The NASA satellites of today ARE what the NRO was operating in the 80s. Hubble itself was a knockoff of a satellite the NRO had launched 14 years prior.
>In the 1980s, the NRO had satellites and software that were capable of determining the exact dimensions of a tank gun. >In 2012 the agency donated two space telescopes to NASA. Despite being stored unused, the instruments are superior to the Hubble Space Telescope. >Sentient is a product of the NRO, which is “an omnivorous analysis tool, capable of devouring data of all sorts, making sense of the past and present, anticipating the future, and pointing satellites toward what it determines will be the most interesting parts of that future” >Budget: classified
Nice little boring federal space agency I see.
That's some top schizobabble. It's been a while I've watched a video with that stupid voice generator, "but what are they hiDING???" style implications and over analysis of pixel artifacts
The commercial space revolution is insane from a surveillance perspective. Random commercial companies are able to spam constellations with high resolution. There’s no hiding anymore if someone is looking for you.
Forget optical resolution, have you heard about Van Eck Phreaking?
Those starlink's are in enough numbers to reduce noise.
Would love to get the real specs of those one day.
We could detect a truck starter motor turning over in the middle of the Laotian jungle from off shore during Vietnam. Lol. Imagine what we can do now...
I did not know it was already in use that early (I'm guessing a big setup on a ship).
Would you like to talk more about it?
A truck starter motor creates allot of EMF so that isn't so hard to detect.
Where there higher resolution applications at that time?
I imagine today they can see pixel EMF from space to see a copy of your screen, and even the 32768 Hz quarts time crystals signature that is in every piece of electronics.
You can't hide a rocket launch but you can most certainly hide the payload. Though once it gets to space they become hard to keep secret, but even then the full capabilities are pretty hard to discover until the President posts them on twitter them to dab on Iranians.
Clearly under appreciated. Their seal is some web 1.0 shit
That's their way of saying we're just a plain old boring agency who operated satellites more advanced than what NASA has today in the 1980s.
The NASA satellites of today ARE what the NRO was operating in the 80s. Hubble itself was a knockoff of a satellite the NRO had launched 14 years prior.
is it true they used to be called 'Big Black' the same way the NSA was called the 'Puzzle Palace'?
how long before it breaks away and becomes its own force?
It already is its own force. It's a separate branch. They are actually currently trying to absorb the NRO, but the NRO wants none of it.
When the Coast Guard joins the Dept of the Navy.
logic says that should already be a thing
all-domain anomaly resolution office
>In the 1980s, the NRO had satellites and software that were capable of determining the exact dimensions of a tank gun.
>In 2012 the agency donated two space telescopes to NASA. Despite being stored unused, the instruments are superior to the Hubble Space Telescope.
>Sentient is a product of the NRO, which is “an omnivorous analysis tool, capable of devouring data of all sorts, making sense of the past and present, anticipating the future, and pointing satellites toward what it determines will be the most interesting parts of that future”
>Budget: classified
Nice little boring federal space agency I see.
If you believe in schizo shit, or want to just observe schizo shit, go on YouTube and look up "Project Golden Dragon".
Link me homie. I youtubed it but need the exact video you want me to see.
Watching it now. Thanks anon.
That's some top schizobabble. It's been a while I've watched a video with that stupid voice generator, "but what are they hiDING???" style implications and over analysis of pixel artifacts
This video is super old. Probably ten years at this point. It keeps being purged from the internet, weirdly.
The commercial space revolution is insane from a surveillance perspective. Random commercial companies are able to spam constellations with high resolution. There’s no hiding anymore if someone is looking for you.
Forget optical resolution, have you heard about Van Eck Phreaking?
Those starlink's are in enough numbers to reduce noise.
Would love to get the real specs of those one day.
We could detect a truck starter motor turning over in the middle of the Laotian jungle from off shore during Vietnam. Lol. Imagine what we can do now...
I did not know it was already in use that early (I'm guessing a big setup on a ship).
Would you like to talk more about it?
A truck starter motor creates allot of EMF so that isn't so hard to detect.
Where there higher resolution applications at that time?
I imagine today they can see pixel EMF from space to see a copy of your screen, and even the 32768 Hz quarts time crystals signature that is in every piece of electronics.
Co you imagine if we used this to measure fields from a scientific perspective. We might get some new physics out of it
Oh yeah EL/SIGINT is crazy too. And SAR can see right through clouds, worse resolution though
Do they have their own secret launch platforms? Can you even hide a rocket launch?
You can't hide a rocket launch. They show up on everything.
You can't hide a rocket launch but you can most certainly hide the payload. Though once it gets to space they become hard to keep secret, but even then the full capabilities are pretty hard to discover until the President posts them on twitter them to dab on Iranians.
https://www.dw.com/en/chinese-space-cleaner-spotted-grabbing-and-throwing-away-old-satellite/a-60658574
they seem to have good eyes on chinese capabilities so yeah it's probably nigh-impossible to hide anything these days
To be fair dabbing on third worlders is a commendable goal
Every day I get surprised by how much more the surveillance machine is capable of.