Leo 2A6 obr. 2024

>Andriy Tarasenko: The Leo 2A6 that was brought to Moscow received an unusual repair - the damaged rollers were replaced with rollers from the T-80.
bastardo...

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Photos of this vehicle
    https://cloud.mail dot ru/public/ksKn/J3YMj9tTv

    Features of the Back Rollers of the Leopard 2
    https://btvt.info/5library/vbtt_1988_01_katki_leopard2.htm

    Study on the Load Capacity of the Back Rollers of the Leopard 2
    https://btvt.info/5library/vbtt_1987_06_leo2.htm

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Videos so you don't have to interact with ziggergram or zigx to see the thing:


  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I knew something looked off.
    The front idler wheel is also too short by the looks of it.

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Nobody cares about these optics except braindead ziggers it's just a tank there's tens of thousands of them. If parading around a tank gets their AIDS orc dicks hard then so be it

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Who the frick cares about a disabled tank?
    A metric frickton have been destroyed in this conflict.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Who the frick cares about a disabled tank?
      >A metric frickton have been destroyed in this conflict.
      Russian losses last 24 hours and totals. Personnel is Russians killed and does not include wounded.

      28.04.2024
      Tanks — 7279 (+11)
      Armored fighting vehicle — 13991 (+20)
      Artillery systems — 11948 (+43)
      MLRS — 1050 (+1)
      Anti-aircraft warfare — 776 (+1)
      Planes — 348
      Helicopters — 325
      UAV — 9507 (+22)
      Cruise missiles — 2124
      Ships (boats) — 26
      Submarines — 1
      Trucks and Fuel Tankers — 16065 (+46)
      Special equipment — 1971 (+3)
      Military personnel — aprx. 466150 people (+1096)

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >21k armoured vehicles
        >12k artillery
        Hoooweee that's a lot.
        The scale of this war is unreal. I unironically wish NATO had started it sooner, without nooks and a bit of preparation, Russian unironically would have been gone in a year.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Manpower losses is the really fricked up part here, Russia is really close to having lost more people in this war then US millitary losses in every conflict since and including WW2

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Zigger shills. Remember, a knocked out/destroyed/captured Abrams or Leo 2 is a tragedy. A thousand T-72/80/90 turrets achieving low orbit is a statistic.

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    was that a russian repair, or an ukrainian one?

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Can't wait for the parade lol.
    I wonder if they'll manage to get the M1 running with some wh40k orc magic by building stuffing some 80s tractor motor inside or whatever.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      No chance, that tank was scuttled
      There's nothing left of the engine and running gear but ashes and rust

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >1000+ russian tanks
    >2 western
    looks like a fair trade to me

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >NOOOO! YOU"RE COPING!!!!
    Ok, little guy.

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    My dude there has been destroyed abrams in Iraq and Yemen, no one gave a shit.
    Destroyed turkish Leos in syria, no one gave a shit either
    I'm a thirdie too my man, so i know how it feels to want to get a "gotcha" at first worlders, but this ain't the way lol

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Destroyed Abrams in Yemen
      Under armored export version operated by sand people
      >Destroyed Turkish Leopards
      Older 2A4 variants from the 80's, also operated by sand people

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Under armored export version operated by sand people
        Saudis have an M1A2 variant. Ukraine has an M1A1 variant.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Saudi's have the M1A2 export version which isn't as good as the U.S. Army M1A2 versions. The M1A2 is in general better than the M1A1 but the version the Ukrainians received was straight from U.S. stocks.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            No, it wasn't. It was rebuilt with export armor. That's why it took so fricking long for them to get there.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >rebuilt with export armor
              Are you moronic, the armor is built in when they are manufactured, show me some sources

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >homie doesn't know what an armor package is

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Why are morons so sure of their own moronation?
                >https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/a42676794/radioactive-armor-m1-abrams-tanks/

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Shows an article from some sweaty wannabe journalist instead of US DOD or ONE documents
                >That'll show him

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It's a welded steel box filled with stuff. You can take it apart, change the stuff, and weld it back up again.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Why are you posting about tanks when you haven't even managed to read the wikipedia article? Lurk moar.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You've never worked on ships or heavy equipment, have you? If you have a cutting torch and a welder there's no such thing as "built in."

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I'm unironically a heavy equipment operator and mechanic, i just like trolling you guys because you've been shitting up my board for over two years now with your slav bumfight content.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                good for you, but stripping down the armor from a tank and replacing it with other armor is completely moronic. the fact that it's an armor downgrade makes even more moronic by power of ten

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                talk to the department of energy moron they control the export of depleted uranium out of the united states

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                you are a jobless neet and a fat homosexual living in /misc/

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >I'm unironically a heavy equipment operator and mechanic
                bro worked with some bulldozers and now he thinks he knows everything about Tanks

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >operator and mechanic
                You know shit about frick. If you can lean you can clean so get back to work.

                t. Engineer and researcher

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I'm unironically a heavy equipment operator and mechanic, i just like trolling you guys because you've been shitting up my board for over two years now with your slav bumfight content.

                you are both tards unfit to mow my lawn. Unlike Jose

                t. harvard professor and super smart mcgenius man

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >I wAs OnLy PrEtEnDiNg To Be moronic
                K

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Uh huh. Sure you are, Indiana vatBlack person. PS: Your posting style remains distinctive.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The US doesn't export Abrams with the domestic armor packages. Export models are rebuilt to order from stripped hulls; they don't keep any on hand. So it took a year to get them to Ukraine because they had to finish one order (Taiwan? Can't remember) and then get to making them for Ukraine.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            No.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        As if those tanks are immune to topd down attack rockets or drones.
        Get a hold of your feelings anon, those are just fricking tanks designed by a group of whom approx 50% at least are fricking morons. It's not a pinnacle of engineering, both aren't.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The latest n greatest abrams is certainly the pinnacle of MBTs, for whatever that's worth.

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    I´d be more impressed if they had running russian tanks other than T-34 in moscow parade.
    But i guess thats not to be expected from russians anymore.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      If task force Z wants to parade around a war trophy that's their business. Not like The Ukrainian's haven't done the same

      [...]

      The timing of parades and diplomacy is such that Putins Pyongyang visit will probably have him flying out to their parade immediately after his.

      Prepare for the most brutal mogging of the century.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Didn't they can the parade?

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    id love to see bmp3s at the parade actually
    I havent seen them in a year

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >id love to see bmp3s at the parade actually
      >I havent seen them in a year

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    I wonder how many t90s have been captured by Ukraine

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >T-90A - 10
      >T-90AK - 1
      >T-90M - 3

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Enough to at one point have separate battalions of captured T-90A and T-80BVM's respectively.
      But you know, as Stalin said: one destroyed Leopard is a tragedy, a hundred T-90's - a statistic.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Can't provide specific numbers, but Russia remains Ukraines largest supplier of tanks in this war.

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    And you still haven't posted any actual government documentation proving that the Ukrainian M1A1's are anything other than genuine U.S. Army M1A1 variants rather than the shit they export to third worlders.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      How about you provide some actual documenjtation proving they're genuine M1A1s with non-export armor packages, depsite the whole fricking reason for their late arrival being that they needed to switch the armor. Stop trying to shift the burden of proof, you dishonest fricktard.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        why does the armor package prove anything? This tank was captured, not destroyed.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          ...are you for real?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            OP here. I've lost track of whether you're the zigbaiter or he is, but I think you're the non-tard.

            Regardless, to spell this shit out for everyone equally:

            1. The US upgraded all Abrams hulls in storage to M1A2 'equivalent' or better. This full lore of how this happened is very convoluted and recounting it here would be unreasonably tedious. So I will not be doing that.

            The gist, for our purposes, is that the notion of a "gen 3" armor standard served as the benchmark which all M1's had to meet. These upgrades were achieved in different ways on different variants, depending on year and what they were starting from.

            2. This process resulted in the near-complete depletion of 'true' M1A1 variants in storage, both for FMS and in storage at Army Prepositioned Stock sites. Most of what remained was tied up in pending sales to Poland. The poland deal is EXTREMELY convoluted, featuring "loaners" of one variant to stopgap until the arrival of another, then to be shipped back, etc...

            3. The US had no intention of providing M1's to a foreign ally except through the FMS channel. This is a slow and high-volume approach in which the export model is given its own designation and very carefully tailored feature list.

            4. Consequently, the US had no contingency plan for providing less-than-current-milspec M1's for ukraine. That is: there were no spare, non-DU, M1A1 builds lying around to send.

            5. To remedy this, certain M1A2* units were outfitted with A1 armor packages. They purportedly retained some of their non-armor A2 features like optics, but this could have been little more than state department sweet talk.

            The whole situation confuses and enrages z's, because they lack critical context like knowledge that the DOD doesn't actually dictate final export policy on anything uranium, even if it's their property. The DOE does.

  14. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I can't believe this is the next shill talking point. A captured abram.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      If task force Z wants to parade around a war trophy that's their business. Not like The Ukrainian's haven't done the same

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's bread & games, my friend.

  15. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    So German tanks get to parade in front of the Kremlin?

  16. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    garage54 tier repair

  17. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Is there going to be a May Day parade?
    It would be a real shame if some plane were to mayday into the square, or a Cessna to land with half a ton of explosives.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Moscow is too well defended for that, especially on Victory Day. Might be a good idea to launch attacks in other Russian areas though

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        True, there's no way in, around May Day

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Another refinery hit would be neat.anything to piss in monkey's soup.

  18. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I can't believe brandon and globbohomer did dis

  19. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What did Ukraine blow up today? There is an unusual amount of shill post today lol.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Ziggers shilling overtime, I heard that the Crimea bridge is about to go down very soon, is that why?

      One sign of autism is inability to read sentiment and context clues.

      was that a russian repair, or an ukrainian one?

      Almost certainly a russian one. Yooks have propa repair depots with real parts.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Yooks have propa repair depots with real parts.
        No they don't.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          no u

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Ziggers shilling overtime, I heard that the Crimea bridge is about to go down very soon, is that why?

      lots of missiles shot at Crimeia and Bryansk is what happened.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I'm actually beginning to think that this isn't anything specific, but rather a generalised ramp up of shilling leading into the parade

  20. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Ziggers shilling overtime, I heard that the Crimea bridge is about to go down very soon, is that why?

  21. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >"lol hohols are blowing up your precious western technobloat tanks, why don't you stop helping them"
    >takes t62s out of storage
    >"why are sending weapons to ukraine, don't you believe Russia is weak? Why send weapons?"
    >takes out 1950s mine gobblers out of storage
    Total Zigger Death

  22. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Leo 2A6 obr. 2024
    You laugh now but just wait till they take it back to front to use themself. Woldn't be the first one-of-a-kind sample they send. They might even add some ERA and claim that's ARMATA.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >mighty rassiya will re-use western sissy tank because... because they just will, blyat

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      With what ammunition lmao

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        115mm from T-62 will fit. Smekalka wins again, xaxaxa.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >some tanks shoot but cant drive
        >some tanks drive but cant shoot
        Judging by the wheel its made to drive...

  23. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    That's actually intelligent. Plug weld, drill to suit then roll. It would not have taken long for any vehicle mechanic with a welder in the field.

    Redrilling wheels for different bolt patterns is common. Cannot see if the replacement road wheels are hub piloted (which would make sense for strength) but for display use stud piloted should be sufficient.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      usually you need to fill them with oil, you won't do this to them. no way it's going to go far

  24. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Just stop giving ukraine tanks

  25. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why is DU armor treated as some unexportable secret, anyways? The uranium isn't a proliferation risk because it's depleted. China and Russia have DU metallurgy experience. What's the actual export risk?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Why the frick do you think?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        My best guess would be Congressional midwits scared of the word uranium

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's just autism, same as the F-22 export ban. Made sense 30 years ago when it was cutting edge, counter productive now.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Institutional inertia

  26. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why would they repair it?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      To parade it around to morons in the countryside. That's literally it.
      We destroyed western wonderweapons, we have destroyed hundreds and thousands of others, look we stronk we will win.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I wonder how good/bad the internals are damaged
        that one abrams that was posted today, is definitely not moving on its own for the parade

  27. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Are you serious?

  28. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Would having DU have saved the Abrams from being deleted by FPV drones that strike from above?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yooks not being under strict US requirements not to do any field modifications woulda. Or did you fail to notice every abrams you've seen in the war has been stock

  29. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >non-sealed bearings
    why?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Common for T-series afaik.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *