Looks like the dam's destruction backfired on Russia

They lost a lot of their frontline fortifications, hidden equipment, and the river narrowed. When the water recedes, the area will be wide open for Ukraine to advance there.

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Or the Russians are just that fricking stupid.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      [...]
      It may shock you but the russians are actually that dumb

      I am shocked - SHOCKED, I say - to hear that the Russians have been acting with knuckle-dragging thuggish stupidity that wound up fricking them over through their own lack of foresight. Again.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      We are very lucky.

  2. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    It may shock you but the russians are actually that dumb

  3. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Crimea is Russian land buddy, even I a LGBT woke antigay could see this was done by my own group, the hohols

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >MUH CRIMEAN LAND

      Pretty sure it belongs to the Crimean Tartars, the INDIGENOUS people of the region.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Seriously, you Russians are nothing more than "Manifest Destiny" types stealing land from the people who already LIVED there.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Greece was first

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Kek greeks turned the skythians gay after they merc'd the persian army, then later the macedonians. Eastern europe/balkans have some very interesting prehistory going for them. Apparently the largest amount of gold found to date in a grave was in bulgaria roughky 1k years before upper and lower egypt united or mesopotamia started building big cities. My personal theory is that it is somehow related to the finnish-korean hyper warz, unironically

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        The entire region has been settled for longer than the pyramids have existed. People have been living there for up to about 30,000 years. There is no longer an "indigenous" population of any modern races.

        https://i.imgur.com/muv72rx.jpg

        Greece was first

        But, we do have fairly detailed records from the Greek era and on forward.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >People have been living there for up to about 30,000 years
          I always appricate the long view. All of Europe should be a Neanderthal reservation. Kick out the H sapians invaders!

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >There is no longer an "indigenous" population of any modern races.
          Indigenous Australians have a pretty decent claim to that title. Nobody fricked with them for tens of thousands of years until a few hundred years ago. Life was so comfy they barely developed past wooden/stone tools and basic nets.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Tartars, the INDIGENOUS people of the region.
        Dude, what the frick?

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >indigenous Crimean Tartars.
          yeah, and turks are indigenous people of balkans

          You heard me the first time. The indigenous people of Crimea were a Turkish people, NOT Russians.

          >Crimean Tatars (Crimean Tatar: Къыpымтaтapлap, romanized: Qırımtatarlar) or Crimeans (Crimean Tatar: Къыpымлылap, romanized: Qırımlılar) are a Turkic ethnic group and nation who are an indigenous people of Crimea. The formation and ethnogenesis of Crimean Tatars occurred during the 13th–17th centuries, uniting Cumans, who appeared in Crimea in the 10th century, with other peoples who had inhabited Crimea since ancient times and gradually underwent Tatarization, including Greeks, Italians, Armenians, Goths, Sarmatians, and others.[9][10]

          >Crimean Tatars constituted the majority of Crimea's population from the time of ethnogenesis until the mid-19th century, and the largest ethnic population until the end of the 19th century.[11][12] Russia attempted to purge Crimean Tatars through a combination of physical violence, intimidation, forced resettlement, and legalized forms of discrimination between 1783 and 1900.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimean_Tatars

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            There were Romanised Greeks, Scythians, Goths, Khazars, Ruthenians and even a frickton of Bulgarians and Scandinavians there before the Tatars even crossed the Urals.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              >with other peoples who had inhabited Crimea since ancient times and gradually underwent Tatarization, including Greeks, Italians, Armenians, Goths, Sarmatians, and others.
              Anon, it literally says that turks weren't indigenous to the region and came with mongols.

              Do you see RUSSIAN among ANY of those groups, lol? Russia's claim to Crimea is pretty much illegitimate.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            >with other peoples who had inhabited Crimea since ancient times and gradually underwent Tatarization, including Greeks, Italians, Armenians, Goths, Sarmatians, and others.
            Anon, it literally says that turks weren't indigenous to the region and came with mongols.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/w4MUSZF.gif

        You don't belong in Crimea Russia. It's not your land, it belongs to the indigenous Crimean Tartars.

        And since you frickers oppressed them, of course they want to rejoin Ukraine.

        [...]

        You heard me the first time. The indigenous people of Crimea were a Turkish people, NOT Russians.

        >Crimean Tatars (Crimean Tatar: Къыpымтaтapлap, romanized: Qırımtatarlar) or Crimeans (Crimean Tatar: Къыpымлылap, romanized: Qırımlılar) are a Turkic ethnic group and nation who are an indigenous people of Crimea. The formation and ethnogenesis of Crimean Tatars occurred during the 13th–17th centuries, uniting Cumans, who appeared in Crimea in the 10th century, with other peoples who had inhabited Crimea since ancient times and gradually underwent Tatarization, including Greeks, Italians, Armenians, Goths, Sarmatians, and others.[9][10]

        >Crimean Tatars constituted the majority of Crimea's population from the time of ethnogenesis until the mid-19th century, and the largest ethnic population until the end of the 19th century.[11][12] Russia attempted to purge Crimean Tatars through a combination of physical violence, intimidation, forced resettlement, and legalized forms of discrimination between 1783 and 1900.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimean_Tatars

        Bait/10

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >this glavset is extremely low quality
      Better shape up tovarische. I hear they are outsourcing HR to Wagner once they find their way back from Bakhmut and that they'll be bringing the hammer down on unproductive elements of the team.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        And you know Wagner's preferred method of hammering

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      It might be russian, but it isnt Russia. By commie logic the whole european map should be redrawn and countries like Swiss dissolved. But there are better ways violent russian apes would never understand...

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      made me chuckle

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      I am john hamburger from New York oblast, and I must say that this post has left me very demoralized.

  4. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >More proof hohols did it
    Russia does stuff that doesn't benefit their position all the time. This war has been nothing but examples as such. This doesn't make it Ukraine's fault

  5. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >https://t.me/operativnoZSU/100469
    damn, who saw that coming

  6. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    You don't belong in Crimea Russia. It's not your land, it belongs to the indigenous Crimean Tartars.

    And since you frickers oppressed them, of course they want to rejoin Ukraine.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Check the crimean tatar demographics during USSR era, then 90's and then after 2014, the results won't surprise you

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        they were expelled in 1944, like literally still in the middle of WW2, and the vatniks still claim its ancient russian land

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >indigenous Crimean Tartars.
      yeah, and turks are indigenous people of balkans

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      I'd hit

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      She looks just like that handjob chick.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        I'm not proud of it but I've fapped to many of her videos

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Why would you not be proud of it? She's a good looking woman who's very good at what she does. I like watching a craftsman (or woman) at work, there's something about someone who takes quiet joy in a job well done. and I've never seen any porn star take as much pride in her work in getting splattered with copious loads of jizz as she does. That's genuine craftsmanship, right there.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Go lick sweaty muslim balls somewhere else

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >tatars
      >literally moved in in the 1200s
      >indigenous

  7. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >hohols blow up dam they maintained for decades and flood an entire region they want to take back just to open a new front after everything is destroyed

    Russians really do have brains worse than Black folk and poos.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      I'd just call it extremely callous and short-sighted. Soon as the water recedes, the Ukrainians will reclaim a frickton of land. Kherson will no longer be threatened.

  8. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Wow, it's almost as if they're not the ones who blew up their own dam. Or their own pipeline. Or...

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Own dam

      It belongs to Ukraine.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        That's a distinction without difference. They had nothing to gain and everything to lose by blowing it up. Just like Nordstream. The amount of blatant untrue bullshit around this war is (literally) unbelievable.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >nothing to gain
          >russia spends 8 months destroying ukrainian power infrastructure
          >a piece of power infrastructure is destroyed
          >I swear it wasn't russia this time! Just the last 1,536 times, but not this one!
          might want to get your brain checked

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah, they bragged on Telegram last year about how it was wired to blow, spent the winter chimping out against civilian infrastructure, and then try to act like "but this one was definitely the Ukrainians, no we can't explain how they did it when artillery shells won't crack concrete that thick". And then later the same day, they blew smaller dams all over Zaporizhzhia in broad daylight to try and foil an AFU advance. Pathologically lying savages.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              single big explosion. No sequence of smaller ones like arty or himars. Before they deliberately let the reservoir to its highest to maximize flood damage.

              now they are bragging about how they want to do the same to the dam at Kyiv to flood the city

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                it was crystal clear from the start that the dam could not fail that badly any other way

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Don't forget they passed a law allowing them to skip safety inspections of the dams

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            The RuAF had control of the dam and the HPP, so setting demolition charges was easy for them.
            The Russians spent months filling the reservoir to dangerous heights, and in some cases water may have been observed spilling over the top of the dam -- very hazardous behavior on their part if they're supposedly beneficent custodians of civil architecture.
            A week before the dam explosion the Duma passed a law banning investigation of any "hydrotechnical" disasters or hazardous behavior. Kinda strange, huh?
            2:50 am, seismographs and magnetometers in other countries registered the explosion. Ten minutes later the quisling RF-appointed mayor of Nova Kakhovka, Leontyev, said that the explosion of the GES was nonsense. Like, al lquiet this evening, we don't know why the water suddenly rose downstream. ( Here is the link to his quote by RIA Novosti: archive.is/aTyK8 ) He "corrected" his story hours later with some bullshit when they realized the demolition was out of control.
            Burden of proof is on you, but I'll keep an open mind. Explain to me what dam-busting special-purpose weaponry the Ukrainians used, why nobody in Nova Kakhova heard it, and then show me the RF's surveillance footage of it impacting on the dam that night.

            Don't care. You shills lied about the pipeline, just like you lied about the missiles hitting that Polish village, and just like you're lying right now. Russians and Ukrainians deserve each other.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              >btfo
              >i dont care!!
              >goes on about unrelated bullshit

              Frick up pseudo-commie

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >muh commies
                I know for a fact you're Polish antifa.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                No he's right, there's absolutely no reason to believe UKR wouldn't do this if they thought it was to their advantage. And it does...seem to be in their advantage. Cui Bono very obviously supports this being Ukraine's work. There's circumstantial evidence seeming to support the claim that it was Russia too, mind you, but it's very much ambiguous and just like with Nordstream I struggle to understand why Russia would do this - what conceivable reason would they have to blow the dam?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                It's prevented Ukraine from being to launch the offensive on two fronts, allowed Russia to concetrate its forces, forced Ukraine to deal with a humanitarian and ecological disaster, and spites the Ukrainians for the rest of the century which is the most important thing for the Russians.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              you are a worthless moron

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Nobody lied about the pieline anon. Well, Russia did. Because they don't really want people knowing they did it.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          The RuAF had control of the dam and the HPP, so setting demolition charges was easy for them.
          The Russians spent months filling the reservoir to dangerous heights, and in some cases water may have been observed spilling over the top of the dam -- very hazardous behavior on their part if they're supposedly beneficent custodians of civil architecture.
          A week before the dam explosion the Duma passed a law banning investigation of any "hydrotechnical" disasters or hazardous behavior. Kinda strange, huh?
          2:50 am, seismographs and magnetometers in other countries registered the explosion. Ten minutes later the quisling RF-appointed mayor of Nova Kakhovka, Leontyev, said that the explosion of the GES was nonsense. Like, al lquiet this evening, we don't know why the water suddenly rose downstream. ( Here is the link to his quote by RIA Novosti: archive.is/aTyK8 ) He "corrected" his story hours later with some bullshit when they realized the demolition was out of control.
          Burden of proof is on you, but I'll keep an open mind. Explain to me what dam-busting special-purpose weaponry the Ukrainians used, why nobody in Nova Kakhova heard it, and then show me the RF's surveillance footage of it impacting on the dam that night.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Didn’t they pull the same shirt during Georgia?

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Didn’t they pull the same shit during Georgia?
            When/where exactly? I'd like to read up.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              It’s the reason for the “Europe will freeze to death” with out Russian gas cope.
              In 2006 two explosions hit the Russian pipeline to Georgia. The Georgian president at the time said it was energy blackmail.
              http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4651182.stm

  9. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Yeah lets completely ignore the fact that Russians destroyed several more smaller dams that they controlled to make the flood worse, complete coincidence.

    And let's ignore the fact that a dam can only really be destroyed like that by targeted explosives stuck to it, not random artillery shells.

    Or the fact Russians straight up admitted on social media to have done it. Then quietly deleting it after figuring out that they fricked up.

    Or the fact that they don't exaggerate and celebrate the destruction caused, because if it was Ukraine's fault they'd 100% do so. But they don't, because they did it. And they know that celebrating the destruction now will just increase the chances of eventual direct NATO intervention.

    It's MH17 all over again.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Ukrainian side of the dam had been cut off so only way inside was from russian side.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      > Or the fact Russians straight up admitted on social media to have done it. Then quietly deleting it after figuring out that they fricked up.

      I believe this, but do we have a copy of the post? I know there is that video of two drunk Russians talking about putting mines on the dam back in December

  10. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why is lying normal for Russians?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Because reality does not favor Russians, and never has.

  11. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    1. Russians control it and we know it was rigged with explosives, because it's a potential crossing point to south of Kherson.
    2. Demolition experts say the explosion was on the inside.
    3. The dam (controlled by Russians) was filled with water before the explosion.

  12. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I think noone did it, neither Russia nor Ukraine or NATO. The dam just broke due to structural weaknesses, unmaintained during the war, happens.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      First, that is complete bullshit unless you can show me definitive proof of the the cracks and leaks that would have preceded a massive structural collapse. There would have been a week's worth of unmistakable signs.
      Second, even if you could prove it conclusively, Russia was occupying the dam and didn't carry out the proper maintenance they were responsible for. That makes them culpable for the consequences of their own inaction, so they're firmly at-fault.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Maybe?
        No need to get all worked up over that
        > First, that is complete bullshit

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        I think noone did it, neither Russia nor Ukraine or NATO. The dam just broke due to structural weaknesses, unmaintained during the war, happens.

        Nobody blew it up, moronic russians just accidentally undermined it because they were too pussy to move the crane closer to the Ukrainian side. The ran a single spillway constantly on double duty till the road deck above it collapsed and by then it was too late to realize what the morons had done.

        Still Russia's fault.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        [...]
        Nobody blew it up, moronic russians just accidentally undermined it because they were too pussy to move the crane closer to the Ukrainian side. The ran a single spillway constantly on double duty till the road deck above it collapsed and by then it was too late to realize what the morons had done.

        Still Russia's fault.

        pic related of said structural failures before the actual breach

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          ryan u make some cool videos but that dam got blown up, shit like that wont fail catastrophically the way it did (in one night) from a relatively minor frick-up like that

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            This didn't happen overnight, this damage was building up for months. moronic Russians are still responsible.

            This isn't a "minor frick-up" this is the kind of stupid shit that kills dams. Dams are stupid tough until you start fricking with their foundations. Look up a bunch of damn failures and almost every one will probably contain something along the lines of "one day person X noticed a small trickle of water in a location it wasn't supposed to be" followed by "just 1 hour-2 days later the foundation gave way and the entire section of the dam collapsed"

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Looks like dam broke due to poor maintainence rather than delibrate action

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Doesn't mean it's not Russia's fault, negligence doesn't mean you get out of the blame.

  13. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >do moronic subhuman shit
    >it backfires
    >blame everyone else
    Sounds like normal Russian behavior to me.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Russia still hasn't discovered the phrase "talk shit, get hit"

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      I feel like this is the moronic nature of Russia , They feel like they are being oppressed when in reality they are falling behind because they suck.

      They react instead of making things better, they just like to them selves over and over. Finally they believe it. But of course this is fiction everything they have still sucks. But they are unable to acknowledge it or act in a manner to fix it. Eventually they act as if the lie is truth and get fricking recked.

      This mans image is what that looks like. The knowledge coming to the man in the form of the smell of burnt daughter that maybe Russia isn't the greatest.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        They are white Black folk at this point, hence why all the muds of the world look to them to dethrone whitey. But the truth is that if the israelites were broken whites wouldn't create either a "multi-polar world" where everybody has spheres if influence or a libtard empire forcing homosexualry. They are just going to murder every shitskin on the planet. Every white guy I know is really sick of this shit and is ready to just murder everybody who constitutes even a slight annoyance.

  14. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    fpbp

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      [...]

      You a bit frustrated everyone's calling you a moron that you need to samegay pidor?

  15. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    The dam either broke due to lack of maintenance, or the ukies destroyed it.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      I think it was lack of maintenance honestly. water running over the top of the dam is fricking terrible for it and you can see it starting to wash away from a week before it's collapse.
      Even the BBC said it was most likely just lack of maintenance/damage and overfilled.

  16. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    This works both ways. The fact that you think this helps only Ukraine shows how dire Russia's ability to wage an offensive truly is. Why the frick would Russia not want to be able to cross the river easier? Why do they fear the Ukrainian?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Russia will cross the river later (in a few months, once this offensive has been seen off) . It will be easier then as the river will be smaller.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        So is that proof that Russia destroyed the dam? Makes no sense

  17. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    OP its been 6 months so far and we want to know if you've been naughty or nice, because in another 6 months Santa Claus is coming to town

  18. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >backfired
    It went exactly as planned:
    >terrorize civilians
    >forced Ukrained to spend resources and men rescuing civilians while Russian artillery takes pot shots at them
    >destroy Ukraine's bridgehead across the river
    >free forces that can be sent to Zaporozhie
    Recently a large convoy of artillery guns was spotted and destroyed on its way from Kherson to Zaporozhie.

    >When the water recedes, the area will be wide open for Ukraine to advance there.
    When the water recedes, it will be a giant flat mud plain with Russian defensive positions on the other side.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Recently a large convoy of artillery guns was spotted and destroyed on its way from Kherson to Zaporozhie.
      That was russian convoy...

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Go back to that post. Look at it again. Notice the context:
        1)Claim that Russians planned to move troops to Zaporozhie.
        2)Claim that a column was destroyed en route to Zaporozhie.
        What do you think the implication was here?
        Was it,
        a)Ukrained already too Kherson and is moving to Zaporozhie,
        or was it,
        b)Russian guns were moving to Zaprorozhie as was their plan and got destroyed en route.

  19. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >the area will be wide open for Ukraine to advance there.
    No it won't it will be a muddy mess

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      heat of summer will dry out exposed earth in days

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Its time to pontoooon

  20. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >russia not only invading a country but destroying a dam, drowning innocents and killing rescuers

    homie is it just me feeling like I'm in some weird fever dream where no one is actually responding the way they should be? Fricking Kuwait, a country no one cares about, got counter invaded by a full international army when Saddam invaded. Fricking Vietnam saw hundreds of thousands of American and allied troops go to war just because lol. How the frick isn't there straight up war happening??

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Because nooks

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Everyone else has nooks too? The price of having nukes is that no one can use them, especially not the aggressor. What are they gonna do, claim they can't be invaded back after invading someone because.. they have nukes? What's to stop any other nuclear-armed nation e.g. China from invading Taiwan then threatening to nuke Taiwan or anyone else if they lose?

        Russia has to be invaded and it's nuclear capabilities destroyed, there's no other option.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      A long time ago, a pair of commie israelites told a subanimal empire how to build nukes.
      They say we should have glassed Moscow and Saint Pidorsburg after we finished with the Nazis. They weren't wrong, but I would have just halted the grain shipments. Never feed your enemies. No matter how much they beg.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Societal rot. Also americans unironically have sympathies for the russians. Something about 2v1 against the chinks.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Something about 2v1 against the chinks.
        A fever-dream of the latter Cold War that *most* have long woken from. Most.

        >russia not only invading a country but destroying a dam, drowning innocents and killing rescuers

        homie is it just me feeling like I'm in some weird fever dream where no one is actually responding the way they should be? Fricking Kuwait, a country no one cares about, got counter invaded by a full international army when Saddam invaded. Fricking Vietnam saw hundreds of thousands of American and allied troops go to war just because lol. How the frick isn't there straight up war happening??

        >How the frick isn't there straight up war happening??
        In a word, nukes. Also this

        A long time ago, a pair of commie israelites told a subanimal empire how to build nukes.
        They say we should have glassed Moscow and Saint Pidorsburg after we finished with the Nazis. They weren't wrong, but I would have just halted the grain shipments. Never feed your enemies. No matter how much they beg.

        Never, ever let israeli commies off the hook for giving the Soviets the keys to the bomb extra early. The commie spies in the Manhattan Project did more incalculable harm to humanity than the bomb's existence, itself.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Imagne actually believing anybody gives a shit about "human rights" or whatever lmao.
      Fricking lib ass children.
      "Human rights" is entirely just geopolitical propaganda and casus belli manufacturing. It has nothing to do with actually helping people. No war on earth is fought over "human rights" or "war crimes" or whatever.

  21. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Have you tried not being 90's saturday morning cartoon villain tier comically evil?
    It's like when robotnik blows up a dam and gets washed away by the flood because he forgot to take a small step to the side

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Asking Russians if they're cartoon villains

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      AH SNOOPINGAS USUAL HOHOLS

  22. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Russians needed to send as many people to Zaporizhya front as possible now. Who cares about what happens in 2 weeks.

  23. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >frontline fortifications
    >hidden equipment
    Nobody will know, how much you stole on fortification, if these fortifications are washed into the sea.
    Blowing dam is good for every level of pidoruzzian command in their own way.

  24. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Wtf are the poccners gonna do once the water recedes? Its been confirmed they're moving men further east which is just gonna leave the rest of Kherson's legs wide open and ripe

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Isn't the entire region depopulated and devestated after the flood? It's basically a scorched earth tactic. So ruskies are just gonna retreat, form new defensive lines and leave all the now worthless land to ukraine.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Yes, that's obviously the plan - retreat and blame Ukraine for blowing the dam. It might work as domestic propaganda, retreat might save them from getting totally raped also, but it's pretty obvious to everyone outside of Russia that Russia actually did it, is just more evidence that they're incapable of waging war effectively without resorting to warcrimes.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        You should look at a map of the regions in question and then watch the relevant part of OP's video. Water in the summertime evaporates, anon, and upstream from the dam breach, the water level has *drastically* lowered, significantly narrowing the river along an even longer frontage than was the case around Kherson.
        The risk of Kherson to Russia isn't that Russia would lose "worthless land," but that any major push allowed to develop across the river will threaten their western flanks in Zap, as well as possibly interdict prospective lines of supply/retreat towards Crimea.

        This really might turn out to be one of the single dumbest fricking moves the Russians have made this whole war going back to 2014, and it'll be because the dumb fricking children were too shortsighted for how clever they were trying to be.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >This really might turn out to be one of the single dumbest fricking moves the Russians have made this whole war going back to 2014, and it'll be because the dumb fricking children were too shortsighted for how clever they were trying to be.
          Then why the frick did they do it? What possible benefit could have accrued to Russia in doing this to themselves? Because to me it seems like, as with Nordstream, there isn't a single reason why Russia would have done this at all.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Petty spite, mainly.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            >here isn't a single reason why Russia would have done this at all.
            You have non-moron brain, anon. From the perspective of Russia (especially if assuming the rumblings that they initially tried for a minor breach and fricked it up royally are true), the goal likely would've been to flood downstream around Kherson to complicate any prospective crossing the Ukrainians had planned, thus freeing up more manpower and equipment to be shifted to Zap and the east. Assuming that actually worked, then yeah, it would work.
            The problem came from them being so desperate that they didn't consider the worst case scenario, and if they did, they deemed the risk worth it (obviously assuming the worst just wouldn't happen because "why worry about something that isn't going to happen?").

            Except the worst (very foreseeably) did happen, it fricked their bank of the river more because its actually lowland marshes and shit as opposed to the higher elevation of Kherson, and now - in a development I'd be fricking floored if the Russian MoD even considered possible - they've created an *even larger* potential areas where Ukraine might pull off a crossing, potentially even closer to the AO that caused the Russians so much fear (Zap), in the first place.
            And I'd wager the Ukrainians would be in a position to do so no sooner than a month to six weeks from now, tops. The ground which used to be riverbed needs to dry out enough to support a mechanized push across it to the "old" bank positions, pre-dam break.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              tldr the russians did it because they are stupid stop asking questions

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                You can still keep asking questions. You're just going to keep getting what appear to be unsatisfactory answers. I'm sorry you think reality is fishy, anon.

  25. 11 months ago
    Anonymous
  26. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    It didn't backfire because of the fact that this war is not close to over and the economic damage to Ukraine in the long run is going to be very big. They can retake the south but the damage will make it harder for them to retake Crimea and the donbass. The impact today is small in comparison, but Russia could have still picked a smarter time to destroy the dam.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >muh economic damage
      LMAO; ziggers still don't grasp that Ukraine is funded by an economic base they cannot ever touch.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        The literal soil of the land provides abundance, the Holodomor was an ethnic genocide.

        Killing a people for living on a fertile land and not bowing to godless Bolshevism. It was wrong. They slaughteted Christians as well, just for being Christian.

        The USSR is gone, Stalin is gone, Christ is still here. Thus always to tyrants.

  27. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Not even 12 hours and Russia already retaking the shit from Ukraine. This offensive is done.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      You can nab settlements but the surrounding hills all speak Ukrainian.

      Control of towns doesn't mean all that much when you do not control the ground AROUND it.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      complete fantasy fiction hour

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Wait. I thought Russia stalled the offensive. Why are they retaking land they are supposed to have control over?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Aside from the fact this is fanfiction, even Girkin has spoken about the bizarre focus of Russian armed forces on settlements rather than deploying on strategically important terrain controlling the area. Especially in the area in question, most of the settlements are in a valley, while all the maps of Ukrainian advances in the area show them focusing on securing the heights and hills that control the surrounding area.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Looting and good PR would be my guess. The RU mil is a house divided against itself - why secure the high ground around the village, and allow another unit to secure the village and take all your glory?

  28. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Russians obviously blew up the damn because they are stupid and evil.

  29. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    While it isn't conclusive, it does support the narrative of the alleged intercepted Russian phone call. According to that call, there was a sabotage group there trying to cause panic by damaging the dam, but they fricked up and caused it to completely burst.
    https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ukraine-security-service-says-it-intercepted-call-proving-russia-destroyed-2023-06-09/

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Ukraine's security service said

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Ukraine says the Russians might've been less moronic, with just one group fricking up against orders
        >"HOHOL LIES!!! RUSSIA FRICKED UP ON PURPOSE AND HIGH COMMAND ABSOLUTELY KNEW!!!"
        I...are you...wouldn't that...sure I guess. Russia very consciously and methodically fricked themselves over with complete knowledge of what they were doing. Whatever you say, Anon.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      I do think that's the most likely explanation. The Russians just wanted to DAMAGE the dam but instead blew it up. In the process they wiped out a ton of their own field gear and fortifications.

  30. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >we

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Which side of this conflict does reddit support?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        What side of this conflict do countries with no indoor plumbing support?

  31. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Obviously Ukraine blew it up. Verification not required.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Verification not required.
      why do people keep saying this shit?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Do you have a PrepHole pass or something? Because if you don't have a PrepHole pass, you have to do a captcha to post, and sometimes instead of giving you one it says "verification not required."

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          No I don't have a pass, I don't know why people keep typing out 'Verification not required' along with their posts. This isn't an automatic thing.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Superstitious meme magic
            >It didn't make me have to solve a craptcha, it knows that what I'm saying must be true and is making it easy for me to post it.

  32. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Water rationing in Crimea. Chuggies told it was fine. Dumb stupid b***hes.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      found the street shitter
      do not redeem sir!

  33. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    The cry baby is strong with this one.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      see

      Do you have a PrepHole pass or something? Because if you don't have a PrepHole pass, you have to do a captcha to post, and sometimes instead of giving you one it says "verification not required."

  34. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Except the person you're calling a "puccian disinfo troll" was responding to me pointing out that Ukraine obviously blew up the dam, so I don't see how that connects.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Oh I understand now, you're more ESL than I expected.
      'verification not required ' in the context of a post implies some level of irony. You shouldn't put it on the end of your posts like that Sergei, it makes you look like you're sarcastically saying Russia did it. Wouldn't want to end up in a Siberian reeducation camp.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        I was born and raised in Peoria, Illinois and got a 35 on the ACT. I didn't miss a single question on the English section, and only one in the reading section. cope + seethe Janusz

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          I too am from Midwest comrade, I work at Chevrolet concern in Michigan oblast

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous
            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              nice vpn

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Which one of these is a VPN? Oh, that's right, none of them. Let's see Paul Allen's taskbar.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                You don't need a VPN. All of that is controlled by Windows location settings.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              https://i.imgur.com/Ft2doMB.jpg

              Which one of these is a VPN? Oh, that's right, none of them. Let's see Paul Allen's taskbar.

              Why do you think that’s proof?

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              https://i.imgur.com/Ft2doMB.jpg

              Which one of these is a VPN? Oh, that's right, none of them. Let's see Paul Allen's taskbar.

              Americans use Mac fyi

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Only gays who don't game use Mac.

  35. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    There are pics of drowned ziggers?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous
  36. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I've heard both sides claim and deny the attack, some even said it was worth Ukrainian civilian lives, that's fricked

    If you attack public infrastructure, causing another Katrina basically, it will cause loss of public and international support. Do you think China wants this fate? China is caught between Russian nationalism, American commerce, and Taiwan.

    Does Putin truly deserve Chinese troops? Every single life is sacred. And China knows the score. Combined with Russia, they can challenge NATO.

    For Putin? For his ego and goals?

    Might not be worth it. Putin might not even be in power or even alive ten years from now.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      The whole world confemned the invasion

      This does not help their cause, could be a false flag?

      Could have been some madman honestly, and people don't know if they should claim the attack or deflect.

      Like Igor. He just blasted his commander. That's a historical event. That's war. Watch out for company commanders like Igor! Don't piss them off!

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >The whole world condemned* the invasion

        Except for a few really spicy countries like North Korea

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >The whole world confemned the invasion
        Also the whole world...

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Did we forget to ask india?

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Or as I like to call it, countries with drinkable tap water

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Overlay this with the countries with widespread access to clean drinking water...

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >appealing to the lives and opinions of subhuman mudmen

          Look I'd be fine with a competent invasion because it would set a precident for my own desired white nationalist empire to slaughter everybody in Mexico. I'm not in favor of a massive frickup, unless of course it cripples a potential competitor for decades to come.

          So I'm relatively pleased with the current situation.

  37. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    It is obvious it was the Russians that blew the dam because they've been intentionally filling the reservoir beyond capacity for months now for no good reason. Temporarily benefits Russia because UF bridgehead positions got wiped out and RF can concentrate in the North for awhile. Long term, it is a stupid fricking move that will benefit UF much more months from now(militarily). It was also especially spiteful and cruel to the civilian population. Essentially that means it has all the hallmarks of a Russian action.

  38. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >How did they rule the Poles for 45 years?

    Badly.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Badly
      No polish partisans or any kind of resistance whatsoever during those 45 years, it seems polacks where satisfied with the job ruskies where doing there.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        there were riots silenced by force every few years and whole ass alternative government in London the entire time
        and the whole thing was brought down by self organized trade union
        I know they barely teach anything in schools these days, but at least read the wikipedia page before spouting bullshit

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Well they could have at least make it clear they're willing to fight russians like ex-yugos did or actually fight it like ukrainians are doing right now.
          polaks should be ashamed of themselves, they always just lick the boots of the strongest bully, be it germans, soviets or americans now.
          like they called the soviet equivalent of nato pact after themselves, can you go any lower than that really?

  39. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    1 Yes, it made sense to try and destabilise the NATO alliance over a pipeline Germany wasn't using anyway
    2 Noone said that, we know it was a Ukrainian suicide bomber
    3 It's not their powerplant, and yes they did shell it just like they shelled the Donbass
    4 ? Same as 2
    5 It's not their dam, but yes they did, accidentally or not it stopped any Kherson push
    6 Noone said that, it was for the memes

  40. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >45 years
    >Rulled.
    That's a miniscule amount of time, the occupying forces just die of old age?

  41. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    I came here to laugh at this vatBlack person seething about Poland

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *