Part of me just wants to see the Ukes hybridise shit even more, so the soviet shit like this looks more and more like a bradley, the Bradley's spaced armour is ouvertly colonised bits of bmp. mt-lbs suddenly have m113/bradley track and wheels and so on. One side just slides backwards in time, while the other becomes more and more kitbashed with improvements, jerry-riggings, salvage and military aide.
It's cool that the Brad could be victorious over a t-90, but now I want to see a m-55s be victorious over one too. Bless the 47th, bless the 67th. Hegel lives.
20+ years of listening to Soviet simping commies, post fall vatniks, Russians on the English internet, fudds and Chinksect propagandaists scream about how the Bradley is shit compared to anything Russian/Chinese makes me want to rub it into their faces.
yeah I'm sure americans have been suffering on PrepHole for decades
>Spammers, shills, turdies
The moment mobile took off it got fricking worse. Letting the rest of the world on the internet including (You) on was a mistake.
Judging from the interview just released with the crew and their pit-stop mechanics, the Brad could use a beefed up Final Drive assembly to handle Ukrainian-grade temperature flux. Other than that, yeah.
20+ years of listening to Soviet simping commies, post fall vatniks, Russians on the English internet, fudds and Chinksect propagandaists scream about how the Bradley is shit compared to anything Russian/Chinese makes me want to rub it into their faces.
this never happened doe
people would say that the bradley had bmp2-bmp3-tier firepower while also being heavier. this is still true despite the ukraine spam on /k/
Every time a RusBlack person dies, every vatnik tardspammer is one life closer to getting his ticket called. Spread minced vatnik on a cracker and feed it to your dogs...
Has anyone got information on the modernisation of the old tow and milan systems that were provided to Ukraine? I remember reading somewhere that the old systems were provided initially, but not without modernising them all so they didn't control like shit. I don't know if that meant they all improved their range as well.
Considering we just had the unlikely scenario of a hand-me-down M2A2 destroying some very new T-90 variant using just its 25mm chain gun I think we're due for an M113 killing a BMP-3 with it's .50 caliber machine gun. It is definitely theoretically possible and Russian incompetence definitely could make it happen.
Probably fired off both TOWs at something earlier and didn't have a chance to reload which necessitates the turret being out of action for a minute or so.
In the BMP-T the bow guns are AGS-13 automatic grenade launchers. Probably same here.
Idea being, you roll up to a trench or house, and carpet bomb it with aimless 30mm grenades. Indirect fire / airburst for poor RusBlack folk.
This probably contributes to BMP-3's blossoming into pretty orange Tigerlily flowers.
Yeah, people on here were saying the BMPT-62 looks weird like a C&C Generals GLA unit, but I agree to me it looks like the better design.
>which were removed
Last time I saw Russian television showing off the Terminator, in the forest SW of Kreminna, they still had the integral AGS-13. In fact, they make a point of wiggling it up and down as the moronic tuning fork autocannons blast away.
... in fact I think they even shoot a volley of those AGS-13 in that vid. Are you sure they were removed? ... maybe from BMP-3, you mean.
The mounts are there thy just don't use them and take them out, remember each has a guy behind it.
Should have moved engine to the front and given it troop carrying capacity with RWS turret.
It's supposed to be cheap and quick. They just welded the armored disk to the turret ring, smacked on a BMP-2 turret and called it good enough.
>moved engine to the front
Impractical, on a T-62 there is a ammo compartment to the right of the driver, the divider makes that impractical. One of the major improvements the Norks made in developing their tanks from being T-62 variations to its own thing was moving the driver to the center hull getting rid of that space as can be seen on the above Type 214.
The design was a calculated risk based on detailed computer simulations however Putin could never figure out how to kite someone while doing micro in Command and Conquer. Of course Koreans did it better.
That looks awesome.
It really does and is a great use of a T-62 hull. The only real flaw is the BMP turret being alot less protected than the T-62 but it is small and since it is on a tank turret ring the shape would allow for a 2-3 ton add on armor shell to go over it.
Friendly reminder that Russia sold 330 of those (plus 300 BMPT) conversions while planning the current war. That is 1260 Kornet launchers and at least 5040 missiles not to mention 330 scrapped BMPs.
Israelis could have use some of those with the armor add-on you mentioned in Gaza. Might be good for Russians in built up areas too. They’d still have to watch for mines and shoot and scoot often of course.
It's "White" figuratively as a ghost,
Which also references a 2012 Russian film Bialy Tigr, or White Tiger, about hunting a spectral Tiger tank throughout WW2.
The Russians referenced the "camo" on the Bradley, but honestly I think they just thought it was camoflaged because it was covered in snow-ice and shit that then got covered in more snow that didn't melt immediately because of all the shit.
"In training I was saying 'god forbid I see a tank in the sights".
Now that is a different attitude to the original training group! You guys remember when one of the trainers was on here saying how they were constantly having to reinforce the Ukes pulling back instead of charging ahead when they spotted a tank? The attitude changed, but the outcome... weeeelllll...
Part of me just wants to see the Ukes hybridise shit even more, so the soviet shit like this looks more and more like a bradley, the Bradley's spaced armour is ouvertly colonised bits of bmp. mt-lbs suddenly have m113/bradley track and wheels and so on. One side just slides backwards in time, while the other becomes more and more kitbashed with improvements, jerry-riggings, salvage and military aide.
It's cool that the Brad could be victorious over a t-90, but now I want to see a m-55s be victorious over one too. Bless the 47th, bless the 67th. Hegel lives.
Bradley seems fine for the Ukies. Americans are acting like Russian bots with their spam though
I lived through years of "PUCCIA STRONK!!!" posting on here, so I'm not gonna miss the opportunity to gloat.
yeah I'm sure americans have been suffering on PrepHole for decades
>Spammers, shills, turdies
The moment mobile took off it got fricking worse. Letting the rest of the world on the internet including (You) on was a mistake.
Quite literally. Asking people to memoryhole your propaganda is a bit counter-intuitive, don't you think?
Man, I respect that. But stop.
Judging from the interview just released with the crew and their pit-stop mechanics, the Brad could use a beefed up Final Drive assembly to handle Ukrainian-grade temperature flux. Other than that, yeah.
Can you link that interview please?
20+ years of listening to Soviet simping commies, post fall vatniks, Russians on the English internet, fudds and Chinksect propagandaists scream about how the Bradley is shit compared to anything Russian/Chinese makes me want to rub it into their faces.
this never happened doe
people would say that the bradley had bmp2-bmp3-tier firepower while also being heavier. this is still true despite the ukraine spam on /k/
I guess Pentagon Wars just doesn't exist to you.
>Ukies
Yeah, "True Rus" is better.
Every time a RusBlack person dies, every vatnik tardspammer is one life closer to getting his ticket called. Spread minced vatnik on a cracker and feed it to your dogs...
Yeah, it's just one guy spamming it.
Out of curiosity, what is the scoop on that white Brad?
Visit WarTranslated (Dmitri) Twixxer for the interview or read my post above.
They don't explain why no TOW against thay T-90 tho.
Considering that the gun fricked up a T-90, TOW seems like a nice afterthought.
nah. TOW is probably a 90%+ probability of catastrophic kill up to 4.5km with one shot against any russian tank with ammo in the carousel.
>carousel
wiener carousel?
It's wire-guided, right?
TOW, a needle pulling thread.
Has anyone got information on the modernisation of the old tow and milan systems that were provided to Ukraine? I remember reading somewhere that the old systems were provided initially, but not without modernising them all so they didn't control like shit. I don't know if that meant they all improved their range as well.
Probably given the ITAS equipped launchers
LAW, a note to follow TOW
SMAW, multi-purpose-warheaaaad!
I have no sides
Considering we just had the unlikely scenario of a hand-me-down M2A2 destroying some very new T-90 variant using just its 25mm chain gun I think we're due for an M113 killing a BMP-3 with it's .50 caliber machine gun. It is definitely theoretically possible and Russian incompetence definitely could make it happen.
Probably fired off both TOWs at something earlier and didn't have a chance to reload which necessitates the turret being out of action for a minute or so.
Why does it have bow guns?
In the BMP-T the bow guns are AGS-13 automatic grenade launchers. Probably same here.
Idea being, you roll up to a trench or house, and carpet bomb it with aimless 30mm grenades. Indirect fire / airburst for poor RusBlack folk.
This probably contributes to BMP-3's blossoming into pretty orange Tigerlily flowers.
Which were removed due to being utterly useless. BPM-T should have been BMPT-62 but apparently Algeria is smarter than Russia.
That looks awesome.
Yeah, people on here were saying the BMPT-62 looks weird like a C&C Generals GLA unit, but I agree to me it looks like the better design.
>which were removed
Last time I saw Russian television showing off the Terminator, in the forest SW of Kreminna, they still had the integral AGS-13. In fact, they make a point of wiggling it up and down as the moronic tuning fork autocannons blast away.
... in fact I think they even shoot a volley of those AGS-13 in that vid. Are you sure they were removed? ... maybe from BMP-3, you mean.
The mounts are there thy just don't use them and take them out, remember each has a guy behind it.
It's supposed to be cheap and quick. They just welded the armored disk to the turret ring, smacked on a BMP-2 turret and called it good enough.
>moved engine to the front
Impractical, on a T-62 there is a ammo compartment to the right of the driver, the divider makes that impractical. One of the major improvements the Norks made in developing their tanks from being T-62 variations to its own thing was moving the driver to the center hull getting rid of that space as can be seen on the above Type 214.
Should have moved engine to the front and given it troop carrying capacity with RWS turret.
The design was a calculated risk based on detailed computer simulations however Putin could never figure out how to kite someone while doing micro in Command and Conquer. Of course Koreans did it better.
It really does and is a great use of a T-62 hull. The only real flaw is the BMP turret being alot less protected than the T-62 but it is small and since it is on a tank turret ring the shape would allow for a 2-3 ton add on armor shell to go over it.
Friendly reminder that Russia sold 330 of those (plus 300 BMPT) conversions while planning the current war. That is 1260 Kornet launchers and at least 5040 missiles not to mention 330 scrapped BMPs.
Israelis could have use some of those with the armor add-on you mentioned in Gaza. Might be good for Russians in built up areas too. They’d still have to watch for mines and shoot and scoot often of course.
Israel actually has enough T-62 hulls to make that worthwhile .
Two of the infantry dismounts have to sit up front on either side of the driver. The bow guns give them something to do.
i'm not seeing the bow guns where are they
no, it's made for BBC
>Big Bradley Chaingun
>BBC
Big Bushmaster Cannon
Did they really paint a Bradley white or it just running around with desert colors?
It's "White" figuratively as a ghost,
Which also references a 2012 Russian film Bialy Tigr, or White Tiger, about hunting a spectral Tiger tank throughout WW2.
The Russians referenced the "camo" on the Bradley, but honestly I think they just thought it was camoflaged because it was covered in snow-ice and shit that then got covered in more snow that didn't melt immediately because of all the shit.
Russians fear Bradleys the way Tigers were feared during WW2.
Bradley sama…
"In training I was saying 'god forbid I see a tank in the sights".
Now that is a different attitude to the original training group! You guys remember when one of the trainers was on here saying how they were constantly having to reinforce the Ukes pulling back instead of charging ahead when they spotted a tank? The attitude changed, but the outcome... weeeelllll...