Literally made for BWB (Big White Bradley).

Literally made for BWB (Big White Bradley).

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Part of me just wants to see the Ukes hybridise shit even more, so the soviet shit like this looks more and more like a bradley, the Bradley's spaced armour is ouvertly colonised bits of bmp. mt-lbs suddenly have m113/bradley track and wheels and so on. One side just slides backwards in time, while the other becomes more and more kitbashed with improvements, jerry-riggings, salvage and military aide.

    It's cool that the Brad could be victorious over a t-90, but now I want to see a m-55s be victorious over one too. Bless the 47th, bless the 67th. Hegel lives.

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Bradley seems fine for the Ukies. Americans are acting like Russian bots with their spam though

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I lived through years of "PUCCIA STRONK!!!" posting on here, so I'm not gonna miss the opportunity to gloat.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        20+ years of listening to Soviet simping commies, post fall vatniks, Russians on the English internet, fudds and Chinksect propagandaists scream about how the Bradley is shit compared to anything Russian/Chinese makes me want to rub it into their faces.

        yeah I'm sure americans have been suffering on PrepHole for decades

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Spammers, shills, turdies
          The moment mobile took off it got fricking worse. Letting the rest of the world on the internet including (You) on was a mistake.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Quite literally. Asking people to memoryhole your propaganda is a bit counter-intuitive, don't you think?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Man, I respect that. But stop.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Judging from the interview just released with the crew and their pit-stop mechanics, the Brad could use a beefed up Final Drive assembly to handle Ukrainian-grade temperature flux. Other than that, yeah.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Can you link that interview please?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      20+ years of listening to Soviet simping commies, post fall vatniks, Russians on the English internet, fudds and Chinksect propagandaists scream about how the Bradley is shit compared to anything Russian/Chinese makes me want to rub it into their faces.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        this never happened doe
        people would say that the bradley had bmp2-bmp3-tier firepower while also being heavier. this is still true despite the ukraine spam on /k/

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          I guess Pentagon Wars just doesn't exist to you.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Ukies

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah, "True Rus" is better.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Every time a RusBlack person dies, every vatnik tardspammer is one life closer to getting his ticket called. Spread minced vatnik on a cracker and feed it to your dogs...

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah, it's just one guy spamming it.

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Out of curiosity, what is the scoop on that white Brad?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Visit WarTranslated (Dmitri) Twixxer for the interview or read my post above.

      They don't explain why no TOW against thay T-90 tho.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Considering that the gun fricked up a T-90, TOW seems like a nice afterthought.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          nah. TOW is probably a 90%+ probability of catastrophic kill up to 4.5km with one shot against any russian tank with ammo in the carousel.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >carousel
            wiener carousel?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            It's wire-guided, right?
            TOW, a needle pulling thread.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Has anyone got information on the modernisation of the old tow and milan systems that were provided to Ukraine? I remember reading somewhere that the old systems were provided initially, but not without modernising them all so they didn't control like shit. I don't know if that meant they all improved their range as well.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Probably given the ITAS equipped launchers

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              LAW, a note to follow TOW

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                SMAW, multi-purpose-warheaaaad!

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              https://i.imgur.com/17JljYb.jpg

              LAW, a note to follow TOW

              https://i.imgur.com/hmZLcbF.jpg

              SMAW, multi-purpose-warheaaaad!

              I have no sides

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Considering we just had the unlikely scenario of a hand-me-down M2A2 destroying some very new T-90 variant using just its 25mm chain gun I think we're due for an M113 killing a BMP-3 with it's .50 caliber machine gun. It is definitely theoretically possible and Russian incompetence definitely could make it happen.

          Probably fired off both TOWs at something earlier and didn't have a chance to reload which necessitates the turret being out of action for a minute or so.

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Why does it have bow guns?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      In the BMP-T the bow guns are AGS-13 automatic grenade launchers. Probably same here.
      Idea being, you roll up to a trench or house, and carpet bomb it with aimless 30mm grenades. Indirect fire / airburst for poor RusBlack folk.

      This probably contributes to BMP-3's blossoming into pretty orange Tigerlily flowers.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Which were removed due to being utterly useless. BPM-T should have been BMPT-62 but apparently Algeria is smarter than Russia.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          That looks awesome.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah, people on here were saying the BMPT-62 looks weird like a C&C Generals GLA unit, but I agree to me it looks like the better design.

          >which were removed
          Last time I saw Russian television showing off the Terminator, in the forest SW of Kreminna, they still had the integral AGS-13. In fact, they make a point of wiggling it up and down as the moronic tuning fork autocannons blast away.

          ... in fact I think they even shoot a volley of those AGS-13 in that vid. Are you sure they were removed? ... maybe from BMP-3, you mean.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            The mounts are there thy just don't use them and take them out, remember each has a guy behind it.

            Should have moved engine to the front and given it troop carrying capacity with RWS turret.

            It's supposed to be cheap and quick. They just welded the armored disk to the turret ring, smacked on a BMP-2 turret and called it good enough.

            >moved engine to the front

            Impractical, on a T-62 there is a ammo compartment to the right of the driver, the divider makes that impractical. One of the major improvements the Norks made in developing their tanks from being T-62 variations to its own thing was moving the driver to the center hull getting rid of that space as can be seen on the above Type 214.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Should have moved engine to the front and given it troop carrying capacity with RWS turret.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The design was a calculated risk based on detailed computer simulations however Putin could never figure out how to kite someone while doing micro in Command and Conquer. Of course Koreans did it better.

      That looks awesome.

      It really does and is a great use of a T-62 hull. The only real flaw is the BMP turret being alot less protected than the T-62 but it is small and since it is on a tank turret ring the shape would allow for a 2-3 ton add on armor shell to go over it.

      Friendly reminder that Russia sold 330 of those (plus 300 BMPT) conversions while planning the current war. That is 1260 Kornet launchers and at least 5040 missiles not to mention 330 scrapped BMPs.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Israelis could have use some of those with the armor add-on you mentioned in Gaza. Might be good for Russians in built up areas too. They’d still have to watch for mines and shoot and scoot often of course.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Israel actually has enough T-62 hulls to make that worthwhile .

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Two of the infantry dismounts have to sit up front on either side of the driver. The bow guns give them something to do.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      i'm not seeing the bow guns where are they

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    no, it's made for BBC
    >Big Bradley Chaingun

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >BBC
      Big Bushmaster Cannon

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Did they really paint a Bradley white or it just running around with desert colors?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It's "White" figuratively as a ghost,
      Which also references a 2012 Russian film Bialy Tigr, or White Tiger, about hunting a spectral Tiger tank throughout WW2.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        The Russians referenced the "camo" on the Bradley, but honestly I think they just thought it was camoflaged because it was covered in snow-ice and shit that then got covered in more snow that didn't melt immediately because of all the shit.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Russians fear Bradleys the way Tigers were feared during WW2.

        Bradley sama…

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    "In training I was saying 'god forbid I see a tank in the sights".

    Now that is a different attitude to the original training group! You guys remember when one of the trainers was on here saying how they were constantly having to reinforce the Ukes pulling back instead of charging ahead when they spotted a tank? The attitude changed, but the outcome... weeeelllll...

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *