>senior fellow
So this is a random retired professor talking to congress. He gets his numbers from one of RUSI's scholars, doesn't elaborate at all, and you make a dogshit thread about it while obfuscating the information even further, thanks
It's some boomer b***hing about software development and he uses some unsourced RUSI figures to set an example, vatnik infosphere grasped on to this and now use this as a "source" for excalibur effectiveness.
Not providing the basic support for them doesn't help.
You need to keep changing your frequencies and signals for targeting constantly and the people who would do that for the US are working in the US doing other things.
>Umm, does NATO have a back-up when it turns out their GPS-enabled technology stops working in a real war?
Yes.
A missile using a non-moronic "GPS" called Galileo, hybridized with a very accurate Inertial measurement unit, and potentially with either an Infrared imager or laser guidance to top it off although it's not really needed in the Ukrainian context.
Now go back to the meat cube Pajeet Pidorovitch.
I don't trust those sources. I remember in spring 2023 GLMRS were said to be "useless" because Russians were jamming and shooting down them, then came summer and Russian were losing Artillery and AA to GMLRS daily
People ITT are kneejerking due to OP's moronation. Read the document, the dude's pushing sensational numbers because he's trying to make a point (a good one mind you, IMO). He pulls the classic F-35 program delays point and then pulls random figures of Ukrainian drone efficiency. Nothing is defined, specifics are all washed away, etc. they're intended to make an impact and drive home the idea that we should have military software be living software with continuous software updates, rather than once-and-done projects that only get a few fixes post deployment, with new features coming rarely and in a single large package.
the Royal United Services Institute is the first ever private defence think-tank, holding a Royal Charter and founded by the Duke of fricking Wellington, dipshit
INS chads... We are so BACK!
Didn't RLGs make metal soccer balls obsolete?
>sauce not provided
Dogshit thread anon, thanks
Just ask nicely next time, lil Chudbro.
>https://www.congress.gov/118/meeting/house/116957/witnesses/HHRG-118-AS35-Wstate-PattD-20240313.pdf
>senior fellow
So this is a random retired professor talking to congress. He gets his numbers from one of RUSI's scholars, doesn't elaborate at all, and you make a dogshit thread about it while obfuscating the information even further, thanks
It's some boomer b***hing about software development and he uses some unsourced RUSI figures to set an example, vatnik infosphere grasped on to this and now use this as a "source" for excalibur effectiveness.
An honest person would just post the RUSI report
A senior research fellow is a post-doctorate research position before you're offered a position as a professor.
He's probably like 25-30. Not some old boomer.
>Just ask nicely bro
I wish I could tell my professors that, when they found the single unreferenced citation in my thesis
No wonder why they're so obsessed with bbc.
>6% Effectiveness
If that were real the MIC shills would be screaming for more $$$$ to develop an Excalibur II, not now buy yesterday...
>If that were real...
It's real now. We need 362 billion dollars more congress and we need it yesterday!
Not providing the basic support for them doesn't help.
You need to keep changing your frequencies and signals for targeting constantly and the people who would do that for the US are working in the US doing other things.
>Umm, does NATO have a back-up when it turns out their GPS-enabled technology stops working in a real war?
Yes.
A missile using a non-moronic "GPS" called Galileo, hybridized with a very accurate Inertial measurement unit, and potentially with either an Infrared imager or laser guidance to top it off although it's not really needed in the Ukrainian context.
Now go back to the meat cube Pajeet Pidorovitch.
How does the article define 'efficiency'?
I don't trust those sources. I remember in spring 2023 GLMRS were said to be "useless" because Russians were jamming and shooting down them, then came summer and Russian were losing Artillery and AA to GMLRS daily
That’s why they sent cluster munitions
Yeah it says so right there in the unattributed text you posted, but you probably just were told to spam it without reading it.
it does, it was over for vatBlack folk before it ever began
People ITT are kneejerking due to OP's moronation. Read the document, the dude's pushing sensational numbers because he's trying to make a point (a good one mind you, IMO). He pulls the classic F-35 program delays point and then pulls random figures of Ukrainian drone efficiency. Nothing is defined, specifics are all washed away, etc. they're intended to make an impact and drive home the idea that we should have military software be living software with continuous software updates, rather than once-and-done projects that only get a few fixes post deployment, with new features coming rarely and in a single large package.
>RUSI
Must be those personal quantum computers the russians have.
the Royal United Services Institute is the first ever private defence think-tank, holding a Royal Charter and founded by the Duke of fricking Wellington, dipshit
>he doesn't know
>over 1 in 20 shells is a direct hit on a target
That is incredibly effective when you consider how many we can make and send
Its incredibly ineffective when you realise gps technology should be able to guide 99.9% of the shells within 1m of the target.
>70% efficiency hitting target
>now 64%
Wow it’s fricking nothing
Actual moron