Is Russia really about to pull a Kyiv feint 2.0?

>material and moboliks being gathered at the border
>Belarusian doctors and nurses being called en masse to draft offices
>air defense systems/tanks being moved south from Minsk
Has the potato finally been peeled and Luka's colonelcy granted?

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine if Belarus alone succeeds on taking Kiev.
    How many levels of cope from monkestan will there be?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >potato colonel takes kyiv
      >adopts war against russia
      >belarus/ukraine personal union against the monkee

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Belarus would be so ultra fucked.
      They have no element of surprise anymore, the casualties would be outrageous.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Russia/Belarus form a union state, one battle one victory.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Luka thought this was going to actually happen years ago and made moves to try to become the head of the entire thing. There are lots of stories of him being surly as fuck with Putin such as widely spreading his legs to make himself shorter for a photo shaking Putins hand since he mogs him in height and a story about some kind of dinner at a summit after one of the high profile Russian poisonings of dissidents (can't remember which) and Luka telling the guy next to him that he wouldn't trust any food here except from this plate, and took Putins plate and put it in front of the guy. Supposedly this causes Putin to protest he had nothing to do with that poisioning.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Day 1: Belarus declares war on Ukraine.
      >Day 3: Surgical strikes on strategic rail lines and bridges initiated. Coordinated cyberattacks and jamming campaign prevent almost all internet and radio inoperable. Belarian maneuver units successfully capture Hostomel runway, utilizing air support to eliminate counterbattery fire.
      >Day 5: Kyiv fully encircled, Armored Belarussy forces achieve fire control around Siverskyi river, Battle for Mykolaiv begins
      >Day 7: Mykolaiv captured, Sloviansk Captured, Odessa and Dnipro continue mass evacuations while preparing for siege
      >Day 10: Kyiv taken, videos of Zelensky being taken out by sniper fire widely distributed on news.
      >Day 14: Treaty of Lviv signed, Ukraine surrenders
      >Day 30: Putin begins parade in Moscow, numerous HIMARS, captured NATO advisors, and Bayraktars displayed.
      >Day 31: Putin hospitalized, rumored to have severe nausea, vomiting, and seizures. Shoigu and Gerasimov still have not made an appearance.
      >Day 50: Lukashenko announces Putins death, attributes it to “Bandit-fascists” in Russian leadership. Duma suspended as Lukashenko forms so-called Revolutionary Peoples Government measures, begins mass imprisonment of rivals.
      >Day 300: Warsaw prepares for last stand.
      >Day 800: Battle of Paris ends in NATO defeat, President Patrick Leahy admits Sino-American forces took “Severe” Losses during Inner Mongolia campaign.
      >Day 36,525: Supreme God emperor of the greater Belarian Co-Prosperity sphere, in his infinite benevolence, will grant pregnant women and elderly opportunity to serve in his majesties acid mines.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Day 1: Belarus declares war on Ukraine.
        Day 1.25: Minsk HIMARs'd into a smoldering crater
        Day 1.5: Luka, suddenly, in remorse, 'accidentally' kills himself while shaving, and falls out of high window onto a pile of rusty bayonets.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          nice image, mutt

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous
          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >nice image, mutt
            brown hands typed this response.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Russians don't get it. The longer this attempt to terrorize and break the Ukrainians goes on, the more blood-hungry the Ukrainians get.

          We're seeing the evolution of Ukraine into a serious anti-Russia mentality, hellbent on slaughtering Russian barbarians.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >hellbent on slaughtering Russian barbarians.
            So they turning into Poles?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        He's a big guy.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous
        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          https://i.imgur.com/FsvLPs9.jpg

          https://i.imgur.com/yhOCSFF.jpg

          the absolute unit!

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            he is standing next to 5'6"/5'7" midgets...

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          UUUU
          It's also the fact that monke is a manlet.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          https://i.imgur.com/FsvLPs9.jpg

          https://i.imgur.com/yhOCSFF.jpg

          How big is Colonel Potato?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        best timeline

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Luka would finally be promoted to Colonel

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    is this a different to development to the Russian's having no capacity to train their newly mobilized meatsacks and making use of Belarus military bases for training them?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Well the training ranges are mostly in the center and north of Belarus. Ziabrivka airfield is right across the border, a five hour drive to Kyiv.

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Probably.

    The possibilities are: (1) attack Kyiv; (2) head West to cut off NATO supplies; (3) troops are receiving training from Belarussian units because Russia's training officers/equipment got sent to the front months ago.

    The Ukrainians now have the upper hand in conventional warfare, so Russia now understands that the status quo has to drastically change or they will lose. If you're Russia, you do that by either stopping the supply of NATO weapons, or decapitating the Ukrainian government. N00king is a third option, but Putin knows this will speed up his demise, so as long as conventional options remain open, he will opt for those. Amazingly, the Russian people are not yet at the end of their patience with Putin, so he has time to order another zerg rush. This is because the the majority of the population is bitter, rural boomers who watch state TV and have hated Ukrainians since childhood.

    Whether attacking Kyiv or attacking West will pay off for Putin is another story. At a minimum, an offensive coming out of Belarus means Ukraine will have to divert resources away from the South and East, no matter how poorly it goes for Russia. Kyiv's security has been substantially beefed up since the first attack, and urban warfare is worst warfare. Russians with orders to take Kyiv are kinda fucked tbh. I find it hard to believe that anything less than ~200,000 well armed men could take the city with air cover. I would be surprised to see that happen. A Westward strike to disrupt NATO supplies might make more sense, but their supply lines would be stretched thin just like the beginning of the war, and they risk sending disoriented, ill-supplied, and desperate troops too close to NATO territory. One misfired missile could hit Poland and trigger Article 5. That has to keep Putin up at night.

    An actual, bona fide feint against Kyiv might actually make sense for solidifying their annexed regions and maybe striking for Odessa. Who knows.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      There is no way this is anything but 3. Belarus will not attack Ukraine, potato man is way smarter than that.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >There is no way this is anything but 3. Russia will not attack Ukraine, monke man is way smarter than that.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          There's 400 km between Belarus and Transnistria, which would be required to cut off the suppliers properly, or at least a good portion of this. This would be the most retarded plan since the war has started, and we've seen some retarded shit.

          [...]
          I'd want to agree but I was saying Russia wouldn't attack Ukraine because it would be retarded.

          Potato man has already proven himself to be magnitudes smarter than Monke man.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      There's 400 km between Belarus and Transnistria, which would be required to cut off the suppliers properly, or at least a good portion of this. This would be the most retarded plan since the war has started, and we've seen some retarded shit.

      There is no way this is anything but 3. Belarus will not attack Ukraine, potato man is way smarter than that.

      I'd want to agree but I was saying Russia wouldn't attack Ukraine because it would be retarded.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's 3 plus 4) they want Ukraine to believe it's 1 or 2 to divert its troops from Kherson in hopes they won't be able to take it

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >troops are receiving training from Belarussian units because Russia's training officers/equipment got sent to the front months ago.
      This. Russians have barely any instructors left.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >An actual, bona fide feint against Kyiv might actually make sense for solidifying their annexed regions
      If Russia pulled off a feint 2-3 months ago then that might have even been a pretty good idea, but with the situation in kherson right now it really might be too late

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        It wouldn't have been a good idea, but anything else would've been better than just waiting for months for some miracle.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          You're right. I should probably rephrase that. It would have been one of the best ideas Russia has had since the beginning of the invasion.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >pull all forces south of the Dnieper in Kherson
        >blow the dam to flood the river and prevent the Ukrainians from following you over
        >Feint 2.0 on Kiev to relieve constant pressure in Donbas/Luhansk and consolidate the lines
        >sue for peace knowing that the western/central Europeans are craven
        >the SPD running Germany are weirdly Russophilic and incomprehensibly still believe in "Wandel durch Handel"

        It might work, it's a real longshot, but it's withing the scope of reality. The Americans and Eastern Euros are ride or die, but the western Europeans have all the resolve of wet corn flakes. Especially with the prospect of a hard economic recession and a cold winter coming. It might be enough for the western Europeans to break ranks and try for appeasement.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Wandel durch handel
          I hate those gays so fucking much it's unreal.
          When you deal with the devil you don't change the devil. The devil changes you.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Ironic that the people who came up with Faust don't understand this.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >German hubris ruining Europe, again.
            who writes this shit?

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              Dunno, but they have a sense of humor.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                My guess would be that they DID hear about Chernobyl, they just weren't briefed about where they were. From another thread:

                >I was listening to accounts from the 1956 revolution in Hungary recently, and some of the Soviet soldiers sent to pacify the Hungarians believed they were fighting a fascist uprising in Germany, while another group believed they were fighting the British and French in Egypt (the Suez crisis was happening around the same time). A third group nearly shot up a hotel full of diplomats (including the Indian ambassador) because they got stuck in the revolving door at the entrance. An interpreter managed to explain to them how to operate it and defused the situation.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >they just weren't briefed about where they were
                the street signs and hastily abandoned town weren't enough of a clue? no, they had no idea what chernobyl and pripyat were, or what had happened there

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          And well so, enough blood has been shed on European soil and the Western economies are on the brink of collapse with these energy prices. Some sort of normalization should occur, like it or not but we need gas and oil.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Wholesale gas prices are back to what they were a year ago.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Do you think gas, oil and coal would be the reason the war ends, rather than because enough men have died for nothing? This is the worst timeline truly

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            There is a 30 day line of LNG tankers waiting to offload their cargo in euro ports. Get down to establishing quick fast docks and there is your fucking gas. Vatnikstan is a nothingburger when it comes to oil and frankly even though the vatniks blew NS1 polaks at least should follow their lead and wreck NS2. Will chase all of those cuck thoughts out of west euros heads.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          It'd only work if Republicans secure the House and thus neutralizing Biden. But this is an extreme longshot, the longest of longshots, as the more visible damage Putin does to Ukraine the less traction Republicans have to block intervention in Ukraine. And Biden could go full retard and appoint (Republican..) John Bolton as an Ass. SecDef to tide over any serious opposition. We'd get airstrikes on Iran too, and counterstrikes on Saudi oil infrastructure causing $10/gal gas, but all of this would be blamed on Putin and we'd win in Ukraine.

          But again, this is a hail mary from the touchdown line. Putin can't make a 100-yard pass and even if he did, the touchdown dance is going to end with America ending the game early and curb checking him on the field.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >he more visible damage Putin does to Ukraine the less traction Republicans have to block intervention in Ukraine
            How naive of you. Here, let me try and predict what they'll say:
            >it's fake
            >why should we care
            >what did Russia ever do to us?
            >this just shows peace is needed, not war
            >the USA is the agressor
            And it will work, too.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >western Europeans have all the resolve of wet corn flakes
          Why do they keep fucking winning, then

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Don't do drugs kids.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Also, I'm gonna assume you are one of those that is ready to die? What the fuck are you still doing here shit posting on Mongolian basket weaving website. Put your money were your mouth is. But no you'd rather wait until the war comes to your home because that's what courages people do, right?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Everyone can say he has courage and is ready to die this way.
            >I'm ready to die
            >noooo please Germany give support im not ready to die
            People like you are a tumor on European societies

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      If Belarus does actually invade then Ukraine needs to finally cut this "We stay inside our borders" bullshit and start pressuring them inside their territory

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >(2) head West to cut off NATO supplies
      then get 1 (one) ukrainian guy to fire a mortar at poland from a vaguely belarussian-controlled area

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >troops are receiving training from Belarussian units because Russia's training officers/equipment got sent to the front months ago.
      I believe it is this. Surely the Russians aren't stupid enough to attack Kyiv again.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Surely the Russians aren't stupid enough to ...
        hahahaha
        By this point, you should know better

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >I find it hard to believe that anything less than ~200,000 well armed men could take the city with air cover.
      It took the axis over 300k men and 2 months to take Odessa. We're talking about hordes of mobiks and possibly TDF-tier Belarusians attacking an enemy that knows their every move.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Roads and any other conceivable crossing from Belarus into Ukraine is also mined to shit.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          they don't need roads, they can simply swarm their 300k man army across the fields and bypass ukrainian strongpoints, just like the chinese did against the us in korea.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            The Chinese were famous for charging into 21st century NATO arms, of course

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              ukraine only has a handful of 21st century nato weapons though, and only slightly more 20th century nato weapons. not that it matters because they're all on the southern and eastern fronts.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Ukrainians could easily set up IED and crude drone factories, to augment their high-tech weapons. Low-tech works both ways. This is shit people have built in their garages.

                The fucking IRAQIS could do it, and Ukraine is far more technologically advanced.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            look up the belarussian/ukrainian border geography and tell me why russia used roads

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              because armor doesn't do well in soft soil. but that's not a problem anymore now that russia is almost completely out of armor. the men will charge through the fields and forest and flank the ukrainian strong points, then what armor is available will advance down the now undefended roads. same tactics the piglets used at kharkiv, only russia can bring hundreds of thousands of men to the party, whereas the hohols could only bring 30k or so to kharkiv. it will be a stunning success.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                hmmm

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Before the swarm there were an infiltration phase to set up the forces and supplies for said surprise swarming, the chinese didn't just rush there running and screaming, you can't do that now with the current technology and with five eyes watching.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >they can simply swarm their 300k man army across the fields and bypass ukrainian strongpoints, just like the chinese did against the us in korea.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              All I see is an opportunity for Ukrainians to slaughter the scum who have been terrorizing their cities.

              This isn't a time to worry. This is a time to fucking celebrate. The Russians have stupidly put themselves in range of Ukrainian weapons, and the Ukrainians will take a lot of joy in using them.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >typical armchair general posting

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Untrained Conscripts can't do anything complex besides charge forward and die

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >(2) head West to cut off NATO supplies
      FFS will SOMEONE on PrepHole look at the terrain and roads of North West Ukraine? Someone other than me I mean.
      Let me help you out.
      Swamps. Thick fucking forests. Few roads. Lakes.
      It's a fucking maze and easily defensible terrain. A Russian attack there would be a nightmarish hellscape for the mobilised Russian troops.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        This is actually a good terrain to advance on in 2022. Kherson is a flat farmland with little to no cover and barely anything has happened there for months despite multiple attacks.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >This is actually a good terrain to advance on in 2022
          Shut up, Armchair Warlord. Just shut up.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            The lack of cover on flat terrain works in favor of drones and satellites. It's hard to keep your plans a secret when an aliexpress drone with a go pro strapped to it can expose your troop buildup.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              Because logistics is not important, right? Not compared to getting the maskirovka bonuses?
              You've convinced me, I believe you're Russian.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Russians don't concern themselves with logistics. You should know this by now.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >terrain that doesn't allow heavy equipment to cross is actually good for advancing
          How are you "people" this stupid?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            russia doesn't have heavy equipment anymore, so roads don't really matter to them. just issue every 10th soldier a pull wagon full of potatos and they're good.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >head West to cut off NATO supplies
      Could you and your fellow mouthbreathing retards that keep suggesting this shit please look up a fucking terrain map of Western Ukraine? This isn't gonna happen, period.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      the west needs to stat right away, an invasion with Belarusian forces on the territory of Ukraine will result in a western strike on those units, regardless if they are intermingled or not with Russians. The west has threaten Russia major consequence for use of nukes, they also need to be threaten with a strike if Belarus gets involved.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >actual, bona fide feint against Kyiv might actually make sense
      Ukrainian TDF raped the Russian regular army, what chance do reserves have? They're not gonna redeploy front line troops to Kiev because they didn't before.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >(2) head West to cut off NATO supplies
      Are you guys mentally handicapped? They need to secure the entity of Ukraine to "cut them off". Maybe look on a fucking map

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        While you are correct, keep in mind NATO can't teleport. Logistics are a thing, and weapon deliveries from western Europe through Poland are probably easier than through Romania. Though that is just my uneducated guess.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >moldova allowing arms through

        el oh el

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    it's an actual feint this time. There won't be more than some border skirmishes if anything

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Can't even take Kyiv first time with benefit of surprise
    >Think it will work a second time against a now dug-in enemy with more weapons, training and NATO equipment

    And they think fucking Belarus will be what tips the scale? If anything it will just commit NATO even more seeing as Russia wants to escalate it by bringing Belarus and Iran into the situation.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      these people who make these threads or even consider the possibility of a second kyiv attempt are incredibly retarded

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Not just with the benefit of surprise, they also had Zelensky ignoring his military and foreign advisors' pleas to take up offensive positions to better repel the increasingly likely invasion because Zelensky was hoping against hope that diplomacy that win out here and wanted to avoid an esclation.
      If they couldn't do THAT with both those things on their side, then they can't period.

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    It would be really funny if they actually went for it though. The tempo tempo tempo of Kharkiv and Kherson is over for now, it's getting kinda boring.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      It will be tempo tempo Lviv. And you will be amazed at how fast the allied push will go (or so one hopes).
      Yes, Russia will pull out of Kherson for it. But they will have a much better defended position across the river which can be held with a small force.
      There are 2 ways to Lviv: From the east which is very entrenched or from the north which is shorter and behind the Ukrainian army.
      However there is a chance that it is too late for Russia because western supplies have made Ukraine a lot stronger and because Putin has stopped the mobilization after only 200.000 new recruits and Ukraine has tens of thousands of mercenaries flooding in so there is not eve a manpower issue for Ukraine.

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Attack a prepared and experienced defender across minefields and blown up bridges
    >Failed when it was actual contract soldiers leading a surprise attack
    They would get obliterated and they know it. If Luka attacks he dies.

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    So, if Belarus does go full potato, and Ukraine slaps the everloving shit out of their armor units, does that mean military targets within 50km of the border are fair game?

    Because Lukashenko is already on thin ice. If Ukraine starts popping transformers due to a Belarussian invasion, are his people going to blame Ukranians or the guy who invaded them? Would that distrinction even matter to Belarussians?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >are his people going to blame Ukranians or the guy who invaded them? Would that distrinction even matter to Belarussians?

      That’ll depend on how blindly patriotic the population are and how much propaganda they swallow. If they think like russians, then they’ll just blame Ukraine for putting up a fight against an invasion of their fucking sovereign soil.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        They hate him. Only the army keeps him in power. Another reason he won't risk losing it.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >full potato
      Potatoes and cabbages are literally what they give their "heroes". I'd rather have a stolen Ukranian washing machine.

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Belarus is in such a fucking hole right now. But now is the probably the best time for them to switch sides, either way they’re going to eat shit.

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Honestly, the should. Do it properly this time. All energy, water and heating infrastructure destroyed, encircle and starve the city. Warm words don't win wars. If you have no nutrition at some point you can no longer fight.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Destroy it with what, fucking catapults?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Missiles and Drones, what else?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          they lack the capacity to hit them all as is. AA will glormp that barrage

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Does the Siege of Stalingrad ring a bell? Terrorizing a civilian population doesn't necessarily impact the war effort.
      Ukrainians were rationing electricity, heat and warm water for consecutive years in the early to mid 90s. In the winters there were times when people had electricity for only 6 hours a day.
      The "Russian winter" meme is the biggest cope in this whole war and I am looking forward to what comes after it in rhe spring, if Russia isn't booted out of Ukraine by then.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        If you have no electricity, no water, no heating, no nutrition, you simply can't fight. If you completely isolate a city, it will starve to death eventually.

        Both in Leningrad and Stalingrad there were a LARGE number of military deaths, one time on the soviet side and one time on germany's side, that definitely has an significant impact.

        If you would completely cut off Kyiv from energy, heating, water and nutrition, it would beyond doubt fall within a year. There would be only skelletons to fight :). Yes annihilating infrastructure IS effective.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          If you want to cut off a city like Kyiv with its 3 million inhabitants, you first need far more soldiers than what Russia can muster up at this point.
          To isolate the city, Russia would need to actually encircle it, something they didn't manage at the start of the war.
          To cut it off from water, they'd somehow have to dry up the river running right through it.
          Medieval sieges could last months, if not years.
          Hell, Mariupol, a city a sixth of the population of Kyiv held out for almost three months. What makes you think Russia could quickly take Kyiv?

          Annihilating infrastructure, even if Russia could reliably do it, would do nothing without complete encirclement and a citywide genocide for anyone trying to flee and also preventing any relief action by the opposing military.
          Tell me how another 200.000 underequipped Russian soldiers surround Kyiv without the siege getting broken?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Neither Russia nor belarus have the capability to surround and siege Kiev. They simply cannot do it.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      If you have no electricity, no water, no heating, no nutrition, you simply can't fight. If you completely isolate a city, it will starve to death eventually.

      Both in Leningrad and Stalingrad there were a LARGE number of military deaths, one time on the soviet side and one time on germany's side, that definitely has an significant impact.

      If you would completely cut off Kyiv from energy, heating, water and nutrition, it would beyond doubt fall within a year. There would be only skelletons to fight :). Yes annihilating infrastructure IS effective.

      Terrorizing the population just means Americans step in on an "aid" mission that becomes a military mission once Americans are killed. Baiting the US into such a conflict is strategically risky and tactically stupid. Putin can only win if America is distracted by something else.

      Remember the Berlin Airlift? Biden can do so again but with much bigger, more capable airplanes and a NATO air defense zone aka Ukrainian no-fly zone which smarter people wanted six months ago. Giving him reasons to start an air campaign is a bad idea that ensures Russian defeat. Unlike Korea there won't be armistice talks until after Ukraine recovers their territories.

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    If Belarus actually does it and obviously gets clapped, I wonder if Ukraine tests the water by counterattacking into Belarus territory. Seems only fair.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Bela-Russian brotherhood will rape oinkers so hard if this happens. In the west we will hear them shout WHEEE WHEE WHEEEE while feeling BRC, but they will do nothing if it's on Belarussian soil.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Here is a tip for the future: It's not "Belarussian" but "Belarusian". Actual Slavs know that and even Russians make that distiction. Happy baiting.

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Almost 650000 people died during the siege. Those were people that could not become soldiers and could contribute to the war machine.

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Yeah sure let's just send retarded conscripts with rusted AKs to do the job that that our professional soldiers equipped with the best equipment we had failed to do with the element of suprise
    What could possibly the problem with this fucking plan

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's a gesture of goodwill.

  15. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I don't think Lukie would keep power for too long if he got involved and he knows it.

  16. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Having a buildup in Belarus is a great idea, because now the Ukes have to keep a certain amount of Troops around Kiev that could have been helping the offensives down south.

    Actually invading from Belarus is a fucking retarded idea because they'll be massacred by said troops and probably lead to the collapse of the only Russian friendly government on the continent, but I wouldn't put it past monke

  17. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    don't worry about it

  18. 2 months ago
    Anonymous
  19. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    This is an incredibly insane move, but we went past insanity exactly on the 24th of February.
    Now literally nothing is out of the question anymore.

  20. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Poland and NATO should mass on Belarus’ border. Make it clear Belorussian aggression will not be tolerated

  21. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    What's stopping NATO from actually interfering against Belarus though?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_State

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        so literally nothing

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Mighty CSTO

  22. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Okay PrepHole, what do you think will happen when a bunch of Russians put themselves close enough that terror-bombed and pissed-off Ukrainians can STRANGLE the fuckers with their bare hands?

    Seriously, the Ukrainians want Vatnik blood and the Russians are going to put themselves right in front of them?!

  23. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Distribute combat manuals and weapons to ALL fight-capable Ukrainian civilians.

    Let the terrorized people finally get to KILL the Vatniks.

  24. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    They are convinced that they failed only because they were too soft and too reliant on stupid western tactics like a mechanized blitz.
    This time they intend to "do it right" - full on terror-bombing, extermination of anything that moves, flattening villages instead of bypassing them and a slow and steady advance under artillery barrages

  25. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    At this point all the border roads should be just one continuous mine field for 100km

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      mine away. the russian new model army doesn't need roads.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      So? just drive over them

  26. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    No.
    They're just training in belarus. Russia's training grounds are overflowing with the moobilization. No heavy equipment has arrived. Belarus' rotation to the border is just a yearly thing.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *