ITS FINALLY GOING TO BE OVER

This fat tank will clear the russians. I've used it in BFBC2 I have experience in it and I can say for certain they don't have a chance.

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    git gud

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Unbelievably based. Good thing they are getting Bradleys and not puma.

    [...]

    [...]

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i think we should send over more C4 to the Ukis, just approach the tank from behind and stick a couple packs on, easy killings.
    Just watch out for it suddenly driving backwards.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      American-ISIS tactics.
      Literally a war crime.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >he doesn't stick it to a go kart, drive toward the tank, and hop out before he detonates it

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        you miss out on the c4 mind games that way.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Just watch out for it suddenly driving backwards.

      The battlefield series are excellent simulators of traffic accidents, I once destroyed a tiger tank by jumping off a cliff with a m3 greyhound armored car and landing on it (b1942 with forgotten hope). I also killed infantry by running trucks off cliffs and landing them on enemy players. Another common type of roadkill was picking people off by scything them with aircraft wings, a basic harvest area was the enemy airfield where plane campers congregated in the plane spawn area. If you went in low you could scythe several in one pass.

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Lmao, shame it's going into retarded Ukie hands

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'm pretty sure this glorified m113 it's gonna win the war alone

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    why was bc2 so fucking good

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It played fast and loose with physics (12 gauge slugs, fighter jet gymnastics) and had an appealing variety of weapons. There was a grind but it wasnt so bad you'd never try the high tier stuff.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        There were no fighters in BC2, only attack helicopters and transport helicopters. The physics worked because they actually played an important role in the game: losing cover and blowing up buildings actually had an impact on how you'd attack and defend different areas. Flash forward to BF3, and while the destruction was more technically impressive, but it didn't actually matter as much in practical terms.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It played fast and loose with physics (12 gauge slugs, fighter jet gymnastics) and had an appealing variety of weapons. There was a grind but it wasnt so bad you'd never try the high tier stuff.

      There were no fighters in BC2, only attack helicopters and transport helicopters. The physics worked because they actually played an important role in the game: losing cover and blowing up buildings actually had an impact on how you'd attack and defend different areas. Flash forward to BF3, and while the destruction was more technically impressive, but it didn't actually matter as much in practical terms.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Bad Company 2 had some of the best gunfighting I've ever seen in a game. The guns all looked unique, sounded unique, and "handled" differently. In a lot of modern shooters you get something 4-5 dozen guns that are all black and all sound the same. In BC2 you had fewer guns, but each one was suited to a new playstyle.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      other than the sound design and destruction it was shit

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It won't win the war with current numbers, although it will provide much needed additional armor for Ukrainian forces.

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    fuck

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Battlefield 3 was a better Battlefield game but Bad Company 2 was far more fun.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I felt like BF3 didn't know if it wanted to be an arcade shooter or a tactical shooter, and as a result it tried too hard to cater to both sides. BC2 was definitely more an arcade shooter, but a well done arcade shooter. The focus was more on individual-level gunfighting, but it worked because the execution of the gunfighting was almost perfect.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        i think in general battlefield works better if leans more arcade than realistic

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I miss the bad company games. BC2 was a ton of fun with multiplayer, probably the most fun battlefield game.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They've fucked themselves trying to shoehorn rush into every main series game.

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If ragheads can do it, anyone can

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Brown

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Ukroids are vatniks at the core, they will waste the bradleys in some retarded way I guarantee it. The propaganda and hype will make them cocky and gassed up.

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's an ifv so it's a self propelled casket. Unless you can sneak one really up close without anyone noticing and out of line of fire of copious amount of anti armor weaponry present everywhere, you just gonna lose it. You may also lose it to a fucking lmg which is a thing not many people even consider. Those can pen some of the armor straight up, and even without that, it can damage the sprockets to the point they fail under load and it's a mobility kill. This tactic also works for a sniper except it takes longer. Don't get me even started on rpgs, for an ifv that's an instakill.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *