Leopard captured intact with engine running by Russkies

It’s over hoholbros…

>The Russian Defense Ministry has released footage which it said shows Russian troops in Zaporozhye Region inspecting NATO-supplied armor that they captured from its Ukrainian operators.

>The video released on Tuesday appears to show an excited Russian soldier circling several damaged pieces of equipment, including a German-made Leopard 2 main battle tank and US-produced Bradley infantry fighting vehicles. He remarked that some of their engines were still running.

>“This [explicit] hardware is not as scary as it seemed,” the man is heard saying.

>The ministry, which shared the clip on social media, called the Western vehicles “our trophies” and argued that the condition in which they were found “indicates the rapid pace of the engagement and the abandonment of the battle-ready hardware by the Ukrainian armed forces.”

https://www.rt.com/russia/577940-russia-captured-leopard-ukraine/

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Mate, its just a tank

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Mate, its just a tank
      Tell that to western propagandists.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >poster
        Where does it say Leopards are the wunderwaffe?

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Perhaps where they used leopards in the fricking poster.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >western
        >Ukraine government organization
        So you admit that Ukraine is a western country?

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Americans run their propaganda

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Wow then they're REALLY Western!

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        That's so incredibly gay holy shit

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >AI generated image
        Holy kino

        [...]
        geez

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Who the frick said a Leopard 2 and some bradleys were wunderwaffen? You shills love your strawmen

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        HAHAHAHAHAHA

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        At least you admit that Ukraine is part ofthe west

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous
    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >T

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      One western tank is a glorious victory
      A million soviet/ZBlack person tanks is a statistic

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous
    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      At first I was like
      >Leos will demolish vatniks
      But then
      >Mate it's just a tank

      But I'm glad both of us are acknowledging that in reality western tech is the same garbage as soviet tech.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >western tech is the same garbage as soviet tech

        If talking about tanks, it really isn't. Western tanks have better optics, better night vision, are safer for the crew, and can back up faster.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >one piece of western tech lost for hundreds of soviet tech
        >western vehicles light damaged and immobilised with zero crew casualties vs soviet vehicles tossing their turrets
        >iT's ThE sAmE gArBaGe
        Beyond braindead take, commit suicide so your moroniation no longer shames civilization.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          There's one piece of western tech lost for hundreds of soviet, because there WAS one piece of western tech for hundreds of soviet. Don't be moronic.
          >zero crew casualties
          Pardon the lack of that one picture of bradley interior being perforated and generously smeared in maroon liquid and pink goo. You know the one.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Pardon the lack of that one picture of bradley interior being perforated and generously smeared in maroon liquid and pink goo. You know the one.
            May we see it?

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              It was actually M113, my bad.

              uh, yes, 40 years of progress actually does make it not a competition. What specific systems are you talking about that are 40 years newer than what the other side is using? 40 years is the difference between the M1 Abrams and the Sherman, or the F-22 and the F-4

              This war showed for a fact that all that shit was just a huge meme.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                splat

                atleast that suppressed krinkoff looks like its still salvgeable

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >It was actually M113, my bad.
                Oh, so it was totally another vehicle from the 60s destroyed in 2022? Yeah, I'm sure this is what we were talking about

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah, M113s are kinda soft. Only about 2 inches of aluminum max.

                At 1.5" max of composite armor, Bradley doesn't have much more protection than M113, and it sure as shit wouldn't have mattered considering it's being fired at by either 125mm shells or 152mm rockets.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Bradley doesn't have much more protection than M113
                All around 14.5 API protection is far from the 7.62x51 ball the M113 is rated for, what the frick are you smoking?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah, M113s are kinda soft. Only about 2 inches of aluminum max.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >all that shit was just a huge meme
                what shit? Are we talking about Bradleys? They're contemporary to BMP-2s you mongoloid, that's not "40 years of technology"

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >They're contemporary to BMP-2s you mongoloid, that's not "40 years of technology"
                Did we have any Stryker casualties yet?
                Also, did we have any BMP-3 equivalents yet?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Stryker casualties
                I haven't seen any confirmed, but some new ones were announced in the mini aid package intended to replace losses so far, so maybe?
                >Also, did we have any BMP-3 equivalents yet?
                I don't believe Ukraine has received anything as new as a BMP-3 as far as IFVs go, if that's what you mean. It's all Bradleys and Marders and some BMP variants from former Warsaw Pact countries. See pic

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Isn't the CV90 a newer gen than the Bradley?
                When will Ukraine get PUMA's?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                you're right, but take another look
                >to be delivered
                I mean it's possible Oryx is just not up to date. Did CV90s appear on that leaked list of the 9 brigades' equipment?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Bradleys are shit!
                >here look at this picture of a Gavin, which is notoriously shit and not a Bradley, as proof!
                damn bro a shitbox that got raped by VCs because battle-taxi APC was a horrible doctrine got fricked up six decades after it was considered outdated?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >NATO armor column rides into a mine field
        >hit by arty
        >hit by Kornets
        >hit by Vikhr

        >zero catastrophic explosions
        >zero turret throwing
        >most of the crews escape
        >2/3 of them will be repaired by next week

        LMAO sure is same shit.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Explosions took place. Turrets been thrown. Most of the crews escape anyway, that's not unique to NATO designs, especially if it's a landmine mobility kill which isn't usually lethal to the crew.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            these are from the desert though. Not saying turrent can't pop on leos (they're just tanks) but nothing from ukraine has been that catastrophic

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Because nearly all the losses have been mines. Same shit happened in Vuhledar with piles of recoverable tanks and IFVs in fields

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              These examples in Syria took a direct hit from a TOW into the hull ammo. You can see how the entire corner of the hull where the ammo used to be has been evaporated.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                There is one, singular, case where this happened, the other case was probably an air strike on an abandonded mobility-killed Leo2.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Western tanks sure are tough even in some of the worst scenarios.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        I would argue western tech is even more garbage due to how overpriced it is compared to soviet shit.
        Like T-72 has a better track record in post Soviet Union warfare than the Leopard 2 and it's like 16 times cheaper.
        And if find it extremely funny how NATO-aligned eastern European countries like Poland and Romania are ditching the Leopard 2 in favour of Korea's K2 or Abrams tanks.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >western tech
          meant German

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >western tech
          meant German

          I feel like this is more a function of german procurement and less german tech. They buy in tiny quantities, have crazy requirements, regularly revise said requirements, etc. This makes for IFVs that cost two to three times as much as they would in a functional bureaucracy

          >We've now moved the goalposts of Gamechanger from breaking the Ziegfried line to it doesn't explode when hit (except when it does)

          yeah no one serious said that. You can find plenty of journalists who don't even cover defense topics saying questionable things, but you'd be hard-pressed to find someone like Michael Kofman making moronic claims like that. If that was your perception I think that says more about your media consumption habits than anything

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Sure, procurement

            https://www.dw.com/en/technical-problems-plague-germanys-puma-armored-vehicles/a-64138126

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              I'm not really sure why you think this supports your point, but thanks for the link anon

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                problems were due to handling and not technical nature. dw never followed up on it but the previous MoD hat to pack her bags because she blew up the situation mroe than it needed to be. The ifv were ready shortly after only one that suffered a fire was extensively repaired
                https://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/bundeswehr-puma-ausfall-selbstgemachtes-problem-1.5736355

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >It's a remarkable admission. The total failure of the Puma infantry fighting vehicle during an exercise in December is apparently mainly due to operational errors by the troops. According to information from the Süddeutsche Zeitung, top representatives of the ministry and the army admitted in the Bundestag Defense Committee on Wednesday that the units were poorly prepared and not familiar enough with the system and that there was a lack of spare parts and tools.
                >Industry support was not sought, although it was possible to do so. All 18 vehicles had failed at the time. Defense Minister Christine Lambrecht (SPD), who has since resigned, initially shifted responsibility for the debacle to industry and put the pending decision on the procurement of further Pumas on hold.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >It's a remarkable admission. The total failure of the Puma infantry fighting vehicle during an exercise in December is apparently mainly due to operational errors by the troops. According to information from the Süddeutsche Zeitung, top representatives of the ministry and the army admitted in the Bundestag Defense Committee on Wednesday that the units were poorly prepared and not familiar enough with the system and that there was a lack of spare parts and tools.
                >Industry support was not sought, although it was possible to do so. All 18 vehicles had failed at the time. Defense Minister Christine Lambrecht (SPD), who has since resigned, initially shifted responsibility for the debacle to industry and put the pending decision on the procurement of further Pumas on hold.

                interesting. Honestly even if it was technical issues, that can be caused by a broken procurement process too. Strict standards and a moving target wrt requirements can lead to increased complexity and design compromises you wouldn't normally make, which can lead to poor reliability or even basic issues with subsystems

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Procurement is so fricked. Everything that costs more than 25m has to go through parlament and being voted and discussed.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            >I feel like this is more a function of german procurement and less german tech.
            It's absolutely true that German bureaucracy is a nightmare which hampers procurement but Germany is also suffering from a brain drain in the engineering sector. It's not that German engineers aren't good, it's more that they get better deals working for non-German companies and end up leaving.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      mate ur a literal queer

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      VatBlack folk reduced their objectives from taking Ukraine to Bakmuht to a tank.

  2. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    For people not wanting to give >>>>>RT clicks
    https://archive.is/RpbqW

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      I clicked the RT link 5 times so you did nothing. How do you feel, basedboy cuck?

  3. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    No proof it's even captured beyond the guy circling it. Until it shows up in a professional propaganda vid it's basically a guy circling it and talling shit until he gets out of dodge.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      The "super tank" still had its engine running, Russia wont pass up this propaganda piece . A big counter to it being a propaganda piece in itself for the media.

      The point is it can be taken by the Russians if they see fit, but it does depend on exactly where it is.

      Honestly its funny how much these where hyped up only to fall to not only atgms, but helis, and drones, and prob arty.

      The Russians where right they burn like the rest, And for the west to compete there has to be a type of economic war footing or economic mobilization. To the degree in which the west probably isnt prepared to cope with what is needed.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >The Russians where right they burn like the rest, And for the west to compete there has to be a type of economic war footing or economic mobilization. To the degree in which the west probably isnt prepared to cope with what is needed.

        The rate at which the US has been sending gibs to ukraine tells me the US is willing to frick over its population for some weird grudge match on the otherside of the planet. I hate the government so much its unreal.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Ok John Smith.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          they've given ukraine a pissy bit of change that's a small chunk of the annual military budget. it doesn't affect american people in any way

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >economic war footing or economic mobilization
        Majority of the stuff we're giving them is old shit that we had to either pay to maintain or pay to dispose of. Random bullshit from the 80s and 90s or older. Those Bradleys they got were probably paid for before you were born.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          regardless they have gotten over 100 billion from the US alone. Frick ukraine give me a stimmy check.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Frick ukraine give me a stimmy check.
            No gibs for you. Get a job.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >The "super tank" still had its engine running
        So what, you mongoloid? It was abandoned for a reason and with a thrown track you won't get it anywhere, engine running or no, unless you've got a recovery vehicle at hand. Which, being R*ssia, seems unlikely at this point.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        There's video of a recovered, towed leo. The russkies might have captured it. Either way, after russians have lost literally thousands of tanks you goons are gloating over single digit losses.

        Besides, they are just tanks. Plenty more will get destroyed. I'm not sure why vatniks thought they were supposed to be invincible; they were just supposed to be a significant upgrade, which they are.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >I'm not sure why vatniks thought they were supposed to be invincible
          It's like some homosexual zigger version of gaslighting or whatever. They're trying to convince you that YOU said they were invincible, so they can go "LOOK HOW FOOLISH YOU ARE"

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      This, unless they show it hooked up to a recovery vehicle the Russians have captured jack shit.

  4. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >intact
    >treads very clearly fricked up

  5. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Oh shit, they might find tech to win the cold war with that 😮 😮 😮

  6. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    yes if i was a russian soldier i'd be very excited about seeing a running tank too

  7. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    You have been spamming that video for two days. There is not a single evidence that they managed to take it from there.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >You have been spamming that video for two days. There is not a single evidence that they managed to take it from there.

      More likely they emplaced demolition charges and left. Ukies are then permanently minus 1 Leo2a6 and minus 11 Bradleys and 1 minesweeper. Thats what I've would have done.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      We will see it in moscow soon.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        very useful in the war indeed

  8. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    That might even demoralize the vatBlack folk since they'll see what humans can build and what their subhuman brethren gave them.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      It might demoralize Russians (but they are already demoralized).
      It won't demoralize vatniks, because:
      >look how expensive it looks
      >it probably uses more gas than ours
      >look, it stopped just from loosing a track
      >so fragile compare to ours, right?
      >must be so overpriced

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Russia would sacrifice 100 mobiks to kill a single nato soldier and call it a victory

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Word for word the cope Lada drivers engage in.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >it probably uses more gas than ours
        That's the funny thing. Even though Western tanks are bigger and heavier, they go faster (especially in reverse gear) while also using LESS gas. Because Western motors aren't complete dogshit.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >must be so overpriced
        They must think the same regarding infantry losses as well since they barely consider themselves human and glee with each actual human they kill.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      well there was the video of the Mariupol BTR4 or what its called and they praising it to the high heavens how good it was...

      How was it captured?

      Doubtful they would be able to repair the track, so they would have to get their own heavy armour or recovery unit out there through an extensive AT minefield away from their own cleared lanes... to drag it back ... through an extensive AT minefield.

      >go there
      >make video
      >claim its capture
      >run away before the are get HIMARSed /shell
      >post video for the twitter offensive

  9. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    How was it captured?

    Doubtful they would be able to repair the track, so they would have to get their own heavy armour or recovery unit out there through an extensive AT minefield away from their own cleared lanes... to drag it back ... through an extensive AT minefield.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      i'd assume the russians know where the safe paths are.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        You sure about that

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          That's an Ukrainian BMPT running through Ukrainian mines.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            How devious of them to paint Zs on their vehicles and drive them into mines

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Ah, thank you for clarifying, fellow native English speaker!

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        As I said, they would have to drag it to the cleared lanes, so they would have to clear a lane to the tank with their own kit.... ironically now leaving a complete cleared path for the UKR drones to see....

        Wait, maybe they should have tried to capture it, would have ended up being the biggest self own of the war so far.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >How was it captured?
      Legally speaking.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >How was it captured?
      It went into captivity by its own power.

  10. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's a working tank so a rare sight for a vatnik

  11. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >rt
    Until they showed evidence that they managed to get that thing off of the minefield, its propaganda. In the video, its noted that the video looked like it took place when the assault happened.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      The very fact that it was taken at the spot it was taken out implies they can't.

      Also, keep in mind that this is in the greyzone, so chances are that the ukies also have a 155mm sighted squarely at said leopard, ready to delete whatever is trying to tow it back.

  12. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >rt
    Why do you cite fake news site?

  13. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >rt

  14. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    geez

  15. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Until there's a video or pics of the tank inside a Russian garrison then there's no way to tell if they are lying again or not, for now there's only that video of Russians soldiers picking up supplies and weapons from the wreaked vehicles

  16. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Monkey got the artifact of the advanced civilization. Monkey will use it to kill da Boss. Vatnik will be da Boss by himself.

  17. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    oh no, they'll immediately start mass producing clones with their impressive R&D and manufacturing industries

  18. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Meanwhile the ukies have captured or destroyed around 60 T-90s alone

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      I'm surprised russia managed to get 60 of them functional and to the front line

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Russia still has a decent number of T90s they refuse to send to the front in fear of them being destroyed.

  19. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    It really is impressive how long the russians have managed to used one disabled probing convoy as a propaganda piece.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      This is probably the best proof Russia hasn't done shit for months because if they did and had a scrap of circumstantial photographic evidence they would NEVER shut up about it.
      They might have gotten a Leopard and bunch of Bradleys so in their propaganda world that no only means totall collapse of Ukraine but total western shortage of armored vehicles.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        This is going to be the equivalent of that one tank from early in the war that shot the Ukrainians at close range when they thought it was their buddies coming back with a captured tank. They'll post it until the end of fricking time.

  20. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Frick deutchstanis they are troony's

    They get gang raped in public Infront of their police and they do nothing

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Trannies out of nowhere
      What's wrong big guy, participating in pride?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        He hates trannies because he's got manboobs and sounds like an old lady over the phone.

  21. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    dude russia have zero semiconductor manufacturing ability, they are unable to reverse engineer anything. This is why they buy all their chips from us

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      [...]

      We know that the DPRK stole a microchip foundry a while back in the 1990s (they used to make bootleg Pentium 3s/4s) so in theory they could beg Kim to reproduce the older chips in a Leo.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Every single electronic component on the L2 A4 is already in the hands of the Chinese thanks to the turks.

        Being highly cynical one might make the argument that the MIC will love these outcomes because the West will need brand new kit to maintain tech edge against peer enemies now they have our old kit in their dirty yellow hands.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          The system is honestly not that complicated. It's got a bunch of gyroscopes, resolvers and some other sensors. It uses basic trigonometry and ballistic tables to calculate a firing solution, which the computer feeds the signals to the hydraulics/electric motors.

          I think the really complicated thing is manufacturing something that is reliable and secure. I can imagine chink tanks cutting the loader's arm clean because the gun stabilization got crazy.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >the DPRK stole a microchip foundry
        How is this even possible? Top zozzle

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >workers arrived at the factory in Taiwan on Monday morning and it was gone
          >right down to the foundations
          >suddenly the nefarious intentions of the the company that opened down the road, the one that ordered 850 million helium balloons, became apparent

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >workers arrived at the factory in Taiwan on Monday morning and it was gone
          >right down to the foundations
          >suddenly the nefarious intentions of the the company that opened down the road, the one that ordered 850 million helium balloons, became apparent

          In the early 1990s the UN had a tech development effort that they scammed so hard they got a chip foundry out of it.

          In the same period they used a Yakuza front company to build an entire cutting edge CnC/Automated rapid prototyping factory in Japan and somehow physically stole the entire thing, as in one day the factory was just an empty building and everything inside got shipped to the DPRK.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Ngl that is an impressive swindle. Norks can be very cunning when they want.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Got a link? I'm too moronic to find anything about it on google

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        almost definitely not. reverse-engineering microchips is very hard and then producing them from your reverse engineered designs is really really hard. (zeptobars / ken shirrif)
        you'd have to reverse engineer the chips and then either redesign them onto your process or also redevelop the process used to make them.
        if you've reverse engineered the chips, then you know enough about them to replace them with COTS chips.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        If the norks are making pentium 4's they have 180 nm ish capability, whereas the west is on 4nm now. So they are still 15 years behind just in terms of the fabs they own. I mean I doubt anything on the Leo is that new anyway. Either way nothing is gonna happen soon

  22. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Wow they really are trying to pass off one win as like 20 wins from different angles aren’t they?

  23. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >the abandonment of the battle-ready hardware
    The fricking tracks were blown off, unlike the scores of tanks left behind by the 1st guards tank division.

  24. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Within a single stroke of war the tide has shifted and russia finally has TIGE- wait no it's a leopard.

  25. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Sooo... can they service and repair it? Do they have the training to use it? Do they have the supply of ammo to fire it?
    Because when Russians abandon their equipment Ukraine can use it because they are ALREADY USING THEM.

  26. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >NATO lost
    NATO isn’t even fighting lol, they’re just giving Ukraine their old shit. Do you really think Russia would still be occupying Ukraine if they had been fighting NATO this whole time?

  27. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    They also destroyed one (ištēn) Leo 2. It's over.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >6million+
      >astronomical number for russians
      I think nato spends more than that on ammo for training exercises. I really don't think the average pidor knows just how much money globohomosexual has to throw around.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >TASS
      And the glavset keeps going. And nobody's listening.

  28. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    T-72s, 80s and 90s have their turrets reach escape velocity
    >*snore*
    >1 Leopard is lost
    >pic related

  29. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Been poop shitting

  30. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Lel, that video doesn't show the other bradleys that came later. It's between the two sets of photos. Russkies didn't capture shit. They weren't even able to deny it.

  31. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Isn't that Leo already repaired in Poland and back in Ukraine again?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      I heard it was upgraded with a bunch of classified modules too

  32. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Not seeing any downed hohol aircraft. If they were making a proper attack, some of those would have appeared by now. So this really is a copefensive.

  33. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    this one?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Russians also captured the recovery vehcile ;^)

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Came here to post that.

      Russians also captured the recovery vehcile ;^)

      Oh (You)

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Leopard looks sad. I think it knows it let down its crew.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Russia capture recovery vehicle and hohols soldoer and now use them as slave to do all recovery*~~*~~*~~

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      god damn it's HAULING ASS
      mirin the power

  34. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Capture modern Western tank
    >Can reverse engineer for their own gain
    >Lack the knowledge and know how to actually develop their own systems
    >Have to import western systems
    >The current political climate
    CYKA BLYAT

  35. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >we captured a leopard
    >no you may not see it

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >That photoshop flag

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Did the good photoshoppers die in the war? That flag looks like shit

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Did the good photoshoppers die in the war?
        Yes. Shills are due for next mogilization.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >this fricking image is still being circulated in 2000+20+3
      Yikes.

  36. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why not just post the actual source video, it's much more entertaining:

    https://twitter.com/MyLordBebo/status/1668533202602934274?t=96Zv8RfO2Rqs1hgC6YTJmA&s=19

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      how is that captured?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      If they were right there standing next to them, why didn't they asset deny them?

  37. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >the newest and greatest NATO has to offer
    That depends on the variant.

  38. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Lol cope its the newest and greatest NATO has to offer
    >L2A6
    >build: 2001

  39. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >they are literally shaking and pissing and shidding themselves at NATO HQ at the thought of russkies dismantling the fire control system and software

    And what are they gonna do with it, improve the three T-14 Armatas they have? kek

  40. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >russia loses 2000+ tanks and 7000+ various military vehicles
    crickets chirping
    >russia captures a NATO supplied tank
    It's all over.

    Fricking Russians, they are just sub Sahara albino Black folk living under a cargocult.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      They didn’t even capture it

      this one?

      Well I guess they legally captured it (on tape)

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        RT doesn't work for me, but there was a video posted a couple days ago of Russian soldiers crawling over a Leopard. It looked like that one Leopard at the tree line they have been shown half a dozen points claiming it to be different vehicles at this point, and it ended up burning out, which makes sense. They got to it, looked inside, and then set it on fire before retreating to their positions.

  41. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >video shows the engine running from a Bradley instead of a Leopard
    >somehow its a Leopard engine
    good memes

  42. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Long time lurker here. As the time goes, mental gymnastics which z-Black folk employ to convince me that they are actually winning the 3 day war become more and more twisted and funny. Every fricking time I visit 4chins I get +50 happiness boost. Great stuff homosexuals, keep doing it, I like your autistic humor

  43. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why not just scuttle it or bomb it from a drone etc instead letting it be captured

  44. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Out of curiosity, would the Ziggers even be able to resupply this tank if it needed more shells/fuel, or repair it if it gets damaged? Surely they don't have the proper ammo or tools.

  45. 11 months ago
    Anonymous
  46. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >>The Russian Defense Ministry
    I was just saying today while speaking with a family member, how much I trust the Russian government. They say the sky is green, that the moon is made of cheese, that communism is a good idea, that the USSR was a great idea, that Stalin was a master physicist and biologist that Lenin was loving and gentle, that they are fighting Nazis from Ww2 in Ukraine (although they must be very elderly). When the Russian government said that they would never invade Ukraine I said to myself, 'If the Russian ministry for Foreign Affairs says that Russia won't invade Ukraine they it must be true'. When the Russian government said the American government was lying about the Russian government preparing to invade Ukraine I said, Russian govement says it that just has to be true. To this day I do not believe there is a single Russian solder in Ukraine or engaged in combat with Ukrainians, just geriatric resurrected nazi Zombies that were dropped into Ukraine b y bats that were created in US Biowarefare labs in Ukraine (Russia said it so that mush be true to and since Russia is fighting 90 year old Nazis then the bats must be how they reach the Russian arms in Siberia which is why it is doing a smpecial military operation (The Russian government says there is NO war just a special military operation, so that must be true). So OP I know you are a liar because there is NO WAR, there is NO war in Ukraine, there is NO war between Leopard tanks and Russian soldiers and there is is NO invasion of Ukraine. You did not even mention the American biowarfare labs in Ukraine either that Russia said were there or the special bats. Credibility zero

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Credibility zero
      Wrong. Russian government and state propaganda have a high NEGATIVE credibility, in that you can take their bullshit, either assume the exact opposite or swap the sides in their narrative, and you'll get surprisingly close to the truth.

  47. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    is this that same set of vehicles they've been spamming pictures of for a week now? holy shit they're milking that

  48. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >www.rt.com
    O my sides. a fricking RT link, have not seen that in ages. Just got to be true if RT said it kek.

  49. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    turns out both sides of the war is being fought by slavs
    pros: 2x dead slavs
    cons: which ever side wins is a slave victory

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Given you are a moronic baathist arab who works for yalla group spamming here for the Russian government so brown you vanish in a dungheap no one cares (you).

  50. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Are Russian recovery vehicles powerful enough to haul a Leopard 2? They weigh considerably more than Soviet tanks.

  51. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    So, you are telling me previous to this Russia is so dumb and poor it couldn't bribe some Hispanic thirdie country to get the schematics?:

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Those are competent turbo capitalist spics.

  52. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    This raises a very obvious question. Since the Ukrainians had to have known where the tank was abandoned, why didn't they launch an artillery strike on it to prevent it from getting into Russian hands?

  53. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Is this goy's face going to eventually rub off?

  54. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >commissar generalovich, german hato tank has one-piece ammunition instead of two-piece
    >da, comrade tovarish
    >can we produce it?
    >nyet, comrade tovarish

    >commissar generalovich, german hato tank has high resolution infrared imager
    >da, comrade tovarish
    >can we produce it?
    >nyet, comrade tovarish

    >commissar generalovich, german hato tank has engine that not of sound like babushka dying of pneumonia
    >da, comrade tovarish
    >can we produce it?
    >nyet, comrade tovarish

    >commissar generalovich, german hato tank has reverse gear with high speed
    >da, comrade tovarish
    >can we produce it?
    >nyet, comrade tovarish

    and so on and so on

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      You did forget the fact even if by some divine inspiration they decided to try it both sanctions and corruption will end up with, well, you see pic related, supposedly a superior tank to the Leopard.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        a game changer so to speak

  55. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Is there any person alive that doesn't hate these face grimace thumbnails?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      The youtube algorithm promotes videos that have them. That's why people do them. He almost certainly knows how moronic it looks.

  56. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Wow.
    Now Russian Army got 1 (one) modern tank

  57. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Well you better show some successes on the 478th day of the 3rd day of the special military operation.

  58. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Nice, I hope they put it on display on the red square. Maybe even do a tour with it in other non-puppet states like China, Iran etc.

  59. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >He remarked that some of their engines were still running.
    So they weren’t completely destroyed like we heard for the past 5 days? Wow Russians lying who would have guessed

  60. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    and? how many t-90M have been captured / destroyed by Ukraine? Congrats on capturing a 20 year old tank though.

  61. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    [...]

    are you ok?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah I'm fine
      Are you ok?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      the Frankfurt israeli troony is their latest cope, the level of frantic Russian bot posts implies a major calamity

  62. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >The Rockefellers
    >European royalty
    >Global israeli cabals

    It's everyone other than a German putting make up and lipstick on then going to open his child brothels in Berlin

    It's everyone other than that guy

  63. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >hoholbros
    Learn how to spell hohol, please.

  64. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Russia said T-62's were superior to Leopard 2's, so what's the point of bragging? Congrats, you destroyed something like you claimed you would after months of saying it was nook time if they were given over.

  65. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    They should send more leopards, challys, and abrahams because it would be funny to see wrecked wunderwaffe after so much dick sucking.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >literally everything in that picture failed to kill even one (1) Leo 2
      LMAO

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Why are vatBlack folk jerking off the Ka-52 like it doesn't get shot down every other week?

  66. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    https://i.imgur.com/awMYoFo.jpg

    Yeah I'm fine
    Are you ok?

    [...]

  67. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Western equipment is better that Soviet shit
    >Waah you said Western equipment is indestructible but here's a pic showing it's not indestructible waah you said it's invulnerable can naver be lost it's magical that's what you said waaah waaah
    The absolute state of Vatniks

  68. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    If true, I hope it spawns a bunch of memes saying the same thing about every good piece of German technology until people get sick of her.

  69. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Found the trainer. God damn. The POWER of HATO.

  70. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I heard this news, or at least the headline, earlier today and thought it was new. Turns out it's the same shit getting spammed yet again. Does this mean Russia doesn't have any other wins besides a couple companies of vehicles being disabled and like 4 dudes killed, several days ago?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      probably several more dudes on ukraine's side( such is war blyat) but if they disabled more vehicles we'd have seen non stop footage of them by now.

  71. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I do like how vatniks are laughing at the losses Ukraine is suffering in their offensive. But they don't stop to think - how the frick did it come to this? How did the supposed second greatest military force on the planet go from 'Warsaw in 3 days, Berlin in a week, Paris in two weeks and London in a month' to 'Haha you lost stuff making an offensive and forcing us into defensive positions after we started the war! Hahahaah!'.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      People have been waging wars against monkeys for so long that they forgot what the frick a peer conflict looks like. They also drank so much of their cool aid that they thought the tiny amount of technological progress made between 80s and today qualifies as being so much superior that it's not even a competition.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        uh, yes, 40 years of progress actually does make it not a competition. What specific systems are you talking about that are 40 years newer than what the other side is using? 40 years is the difference between the M1 Abrams and the Sherman, or the F-22 and the F-4

  72. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    i sincerely doubt russia would even be capable of maintaining these pieces of shit let alone learning anything of value from them. the war is right now, not 30 years from now when a new generation of fit, competent adult men can be born and raised to conduct R&D and replace their current population who are currently decomposing in foreign soil

  73. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Russians finally examine a Leo 2.
    >"Where's the ammo?"
    >"Wait, is that a Blast Door?"
    >"They keep ALL their ammo behind a Blast Door?!"
    >"How is a tank supposed to cook off if all the ammo is behind a Blast Door?
    >"It doesn't?"
    >"Blyat"
    >"Contact Supreme Leader Putin. Tell him we may need to revise our damage assessments."

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >They keep all their ammo behind a blast door
      ayyylmao

      Who the frick said a Leopard 2 and some bradleys were wunderwaffen? You shills love your strawmen

      Where were you at the start of the year? The whole of Western media were saying this

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Turns out a 25mm aluminium shitbox is not gonna be a wunderwaffe

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >The whole of Western media were saying this
        May we see it?

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Should I continue? This really isn't hard, but it seems you have memory-holed it

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            That's a pretty reasonable text about western tanks.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            I mean this is already proven true, it was a game-changer. Look how few casualties they had from a pretty catastrophic failed attack. Western vehicles are way safer for crews, and when force quality is such a big factor like it is in this war that's a pretty big deal

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              >We've now moved the goalposts of Gamechanger from breaking the Ziegfried line to it doesn't explode when hit (except when it does)

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                why must /k/ defend the dribblings of some journalist somewhere? You think we're writing this shit? What does it have to do with anything? Russian "press" is pretty deranged when it comes to spouting off about Russian capabilities

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Why are these goalposts our problem? People on /k/ haven't been jerking off over the apparent invincibility of Leos because we're not moronic

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Oh really? Should I really go back through the archives and disprove that. Lmao

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                you can probably find people talking about Leos being superior in every way to T-series tanks, which was and is true. Doubt you'd find many people that think 30 of them would change the course of the war on their own

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                I've heard from quite a while back people took shit on Leos for, among other things, really poor ammo rack placement, because simply taking a potshot at the tank is very likely to result in blowing it up.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                listen you stupid fricking Black person. The Leo is a superior tank to the T-72, especially the shitty dragged-out-of-reserves rustbuckets being fielded in large quantities at present. Fire control, stabilisation, sights, crew survivability, etc.
                The level of superiority varies quite a bit according to the model of the leo in question, what additional armour it has, countermeasures, etc.
                The latest and greatest T-72 derivatives such as the T-72B3M are much more of a challenge on paper, but they are also mostly destroyed.
                Either way a direct hit from a T-72 main gun will likely put a hole in a Leo unless it happens to land in the absolute most armoured spot.
                If there's people on /k/ truly jerking off about the leos being some invincible super weapon they are just dumb Black person war tourists like yourself.
                It is a superior tank. But being a superior tank will still result in them getting merked in attacks on fortified positions. We'll be seeing plenty more dead leos; this might be something that causes butthurt among normies but not among the weirdos that hang out on this board

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                good evening, saar

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah, if Leos or any western army tech were invincible, Ukros would simply steamroll to Moscow… vatnigg logic is strange.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                You're the one that posted the pic saying "Gamechanger". Not our fault you tried to move the goalpost forwards.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            I mean even if certain media outlets are frothing at the mouth, they're the media, that's what media does. Nobody on /k/ cares, because we're interested in reality

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              >Nobody on /k/ cares, because we're interested in reality
              This is a joke right?

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Uh so where do they say leopards are immortal gods ready to take T90s in a 1v50? Did anyone suggest there weren't gonna be any losses?

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              I don't suppose many people literally said that, no. But the
              >vatniks are over and finished
              was plentiful.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                are over and finished
                Yeah, that's still true

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            https://i.imgur.com/XMELPNn.png

            >They keep all their ammo behind a blast door
            ayyylmao
            [...]
            Where were you at the start of the year? The whole of Western media were saying this

            I am not /k/ enough but there was a battle in Israel where some commander mopped the floor with the enemy, using just one modern tank from Israel.

            but that's the point. the commander knew the tank, while these poor guys are tossed into whatever tanks/IFVs and expected to perform at their absolute best.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        That headline is accurate. You're melting with anger and damage control.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Where were you at the start of the year? The whole of Western media were saying this
        Post all of these western media articles jerking off to cold war equipment.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        You know what an edge means in English right? It means slight advantage. You know what could means in English right? It means maybe. You know what Wunderwaffe means in German or at least its transferred meaning in English right? Alright now tie it all together and check what you said.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      the hull stowage doesn't have any protection and if it gets hit the whole tank blows into bits, which is what happened with those obliterated turk leos

  74. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    When will the degenerate west finally design and field a modern tracked IFV?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      When will the corrupt east? There's only like 10 units of this shit built ever.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        10 more than the west ever had lol

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >literal wunderwaffen
          Yeah, I'm sure those 10 IFV will take Kiev

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Imaginary weapons are the best ones

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      there are more pumas than t15 around

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        cope and seethe maybe the German army can get their 4 operational pumas staffed by the end of next year lol
        >the US doesn't have anything newer than a bradley
        Nice mechanized army you have there

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          41 all operational 🙂
          one being worked on due to fire

  75. 11 months ago
    Jenson von Rockefeller

    I sat in a leo 2 once outside the Frankfurt school of medicine

    I am now a flourishing trans woman

  76. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    When will the British army be equipped with their AJAX wunderwaffle?
    Seems like the whole world has problems replacing tracked IFV's when the CV90 is the only newer one that's readily available.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Estimates put the Ajax as entering service around 2040 at the earliest.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        MOD are saying fully operational by 2028.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Send it to the Russians, it will kill them faster.

  77. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Russians finally have their hands on technology from the 1970s it's actually over

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >upgraded to the SOTA equipment
      >just shitty old 70s technology
      Which is it?

      That's rhetorical. Obviously the answer is "whichever is convenient to me at the moment".

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah, it's State of the Art...
        ...in the eyes of Russia

  78. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >I've read unconfirmed reports on Twitter that allegedly Ukrainians have possibly reached a region near the azov sea.
    They're complete bullshit. The most successful axis is still in heavy combat in Urozhaine, the Bakhmut Axis isn't heading towards Azov, and the Robotnye axis has made no progress whatsoever while taking heavy casualties.

  79. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Can't be bothered to read this thread. Has the Black person OP posted any evidence that is photographic in nature to support his propaganda claim

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's been on 2ch for a few days now. Evidently, nobody can be assed to make the Black personlicious low bitrate audioless version with subtitles to post it here.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      I've seen the video. It's just some russian soldiers looting shit from the column before running away.

  80. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    It doesn't matter if Russia captures all of Ukraine's Leopards

    The high IQ take is that they'll give the tech to Chyna who will get kraut wunderwaffe and will mass produce it for their own use

    They'll also auction one for pajeets, Iran and North Korea

  81. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Of the Ukrainians have time to play around like that, what does that say to russia? Sounds like Russia failed to break their spirits despite the bombardments of critical infrastructures and rando apartments.

  82. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Stupid the xolxolz with their fancy 'funerals' and 'coffins' are a sign that they have been corrupted impossibly by the decadent westoids.

  83. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Because printing ANOTHER bajillion dollars in coof gibs will fix the inflation this time for sure.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      It wont, but instead of spending it on ukraine why not give it back to tax payers? Itd be the same thing in terms of effect on inflation.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Isn't the money from the Pentagon's already 800 billion budget, so cutting aid won't do much other than sending all of that to Israel lol

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Isn't the money from the Pentagon's already 800 billion budget, so cutting aid won't do much other than sending all of that to Israel lol

          I hate how government agencies think

          >gee we have been allotted this money
          >better spend it all regardless of how banal it is since it was given to us

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Because that's how it works you fricking homosexual. Budgets in both gov and businesses are like that - there's a predicted 'effect' by dollar value calculated, and then the entity doing the budgeting calculates how much 'effect' they'll require for the year and forks over the dollar value. The agencies are supposed to spend it all because the parent entity is giving that money to receive back a calculated amount of return on that investment.
            If the DoD maths out that it'll take 800 billion annually to be able to fight two near peer wars and win then they'll budget for that. The DoD doesn't turn around and say "Hey we've managed to achieve most of our main goals for 700 billion, have a 100 back", they'll take that 100 billion and spend it on overkill - or in this case, they'll give it to Ukraine for the most dollar efficient spending ever for destroying the Russian military. You're a moron for not seeing this.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Giving money to taxpayers would drive spending on basic goods. Higher demand of consumer goods = more inflation. Dumping our 50 year old weapons and ammo just provides a few thousand extra union jobs to American citizens without the heavy inflation hit

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Any money the Gov injects into the middle class and below will be sucked up by corporate elites raising prices to suck it all out of the economy into trust funds, investment properties, holiday homes and vacations.
        Anyone suggesting that higher corporate or top bracket income tax rates are bad for the economy deserves the guillotine.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >why not give it back to tax payers?
        moronic, the point of taxpayers is paying not getting money. Im not even being edgy, the flow of taxes is from the population to the government not in reverse. All the gov can do is tax less

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Look, I'm not opposed to the govt handing out old Bradleys and GMLRS ammo to taxpayers, but I don't think it would be as beneficial as you're implying.

  84. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    The assertion that Russia captured western equipment seems to be based on the video (singular) already posted to /k/, where Russian soldiers took a smartphone video of themselves looting infantry weapons off one disabled leopard (the same leopard already photographed from multiple perspectives by Russian propagandists.)

    Whether or not they actually recovered the vehicle or not is questionable, as Ukrainian forces seem to have maintained pressure on that front. The Russians may not have had time to bring in any vehicle capable of towing it.

    Additionally, there is now footage of Ukrainians using a maintenance vehicle to drag a leopard with a damaged track. This may in fact be the leopard in question.

    Eventually, the Russians will undoubtedly capture western tanks and vehicles in some quantity, but a lack of convincing evidence in this case leads me to believe that the Russians are engaging in the only behavior that their military is exceptionally well-drilled in: lying.

    P.S., kill all Russians

  85. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    These subhumans are just posting rt links now without an ounce of shame.

  86. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    us inflation is down to 4% as of today, stop gargling cum up

  87. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    From Kiev to Bakmuht to a western tank...
    ...
    ...
    >HA HA

  88. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >you must fight inflation by flooding the market with more free money

  89. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    In all seriousness, not to sound like a zigger but the offensive has been an unmitigated disaster so far. The good news is that Ukraine seems to be savvy enough to realize these assaults are stupid and aren't going anywhere, thus they haven't thrown away most of their kit like the Russians have. So I'm wondering what their plan B is if they can't dislodge the Russians in the south. They need to keep up the pressure on Russia but they also need to silence the peace cucks in the west so they can keep getting support despite the lack of any significant accomplishments on the battlefield.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      We are only a few days in anon, iirc Kherson was like two months and we heard all the same shit we are hearing now back then. I'd wait until the Ukies lift their media gag order before making any determinations on how successful they've been

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Even optimistic forecasts are that this is going to be pretty slow going, and measured in weeks if not months.
      However, we're only one week in and the Russians have already committed a sizable reserve to the Velikya Novosilka area for counterattacks, and while they've slowed the Ukrainians advance they haven't managed to turn it back. Any talk of "crumple zones" is bullshit to disguise that the AFU brigades are already putting enough pressure on Russian defenses to penetrate, albeit slowly.

  90. 11 months ago
    Anonymous
  91. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >western tanks are useless; please stop sending them

  92. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >random nation
    >giving
    Oh no,no,no. See. Ukraine is going to Owe the US for every ounce of military materiel that we gave them and they didn't give back. That's a Staggaring sum that our Grandkids can hold over Ukraine's head. Ukraine with it's abundant natural resources, educated populace, and established industry will actually be able to pay off if we give them generous terms. Generous terms the US will happily give, in exchange for...considerations

  93. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    another dead leo 2 in ukraine

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >totally unrecoverable

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >recoverable crash
      >snow on the ground
      >picture is from ylilauta.org, so finnish
      What a lazy, stupid lie.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >snow
      zBlack person cope

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >zigger prostitutes now propagating leopard cope with decades old pictures from training areas in other countries

      hahahaha

  94. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    it's the defence budget. This year it's being spent on bleeding one of your principle rival's white. Seems like good value, seeing as they spaff the same amount of money every year. Not to mention you just demolished a major arms export competitor

  95. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    We aren't giving them all cash dipshit, it's aid in that amount, aka gear, food, fuel and training

  96. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Giving out free money causes more inflation.
    Buckle up and deal with it

  97. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Yeah it's going to bite the Russians in the ass. The Ukrainians will certainly be happy to put their equipment back to work.

  98. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >completely pretending to forget all the abandooned russian tanks at the beginning of the war
    >will almost assuredly give some worthless explanation for why its different

  99. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >hoholbros
    Hohol. Learn to spell the god damn word.

  100. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    VatBlack folk really upped their shit propaganda. not in effectiveness of course, just volume.

  101. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >source: RT

    Even if it was true, so what? Is this supposed to be the crippling blow that finally knocks Ukraine out? Is it a desperate attempt at coping over the hundreds of vehicles towed off the battlefield by tractors to be refurbished by or parted out to maintain other Ukrainian vehicles?

    Seriously. This is even sadder than spending a week screaming about disabling a few brads. Stop embarrassing yoursleves.

  102. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    already posted 3 days ago stupid vatnik
    nobody cares

  103. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    This is normal for western tanks to not being abble to witstand artillery fire?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous
    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      is it normal for the armor at the top to be this thin? it looks like it ould be pierced by those old WWI anti-tank rifles.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        40mm, so yeah a PTRD would go through it at point-blank range

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >This is normal for western tanks to not being abble to witstand artillery fire?
      They aren't expected to survive artillery at all. Any modern artillery one-shot tank. We win the war by preventing enemy artillery from firing in the first place.
      So them being able to survive russian artillery? It mean the russian are throwing some really weak shit.

  104. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >blatant sosach raid
    Did Abu kill your shithole so badly that you need to seek your 15 rubblemass here?

  105. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Well they can go ahead and try towing it out when it's located right on the frontline in a minefield.

  106. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    it's over hoholbros how can we possibly compete

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *