New image of the J-15T prototype

Once the J-15T enters service wouldn't It be the largest/heaviest/longest range CATOBAR carrier fighter since the F-14?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Kino

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/ai6SiWD.jpg

      Once the J-15T enters service wouldn't It be the largest/heaviest/longest range CATOBAR carrier fighter since the F-14?

      It seems to be a newer variant with a split front landing gear door, compared to the original one

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/Ydallx9.jpg

      >the JUST prototype

      >homosexual mutts immediately attempt to derail chink threads with their rampant stupidity: case 12535436
      just gtfo you dumb gays.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Wow, you really should find a way to get tortured to death.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          you're a worthless homosexual and you should kys asap.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        动态网自由门 天安門 天安门 法輪功 李洪志 Free Tibet 六四天安門事件 The Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 天安門大屠殺 The Tiananmen Square Massacre 反右派鬥爭 The Anti-Rightist Struggle 大躍進政策 The Great Leap Forward 文化大革命 The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution 人權 Human Rights 民運 Democratization 自由 Freedom 獨立 Independence 多黨制 Multi-party system 台灣 臺灣 Taiwan Formosa 中華民國 Republic of China 西藏 土伯特 唐古特 Tibet 達賴喇嘛 Dalai Lama 法輪功 Falun Dafa 新疆維吾爾自治區 The Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region 諾貝爾和平獎 Nobel Peace Prize 劉暁波 Liu Xiaobo 民主 言論 思想 反共 反革命 抗議 運動 騷亂 暴亂 騷擾 擾亂 抗暴 平反 維權 示威游行 李洪志 法輪大法 大法弟子 強制斷種 強制堕胎 民族淨化 人體實驗 肅清 胡耀邦 趙紫陽 魏京生 王丹 還政於民 和平演變 激流中國 北京之春 大紀元時報 九評論共産黨 獨裁 專制 壓制 統一 監視 鎮壓 迫害 侵略 掠奪 破壞 拷問 屠殺 活摘器官 誘拐 買賣人口 遊進 走私 毒品 賣淫 春畫 賭博 六合彩 天安門 天安门 法輪功 李洪志 Winnie the Pooh 劉曉波动态网自由门

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Do mutts really think these offends the Chinese?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            It isn't meant to offend, but to trigger a interruption on the internet connection of any Chinese using this website, since most of those words are a big no no there.
            At least in theory.
            I think mainland chiners can still reach PrepHole without VPNs, and it should work against those. but many of them use VPNs to bypass internet restrictions, so those words don't do anything for them.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              You’re moronic.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I know that this is a try to mimic the chinck 5.7 post but isn't funny like that one.

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >the JUST prototype

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Isn't it the J-15B? Or am i missing something?

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    CGTN made a documentary about their carrier ops. Since it's state media it's probably propagantized to hell, but interesting nonethless.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Why use english on your Chinese aircraft?

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >longest range
    How much more range can you really get out of a Flanker air frame? I'm guessing they changed the engines out but i mean, what makes this any different from a regular J-15?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Isn't the Su-33 like 2500km range?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        combat radius or ferry range?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Ferry range.
          You also mentioned they changed the engines so we don't really know how fuel efficient they are, although the first units used the AL-31, but i guess at this point they replace them too.

          Lots of variables.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      When taking off from STOBAR the Flankers had to make compromises with how much fuel/payload they could carry. Being launched from CATOBAR means that It can take off with full tank and payload.

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Can we agree it's a cute looking airframe?

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Once the J-15T is mass ploduced, we will bling an end to westelnels in no time.

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It's Su-33.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      A Su-33 which will take off from CATOBAR (Type 003 carrier), so It can carry the same payload as if It's taking off from an airbase unlike the current J15/Su-33 which needs to make compromises in fuel/payload in order to take off from a STOBAR carrier

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      a Su-33 that doesn't suck, you mean.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Fricking this, thirdies please make anything else but another flanker

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      *Su-27

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >CATOBAR carrier fighter
    >China
    They actually have a vessel capable of launching this?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yes: https://youtu.be/d_qCldb9eJU

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I said "capable", not "theoretically capable in the future once they figure out how to make their emals rails and coils stop melting so they can actually install them on a vessel".

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Just as the Ford is theoretically capable of launching F35, but has to use the f18 because it can't?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            The Ford can, and does, launch SHs right now. The Type 003 has yet to even install their launch system.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Can't you read?
              I said Ford can't launch F35.
              It's because the AC catapult can't handle the weight

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >It's because the AC catapult can't handle the weight
                Source? Sounds like Chinese cope because PLAN EMALS are still stuck on land trying to figure out why their shit doesn't work for my than 30 pulls.
                F-18 is only 1k lbs less than F-35 and it launches and recovers just fine. An additional thousand pounds isn't going to be the straw that breaks the launchers back.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                > https://www.cbsnews.com/news/uss-gerald-r-ford-navy-deployment-aircraft-carrier-atlantic/
                For someone who is screeching so hard, you certainly know very little.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Obviously you cannot read, which is unfortunate.
                Nowhere in that article does it mention the catapult not being strong enough for launch.
                It is because the Ford doesn't yet have the capability for arrest of the F-35, as mentioned here

                >Ford can launch and arrest every aircraft the US currently fields except the newest one, because it cannot recover the f-35
                >giant sea dragon or whatever loong name they chose for this one can't launch or recover literally anything because it keeps turning it's launchers into liquid copper and they can't figure out why
                This is just about the stupidest comparison you could have made.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I never said it was too heavy. I’m not that guy. I simply pointed out to you that the ford is not cleared to operate the f35c, something you did not believe.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                The Ford can launch 5 wet tanker configured fa-18s, which adds about 15000lbs to the base weight of the aircraft.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >Ford can launch and arrest every aircraft the US currently fields except the newest one, because it cannot recover the f-35
            >giant sea dragon or whatever loong name they chose for this one can't launch or recover literally anything because it keeps turning it's launchers into liquid copper and they can't figure out why
            This is just about the stupidest comparison you could have made.

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    No one is worried about Flankers

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    USS Ronald Reagan, USS America, and USS Tripoli all deployed with F-35s to the Phillipine Sea and the South China Sea in August of 2022 you absolute mong.

    [...]

    Die mad you salty b***h.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      America and tripoli aren’t carriers you dumb shit.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >wah wah wah it's an assault ship not a carrier
        KYS. They're still each toting 30 F-35s so close to Guangdong they could make two trips from the city center and back without touching down.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >I’m a dumb frick who doesn’t understand the difference between the f35b and f35c yet i must continue to shitpost to justify my existence
          KEK
          E
          K

          Btw, the rondald Reagan doesn’t operate f35s and the only reason you think it does is because you googled it and saw the USNI headline but your literacy skills are too low for an accurate assessment.

          Like I said, the Carl Vinson is the only USN carrier operating F35Cs operationally.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          They can't launch AWACS planes and F-35s have abysmal ready times

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          we're talking about catapult launched aircrafts here, bud.

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Chinkshits has a proven record of being more reliable than any amerimutt shit ever hoped to be.

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Chinkshits has a proven record of being more reliable than any amerimutt shit ever hoped to be

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Do mutts really think these offends the Chinese?

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    TLULY IMPLESSIVE

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Sources? lol
    I can't be bothered to find the reports, if they even still exist at this point. CN MOD has a habit of wiping critical articles once they're discovered externally.
    If this thread is up long enough, hopefully some other anon can provide screencaps or archive, whatever.
    The short of it is they get about 30 launches out of their land-based EMALS systems before they encounter problems with coils shorting out, rendering the entire system useless.

    Why do you think they launched the Fujian without having the EMALS installed?
    They can't, because if they do, there would be a demand to see them in operation, and the fact is they don't fricking work.
    It's been almost a year since the launch, and there hasn't been a SINGLE takeoff from the Fujian yet.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      > Why do you think they launched the Fujian without having the EMALS installed?
      Gerald r ford was also launched without working catapults. First aircraft launch for the ford happend 4 years after the ship was launched.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >The short of it is they get about 30 launches out of their land-based EMALS systems before they encounter problems with coils shorting out, rendering the entire system useless.

      Chingchong catapults doesnt use coils, their EMALS is DC, not AC. And a DC catapult is known in other words as a "railgun". It is an exceptional simple machine that has only 1 moving part and you dont need any fancy electric switching, you just pour DC current into it.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Lol, i'm sure this is as simple and original as you describe and changnese have figured this out before everyone else by accident.

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >all the anti-chink and pro-chink posts got removed

    Is it really just one guy fricking with those threads?

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    What motivates ameritards to derail every single thread on chink equipment with their rampant stupidity? It’s all so tiresome.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *