NEW GOODIES FROM THE BURGERS. >HIMARS ammunition. >16 105mm light howitzers and 36,000 artillery rounds

NEW GOODIES FROM THE BURGERS
>HIMARS ammunition
>16 105mm light howitzers and 36,000 artillery rounds
1>5 High-endurance ScanEagle surveillance drones
>Mine clearing & mine resistant vehicles
>Additional HARM (High Speed AnitRadiar Missiles)
>1,000 TOW missiles (anti-tank)
>1,000 Javelin anti-tank missiles
>2,000 Anti-armor rounds
https://nitter.it/jseldin/status/1560654906897625088
TOW missiles are on the menu, bois.

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >TOW
    Worse than Stugna

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      How so?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        don't acknowledge him

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Wire-guided
        >Optically-tracked
        Stugna has a huge advantage of having an ability of being tracked from a safe spot up to 50 meters from the launcher

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          How hard would it be to retrofit a stugna type system to a TOW (Genuine question)?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Not difficult at all. It's just a remotely actuated launcher with the video feed from the optics going down a cable to a terminal.
            That said, I don't think the Ukrainians have the capacity to do that retrofit right now, but I hope that the rest of the world comes to realize how nice remotely operated launchers are.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          That's an advantage yes but it flys in that weird corkscrew trajectory that lowers accuracy because it's guidance system isn't very advanced and the remote controlled optical guidance is choppy. You can see the operators having trouble to stay on target.
          The TOW exposes the operator but is more precise and allows better tracking.
          Not being exposed isn't a "huge" advantage at all. Unless the enemy is constantly scanning the sorroundings with high tech thermals he will never find out where the missile came from because he's busy getting the frick out of there after the guy in front of him exploded out of nowhere.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Not being exposed isn't a "huge" advantage at all.
            It absolutely is, Stugmaballs allows operator to set up a position and basically just look for the enemy vehicles from safety of some lowlands or trench, TOW is used after spotting the target, which you can argue is more relevant when using on offensive, yet even then it's being mogged by Javelin or mortar

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Safety is not that much of an issue since it's not likely that you will be spotted in your ambush position, even after you fired the weapon.
              If we talk about militaries that are actually competent and scout ahead for such AT positions with drones, gunships or spotters with thermals, it's another story.
              As I said: it's an advantage, but not a "huge" one.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >If we talk about militaries that are actually competent and scout ahead for such AT positions with drones
                Stop underestimating Russia mate, they have a lot of drones like orlans that can get up to 100km inside enemy territory
                Im telling you info that i heard basically from 1st hand from a Ukrainian anti tank platoon guy who's been using "Stugnas", "Corsairs", and before that Soviet "Mulat"
                Basically said that Stugna is better just because of that one feature

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >Safety is not that much of an issue since it's not likely that you will be spotted in your ambush position
                thermals, heard about them?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                only an issue when fighting first world militaries

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                French sold thermals to Russia, a lot of them

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                STOP
                UNDERESTIMATING
                RUSSIA
                MATE

                I'm not underestimating them, we just haven't seen widespread introduction of thermals in russian vehicles or infanty (yet, to be fair). But i also dont believe that r*ssia sent its bad equipment first and is only now starting to take off the gloves. Their best equipment has been destroyed and that also means that most likely everything with thermals equipped and in working order is now gone

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                STOP
                UNDERESTIMATING
                RUSSIA
                MATE

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                by any chance are you an armchair warlord, or even the man himself?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      yes, yes, however consider this counter-point:
      having a TOW is better than nothing at all

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Better than nothing my guy.

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >36,000 artillery rounds
    That'll last about, lessee, about two weeks or less.

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Did Ukraine get Sweaty Ben? Or is that his cousin, Sweaty Bensky?

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Any confirmation of F16 training/gifting yet?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Nah mate, that's too provocative

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Nah mate, that's too provocative

      They're training on F-15's, F-16's and A-10's for some god-awful reason if you believe the journos who saw it.

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    ABSOLUTE UNIT

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >16 105mm light howitzers
    wow the collective West are really trying with this latest AIDS package lel

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >15 High-endurance ScanEagle surveillance drones

    happy 20th birthday!

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    ITT concern trolling about free goodies

    >when does it end?

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    but you do understand that the US can't provide soviet artillery munitions but it can provide TOWs?

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Ukraine needs to de-escalate NOW.

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Why did the Euros stop with shipments? It used to be they were competing to see who was helping more.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Afaik UK is building a frigate for Ukraine and some missile boats. Poland has given most of what they can. Rest is just drips and drabs.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Countries willing to give away their old soviet stuff already did so, countries that still have some soviet stuff would be left with nothing, and Ukraine is already in phase when they have the more modern army than their initial suppliers.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *