>most tank kills of any IFV in history (and more than most tanks)
>most praised IFV in terms of crew protection
>only IFV in history to take a tank round to the hull and not be penned
ITT we kneel and say sorry to the Bradley
>most tank kills of any IFV in history (and more than most tanks). >most praised IFV in terms of crew protection
>40 mins >20 mins >2 mins
puting and zelensky thank you all for your good fight on the fronts of PrepHolekivski
we're winning though.
It’s as Dugin says: He who controls four of the changs controls the chakra of the Ying & Yang and with it the universe.
Did /k/ larpers seriously hate Bradley's up to now? sad. I knew they were badass since 2005
I knew their worth against rushit tech since fricking Desert Storm.
has TOW,
integration with he gunnery worked,
basically the only time west fought tanks since ww2 is desert storm.
what is the disscussion even about?
The virgin every other IFV in existence vs the chadley
sorry bradley
>old /k/
>literally almost entirely Americans
>hated American shit
lel
way too obvious bait
he only stated facts though
No.
>B-but sometimes it doesn't explode
Compelling argument but what have they actually achieve outside of depleting Russian mine stockpiles
Spbp
Deleted the Russians first line of defense
>inb4 we retreated and made a new first line
kek Bradley scores another mind kill
what you're seeing here is self-comforting behaviour, the vatBlack person lies to himself by saying "w-we'll they mostly do e-explode" when visual evidence has shown this is a complete lie and only a tiny proportion of them so far have not been recoverable.
he will shun from his mind any comparisons to any other vehicles and pretend the bradley is the only IFV on earth, so that he doesn't have to fear comparing it to the numerous thirdie machines he's been shilling for the last decade that pretty much never project their crew from anything and have fuel in the fricking backdoor.
all around a very interesting example of psychological self-comforting. this is how immature human brains cope with a reality their worldview is not equipped to deal with.
perhaps when he becomes older than 20, he will learn how to accept reality and feel okay with things not always going how he wants them to go.
>that pretty much never project their crew
That's where you're wrong, kiddo
that's not a person, look at the size of it compared to the vehicles. if that were a human they would be over 10ft tall
Holy frick, they actually got him.
>Bradley gets destroyed
>Crew comfortably walks away and even gives their trusted companion a final pat
I would say "BMP zisterz what's our response" but I don't even want to ironically be a fan of that shitbox.
You have to go back.
It would appear that the Bradley is a rising new contender for turret toss champion, that’s gotta be at least a 20-30 yard chuck.
About to be dethroned by BMP-3 dude
Nothing packs as much heat as this little piece of tech
It's over once Russia starts fighting for real.
Are you fricking moronic?
I know sarcasm is hard to pick up on over text, but come on.
CV90 bros I’m close to suicide
I'm sorry Bradley
General Bradley is probably the greatest general of WW2. Absolutely spanked and did it without being a moron like Patton or MacArthur.
Patton was completely correct about re-arming the Germans and marching on moscow. MacArthur has a cool pipe and wanted to nuke China so he’s ok in my book, even if he sucked as a general
This is a variation of the same pictures from last month. Why don’t you post some other ones. How mad are you that the Bradley ate a tank main gun roung
>Abu Musa al-Keevi
Why do they all look like that?
Thats like leaving your woman to be raped and burned to death by russians or captured and sold into sex slavery by gypsies. Good man gong back and saving IFV
I kneel, Bradley-sama..
>worst modern ifv in service
>expensive
>death trap with poor armor protection even when introduced
>really offers nothing over other ifv's
yeah
Everyone with experience around the Bradley says the opposite. Cope harder.
it also hasnt been used in any real wars that werent against third world countries. just saying, it was never a good ifv and everyone knows that.
Except you're obviously clueless and have no idea what you're talking about.
compare it to something like the cv90 though.
The M2 Bradley is 13 years older than the CV90. The M2 Bradley out performs any IFV from it's prime, can easily knock out modern MBTs, has incredible crew survivability and has wide selection of advanced ammunition that allows it to engage targets in a diverse and highly effective manner.
>can easily knock out modern MBTs
>easily
yeah no, thats dependent on many things but the bradley does what every other ifv does: can mount an atgm.
>has incredible crew survivability
thin armor even for its day
Armor thickness isn't the only factor in crew survivability and is far from it, this isn't WW2. The design and layout of the armor leads to essentially unrivaled survivability from an IFV.
Maybe don't get all your knowledge from Warthunder in the future.
>The design and layout of the armor leads to essentially unrivaled survivability from an IFV.
imagine believing this. bradley armor could be penetrated from the front by 30mm. the layout of the bradley isnt much different than other ifv's and the specs are worse.
Imagine ignoring the testimony of crew members and the numerous times it has been proven in battle. But surely you know better, surely.
> numerous times it has been proven in battle
> proven
Half destroyed, half damaged in its first battles. No other battles since then. Waiting to be replenished, hence the praise. If the "survivors" say it's shit - no more armor. Easy choice, no?
Most tank kills out of any ground vehicle in the gulf. Now it’s proving itself protecting troops and killing Russians. What’s not to love
le specs(implying)
First off, modern Bradley's are rated to a classified degree somewhere above the stanag rating for 30mm, secondly, you're fricking moronic there's current combat statistics showing you're wrong, ones from the gulf war showing that your wrong, and shitloads of crew testimonial that says you're wrong.
>Classified degree
My fricking ass, we get a good look of the Bradley's armor every time the engine access panel is opened up. The front glacis of the Bradley is 1" RHA + 1.5" Al 5083
Anything that can pen a Bradley pretty much pens every IFV
Most IFV didn't have integrated ATGM until recently
They either didn't have one or just mounted a man portable launcher on top of the turret to be fired manually by the vehicle commander
Look up amx-10p, warrior, murder even cv90
Bradley had an integrated double TOW launcher since 1980
Cv90 that doesn't have ATGM on most models?
That Cv90?
>it also hasnt been used in any real wars that werent against third world countries.
Russia = third world country confirmed.
they dont seem to be doing so well against russia
Because it hit some mines?
>asnt been used in any real wars that werent against third world countries.
By that logic there are no good IFVs. There hasn’t been a war between first world nations since WWII.
>25mm
roru
rmao
METAL BAWKESSSSSSSSS
Underrated toast
>M113
>Bradley
>AICV
>Turretless Bradley
The optimal shape and design for IFVs and APCs...
amen
The FOOLS!!! THE COWARDS!!!!!!
>one month old pic
hey at least you cropped it different this time
the brad is a big pile of shit, but it's the best big pile of shit out there
t. two tours in iraq in one
What is the alternative, moron? Ukraine doesn't have sufficient air force to just go over the mines. It will be a slow methodical grind until F-16s show up or until ziggers run out of arty.
Bradley scores tank kill on camera
https://twitter.com/yarosgreb/status/1676900544386826241?s=46&t=vNUOI7d7yJFqHoqKrRS_XQ
>https://twitter.com/yarosgreb/status/1676900544386826241?s=46&t=vNUOI7d7yJFqHoqKrRS_XQ
WEBM.
/k/ino
>you lived to see Bradleys plinking soviet shitboxes with TOWs firsthand
Thanks Russia
You are a worthless moron.
He's worth less than the wad his father shot, because at least that protein could have been swallowed
Same as this guy
Turns out strapping an ATGM to a tank was a good call.
>only IFV in history to take a tank round to the hull and not be penned
That's not true. On 26 February 1991 a Challenger 1 from SCOTS DG hit a Warrior from 1 STAFFS with a HESH shell. Nobody inside was injured but one dismount outside the IFV was hit by shrapnel.
HESH is more likely to break the hull of an IFV than the 3VOF round the Bradley was hit with
Citation needed shitbird
May I see detailed photographs or a video with the crew detailing those events. That’s what we have from the Bradley tank strike. Is this going to be the same as the 70 rpg challenger.
Yeah dude because we were all uploading tiktok videos in 1991
You'll have to settle for a parliamentary report in to friendly fire incidents during Op Granby
https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/written-answers/1991/jul/24/friendly-fire-incidents
>During the conflict there were a further three incidents involving friendly fire in which British service men were injured.
>The first of these occurred shortly after 1100 local time on 26 February. An officer attached to 1 Staffords received shrapnel wounds when a Warrior vehicle was attacked by a Challenger tank of the Scots Dragoon Guards. Personnel from 1 Staffords were guarding prisoners of war when a Challenger tank from the Scots Dragoon Guards began to engage nearby Iraqi armoured vehicles, which later turned out to be abandoned. The tank mistakenly fired on the vehicles of 1 Staffords, hitting the Warrior, before moving off. Visibility at the time was reduced by a dust storm to about 400 m. All the Staffords' vehicles were marked with the inverted V device and carried fluorescent orange panels. The four personnel in the Warrior were unharmed, but shrapnel injured an officer who had dismounted from another vehicle. Once the mistake was realised, the Scots Dragoon Guards returned to the scene and evacuated the officer to hospital.
OP delivers, thank you
Was it a direct hit?
Yes. Hit it square on the side at a joint where two screens of the up-armoured sideskirts meet
Buckled the up-armour plates good, but the vehicle hull behind it was untouched
No wonder HESH hasn’t been adopted by anyone else
That's more of an indictment of HESH being fricking garbage then anything else. Delay-fuzed 125mm HE would have probably absolutely fricked it
This speaks to the ineffectiveness of the HESH round and sheds light on why no one wants to use it
Besides the British
Irrelevant. The British use a lot of underperforming gear.
ur irrelevant wienerbag
British army lacks funding and has mediocre equipment
They still use the same L85/SA80 in the year of our lord 2023
out of all the garbage equipment the British Army is stuck with the L85 really doesn’t even make the list anymore. The A1 had a kind-of deserved shitty reputation but the A2 and A3 are pretty damn good, at least on par performance wise with international contemporaries.
I think you misunderstood
The quality of L85 is irrelevant to me
When I stated "the same"
I didn't mean same design
I mean the same guns
L85A2 and L85A3 are just upgrades of the very same L85A1 from the the 1980s
It's not like say the M16
Where the ar-15, m-16, m-16a1, car-15, m-16a2, m-4, mk18 were all the same basic design BUT they weren't the same rifles recycled for 40 yrs
The A2 and A3 are fine. They aren’t “pretty damn good”.
Brits
Bunch of posers and liars and big talkers
That’s a Gavin, not a Bradley
go suck James Burton's dick some more gavingay, and remember to rub the balls this time.
It's a FAMAS, you tourist.
>haha cope with the fact that Bradleys can go through successive Russian minefields
okay
Proofs? Don’t post the day 1 offensive image again, most of those were recovered
I just saw a video of a Bradley killing a Russian armored vehicle using its TOW. You saw it too
Okay, so 25 bradleys for 1 russian armored vehicle. A splendid record!
There’s at least 3 Bradley videos of it killing Russian vehicles and only 9 confirmed Bradley’s destroyed. You’re purposely ignoring the damaged ones that got repaired and trying to pretend that 9 destroyed vehicles is a lot for an offensive. It didn’t work. This is what a failed offensive looks like
Do you want to know how we know your skin is shit colored?
A splendid record indeed
>https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_War
3300 tanks and 2100 APCs destroyed. Most by Bradley’s. What Iraq fielded during desert storm was better than what Russia is currently fielding
Should call it the chadley
Russians misreport higher losses. See
for an example of this phenomenon
Bradleys eat T-72s for breakfast.
>After defeating that force, McMaster sent a scout platoon of two M3 Bradleys north to regain contact with Troop G. In doing that the scout platoon encountered another Iraqi tank position of thirteen T-72s. The lightly armored Bradleys, each equipped only with a 25-mm cannon and two TOW missiles, are intended for reconnaissance, not direct engagement with armored tanks. Despite a misfire, and having to reload the launchers in the face of the enemy, the two Bradleys destroyed 5 tanks before help arrived.[7][23]
>INB4 Arabs
They were trained by the Soviets and used Soviet tactics that the Russians still stupidly use.
That’s insane. Even though they were Arabs and using Soviet shitboxes, it’s still 13 vs 2 and the tanks should have better armor
No one said that either. A small number of Bradley’s were lost
see this is why nobody can hold a normal conversation with your ilk, you type like a woman on her period having a temper tantrum. half-cynical, half-subversive.
self-victimizing homosexual.
i could hold more direct conversation with my sister after i accidentally ate her lunch.
eat her box instead
Fake and Gay since that's not a Ratel IFV.
IT WASN'T FRICKING LABELED, EVERYONE KNOWS YOU LABEL YOUR GODDAMNED LUNCH OR AT LEAST WRITE YOUR NAME ON IT!
ching chong
do you label your food AT HOME???
>we keep getting sent into mine fields and blown up
>I get launched into space
>Anyway off I go into the cube
>guy says his IFV has the most tank kills of any IFV in history
>Ask him if it is against a peer adversary or abandoned T-55s in the desert.
>'they are good Armor kills sir'
>Check
>It's all rustbucket Iraqi type-59s buried up to the turret.
>guy says something
>turns out to be true
>I just don’t like it
I mean it puts all these feats into context.
It's like saying Kanye won a basketball game all by himself, while leaving out the fact that it was against disabled kids.
It doesn't change the fact that he won a basketball game all by himself, but it puts it into perspective.
Why did you leave out that’s it’s also killed t-72s
Name an IFV with a more impressive tank killing record
I can’t
Exactly
Well hey, it all works out because T-55's is all Russia has it seems.
Well given that Russia was recently seen sending a train of T-55s to Ukraine, it should work out
>kneel
more like F
Oh are we posting the same images again.
Why don’t they look at all destroyed. Are these the same ones we see towed off by Ukraine in later videos
they got destroyed alright
can't be arsed to look up the video but the front shifted enough that a few days later Russkie soldiers walked freely among the wrecks
this video was made right after they second detachment of Bradlies arrived to rescue potential survivors
they all died along with the rescuers
They got towed away. I can’t believe Russia couldn’t spare a few PGMs or even artillery to take out that cluster. Mistakes like that is why they’re losing
The bottom three in a line end up burning out. The rest got recovered
>They got towed away
frick you, made me look it up
they absolutely didn't get recovered
I’m not downloading that. Post proof if you want to be taken seriously
phoneposting homosexuals
Better than not being able to back up your claims and posting random shit hoping no one would figure it out.
>catbox link
>random shit
you're the newest of newbies
you have to go back
>be shown the proof you asked for
>"wtf i won't open that!"
no way you're doing this for free
man i hope you aren't doing this for free at least
Proof that requires a download to be viewed isn’t accepted here. Just post webm or a link to an unrestricted video
don't you dumb gorilla Black folk have to do a basic computer course before admission?
that's entirely up to your browser settings
killyourself
unironically
>still hasn’t posted proof
Just show us where
Ends up all destroyed and not just 3 of them
Posts one minute apart. This is the same poster
I can only imagine the disturbing video your trying to pass off
When will HBO apologize?
But [IFV that's never seen combat even once] is way better than the Bradley!