational-tactical Bayraktar-TB and counteraction to crewed aircraft. The elimination of more than 130 Bayraktars, delivered to Ukraine during the whole period of the special military operation, is clear evidence of this.
- General Andrey Demin, describing how Russia has shot down 130 of Ukraine's 50 Bayraktar drones by the end of 2022
▪Pyatikhatki, Harvest, the northern part of Rabotino - under the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Huge chunks have been given to Ukraine.
▪The APU is located above Tokmak in the village of Sadovoye, and God forbid, if this is some kind of single group of 50-100 people.
▪There is no control, no weapons, no ammunition, soldiers write letters that they need shells, anti-tank weapons, grenades, armor-piercing cartridges.
▪On the sly from everyone, so that not a single military commander gets there, any information is shut up. Armed forces of Ukraine go towards Molochny Liman. If they go there, most of the territories captured during the so-called. "SVO" will be returned.
▪AFU begin to cross the Dnieper. The first DRGs appear in Naked Pristan. All this is completely hidden from everyone.
▪Russia will wake up one day and find out that Crimea has already been handed over to the Ukrainians.
▪All this happens against the backdrop of losses. A soldier cannot fight when there is a 50-60% shortage of personnel in the unit.
▪Everything that the leadership of "SVO" does is juggling facts in order to send beautiful reports to Moscow.
▪ "SVO" is carried out at the cost of the total destruction of the army. For what? So that some Shvonder gets a marshal's star. For him to paint himself on the frescoes in the temple of the Ministry of Defense.
>Is this legit?
No. P:ic related is though, typical Ukrainian losses are 1/2 to 1.3rd of Russian losses. Before you dispute this consider that they have western satellite and signals intelligence as well as more accurate and longer range artillery and more highly trained and experienced troops that are better equipped with everything from western donated body armour, camo, medical gear, body armour, rifles, optics, thermal and night vision as well as fighting on their own clay so its not that fricking surprising either.
yes, there's countless videos of fields covered with vatnik corpses and columns of their worthless armor destroyed, that's why it's not hard to believe those, unlike russian claims with a grainy vid of some farm equipment being blown up.
This is while attacking defensive positions,isn't it though? Previous metrics showed that an attacker needed roughly 2x the number of defenders to break a position. That Ukies only need 1.2 to 1.3x the number of defenders is pretty amazing, and it's even more amazing that the ratio was skewed even more heavily in the Ukies favor when they were defending.
What gets lost in the conversation anytime that nominal ratio is brought up is how force-multipliers are supposed to play a role in the "neutralization" of the ratio's seemingly strict parameters.
If two belligerents of equal or near-equal capability are at war, the ratio holds. If one opponent has the requisite force-multipliers (solid ISR, C3, well-practiced interoperability and combined-arms warfare, dominant air power and effective SEAD/DEAD, responsive, long-range, and precise artillery, etc.), then that belligerent can begin to seriously bite away at the constraints of the ratio.
This basic thought process and theory is *THE* bedrock that the US and NATO's Cold War doctrine seemed to settle on by around the late 60s/early 70s, with militaries that reflected these ideas being fielded in earnest by the 80s in major Western nations, with the rest catching up throughout the 90s and early 00s.
All this to say the Ukrainians have, at the barest fricking minimum, enough force multipliers to *consistently* overperform "against the ratio," basically (not uniformly, and definitely not overtly during the opening months through to around Several Donuts). Since then, with Bakhmut and Vulhedar being particularly high profile examples, the Ukrainians have been doing pretty decently as the nominal attacker:defender ratio goes.
This offensive will be a challenge to keep it up, because on the attack, some of those multipliers count for a hell of a lot more than others, and with no real air power, shit's gonna be sporty, to say the least.
Well. We do have vatnik tgram going apeshit, prighozin larping as a revolutionary, and girkin going somehow even more blackpilled than usual. So the hints are all there.
Russian estimations of enemy losses are based on the following principle:
If a Russian commander loses X pieces of equipment and Y number of soldiers during an operation, then he will report X+a and Y+b losses for the enemy, where X>>a>0 and Y>>b>0.
As such, Russian estimations of enemy losses are very useful for estimating Russian losses. If they report the Ukrainians losing 245 tanks and 678 armored vehicles, then the Russians will have lost 200+ tanks and 600+ armored vehicles.
Russia pays for every destroyed equipment, every non combat homosexual wants money too, that's how russian statistics are done. Not only oligarchy stealing, whole country are built on vranyo, stealing and ass fricking everyone
How could they not when all of HATO is fighting there?!?!
Why is russia fighting so much before their defensive lines? If you have some epic bannanerheim-line build up doesnt it make sense to fight there? I get harassing the approach TO the line but at some point you gotta retreat to make use of defenses otherwise you take casualties for no reason.
I imagine those 300 ossetians could have made use of a big defensive line to hold.
(Unless of course the ukrainians ARE fighting the first defensive line and this secret super first line in the back is just cope, but that would mean russia is lying and when have they ever done that?)
300 tanks, 800 bikes, 30 schools, 9,000 Bradleys and we're almost up to 4 Himars destroyed. Russian victory is assured, three days remain until total holol death and Z flies above the capital of Kiev.
the less moronic authoritarians understand the need for sources of negative feedback that operate outside the normal power structure. strelkov is connected, powerless, and will hang if he ever sets foot outside russia.
Because he's a mouth-/chess piece for certain Powers That Be, namely higher-up FSB spooks and their oligarch backers. Poopin encourages these kind of blocs to an extent in order to create a stalemate (keeping each too weak to threaten him) between them by favoring one bloc one day and another the next.
I don't think he's a mouth-piece exactly but there's probably silovik types who helped put Putin in power and maybe they give Girkin some cover but nothing that Girkin says is going to get back to Putin, who would report it?
At most, it's an outlet for venting as you or another anon said. Maybe even a honey-pot if people agree with him too loudly in public.
>approximately 678
kek
>45 678
Lmao, I did not even notice it.
>we anally obliterated 123 aircraft, 456 tanks, 789 infantry
kek
Holy shit! Whats next?
>1 Zelensky
>245 tanks
>678 armored vehicles
>9 patriot systems
>0 Russian soldiers lost
And a partridge on a pear tree.
Boris Johnsohn and his SAS retinue
I loved his face of mild consternation.
That's some advanced vranyo.
>the government knows it's lying
>you know they're lying
>they know you know they're lying but can't do shit about that
>now the dictator realized on camera they're lying to him but can't do shit about that because it's day 483 of the 3-day military operation and he's committed way too far to pull out
day 3600 of the 24 hour hohol anti terror operation in donbas
>counter offensive lost 300 armored vehicles and over 20k troops so far
>hasn't even breached the first line of defense
sorry sweetie, no refunds on all those expensive western super weapons
It is afraid.
Good morning sir
Thank you for doing the needful.
ZOKA, the nafo guy.
>defeated enemy continues its cowardly advance
This sure sounds less like objective reporting and more like a last-ditch attempt to boost "morlae".
>cum/chug/gers actually believe there's a Maginot tier first, second, etc "line of defense" and not just hastily dug trenches and sparse minefields for Russian troops to retreat behind
why is russia putting their artillery in front of their defensive lines?
Why is russia fighting so much before their defensive lines? If you have some epic bannanerheim-line build up doesnt it make sense to fight there? I get harassing the approach TO the line but at some point you gotta retreat to make use of defenses otherwise you take casualties for no reason.
I imagine those 300 ossetians could have made use of a big defensive line to hold.
(Unless of course the ukrainians ARE fighting the first defensive line and this secret super first line in the back is just cope, but that would mean russia is lying and when have they ever done that?)
Are you sure it wasn't 30,000 armored vehicles and 6 gorillion troops?
I heard it was three whole Space Marine legions
One of them was the Iron Hands so nothing of value was lost.
>Zoka
That homie is one bad day away from telling Putin to kill himself again. This guy spent all of September 2022 behind a locked account.
Didn't Vugledar fall?
Stop making fun of us immediately, comrade
It's not funny
I don't get it
We are now approaching month eight of Russia's successful blitz on Vuhldevar, in which they have already legally, morally and technically totally annexed it, and only a stubborn Ukrainian occupying force delusionally claim otherwise
How'd you do, sir?
>morlae
>counter offensive lost 300 armored vehicles
LMAO, those numbers keep shrinking and shrinking. Why are you contradicting the Supreme Monke?
Also, may we see them?
>Zoka
Didn't he promise to become ukieshill if *something that happened* happens?
>no refunds on all those expensive western super weapons
That's ok, they weren't paying for them anyway.
Lmao, what has the KGB been telling big monke?
He is the KGB, Anon
When it comes to Russian official figures, half it and apply it to them. This is how they get their numbers in the first place.
i can believe that those are the numbers putin was told
>245 Leo2 already destroyed
Hoholsisters... it's over.
Did they even get that many shipped to them?
I think they got around 70.
We're countin since the beginning of 2023 or from the start of this frick frick circus of a war??
We're countin the tanks destroyed in dreams
>said putin
https://twitter.com/wartranslated/status/1671528539655491585
Is this legit?
Yes, if you consider farm equipment to be tanks and armored vehicles.
>our dudes nailed 245 dudes and approximately 678 twinks
fixed
H-hot!
is more realistic than
>got the biggest motherfricker they could to stand in the doorway with a mak drawn
guess the previous incident really got to them
For me it's the guy wearing an Uruk Hai hand over his wiener to the boot camp medical.
That's a power move.
>no Boris Johnsons
Why do Russians suck so bad at war?
You know its bad when everybody including the audience they're trying to 'convince' ain't convinced by anything the Russian government says.
He is literally a 1.55m manlet, wearing heels. I don't give a frick what he says.
Lol, trading 10 modernized T-72s for 1 old rustbucket of a T-72 that is used as morale support.
They also nailed 1000+ Bradleys, 500 HIMARS, 200 F-16s secretly transferred as well as a NATO Submarine squad in the Black Sea. They also killed two and a half Zelenskyys.
>They also killed two and a half Zelenskyys.
Shit that kind of loss requires at least another $trillion in aid right fellow westerners?
Any good non-shitpost examples of Russia doing this? I've actually got one to contribute
https://topwar.ru/206087-ukrainskie-voennye-prakticheski-perestali-primenjat-bpla-bayraktar.html
>There are practically no fundamental distinctions between fighting against strategic drones like the US Reaper (MQ-9) or Turkey’s operational-tactical Bayraktar-TB and counteraction to crewed aircraft. The elimination of more than 130 Bayraktars, delivered to Ukraine during the whole period of the special military operation, is clear evidence of this.
- General Andrey Demin, describing how Russia has shot down 130 of Ukraine's 50 Bayraktar drones by the end of 2022
>Turkish lawnmower = reaper
Good coping.
Half as good for 1/50th of the price is a pretty decent ratio tbqh
Try 1/10th as good, also, after a certain point, you get diminishing returns with money invested not necessarily matching effectiveness 1:1.
Prigogine:
▪Pyatikhatki, Harvest, the northern part of Rabotino - under the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Huge chunks have been given to Ukraine.
▪The APU is located above Tokmak in the village of Sadovoye, and God forbid, if this is some kind of single group of 50-100 people.
▪There is no control, no weapons, no ammunition, soldiers write letters that they need shells, anti-tank weapons, grenades, armor-piercing cartridges.
▪On the sly from everyone, so that not a single military commander gets there, any information is shut up. Armed forces of Ukraine go towards Molochny Liman. If they go there, most of the territories captured during the so-called. "SVO" will be returned.
▪AFU begin to cross the Dnieper. The first DRGs appear in Naked Pristan. All this is completely hidden from everyone.
▪Russia will wake up one day and find out that Crimea has already been handed over to the Ukrainians.
▪All this happens against the backdrop of losses. A soldier cannot fight when there is a 50-60% shortage of personnel in the unit.
▪Everything that the leadership of "SVO" does is juggling facts in order to send beautiful reports to Moscow.
▪ "SVO" is carried out at the cost of the total destruction of the army. For what? So that some Shvonder gets a marshal's star. For him to paint himself on the frescoes in the temple of the Ministry of Defense.
Full audio https://t.me/ToBeOr_Official/12290
>The APU is located above Tokmak in the village of Sadovoye, and God forbid, if this is some kind of single group of 50-100 people.
wut
When did Russua lose Orkhive?
Nobody knows where trench with SoF was.
>the northern part of Rabotino
>Sadovoye
Enormous if veracious.
Over the course of a year and 4 months? Yeah, that's believable.
Otherwise, pure science fiction.
Ukies are so efficient that they repaired the same 5 tanks that keep getting destroyed 49 times
our air forces have shot down three pig dog galactic republic SDs, 152 y-wings, and 25 landing craft
>"t-series"
GOOD MORNING SARS
>Frick it, just skip over the 3, it will seem legit Da?
Putin is being ridiculed in the public. They are going to kill him within 6 months. Screencap this.
>*2*45678**
dude was likely teaching his kids or grandkids numbers over the weekend
Why is Putin talking like a totally gnarly surfer from 80's California?
>Is this legit?
No. P:ic related is though, typical Ukrainian losses are 1/2 to 1.3rd of Russian losses. Before you dispute this consider that they have western satellite and signals intelligence as well as more accurate and longer range artillery and more highly trained and experienced troops that are better equipped with everything from western donated body armour, camo, medical gear, body armour, rifles, optics, thermal and night vision as well as fighting on their own clay so its not that fricking surprising either.
>No. Pic related is though
Can we see these losses?
yes, there's countless videos of fields covered with vatnik corpses and columns of their worthless armor destroyed, that's why it's not hard to believe those, unlike russian claims with a grainy vid of some farm equipment being blown up.
I personally made a photo of each dead zigger. Give me your email and I'll send them to you.
This is while attacking defensive positions,isn't it though? Previous metrics showed that an attacker needed roughly 2x the number of defenders to break a position. That Ukies only need 1.2 to 1.3x the number of defenders is pretty amazing, and it's even more amazing that the ratio was skewed even more heavily in the Ukies favor when they were defending.
What gets lost in the conversation anytime that nominal ratio is brought up is how force-multipliers are supposed to play a role in the "neutralization" of the ratio's seemingly strict parameters.
If two belligerents of equal or near-equal capability are at war, the ratio holds. If one opponent has the requisite force-multipliers (solid ISR, C3, well-practiced interoperability and combined-arms warfare, dominant air power and effective SEAD/DEAD, responsive, long-range, and precise artillery, etc.), then that belligerent can begin to seriously bite away at the constraints of the ratio.
This basic thought process and theory is *THE* bedrock that the US and NATO's Cold War doctrine seemed to settle on by around the late 60s/early 70s, with militaries that reflected these ideas being fielded in earnest by the 80s in major Western nations, with the rest catching up throughout the 90s and early 00s.
All this to say the Ukrainians have, at the barest fricking minimum, enough force multipliers to *consistently* overperform "against the ratio," basically (not uniformly, and definitely not overtly during the opening months through to around Several Donuts). Since then, with Bakhmut and Vulhedar being particularly high profile examples, the Ukrainians have been doing pretty decently as the nominal attacker:defender ratio goes.
This offensive will be a challenge to keep it up, because on the attack, some of those multipliers count for a hell of a lot more than others, and with no real air power, shit's gonna be sporty, to say the least.
Dont forget that ukies are still under strict OPSEC
They could be absolutely steamrolling the vatniks and we wouldnt know about it untill weeks later
We would know from all the Russians begging for support on telegram and Girkin making suicide attempts.
Well. We do have vatnik tgram going apeshit, prighozin larping as a revolutionary, and girkin going somehow even more blackpilled than usual. So the hints are all there.
I think they're trying to force russians to commit their reserves first. That's why the attacks are neither very strong, nor merely a probing.
What if russia already exhausted their reserves, but it was so pitiful that the ukrainans actually believe its a ruse, and not total collapse?
This is the true difficulty in fighting the Russian. They are the best liars in the world.
They should have hours of drone footage of over dozen distinct burning columns, or are they waiting a year to reveal those as well
Russian estimations of enemy losses are based on the following principle:
If a Russian commander loses X pieces of equipment and Y number of soldiers during an operation, then he will report X+a and Y+b losses for the enemy, where X>>a>0 and Y>>b>0.
As such, Russian estimations of enemy losses are very useful for estimating Russian losses. If they report the Ukrainians losing 245 tanks and 678 armored vehicles, then the Russians will have lost 200+ tanks and 600+ armored vehicles.
Russia pays for every destroyed equipment, every non combat homosexual wants money too, that's how russian statistics are done. Not only oligarchy stealing, whole country are built on vranyo, stealing and ass fricking everyone
What is she blinking in Morse code?
>My husband died in Ukraine and I'm too tied up with work to be there for our child
>Cut the line, he is off his meds.
>Cut. The. Line.
Who's the femboy with the skyrim badge in the back?
They don't have 245 tanks to begin with. It's another lie
How could they not when all of HATO is fighting there?!?!
Our glorious banan?! Lie?! No way!!!!!111
I heard they also killed 90,1234 soldiers
I'd hit to be perfectly clear.
Which one tho?
I know Ukrain managed to lose 11 of the leopard 2 tanks in one day
Like the expensive ones
300 tanks, 800 bikes, 30 schools, 9,000 Bradleys and we're almost up to 4 Himars destroyed. Russian victory is assured, three days remain until total holol death and Z flies above the capital of Kiev.
He's addressing the big monke himself, instead of pretending that he's talking about someone else
Man, how does Strelkov always get away with saying stuff like this? If anyone else dared to voice such opinions, they'd get instadefenestrated.
secret services-tier kompromat on various higher-ups, if he dies/disappears he pulls them down with him.
the less moronic authoritarians understand the need for sources of negative feedback that operate outside the normal power structure. strelkov is connected, powerless, and will hang if he ever sets foot outside russia.
Because he's a mouth-/chess piece for certain Powers That Be, namely higher-up FSB spooks and their oligarch backers. Poopin encourages these kind of blocs to an extent in order to create a stalemate (keeping each too weak to threaten him) between them by favoring one bloc one day and another the next.
I don't think he's a mouth-piece exactly but there's probably silovik types who helped put Putin in power and maybe they give Girkin some cover but nothing that Girkin says is going to get back to Putin, who would report it?
At most, it's an outlet for venting as you or another anon said. Maybe even a honey-pot if people agree with him too loudly in public.
>war
Oh no, he said the naughty word! That's 10 years in the gulags.
Those rules only apply to little people in Russia.
I think Girkin has been saying that nearly all along.
I'd it were true, they'd be blasting pics/videos of it instead of the same like 8 tanks/IFVs from 100000 angles
He's a mad man!