>muh warrior honor muh masculinity
War has NEVER EVER been honorable. Any usable advantage was sought. This fantasy of war as a giant duel between square-jawed gentlemen agreeing to terms and conditions is fricking moronic.
>Never ever
It was at a time. moronic? Absolutely but there was a time where lords would gather up their peasantry to have a mass wiener-fight with a neighboring lords peasantry with both of the lords betting some land or resources on the outcome.
The terms and conditions were absolutely a thing in medieval europe.
Landed nobility and royalty did not kill each other. They sent their men and lesser noblemen to kill each other, but even in loss they would remain landed gentry.
Twisted ruthlessness, where they could kill as many civilians they want but not the 'protected class'.
t. bongs on the proliferation of u-boats
t. germoids on the proliferation of shotguns
t. knightoids on the proliferation of crossbows
t. bronzoids on the proliferation of iron
>Modern warfare is gay and unmasculine.
Getting orders from a dude and doing whatever he says has always been gay. Military is as homosexual as it gets since its invention.
pretty anti-semitic of you not to support New Isreal
new israel is called the israeli autonomous oblast
t. The man who's fought in masculine wars and hasn't been a keyboard warrior his whole life.
>muh warrior honor muh masculinity
War has NEVER EVER been honorable. Any usable advantage was sought. This fantasy of war as a giant duel between square-jawed gentlemen agreeing to terms and conditions is fricking moronic.
>Never ever
It was at a time. moronic? Absolutely but there was a time where lords would gather up their peasantry to have a mass wiener-fight with a neighboring lords peasantry with both of the lords betting some land or resources on the outcome.
Until the time of Napoleon a general draft of the commoners wasn’t the norm
The terms and conditions were absolutely a thing in medieval europe.
Landed nobility and royalty did not kill each other. They sent their men and lesser noblemen to kill each other, but even in loss they would remain landed gentry.
Twisted ruthlessness, where they could kill as many civilians they want but not the 'protected class'.
How's that different from modern warfare, where politicians send the peasants to fight each others while a decapitating strike is seen as war crime?
Okay liquid
t. bongs on the proliferation of u-boats
t. germoids on the proliferation of shotguns
t. knightoids on the proliferation of crossbows
t. bronzoids on the proliferation of iron
>-t. neverserved
War is about winning not larping about honor.
At least post the video instead of a picture.
>Masculine: definition: Being a good Dad
The most cushiest of servicemen are infinitely more masculine than you are, even the ones that aren't men.
how come everyone obsessed with masculinity is gay?
as long as zBlack folk end up like this its all smiles
>ID TAGGED SOLDIERS CARRY ID TAGGED GUNS
>Modern warfare is gay and unmasculine.
Getting orders from a dude and doing whatever he says has always been gay. Military is as homosexual as it gets since its invention.