Look, is it going to come to this or will cooler heads prevail?

Look, is it going to come to this or will cooler heads prevail? Russia really isn’t that hell bent on “if we don’t exist, no one will” are they?

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >xaxaxaxa nooks
    No.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That has to be one of funniest pictures to come out of this war.

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Nah, this war is probably end like winter war.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Pretty much looking more and more like it

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Duma and the Russian media establishment is a schizo central, monke is going senile, but all of the people actually responsible for launching nooks are probably smart enough to realise that doing so will result in NATO turning every big Russian city into rural Russia

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >probably
      yeah, let's hope so, yikes

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You can’t imagine how good this would be for the world. Take away London, DC, garden gnome York, Chicago, LA, San Francisco, and Newark, Baltimore… that’s enough. Now, just think about how much better the USA would be. Daily life. Every little thing. Even with the radioactive bullshit. Even with cancer risks being higher. Just imagine it. It would give us another generation of life before the garden gnomes fist the USA to death and sell white toddlers as sex slaves on Amazon.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      what are you talking about, this would be terrible. all those cities gone and you didn't even include Seattle.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >that’s enough
      that's not even a good start. You forgot Houston, New Orleans, St Louis, Seattle, Portland, and Denver

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      And Berlin too. Don’t forget Paris. And please, PLEASE Portland

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Go back to your 4chan containment board, retard.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Look a broken clock and all that, but not only 4chan feels that way about many cities.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >and Newark
      This is such a specific mention, only those from the tri-state area would understand why it must burn.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Man, as much as I'd like to see those cities purged, and as much as I think we're all fucked one way or another and may as well take the opportunity to shut Russia the fuck up once and for all, virtually nobody in the US could survive those cities being nuked. It's just not possible to run modern agriculture without the infrastructure, supply chain, and manufacturing that goes through those cities. Tractors and combines etc. are all shitboxes that need constant parts and service support, crops are all hybridized and GMO'd to the point you need to buy new seed every year, most of the current farmland would never be farmable without high-tech fertilizers and soil supplements and the aforementioned heavy equipment, processing that turns crops into edible food is hundreds or thousands of miles from farms and is often in those cities, and so on, and nobody except maybe living history larpers knows how to do pre-industrial farming anymore and the equipment and draft animals necessary to do it on a scale that'd support any kind of population don't exist anymore. That's just one part of the food side of the equation too, you've also got just as many issues with livestock and then everything else in society that'd be fucked.

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I say go for it. I kinda want to see how many of russia's nukes actually work.

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Not to shill, but this guy did what I think is a pretty good video explaining why it's probably quite unlikely that nukes will be involved.

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >“if we don’t exist, no one will”
    if those are the options then yes, Russia will use nukes

    fortunatly, EU and the US will force Ukraine into ceding territory before that happens

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >if those are the options then yes, Russia will use nukes
      a barking dog does not bite zigger. if they get completely routed from ukraine they will memory hole it like they have all the other wars they lost. if they manage to steal some pieces from it they will spin it as stronk rasha grow bigger xaxaxxaa cope

      nobody is going nooks there that they themselves honestly dont know how many of them and their carriers are still operational

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This implies that Russia is unable to survive without Donetsk and Crimea.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Well that really depends on how Russia ends up interpreting a loss in Ukraine. You could make the argument that with the discovery of large fossil fuel reserves in Ukraine potentially undercutting the only advantage that Russia really has, an intact ukraine does pose a sort of existential threat to Russia just by way of economic stability.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >You could make the argument
          Go on then. Make the argument that Ukraine getting richer will utterly destroy Russia. You fucking dumb moron.
          If that's the case, Putin better nuke now because fossil fuels are on the way out.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >fortunatly, EU and the US will force Ukraine into ceding territory before that happens

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        fucking hell the absolute agony

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          he deserved every second of it and he relives it over and over and over again if such a thing as Hell exists.

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They the reduced the nuclear rethoric lately.

    After a year of conflict without using it, it's pretty safe to assume they won't use it in the future.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >the way he grips the wood as he is dragged off to Russia.

      Poor guy

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    serious question: why should the world be allowed to exist if russia isn't supreme?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      russia has never been supreme so why hasn't it nuked the world yet?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Seriousler question: why should Russia be allowed to exist at all?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      THIS IS AN ANGLO WORLD AND YOU'RE LIVING IN IT

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Russia really isn’t that hell bent on “if we don’t exist, no one will” are they?

    If I had the following options:

    >be destroyed and leave my opponent relatively unscathed

    or

    >be destroyed and inflict as much damage as possible to my opponent beforehand

    I would definitely choose the latter.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      most of Russias nuclear arsenal is defective and most of their delivery systems are to. Something may hit but they are not the USSR and now is probably the best chance to wipe them out for our grandchildrens sake we should do it because I now have zero doubt that if the Russians ever have the kind of advantage NATO has now, they will wipe out western civilisation and with it the future of mankind. Russia must be destroyed completely, no butthurt vengeance rump state appearing in 50 years. Kill all of them and keep killing them until there are none left anywhere on earth then destroy all trace of their language, literature, everything, erase them

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Hope so I want to see Russia nuked. Whatever the cost it is worth it. My whole life I have lived under Russian threats of nuclear war for communism or Putin. I don't care anymore, I am happy to die as long as the bastards that have threatened me my whole life in Russia die to. Let's get it on. Kill every Russian all of them and do it today. Let's roll the die. I'll die smiling as long as I know that all the Russian cities were hit. I personally don't believe they will manage to destroy Europe or the USA either, they *may* get a couple of cities but that's it. I do believe that NATO can (and should) kill every single Russian alive in Russia and outside it and have enough firepower to tell China to fuck off or it gets the same afterwards.....I don't think that there will be a civilisation in a few hundred years if Russia is allowed to continue to exist. Patton was right. Kill them all.

        And the goodest goy award goes too…

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >most of Russias nuclear arsenal is defective
        I'll listen to the experts' opinion thanks, rather than some internet forum poster.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You will find they say the same. Thanks for playing. Now can we nuke Russia?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Which expert is saying that? You mean the inspectors who literally view the russian arsenal in person every year as per START?

            Those guys seem to be taking the russian nuclear capability pretty seriously

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >Those guys seem to be taking the russian nuclear capability pretty seriously
              if they didnt they would be out of a job 🙂

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          you sound dangerously fond of your goyslop, putting your betters - "the experts" - on a pedestal

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >I now have zero doubt that if the Russians ever have the kind of advantage NATO has now, they will wipe out western civilisation and with it the future of mankind. Russia must be destroyed completely, no butthurt vengeance rump state appearing in 50 years. Kill all of them and keep killing them until there are none left anywhere on earth then destroy all trace of their language, literature, everything, erase them

        Unfathomably moderate opinion.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Level-headed and moderate.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      But nobody is destroying you. Russia is the one who could stop this but wont. Nobody, still to this day, is invading Russia. Russia is simply trying to destroy itself while others watch.

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It will. France will burn Moscow to the ground once again.

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Can't have an omlette without breaking some eggs; nice things never came without hardship first. If we want Russia gone it's going to cost us , a lot, but it'll be worth it in the end.

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Hope so I want to see Russia nuked. Whatever the cost it is worth it. My whole life I have lived under Russian threats of nuclear war for communism or Putin. I don't care anymore, I am happy to die as long as the bastards that have threatened me my whole life in Russia die to. Let's get it on. Kill every Russian all of them and do it today. Let's roll the die. I'll die smiling as long as I know that all the Russian cities were hit. I personally don't believe they will manage to destroy Europe or the USA either, they *may* get a couple of cities but that's it. I do believe that NATO can (and should) kill every single Russian alive in Russia and outside it and have enough firepower to tell China to fuck off or it gets the same afterwards.....I don't think that there will be a civilisation in a few hundred years if Russia is allowed to continue to exist. Patton was right. Kill them all.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Based moderate

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I really am a moderate though I dislike left and right wing extremists. Honestly I think most people who lived through the 80s and this would just like to see Russia nuked. Another generation can't live under their mindless shitty threats. It sucks it has to be this way but the Russians left no other option, there were given every chance after communism collapsed. Ten years after eating western food air they are spamming ultra-hate all over the internet 24/7./ Just kill, them all. Yes some of us will die but it is worth it.
        Lenin-Promoted marxist terror worldwide invaded and occupied neighbours, established secret police, starved and executed huge numbers started world war two allied to hitler
        Stalin-Infamous mass murderer and tyrant
        Putin- more murder and war and secret police dictators and propaganda spew
        Just fucking nuke Russia. Please

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >.I don't think that there will be a civilisation in a few hundred years if Russia is allowed to continue to exist.

      The beautiful thing about global temperature rise (irrelevant of whether, or not, one thinks it to be man-made or natural occurance) is that within 30-40 years the most powerful nations of the world will be coveting Russian clay more than ever. Hoardes of Asians from climates that will become too hot to survive in, plagued with food shortages, will migrate north to Russia's vast expanse of wilderness now in relatively temperate conditions.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >now with

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Your thesis does not work because you don't know if temperatures will keep rising. They could stop rising next year(there is global warming, we know where we are on the scale about 3/4 way up) however it is not a regular pattern and we could already have begun cooling again or might next year....climate apocalypse is really a very very weak thesis particularly since the earth has already passed through all its warming and cooling cycle possibilities already and life always survives and that was life without our technology or brainpower. Mankind is amazing. We can recover from nuking Russia and head into space.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Climate change was never about humanity going extinct. Couple of billion Asians and Africans yes, but not so much the western world.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        This is already happening. Both russia and china are making major moves to try and secure the arctic as it continues to warm. There are shitloads of resources there

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >russia making major moves in the Arctic

          I used to believe that until I seen how corrupt they are. Now I just believe those moves are more yachts.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Your thesis does not work because you don't know if temperatures will keep rising. They could stop rising next year(there is global warming, we know where we are on the scale about 3/4 way up) however it is not a regular pattern and we could already have begun cooling again or might next year....climate apocalypse is really a very very weak thesis particularly since the earth has already passed through all its warming and cooling cycle possibilities already and life always survives and that was life without our technology or brainpower. Mankind is amazing. We can recover from nuking Russia and head into space.

        Climate change isn't simple everywhere sees it's average temperature go up a little. It's also weird disruptive weather paterns and ecological collapse as regional flora and fauna die off. Coupled with increasing frequency of natural disasters this puts most world governments in a precarious position where they must deal with continuous crisises, including refugees from harder hit regions, as well as economic downturn from being less able to exploit resources from said crisises.

        Climate change will not kill everyone and plunge the world into some kind of madmax fallout esque hellscape. But it will make things become unbelievably shitty for a while. Namely until global population preforms a self correction to match new carrying capacity.

        There are other problems coming down the pipe too like various resources being depleted, freshwater becoming scarce by 2040, etc. But life will go on no matter what we do it just will be much crappier than it is now. The 1950's-1980's will quite literally be remembered as the highpoint in human existence in regards to plentiful resources and cheap gasoline.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I really am a moderate though I dislike left and right wing extremists. Honestly I think most people who lived through the 80s and this would just like to see Russia nuked. Another generation can't live under their mindless shitty threats. It sucks it has to be this way but the Russians left no other option, there were given every chance after communism collapsed. Ten years after eating western food air they are spamming ultra-hate all over the internet 24/7./ Just kill, them all. Yes some of us will die but it is worth it.
      Lenin-Promoted marxist terror worldwide invaded and occupied neighbours, established secret police, starved and executed huge numbers started world war two allied to hitler
      Stalin-Infamous mass murderer and tyrant
      Putin- more murder and war and secret police dictators and propaganda spew
      Just fucking nuke Russia. Please

      Based fellow moderate.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      this
      most of their warheads are depleted duds anyway, we would win a straight slogging and solve this problem once and for all, and if they manage take out londonistan or garden gnome york, boo hoo, not a big deal, they'd be doing us a favor

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    russia could probably nuke kyiv and get away with it, I can already see the arguments from germany and france about how WELL THAT'S JUST UKRAINE RUSSIA IS REASONABLE AND WOULDN'T NUKE AN ACTUAL COUNTRY AND ISN'T IT BETTER THAT THE WAR END FASTER ANYWAY

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >I can already see the arguments from germany and france
      Yeah no, you clueless underage gay.
      France has the most extreme nuclear doctrine of all the major nuclear powers and Germany has such a hateboner for nukes for some reason, that someone actually lobbing them around is probably the only thing that could possibly make them go like it's 1939 again.

      Try reading instead of memes next time.

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >there are still retards around thinking russia is anything other than nuclear paper tiger
    they won't do shit.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I don't care if they are a paper tiger. I want to see Russia nuked just for threatening use of nuclear weapons for 70 years for bullshit like communism and putin. Let's do it.

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >based country that says what it means, and does what it says
    >"no, I think this time they're bluffing"
    lmao

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I unironically would not be surprised if Ukraine took a nuke supplied by the US and Nuked themselves to get NATO to go full Nuclear. For fuck sake they bombed Poland trying to do the exact same.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I hope so. I don’t care how it happens or why. I just want to see nukes fly

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Well one thing we can be sure of is NATO presuming Russia's inclination to end the world if threatened enough is bluff and will continue to escalate until proven otherwise

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Every time NATO escalates and Russia doesn't start nuclear war in response
    >They're scared, they're weak, keep the pressure on! Don't stop until Russia collapses!
    But when the "one escalation too far" comes and we're all either dead, irradiated or stuck living in a wasteland
    >Wow what madmen, I can't believe they weren't bluffing, that's really out of order of Russia, such an overreaction to just fighting off NATO on your borders, where was the diplomacy?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      pussy

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Honestly I'm far more scared of a receding United States and what they're capable of to maintain control in a world where half of it wants to break free from its influence and control.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Pax Americana is literally the best thing to happen since Pax Romana and if a nation of krokodil addicted pederasts has to get glassed to maintain the peace SO FUCKING BE IT

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        this
        never back down to Tyranny. Besides, their Chinese masters won't let the dog use nukes anyway.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >we're all either dead, irradiated or stuck living in a wasteland
          lmao
          unless "we" all live in Russia those things are extremely unlikely.
          And if "we" do live in Russia, they'd be an improvement.

          Pax Americana is literally the best thing to happen since Pax Romana and if a nation of krokodil addicted pederasts has to get glassed to maintain the peace SO FUCKING BE IT

          Jesus Christ Americans are fucking cringy in their understanding of how the world (and nuclear war evidently) works

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Jesus Christ Americans are fucking cringy in their understanding of how the world (and nuclear war evidently) works

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >some euromutt/poo with no nukes is trying to claim they understand how a war that has never happened will work to the nation who has the best understanding possible
              lol
              lmao

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The Chinese are more scared of the Russians than the Americans.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >russia invades literally dozens of countries
      >west doesnt do shit
      >russia continues lmao
      >west finally realizes it needs to put its foot down
      >NATO ESCALATION WHY YOU DO THIS? JUST LEAVE RUSSIA ALONE AND MAINTAIN THE STATUS QUO

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Dozens of countries
        List them?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Estonia, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Poland, Germany, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Belarus, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, Syria, Afghanistan, Czechoslovakia, Romania, Hungary, Albania, Bulgaria and Yugoslavia

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Oops put Belarus twice, my bad, probably forgot somebody else in that spot

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Japan

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            All of that in the last 30 years of the current Russian Federation? Or are you just combining centuries of history and multiple now defunct Russian states?

            Because if we're including centuries of history, then plenty of European countries considered the "good guys" have invaded similar numbers of, or even more, nations with some of them retaining the same flags and states as when they were invading, conquering and enslaving. Most of those nations have also invaded more countries in the last 30 years than the Russian Federation has.

            But no, only Russia is a threat to the world lmao

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              And whoosh the goalposts go flying off into the distance

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                What are you talking about? You threw the goal posts to the ends of the universe when you criticised modern Russia for the actions of their predecessors from decades or even centuries ago, something I've demonstrated is not applied to most western nations. They can somehow be considered the arbiters of global peace despite having enslaved most of it at some point in history.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You got a direct answer to what you thought was a retarded rhetorical question and immediately broke into a tantrum of whataboutism, shut the fuck up forever

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It is a retarded comment to make for the reasons I just discussed, it's not >muh whataboutism to expose hypocrisy.

                To say "Russia invaded 30 nations" suggests that Russia as it exists today invaded 30 nations, which it hasn't, the USSR invaded some and Tsarist Russia invaded more, but the Russian Federation, the state we apparently need to risk the entire world to oppose because it's such a threat to the world has not invaded 30 nations.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >List them?
                >he actually lists them
                >Yeah but *cope and deflection*
                Holy shit

                NTA but posting shit the soviets did would be like listing off all the countries Germany invaded during WWII under the Nazis. Not saying the Russians didn't incade Georgia and Crimea but that's still less than all the countries the US invaded and its government has been intact since the 1700s

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >listing off all the countries Germany invaded during WWII under the Nazis.
                People literally do that all the time when bitching about Germany, I'd dare say an actual majority of any conversation complaining about Germany that's ever happened has resorted to that, for fucks sake Russia calls the EU the continuation of the Reich right now

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >for fucks sake Russia calls the EU the continuation of the Reich
                I mean it is a governmental body that none of the populace votes for and controls wvery aspect of it's member's economy and legislation without respecting the sovereignty of its members. I mean it's not that far off of a comparison.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >List them?
              >he actually lists them
              >Yeah but *cope and deflection*
              Holy shit

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It's not deflection, if we're not talking about the Russian state in its current form and are including the entirety of a nation's history, then why isn't the West held to account for collectively colonising most of the planet in the same way?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >continues whataboutism
                Fine I've got one for you, if you're in a war and you're shooting other guys why don't you have a nice day too just to be fair?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It's not whataboutism, you just haven't considered the hypocrisy of your own position and that's not my fault.

                If you do think about it, then really what is your position on historical invasions? They're only relevant for Russia but not the West? Then your position is (unsurprisingly) western exceptionalism.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >it's not whataboutism it's only (continues whataboutism)
                Oh my God this is why everyone eventually decides to kill Russians isn't it

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No this is why most of the world hates America, the entitlement you have to being hypocrites.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                lol

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Whose doing whataboutism now?
                >You're a hypocrite like most Americans and that's why Americans are disliked around most of the world
                >ERM ACKSHUALLY THE WORLD HATES RUSSIA according to this Washington DC based think tank
                Absolutely pathetic, I'm done here.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                always nice how fags voluntarily announce ragequits now instead of just ghosting like normal people

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                lol

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >denounce Russian Incasion
                >supports raping children in Africa
                >supports genocide in China
                >supports annexation of Libya

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >whatabouting the UN
                >by saying every country in the UN is responsible for what the UN does
                You realize Russia is on the UN Security Council right

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Whataboutism is a retarded argument which can simply be summed up as
                >I KNOW I'M A HYPOCRITE BUT THAT DOESN'T MATTER!
                Anyone using "whataboutism" is literally a sub 80 IQ moron

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Whataboutism is a retarded argument
                Agreed, and yet it's the only argument Russians ever have

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Pointing out the hypocrisies of NATO is not a defense for Russia you mouth breather. Russia doesn't have to be the good guys for NATO to be evil.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous
              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Time for the old diagram aga-

                https://i.imgur.com/C67BRXx.png

                lol

                Hey, someone updated the diagram!

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I always admired Turkey's consistency in this poll

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >we're all either dead, irradiated or stuck living in a wasteland
      lmao
      unless "we" all live in Russia those things are extremely unlikely.
      And if "we" do live in Russia, they'd be an improvement.

  20. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >if we cant capture a couple oblasts then our whole country is being threatened
    What on Earth causes this kind of thinking?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Okay so Mexico joins a military alliance with China, how does the US respond?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Definitely not by threatening to nuke the rest of the world over losing Tijuana.

  21. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If Russia "collapses" they will basically ragequit and take the world with them. If not, nothing will happen.

  22. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I welcome Atom.

  23. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >France and Germany aren't the ones in control of the world's second-largest nuclear stockpile (and likely the world's largest functioning one) you goddamn stupid moron, we are.
    You literally placed nukes in Germany to be used by Germany and France has a considerable stockpile themself.
    Not saying I disagree with your line of arguments though.

  24. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >you wipe off the map Moscow(and the surroundings) and st petersburg, their elite will die
    >they will bomb the shitholes like Paris, Berlin, London, LA, New York, DC
    win win for everyone, the elite won't like it, average Joe will love it. But most likely nothing will happen, because nothing ever happen.

  25. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    OP here. So, the geneal gist of it is, is that you think this…

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Is better off becoming this? Also, says only one poster in this thread.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/O750WLs.jpg

      Is better off becoming this? Also, says only one poster in this thread.

      >GUYS NOOOOOOO THE WORLD WILL BECOME THE MOON REEEEEEE
      kek
      push the button gay

  26. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    The USA might retaliate but it wouldn't be nuclear. It would be the sinking of their ships and then even harsher sanctions.

  27. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    How are you going to launch nukes when you are too busy sinking from a torpedo attack by the US sub that was tailing you 24/7 and your equipment was too badly maintained to detect?

  28. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Bring it on. I'm ready to be vaporized for American-gnomish world dominance. Not because I like America but because that's how much I hate Russia.

  29. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I dream of submoron scum knowing the joys of radiation poisoning. I love the Bomb, and the Bomb loves me.

  30. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Well, if the sci fi gays are right, we must go through this,

  31. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Russia really isn’t that hell bent on “if we don’t exist, no one will” are they?
    Even if they were, it doesn’t matter as nobody is going to go and genocide them, people are content with just BTFOing them out of Ukraine and leaving them to rot inside their borders. And Russian leadership knows this. They also know that while Putin can’t get away with a lost war, the rest of them have a chance IF they don’t go nuclear.

  32. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    No it wouldn't. Because for all the big talk no one wants to be king of a radioactive wasteland. Russia would get near universal condemnation from the world and guaranteed sanctions for the next 50 years similar to Cuba. But a retaliatory strike from the USA wouldn't happen because Ukraine is still not a NATO country. Russia would undoubtedly lose even harder even if it was a phyrric victory because no one would do buisness with them. Not India, not china, not North Korea. They would strong arm Ukraine into surrender but it wouldn't escalate beyond that. The Russians can always point out that the USA used nukes on Japan so the precedent has already been set for using nukes to win wars in the name of minimizing casualties.

  33. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >russia can’t even manage basic post WW2 logistics, fielding and producing anything made out of tech beyond 1987, a functional society that doesn’t involve everyone stealing from each other while spouting actual doublethink, or any advanced sectors worth a shit from the decades of brain drain, all to name just a few things
    >people unironically still think they can maintain even a fraction of the soviet legacy stockpile without it decaying like their sub fleet/navy in general or from those inside stealing vital components
    If every single other part of Russia just got showed to be the total clown pit it all is then how in the living fuck could their nukes be any different? They’re not only pretty expensive but also pretty delicate to maintain, and if they can’t even manage tanks, ships, or pallets without fucking it up or scrapping it for vodka/krokodil money I seriously doubt their nuke arsenal is anywhere even close to what its said to be. Russia throughout its entire history has always been all bark and very little bite, any time they weren’t completely carried by someone else they fucked up badly outside of killing each other in more grotesque ways. There’s a reason why so many of the most influential figures in Russian cultural history utterly despised the common culture that surrounded it.

  34. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >nooks nooks nooks
    No you silly gay, this is Drone War 1, televised, fish in a barrel fun for everyone! Except for the fuckers losing face…literally.

  35. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Russia really isn’t that hell bent on “if we don’t exist, no one will” are they?
    You don't understand the fatalist vatnik mindset. If the tsar tells vatniks to go to war, they go to war, even if they know it's a pointless war. If the tsar says launch the nooks, the vatniks will launch the nooks. The vatnik would rather live in a completely destroyed world then admit defeat

  36. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why are these threads always full of edgy retards who want millions of their own countrymen to die?

  37. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Reminder: Russia has no working nuclear weapons.

  38. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    their targets are all 60%+ moron/muslim infested schizo shitholes they'd be doing a net positive starting a nuclear war

  39. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    BIX NOOK

  40. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If Putin remains and democrats lose elections things will cool down.
    If Putin dies or is erased in some other way and idk that Wagner guy becomes a president fulfilling "After Putin - Stalin" meme and democrats win elections again end of the civilization in current form is viable outcome.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *