>so much different equipment it looks like Fall of Berlin
Kek, reminds me of CivDiv's video the other day >fires NLAW >fires RPG-7 >"bring more AT" >guy brings out RPG >"does anyone know how to fire this?"
They have such mix of everything they are either looking for someone that knows how to use a weapon or just reading the plate and hoping.
Late cold war prototypes were basically this except the crew are in an armoured citadel at the front. The Armata is the only one of this design tree that has come close to fruition though
We will, it's the best possible design if you are willing to use an auto-loader.
Putting the engine up front and turret in the middle means the whole vehicle will be absurdly front-heavy, which means maneuverbailtiy on soft ground will be shit and it'll be huge maintenance hog. You want the weight to be distributed relatively evenly across the length of the vehicle if at all possible. This is also why a lot of WWII tanks used a setup with a rear engine, front transmission and a driveshaft connecting the two.
If it makes you feel better the opening NLAW shot fricked the engine on the BMP-2 so they had plenty of time to bring up AT and find someone that knew how to use things.
It ws honestly impressive that they reported the BMP on radio and within 10 minutes a ute full of AT was there to resupply them.
All hand-held rocket launchers are in a competition to see who can come up with the most moronic sighting system.
The RPG-7 has all these awesome ranging markers on it's sight and is super practical, but the N-LAW only has a fricking dot as a sight because it literally flies in a straight line and has zero drop.
That's just two examples, there's at least 10 different anti-tank launchers floating around Ukraine right now, it's pretty understandable that not every soldier knows how every single one of them fricking works.
I'm not giving them shit, no one is going to remember the details of 20 different launchers. I'm just pointing out one of the issues that comes from running every AT made in the last 50 years.
yes its very good. if its the upgraded ones that is.
>so much different equipment it looks like Fall of Berlin
Kek, reminds me of CivDiv's video the other day
>fires NLAW
>fires RPG-7
>"bring more AT"
>guy brings out RPG
>"does anyone know how to fire this?"
They have such mix of everything they are either looking for someone that knows how to use a weapon or just reading the plate and hoping.
>RPG-28
Fugg
why dont we make tanks like this
We will, it's the best possible design if you are willing to use an auto-loader.
what if they shoot you in the back
Then you die, if you want to make sure no one dies you put a robot in the back too.
Late cold war prototypes were basically this except the crew are in an armoured citadel at the front. The Armata is the only one of this design tree that has come close to fruition though
Putting the engine up front and turret in the middle means the whole vehicle will be absurdly front-heavy, which means maneuverbailtiy on soft ground will be shit and it'll be huge maintenance hog. You want the weight to be distributed relatively evenly across the length of the vehicle if at all possible. This is also why a lot of WWII tanks used a setup with a rear engine, front transmission and a driveshaft connecting the two.
tfw pic related never happened
I am now demoralised. Damn you
If it makes you feel better the opening NLAW shot fricked the engine on the BMP-2 so they had plenty of time to bring up AT and find someone that knew how to use things.
It ws honestly impressive that they reported the BMP on radio and within 10 minutes a ute full of AT was there to resupply them.
You shouldnt be. The fact they actually have supplies like that is more than you can say about the russians.
Russians are far worse. Ukraine is at least getting stuff so even random volunteers can get them.
All hand-held rocket launchers are in a competition to see who can come up with the most moronic sighting system.
The RPG-7 has all these awesome ranging markers on it's sight and is super practical, but the N-LAW only has a fricking dot as a sight because it literally flies in a straight line and has zero drop.
That's just two examples, there's at least 10 different anti-tank launchers floating around Ukraine right now, it's pretty understandable that not every soldier knows how every single one of them fricking works.
I'm not giving them shit, no one is going to remember the details of 20 different launchers. I'm just pointing out one of the issues that comes from running every AT made in the last 50 years.
Your average COD lobby has less diversity in weapons used. Not complaining, it sure makes all the footage really interesting to watch.
>Be me
>Wake up
>Go on /k/
>Breaking News: NATO is trying even harder than yesterday
>"NATO aren't tryhards though"
>Go back to sleep
>Repeat
Maybe try getting some friends or a job or something instead of sleeping and being on PrepHole.
No can do, I'm not a tryhard