It isn't meant to offend, but to trigger a interruption on the internet connection of any Chinese using this website, since most of those words are a big no no there.
At least in theory.
I think mainland chiners can still reach PrepHole without VPNs, and it should work against those. but many of them use VPNs to bypass internet restrictions, so those words don't do anything for them.
>longest range
How much more range can you really get out of a Flanker air frame? I'm guessing they changed the engines out but i mean, what makes this any different from a regular J-15?
Ferry range.
You also mentioned they changed the engines so we don't really know how fuel efficient they are, although the first units used the AL-31, but i guess at this point they replace them too.
When taking off from STOBAR the Flankers had to make compromises with how much fuel/payload they could carry. Being launched from CATOBAR means that It can take off with full tank and payload.
A Su-33 which will take off from CATOBAR (Type 003 carrier), so It can carry the same payload as if It's taking off from an airbase unlike the current J15/Su-33 which needs to make compromises in fuel/payload in order to take off from a STOBAR carrier
I said "capable", not "theoretically capable in the future once they figure out how to make their emals rails and coils stop melting so they can actually install them on a vessel".
Can't you read?
I said Ford can't launch F35.
It's because the AC catapult can't handle the weight
1 year ago
Anonymous
>It's because the AC catapult can't handle the weight
Source? Sounds like Chinese cope because PLAN EMALS are still stuck on land trying to figure out why their shit doesn't work for my than 30 pulls.
F-18 is only 1k lbs less than F-35 and it launches and recovers just fine. An additional thousand pounds isn't going to be the straw that breaks the launchers back.
1 year ago
Anonymous
> https://www.cbsnews.com/news/uss-gerald-r-ford-navy-deployment-aircraft-carrier-atlantic/
For someone who is screeching so hard, you certainly know very little.
1 year ago
Anonymous
Obviously you cannot read, which is unfortunate.
Nowhere in that article does it mention the catapult not being strong enough for launch.
It is because the Ford doesn't yet have the capability for arrest of the F-35, as mentioned here
>Ford can launch and arrest every aircraft the US currently fields except the newest one, because it cannot recover the f-35 >giant sea dragon or whatever loong name they chose for this one can't launch or recover literally anything because it keeps turning it's launchers into liquid copper and they can't figure out why
This is just about the stupidest comparison you could have made.
1 year ago
Anonymous
I never said it was too heavy. I’m not that guy. I simply pointed out to you that the ford is not cleared to operate the f35c, something you did not believe.
1 year ago
Anonymous
The Ford can launch 5 wet tanker configured fa-18s, which adds about 15000lbs to the base weight of the aircraft.
>Ford can launch and arrest every aircraft the US currently fields except the newest one, because it cannot recover the f-35 >giant sea dragon or whatever loong name they chose for this one can't launch or recover literally anything because it keeps turning it's launchers into liquid copper and they can't figure out why
This is just about the stupidest comparison you could have made.
USS Ronald Reagan, USS America, and USS Tripoli all deployed with F-35s to the Phillipine Sea and the South China Sea in August of 2022 you absolute mong.
>wah wah wah it's an assault ship not a carrier
KYS. They're still each toting 30 F-35s so close to Guangdong they could make two trips from the city center and back without touching down.
>I’m a dumb frick who doesn’t understand the difference between the f35b and f35c yet i must continue to shitpost to justify my existence
KEK
E
K
Btw, the rondald Reagan doesn’t operate f35s and the only reason you think it does is because you googled it and saw the USNI headline but your literacy skills are too low for an accurate assessment.
Like I said, the Carl Vinson is the only USN carrier operating F35Cs operationally.
>Sources? lol
I can't be bothered to find the reports, if they even still exist at this point. CN MOD has a habit of wiping critical articles once they're discovered externally.
If this thread is up long enough, hopefully some other anon can provide screencaps or archive, whatever.
The short of it is they get about 30 launches out of their land-based EMALS systems before they encounter problems with coils shorting out, rendering the entire system useless.
Why do you think they launched the Fujian without having the EMALS installed?
They can't, because if they do, there would be a demand to see them in operation, and the fact is they don't fricking work.
It's been almost a year since the launch, and there hasn't been a SINGLE takeoff from the Fujian yet.
> Why do you think they launched the Fujian without having the EMALS installed?
Gerald r ford was also launched without working catapults. First aircraft launch for the ford happend 4 years after the ship was launched.
>The short of it is they get about 30 launches out of their land-based EMALS systems before they encounter problems with coils shorting out, rendering the entire system useless.
Chingchong catapults doesnt use coils, their EMALS is DC, not AC. And a DC catapult is known in other words as a "railgun". It is an exceptional simple machine that has only 1 moving part and you dont need any fancy electric switching, you just pour DC current into it.
Kino
It seems to be a newer variant with a split front landing gear door, compared to the original one
>homosexual mutts immediately attempt to derail chink threads with their rampant stupidity: case 12535436
just gtfo you dumb gays.
Wow, you really should find a way to get tortured to death.
you're a worthless homosexual and you should kys asap.
动态网自由门 天安門 天安门 法輪功 李洪志 Free Tibet 六四天安門事件 The Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 天安門大屠殺 The Tiananmen Square Massacre 反右派鬥爭 The Anti-Rightist Struggle 大躍進政策 The Great Leap Forward 文化大革命 The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution 人權 Human Rights 民運 Democratization 自由 Freedom 獨立 Independence 多黨制 Multi-party system 台灣 臺灣 Taiwan Formosa 中華民國 Republic of China 西藏 土伯特 唐古特 Tibet 達賴喇嘛 Dalai Lama 法輪功 Falun Dafa 新疆維吾爾自治區 The Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region 諾貝爾和平獎 Nobel Peace Prize 劉暁波 Liu Xiaobo 民主 言論 思想 反共 反革命 抗議 運動 騷亂 暴亂 騷擾 擾亂 抗暴 平反 維權 示威游行 李洪志 法輪大法 大法弟子 強制斷種 強制堕胎 民族淨化 人體實驗 肅清 胡耀邦 趙紫陽 魏京生 王丹 還政於民 和平演變 激流中國 北京之春 大紀元時報 九評論共産黨 獨裁 專制 壓制 統一 監視 鎮壓 迫害 侵略 掠奪 破壞 拷問 屠殺 活摘器官 誘拐 買賣人口 遊進 走私 毒品 賣淫 春畫 賭博 六合彩 天安門 天安门 法輪功 李洪志 Winnie the Pooh 劉曉波动态网自由门
Do mutts really think these offends the Chinese?
It isn't meant to offend, but to trigger a interruption on the internet connection of any Chinese using this website, since most of those words are a big no no there.
At least in theory.
I think mainland chiners can still reach PrepHole without VPNs, and it should work against those. but many of them use VPNs to bypass internet restrictions, so those words don't do anything for them.
You’re moronic.
I know that this is a try to mimic the chinck 5.7 post but isn't funny like that one.
>the JUST prototype
Isn't it the J-15B? Or am i missing something?
CGTN made a documentary about their carrier ops. Since it's state media it's probably propagantized to hell, but interesting nonethless.
Why use english on your Chinese aircraft?
>longest range
How much more range can you really get out of a Flanker air frame? I'm guessing they changed the engines out but i mean, what makes this any different from a regular J-15?
Isn't the Su-33 like 2500km range?
combat radius or ferry range?
Ferry range.
You also mentioned they changed the engines so we don't really know how fuel efficient they are, although the first units used the AL-31, but i guess at this point they replace them too.
Lots of variables.
When taking off from STOBAR the Flankers had to make compromises with how much fuel/payload they could carry. Being launched from CATOBAR means that It can take off with full tank and payload.
Can we agree it's a cute looking airframe?
Once the J-15T is mass ploduced, we will bling an end to westelnels in no time.
It's Su-33.
A Su-33 which will take off from CATOBAR (Type 003 carrier), so It can carry the same payload as if It's taking off from an airbase unlike the current J15/Su-33 which needs to make compromises in fuel/payload in order to take off from a STOBAR carrier
a Su-33 that doesn't suck, you mean.
Fricking this, thirdies please make anything else but another flanker
*Su-27
>CATOBAR carrier fighter
>China
They actually have a vessel capable of launching this?
Yes: https://youtu.be/d_qCldb9eJU
I said "capable", not "theoretically capable in the future once they figure out how to make their emals rails and coils stop melting so they can actually install them on a vessel".
Just as the Ford is theoretically capable of launching F35, but has to use the f18 because it can't?
The Ford can, and does, launch SHs right now. The Type 003 has yet to even install their launch system.
Can't you read?
I said Ford can't launch F35.
It's because the AC catapult can't handle the weight
>It's because the AC catapult can't handle the weight
Source? Sounds like Chinese cope because PLAN EMALS are still stuck on land trying to figure out why their shit doesn't work for my than 30 pulls.
F-18 is only 1k lbs less than F-35 and it launches and recovers just fine. An additional thousand pounds isn't going to be the straw that breaks the launchers back.
> https://www.cbsnews.com/news/uss-gerald-r-ford-navy-deployment-aircraft-carrier-atlantic/
For someone who is screeching so hard, you certainly know very little.
Obviously you cannot read, which is unfortunate.
Nowhere in that article does it mention the catapult not being strong enough for launch.
It is because the Ford doesn't yet have the capability for arrest of the F-35, as mentioned here
I never said it was too heavy. I’m not that guy. I simply pointed out to you that the ford is not cleared to operate the f35c, something you did not believe.
The Ford can launch 5 wet tanker configured fa-18s, which adds about 15000lbs to the base weight of the aircraft.
>Ford can launch and arrest every aircraft the US currently fields except the newest one, because it cannot recover the f-35
>giant sea dragon or whatever loong name they chose for this one can't launch or recover literally anything because it keeps turning it's launchers into liquid copper and they can't figure out why
This is just about the stupidest comparison you could have made.
No one is worried about Flankers
USS Ronald Reagan, USS America, and USS Tripoli all deployed with F-35s to the Phillipine Sea and the South China Sea in August of 2022 you absolute mong.
Die mad you salty b***h.
America and tripoli aren’t carriers you dumb shit.
>wah wah wah it's an assault ship not a carrier
KYS. They're still each toting 30 F-35s so close to Guangdong they could make two trips from the city center and back without touching down.
>I’m a dumb frick who doesn’t understand the difference between the f35b and f35c yet i must continue to shitpost to justify my existence
KEK
E
K
Btw, the rondald Reagan doesn’t operate f35s and the only reason you think it does is because you googled it and saw the USNI headline but your literacy skills are too low for an accurate assessment.
Like I said, the Carl Vinson is the only USN carrier operating F35Cs operationally.
They can't launch AWACS planes and F-35s have abysmal ready times
we're talking about catapult launched aircrafts here, bud.
>Chinkshits has a proven record of being more reliable than any amerimutt shit ever hoped to be.
>Chinkshits has a proven record of being more reliable than any amerimutt shit ever hoped to be
TLULY IMPLESSIVE
>Sources? lol
I can't be bothered to find the reports, if they even still exist at this point. CN MOD has a habit of wiping critical articles once they're discovered externally.
If this thread is up long enough, hopefully some other anon can provide screencaps or archive, whatever.
The short of it is they get about 30 launches out of their land-based EMALS systems before they encounter problems with coils shorting out, rendering the entire system useless.
Why do you think they launched the Fujian without having the EMALS installed?
They can't, because if they do, there would be a demand to see them in operation, and the fact is they don't fricking work.
It's been almost a year since the launch, and there hasn't been a SINGLE takeoff from the Fujian yet.
> Why do you think they launched the Fujian without having the EMALS installed?
Gerald r ford was also launched without working catapults. First aircraft launch for the ford happend 4 years after the ship was launched.
>The short of it is they get about 30 launches out of their land-based EMALS systems before they encounter problems with coils shorting out, rendering the entire system useless.
Chingchong catapults doesnt use coils, their EMALS is DC, not AC. And a DC catapult is known in other words as a "railgun". It is an exceptional simple machine that has only 1 moving part and you dont need any fancy electric switching, you just pour DC current into it.
Lol, i'm sure this is as simple and original as you describe and changnese have figured this out before everyone else by accident.
>all the anti-chink and pro-chink posts got removed
Is it really just one guy fricking with those threads?
What motivates ameritards to derail every single thread on chink equipment with their rampant stupidity? It’s all so tiresome.