I don't think any of the gentlemen of the 18th century, to whom so much is owed, would find pic related, and its like, agreeable. Behaving like a boorish lout with guns is damaging to the cause. It seems the poor, who are so intent on imitating their dusky counterparts, risk tarnishing the reputation of all gun owners with the same dark brush. If didn't have such a level head, I might think there was some sort of psyop underway to discredit gun owners by promulgating the most obnoxious form of gun culture for the public to consume. inb4 fudd.
They'd be mad poor people are allowed to own weapons.
I think they liked the idea of lower class WASPs having guns.
That's just asking for a Chartist riot or a whiskey rebellion.
WASP
White
Ass
Suburban
POOR
Theres absolutely no way that gun nuts and self defense autists are a new thing.
Considering we founded America, duh.
>REJECT MODERNITY
>RETVRN TO FRILLY SHIRT TIMES
>strutting through the muddy streets of a colonial city
>freshly shined boots
>tail coat flapping in the wind
>shirt to accentuate your fat belly, a sign of massive wealth
>frills of your shirt bouncier than all the normies
>killed a man in a 50 pace duel thirty minutes ago
>on your way to practice your signature with your newest feather quill
>picking up the freshest flintlock technology later from an a saudi travelling merchant
>gf just penned you a sultry letter
feelsgoodman
>the freshest flintlock technology later from an a saudi travelling merchant
lolno, the finest locks came from ingerland and the French invented flintlocks
whatever im meeting me frenchy twirled moustache flintlock merchant as soon as he steps onto the docks. no time to waste i have duels to win and feather quill signatures to write
US President Andrew Jackson participated in up to 103 duels in his lifetime.
Often, his modus operandi was to let his opponent shoot first, because they would be scared and rushed trying to get their shot off first.
After they fired, Jackson would carefully aim at them while they were forced to stand and tearfully accept his accurate return fire by the laws of dueling.
This often didn't work out exactly right, as Jackson would receive many wounds throughout his body, with many of the pistol balls remaining in him until his death.
He had been shot so many times that John Adams said he had so much lead in his body that he "rattled like a bag of marbles".
BTW on his deathbed he said "I have only two regrets: I didn't shoot Henry Clay and I didn't hang John C. Calhoun."
He also cursed Martin Van Buren with a 700lb block of cheese found in a backroom after he left the White House LOL.
>700lb block of cheese found in a backroom
I don't think that was the only wheel of cheese Jackson had in the Whitehouse, there was another wheel over 1000lb which was stored for two years (before being given to the public), the smell permeated the house, so Van Buren had to have the cheese room stripped, sanded, and redecorated.
State sanctioned duels should become a thing again
Don't try to change my mind, you're always wrong
I agree but it should be done with 40mm grenade launchers instead
I shall accept my destiny and die a warrior's death
Elitist wienersucker. Poor people flaunting their guns is a direct strike against tyrants who wish to trample on our freedoms, if guns were only a rich person thing how could you call that a right? It would be a privilege. If rich wienersuckers dictating gun rights there wouldn’t be gun rights, oh I’m sure Soros and Rockefeller and the rest of the WEF wants us to have guns.
>flaunting their guns is a direct strike against tyrants
No, that would be something like ordinary citizens self-organising into community militias. Unloading 60 rounds of ZombieSkullSpliterz™ into a berm is not. Such ineffectual displays are probably comforting to the elite.
> Unloading 60 rounds of ZombieSkullSpliterz™ into a berm is not.
Merely displaying such firepower requires them to send platoon sized elements to enforce their will against a single person
>Such ineffectual displays are probably comforting to the elite.
The most dangerous people in the world are those with some form of power and little to lose.
A hobo with a boxcutter seeing you alone at night is more realistically dangerous than any idealized image of a militia you have.
>oh I’m sure Soros and Rockefeller and the rest of the WEF wants us to have guns
qtard republican not mentioning soros or wef for a day (impossible)
>Leave the billionaire NGOs alone!
Why would the Water Environment Federation care about you owning guns?
I don't care what homosexual leftists (but I repeat myself) think. If you showed a firearms enthusiast of the 18th century an AK-47 he would absolutely love it and probably put some sick baroque furniture and gilding on it for hunting animals such as foxes and the Irish.
He would like the AK, but might not be so hot on the idea of the Irish getting his potatoey digits on it, nor his favorite little black manservant keeping one hanging up behind the door of his shack.
Try actually reading what the Founding Fathers believed. It might surprise you.
I just read it all, you're right, those guys were really into rights for slaves, papists, and women.
Slavery only was permitted to exist because the Southern states all threatened to run back to the crown, and because it was expected to die out within a decade for economic reasons (nobody predicted the cotton gin making slavery profitable again). As for papists and women, where is that part of the Constitution that says the bill of rights doesn't apply to them? Frick off historylet.
This
Suck a wiener Shareblue
The founding fathers didn't envisage a democracy with universal suffrage, and the same goes for their intention for firearms.
>includes paid promotion
you mean to tell me that ads on an app for children are... le cringe?
Jesus you write like a socially awkward dweeb
Well, I can retype it like a Black person if you want, it'll have fewer syllables that way, and maybe that will help you stop being a whiny b***h.
what guns do you own OP?
>I don't think any of the gentlemen of the 18th century, to whom so much is owed
didnt read the rest of your post but i think you should have a nice day
> I don't think any of the gentlemen of the 18th century, to whom so much is owed, would find pic related, and its like, agreeable.
They would not find women rights or right of Black folks to vote agreeable too. Checkmate, commie.
I UNIRONICALLY WANT A 3 FOOT LONG EXTENDED MAG SO I CAN WALK AROUND WITH A 1911 LIKE A GENTLEMAN'S CANE AND THERE'S NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT YOU FRICKING MONGOLOID
>I don't think any of the gentlemen of the 18th century
stopped here, have a nice day immediately
It is plain to see that there are distinct classes of people, and that the lower classes should be not have armaments because they are too stupid.
Mark Twain fricking around
>We had never seen him before. He wore in his belt an old original "Allen" revolver, such as irreverent people called a "pepper-box." Simply drawing the trigger back, wienered and fired the pistol. As the trigger came back, the hammer would begin to rise and the barrel to turn over, and presently down would drop the hammer, and away would speed the ball. To aim along the turning barrel and hit the thing aimed at was a feat which was probably never done with an "Allen" in the world. But George's was a reliable weapon, nevertheless, because, as one of the stage-drivers afterward said, "If she didn't get what she went after, she would fetch something else." And so she did. She went after a deuce of spades nailed against a tree, once, and fetched a mule standing about thirty yards to the left of it. Bemis did not want the mule; but the owner came out with a double-barreled shotgun and persuaded him to buy it, anyhow. It was a cheerful weapon--the "Allen." Sometimes all its six barrels would go off at once, and then there was no safe place in all the region round about, but behind it.
>I don't think any of the gentlemen of the 18th century, to whom so much is owed, would find pic related, and its like, agreeable. Behaving like a boorish lout with guns is damaging to the cause. It seems the poor, who are so intent on imitating their dusky counterparts, risk tarnishing the reputation of all gun owners with the same dark brush. If didn't have such a level head, I might think there was some sort of psyop underway to discredit gun owners by promulgating the most obnoxious form of gun culture for the public to consume.
Low class wiggers detected.
noguns
If they had things their way only the rich would be able to obtain the good stuff, and the poor and middle class would be relegated to jumping through a hundred hoops to get the same or settle with neutered versions of the same gun.
Oh wait...
You talk like a gay and your shit's all moronic
This mentality of 'bad sporting immature image bad', for as long as it existed as the predominant thought, led exclusively to gun control and bans.
>inb4 Fudd
Fudd.