>I can't give a opinion on a Akula being junk
or not, I never got the chance to inspect one.
I don't think anyone's ever actually has inspected one, except for valuable parts or materials.
>nose air intake >submarine
You don't see any potential issues with this? Anything that might make it a good idea to cover the intake with a nose cone that the missile ejects once there air for it to take in?
Golly gee, you're right, it sure does, mm-hmm
Now why don't you take your meds and have a nice lie-down
1 year ago
Anonymous
Ok Anonymous. To be fair, what would you like to talk about?
You need to understand though 90% or so of subs
"need to know" have a confidential, secret, top secret DOD classifications.
So... We can start with something like the PL system.
Guessing you maybe Russian I'm thinking a toilet design would be... irresistible.
Hard to say if it's on par with NATO subs, but it's definitely a decent sub as it is. Maintenance is the key factor with subs or any ships, armor, or planes anymore.
Britain France and muttland are all building new subs rn fr
STSC.
They're not hard to see.
> Is the akula sub junk??
Retired Sub Builder here.
I can't give a opinion on a Akula being junk
or not, I never got the chance to inspect one.
>I can't give a opinion on a Akula being junk
or not, I never got the chance to inspect one.
I don't think anyone's ever actually has inspected one, except for valuable parts or materials.
>I don't think anyone's ever actually has inspected one
hahahahaha
>>I don't think.......
That mabe the case.
Your statement is... let's say, Eccentric.
>Botton pic
What am i looking at here?
My guess is the containment vessel for the reactor. Which suffered violent pressure equalization.
P-700 Granit cruise missile.
where's the nose air intake?
>nose air intake
>submarine
You don't see any potential issues with this? Anything that might make it a good idea to cover the intake with a nose cone that the missile ejects once there air for it to take in?
Is it filled with construction foam?
I'm guessing a type of foam to force the water out of the tube, to aid in floatation for raising the sub.
So your post is in fact completely worthless
But some random /kommando civilians opinion has worth?
It's worth more than an absence of meaning, which what your post is
To You.... Yes.
>I'm a knower
>I know nothing about this
Lol
Lmao even
KEK
That's right... I know and You Don't Know,
and I can see that it that bothers you, doesn't it!
Golly gee, you're right, it sure does, mm-hmm
Now why don't you take your meds and have a nice lie-down
Ok Anonymous. To be fair, what would you like to talk about?
You need to understand though 90% or so of subs
"need to know" have a confidential, secret, top secret DOD classifications.
So... We can start with something like the PL system.
Guessing you maybe Russian I'm thinking a toilet design would be... irresistible.
It was pretty good when it left the dry dock, but poor maintenance habits and support mean it's probably shit now.
>pretty good
That's if Russian claims are to be believed.
>if Russian claims are to be believed.
If Russia claims that the sky is blue you'd better go double fricking check.
> It was pretty good for a Russian sub
FTFY
>Is an Akula-class sub junk?
No
>Is an Akula-class sub operated and maintained by Russians junk?
Yes
It might be on par with Canada's fleet of subs.
I forget, is there a Victoria-class sub on fire this week?
Hard to say if it's on par with NATO subs, but it's definitely a decent sub as it is. Maintenance is the key factor with subs or any ships, armor, or planes anymore.