And? It still slings shells right? It can still put an HE shell into a building where infantry are hiding while being immune to everything but the most modern Western infantry AT weapons. The tank is unironically fine. It's probably being used only at checkpoints and as a sturmgeschutz for supporting infantry. The tank is unironically fine. Also modern shells can be fired that can penetrating the modern Western tank and it can be used as light artillery platform. A tank is still a tank and Russia has thousands of these so it's fine. The tank is unironically fine. It's much better to use up these old shitty tanks on rope a dope defensive actions before using the thousands more modern t-90s and t-14s. THE TANK IS UNIRONICALLY FINE.
>posting fake r*ssian cope to stir a backlash when 'dumb HE throwing bulletproof piece of shit is still better than a Lada' is a legit argument and will probably postpone Russian collapse by 1-3 years
Come on now. Stop shitting up the board.
And? It still slings shells right? It can still put an HE shell into a building where infantry are hiding while being immune to everything but the most modern russian infantry AT weapons. The tank is unironically fine. It's probably being used only at checkpoints and as an assault gun for supporting infantry. The tank is unironically fine. Also modern shells can be fired that will penetrate modern russian tanks and it can be used as self-propelled gun. A tank is still a tank and israel has hundreds of these so it's fine. The tank is unironically fine. It's much better to use up these old shitty tanks on rope a dope defensive actions before using the thousands more modern leopard 2A7s and M1A2s. THE TANK IS UNIRONICALLY FINE.
>while being immune to everything but the most modern Western infantry AT weapons
A regular RPG-7 would take it out. It's only saving grace is that it'll be less likely to throw a turret the way the autoloader tanks do.
So is it already known wich T55 variant it is?
Because i can't imagine would send anything other then T55AM as the rest doesn't even have range finders i think.
T-55A. No ERA bolts, no cheek armor, no extra antennas, no climate sensor, no active IR sight, no laser (or coincidence) rangefinder. No grenade launchers. No glacis armor. No refurbished tracks. No side skirts. It could even be a fricking T-54M
what will this accomplish other than easy targets?
If dug-in - Pantherthurm 🙂
T-62 was used in the same role in Kherson region.
>Kherson region
hope it goes just as well
Tank is tank, comrade.
You get to kill four Russians at once instead of only three
If they man a fully due t-62 also is without an autoloader
Old photo
Make me laugh really really hard. Honestly the best entertainment of 2023
make me howl with laughter as half get destroyed or captured, and half don't work at all
They could be kinda useful as really shifty SPG's with the ammo they god from Iran, but that's about it.
those drone zoomers all get to become tank aces too, if those rumors of massive stocks of FPV drones are even half true
And? It still slings shells right? It can still put an HE shell into a building where infantry are hiding while being immune to everything but the most modern Western infantry AT weapons. The tank is unironically fine. It's probably being used only at checkpoints and as a sturmgeschutz for supporting infantry. The tank is unironically fine. Also modern shells can be fired that can penetrating the modern Western tank and it can be used as light artillery platform. A tank is still a tank and Russia has thousands of these so it's fine. The tank is unironically fine. It's much better to use up these old shitty tanks on rope a dope defensive actions before using the thousands more modern t-90s and t-14s. THE TANK IS UNIRONICALLY FINE.
I give it a few hours of being in n operation until something internally fails and it needs to be towed out or abandoned.
Whoa, we're holding onto that cope for the T-34s! You're jumping the gun on this one.
>posting fake r*ssian cope to stir a backlash when 'dumb HE throwing bulletproof piece of shit is still better than a Lada' is a legit argument and will probably postpone Russian collapse by 1-3 years
Come on now. Stop shitting up the board.
And? It still slings shells right? It can still put an HE shell into a building where infantry are hiding while being immune to everything but the most modern russian infantry AT weapons. The tank is unironically fine. It's probably being used only at checkpoints and as an assault gun for supporting infantry. The tank is unironically fine. Also modern shells can be fired that will penetrate modern russian tanks and it can be used as self-propelled gun. A tank is still a tank and israel has hundreds of these so it's fine. The tank is unironically fine. It's much better to use up these old shitty tanks on rope a dope defensive actions before using the thousands more modern leopard 2A7s and M1A2s. THE TANK IS UNIRONICALLY FINE.
>being immune to everything but the most modern russian infantry AT weapons
PRG-7: Can I have a word with you
the T-55 could be penned by the M27 LAW, so this pasta was stale before it was ever typed
Whoosh
In case you are actually being serious about this: Soviet Union considered T-55 obsolete design by late 1950's.
>German terms
>that can penetrating
>t-14
Very nice, anon. You deserve a (You). Spot o
there is no modern tank that can be frontally penetrated by a LAW or RPG-2
>being immune to everything but the most modern Western infantry AT weapons
Are M72 LAWs “modern”?
By Russian standards, yes
It's worse than that. A lucky M20 Super Bazooka round could penetrate the front of this POS
Guaranteed replies, have another (You) on the house humble farmer
>while being immune to everything but the most modern Western infantry AT weapons
A regular RPG-7 would take it out. It's only saving grace is that it'll be less likely to throw a turret the way the autoloader tanks do.
obr. 2023 where?
T-
but
but
muh museum relocationg
muh spare parts needed
So is it already known wich T55 variant it is?
Because i can't imagine would send anything other then T55AM as the rest doesn't even have range finders i think.
I think the one in the picture doesnt have a range finder
the ones weve seen so far are all original t-54/55
Anon, they don’t give their soldiers socks. Why do you think they’d make sure their 70 year old tanks have rangefinders?
T-55A. No ERA bolts, no cheek armor, no extra antennas, no climate sensor, no active IR sight, no laser (or coincidence) rangefinder. No grenade launchers. No glacis armor. No refurbished tracks. No side skirts. It could even be a fricking T-54M
Someone email this to Scott Ritter. According to him there were no T-55s going to the front, because Russia was the only country prepared for this war
>you will live to see Bradleys that slotted Iraqi T-72s slot Russian T-55s
God bless this timeline
Hahahahaha I’ve commandeered a T-55 from 1988 to 1990 in the Hungarian People’s Army. It was a fun time.
Commandeered means stolen hungarianon. The word you want is commanded. How was the tank?