Military implications?

Military implications?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Hersh the geriatric washup was lying to get clicks on his substack
    Shocking, truly.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You mean to tell me the like 90 year old guy that doesn’t leave his apartment and hasn’t been taken seriously for decades WASNT accurate in his reporting for some Indian shitrag?!?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I get the vibe it was less consciously lying and more uncritically regurgitating what his anonymous source fed him because it fit his worldview.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It's exactly the same thing.
        Especially considering the nature of information his "anonymous sources" have been giving him since the 90s.
        Unfortunately, it won't cause any re-examination of the rest of his career.

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    none

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >go to restaurant
    >order your food
    >waiter brings it out
    >*sneeze*
    >waiter drops all your food
    >since you sneezed you caused the food to drop, so you have to pay for it

    that's how moronic you sound like right now

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The ass is truly in the ass now.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >sneeze analogy

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      > *sneeze*
      > waiter drops all your food
      > your foot suddenly explodes
      > american imperialism and nato expansion are to blame

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >go to restaurant
      >order your food
      >waitress brings it out
      >*sneed*
      >*feed*
      >*seed*

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      What's the point of this analogy? It was all an accident?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Don't you hate when HATO ships, Polish and Ukrainian divers, satellites, AWACS and Boris Johnson himself scare you while you're carrying a pipeline bursting charge, and you accidentally drop it right when you're sailing over a pipeline? It's always at the worst time and place, isn't it?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I think he's trying to get across that because the Russians drove by that area on the same day it's implied they destroyed it when they could have just been in the area in general. I think. It's hard to follow what the hell his analogy means.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Hershbros... how could this happen?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      People that old are either easy to trick or dream about their glory days

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        That also explains Douglas MacGregor.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      he seethes incessantly at america.
      basically he's the equivalent of your typical /k/oper and russia

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      imagine riding on a wave of fame for half a century because you uncovered american war crimes. his own brand got to his head.
      it's the same for all the other russaboos like ritter, carlson or the hundreds and thousand of small time.
      also a bit of

      People that old are either easy to trick or dream about their glory days

      you're expected to drop hot shit, to live up to your name in times of crisis

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    https://oalexanderdk.substack.com/p/osint-analysis-six-russian-ships
    Seems to be a part of information.dk's source. Can't read Danish, though, so I don't know if there's a Danish military press release in there as well.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://www.information.dk/indland/2023/04/forsvaret-bekraefter-rusland-specialfartoej-naer-nord-streams-spraengningspunkt?lst_frnt

      >the russian vehicle ss-750 was present near the north stream pipes four days before they were blown up on 26th of september last year. the special vehicle is adapted to do operation underneath the sea and has a mini submarine of the type as-26 priz on board.

      >the danish defence command confirms in an "aktindsigt"(when you send a formal letter to the gov. to get access to documents) that 26 pictures were taken of the russian vessel from a danish patrol boat, in the area east of bornholm on the 22nd of september 2022

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        they didn't get the photos from the enquiry, by the way. "national security" and all that bs

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Get H.I. Sutton and Jive Turkey on the case.

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Not a zigger, but why wait unitl now if they had those photos back in September?
    Sounds...fishy

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Gives the Russians an opportunity to make fools of themselves.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Vatniks will say they're doctored anyway

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Could still influence proceedings on Gazprom's contract force majeure claims.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Because glowies hate sharing secrets

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The west doesn't wanna get dragged in the war so they let the whole thing blow over and now nobody is paying attention/cares

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Knowing things your opponent doesn’t know you know is a great way to get them to say stuff that upon retrospective cross-examination makes them look like guilty bozos.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Publicly sharing intel you have on your enemy is a massive fricking mistake that nobody would make.
      The only time you would ever do it is if it's absolutely fundamental for some purpose you have designed. Otherwise you keep a tight lid on it.

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >twitter

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    None, probably. Everyone who needed to know the truth has had access to it for a long time.
    Why reveal this to general public now? Dunno.

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    what's wrong with blowing up nordstream so germany doesn't back out of it's commitments?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Morally? nothing. But it would have financial consequences.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      everyone expected it was Russia for exactly this reason from the start
      we're just annoyed that you lied to us for no reason when it was very obvious from the start that Russia bombed their own pipeline to try and force Germany's hand economically.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >force Germany's hand economically
        force it to do what?

        Russia was playing chicken with the pipeline ("lift the sanctions or we will have to do another six months of unscheduled repairs") and destroying it was like calling their own bluff. They're kinda fricked without that income, long term.

        They could have blown it up for 4D chess moron reasons or internal power struggles I guess

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          NTA but theres a secondary advantage in trying to wedge the Europeans against the Americans by implicating the USA as the perpetrator.
          >But that's pretty moronic...
          Were talking about Russia.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            they know their only way to have the slightest chance is to sow discord amongst nato member states, it's why they support both sides of political extremists abroad, which is most prominent in germany where both the alt right and former east german commies simp for putin, russia or the soviet union, often times for the same reasons. those being:
            >strong man at the helm
            >"""anti-imperialism"""
            >hating on america and nato
            >seething cos of eurogay's unity

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          as I recall the sabotage was minor (3 of 4 pipes, and repairable) and still allowed the possibility of trade, just at reduced quantities
          the immediate and obvious answer then is
          >oh, so the people who made the pipe did it as a threat then, and to jack up prices while strangling one of their major enemy's energy production (hopefully)
          I honestly think Russia just overplayed their hand again. They didn't expect it to be so obvious to everyone that it was Russia, they didn't expect Northern Europe and Germany to be fine thanks to American imports and an unusually warm winter (our weather control tech), they didn't expect a unified NATO response. Their mistake.

          It strikes me as a move that some person in a very impressive hat thought sounded super smart and cool, very 007. Just... you know.... those are fiction, that doesn't usually work irl.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            what seems to have happened (IMO obv) is that Russia has played the 'shutting down the pipeline because of maintenance' too many times. Every time they do it the public fear and panic gets reduced. They hoped that such a bold play would cause major panic among the people to deescalate the aid in return for helping to get the gas back. With the threat being of a cold winter. With a hope that it would also strain the relationship between Europe and America. Which is probably secondary considering the current real time problem of the Ukraine war.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            what seems to have happened (IMO obv) is that Russia has played the 'shutting down the pipeline because of maintenance' too many times. Every time they do it the public fear and panic gets reduced. They hoped that such a bold play would cause major panic among the people to deescalate the aid in return for helping to get the gas back. With the threat being of a cold winter. With a hope that it would also strain the relationship between Europe and America. Which is probably secondary considering the current real time problem of the Ukraine war.

            i still like the factionalism explanation though
            >gas barons: "if we sideline putin and take over we can just turn the taps back on and the gas will flow"
            >putin blows up the pipeline, now even if the gas barons do take over the gas can't flow anyway so there's no point taking over in the first place

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >now even if the gas barons do take over the gas can't flow anyway so there's no point taking over in the first place
              You know there are several more pipelines from Russia to Europa?
              Granted, they also go through Poland or Ukraine, but currently only run with a fraction of their max capacity.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Germany was due compensation for gas not delivered. The sabotage took care of that while conveniently leaving NS2 untouched.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            NS2 was not untouched.

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    there was never a nordstream 1, nordstream 2 got its name from an online poll

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      So that explains the "Hitler Did Nothing Wrong Stream" built nearby.

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Relatively certain my energy provider blew that shite up so German gas sky rockets...

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    How embarrassing; they can't even do a covert op right

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    But the USA said the Ukrainians did it...
    What is going on, bros?

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I'll be disappointed if it doe end up being Russia that blew up Nordstream and not America swinging its wiener around.

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    "Hello hello. What's all this then?"

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Military implications?
    Of some fake attention whoring twitter cap? 0

    Twitter is not real news. Stop posting it here

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *