was some what short around 150 cm I think I started a little eating meat and had a groth spurt at 16 and got to be 165cm I think the same might happen for you some guys can grow a little at 18 good luck bro
First and foremost: Being short and light is a big plus in every .mil job with a lack of space. So while western tanks (just as one example) are made for taller guys you'd still have much more space inside, being more comfortable, less prone to bang your head etc.
Then: >smaller caloric intake needed >smaller target in all three dimensions
Pic related. These ARVN Rangers should be about your size and weight. See how they can take cover behind a fricking gutter? Being short and lean has more pros than cons in the military
Good in a firefight sure, but as infantry you gotta haul heavy gear all the time. Tanker or pilot (even helicopter) is the way to go. Or more recently, drone operator.
In combat, yes. As infantry, no. It's almost purely an upside in a pure gunfight without the need to lug around a huge amount of equipment, but a lot of soldiering is the things between combat, where it will often be a hindrance.
Lmao at all this manlet cope. 99,9% of the time being a manlet is inferior. That one magical combat scenario where being a midget magically saves you is pure manlet lore.
Imagine being so sizebroken that you have names and lists of units that are succesful. Fun fact; they'd all be better at their jobs if they were bigger.
I'm an honest-to-God 6'4 man, dude. My friends include giants and manlets, and I see no reason to shit on manlets if they are good humored.
You're acting like it's weird to know the name of the most decorated unit of WW2 and a short soldier who went on to become a movie star. And you are screeching like a female because I'm saying "Hey, short men aren't all bad" Who's mindbroken?
>I-i-i am totally one of you tallbro's, like for real trust me
No you aren't. As all tallbro's know there is no such thing as "Giants" only fellow bro's. So you've just exposed yourself as a manlet that looks up to other men. Good job. Also female is the best insult you have? |
Honestly manlets like you are the reason society looks down upon you. Always overcompensating as a coping mechanism for your inferior genes. Pathetic.
>you aren't 6'4 because.... You just aren't! Okay!?
You're melting down, bud. Why is it so important for you to blackpill? Open your life to the possibility that men with disabilities like being a midge can still be people with admirable traits.
And yes there are giants. One of my friends is 6'9 (I think, never asked him. He's about half a foot taller) and giant is the best way to describe his physique. His hands are like shovels.
Short men are genetically superior to taller men especially when they are super athletic.
We're going to genetically engineer all men to be small and super athletic in a few years as well, but that's a different conversation. Anyway you're a brainlet and an incel
>Fun fact; they'd all be better at their jobs if they were bigger.
So why didn't the other taller guys around them do better than them? That's a pretty dumb argument to say in this context.
If everyone carries 40kg of kit amd you're in the light infantry the bigger taller guys will be less exhausted carrying a smaller proportion of their bodyweight. The manlets will also need to flail their legs in rapid beetle-like strides to keep up.
In actual combat with sprinting between cover small people will tire from the higher percentage of weight. In the situational awareness of "can't see shit" everyone is equal.
Short people only have the smaller target minor advantage and the ability to crawl through a smaller hole to reposition.
Counterpoint, taller people carry more of their own body weight plus gear. Small people have less body to carry around. But you're still the smallest target in a shooting war not the biggest and that speaks volumes. Strength can be obtained, size cannot
That is pretty short. Roughly 5'3" 120lb in American units.
That makes you tall enough to meet requirements for entry into the US military, although you would need to bulk up a couple of KGs to meet minimum weight.
In terms of doing stuff, it will be a challenge to climb obstacles, keep pace in a march (short legs) and carrying the complete combat load. Especially since you are underweight, you probably lack muscle mass which would make you particularly vulnerable to physical injuries and strain from carrying all the gear and body armor that's standard issue to a grunt.
In terms of combat, you are a smaller target which is a great thing. Manipulating certain weapons may be tricky due to their weight and size, although you aren't so small that it would be difficult per se. A assault rifle with an adjustable length stock such as an M4 Carbine would probably do the trick just fine.
You would probably be a very good armored vehicle crewman. Endurance and carrying weight long distances is less of an issue since you have a vehicle for that. You'd still have to lift heavy objects frequently which would be a challenge, but not insurmountable so long as you learn to do it in a safe manner. Your smaller stature would actually be a huge benefit in the cramped interior, since taller/fatter crewmen normally struggle to get in/out and work in such a confined space.
My advice, bulk up and get good at lifting things without hurting yourself then aim for a job in an AV or maybe aircraft (they can get pretty tight as well). You could do pretty well specifically because of your height.
It's not about being healthy, it's about being useful
There are middle schoolers I'd sooner put to work than OP's twink ass. He wouldn't even be able to open the door to an APC
Being in combat is bad for your health.
Being short doesn't mean much except you're probably weaker and tire sooner because you have a higher percentage of carried gear by body weight.
I've never understood /misc/ going all in on the groomer thing when so many of them are moeshitters and e-girlgays. It reminds me of them supporting the Taliban as anti-pedo due to the bacha bazi stuff despite the Taliban forcibly marrying girls under 12 to adult male fighters for sex.
>Why are there so many gays on the internet? They invade every space trying to claim that liking an athletic or healthy woman is the same as being gay.
They arent gay, they are people who like to troll insufferable I-am-better-than-you christians by pretending to be gay.
Historically manlets always got the shit end of the stick. From ball gunning in ww2 to crawling vc tunnels in nam. Nowadays you'd probably get shoved into some claustrophobic deathtrap again.
>tunnel rats were just super hardcore and the chose to go into the tunnel
Cowards can't comprehend that a man would willingly face the danger, the darkest depths of human brutality, to fight out of bravery and honor and duty. Which is courage.
Excuse my colorful language, the tunnel rates were just super hardcore and the chose to go into the tunnels, to protect their friends.
The best quality of a soldier is courage.
>Manlets get forced into the worst and most dangerous tasks >99.8% of manlets just die because the task was a suicide mission >A manlet occasionally succeeds at the suicide mission and earns a medal of honor >This means manlets are superior at combat
Nah
i can imagine you've got a 99% chance of being below 18. i remember a lot of teenagers obsessing over their height when i was that age.
it's okay anon, your physicals characteristics aren't the end all be all, you can still succeed with your lesser genetics, there's no need to obsess over them. this isn't even meant to be a jab, i seriously mean it, being this insecure will go away with time man, stop worrying so much.
If manlets truely made better soldiers then child soldiers would still be en vogue. Being a smaller target being an advantage is like saying taller soldiers have an advantage because they can see over walls and bushes better. It's such a small thing its negligible. While the better endurance and strength of someone who isn't a manlet is always useful.
>Unnarmed
Big is better >Wielding swords and spears
Size matters much less, and small might be slightly better >Wielding swords and spears with heavy plate armor
Size dominates, small guys don't stand a chance >Guns
Size doesn't mean shit
Your combat name: mouse
Your job: hide in sewers and be a personal pussy of the company leader
XD
>personal pussy
Tall people are more estrogenic and feminine tho
They were the eunuchs historically
Being short was always better in combat/war
forgot to mintion , i am 18 years old
Too old for us,
But if you wear that maid dress we can keep you as a pet.
Just how stretchy do you want to be?
That is one year above the legal joining age here. You could take an officer track even.
But you have to be a legal adult to fight in our militias, we aren't on that Kony 2012 shit.
was some what short around 150 cm I think I started a little eating meat and had a groth spurt at 16 and got to be 165cm I think the same might happen for you some guys can grow a little at 18 good luck bro
You'd make a good tanker
First and foremost: Being short and light is a big plus in every .mil job with a lack of space. So while western tanks (just as one example) are made for taller guys you'd still have much more space inside, being more comfortable, less prone to bang your head etc.
Then:
>smaller caloric intake needed
>smaller target in all three dimensions
Pic related. These ARVN Rangers should be about your size and weight. See how they can take cover behind a fricking gutter? Being short and lean has more pros than cons in the military
Good in a firefight sure, but as infantry you gotta haul heavy gear all the time. Tanker or pilot (even helicopter) is the way to go. Or more recently, drone operator.
In combat, yes. As infantry, no. It's almost purely an upside in a pure gunfight without the need to lug around a huge amount of equipment, but a lot of soldiering is the things between combat, where it will often be a hindrance.
The answer is always the same: tank driver
it's actually better, you'll be a smaller target
55kg...lol
Every time you fire recoil will push you over, invest in some lead boots
Audie Murphy.
442nd Regimental Combat Team.
The Gurkhas.
The North Vietnamese.
Nah, I think you're fine.
Lmao at all this manlet cope. 99,9% of the time being a manlet is inferior. That one magical combat scenario where being a midget magically saves you is pure manlet lore.
Imagine being so sizebroken that you have names and lists of units that are succesful. Fun fact; they'd all be better at their jobs if they were bigger.
I'm an honest-to-God 6'4 man, dude. My friends include giants and manlets, and I see no reason to shit on manlets if they are good humored.
You're acting like it's weird to know the name of the most decorated unit of WW2 and a short soldier who went on to become a movie star. And you are screeching like a female because I'm saying "Hey, short men aren't all bad" Who's mindbroken?
>I-i-i am totally one of you tallbro's, like for real trust me
No you aren't. As all tallbro's know there is no such thing as "Giants" only fellow bro's. So you've just exposed yourself as a manlet that looks up to other men. Good job. Also female is the best insult you have? |
Honestly manlets like you are the reason society looks down upon you. Always overcompensating as a coping mechanism for your inferior genes. Pathetic.
>you aren't 6'4 because.... You just aren't! Okay!?
You're melting down, bud. Why is it so important for you to blackpill? Open your life to the possibility that men with disabilities like being a midge can still be people with admirable traits.
And yes there are giants. One of my friends is 6'9 (I think, never asked him. He's about half a foot taller) and giant is the best way to describe his physique. His hands are like shovels.
Post height
you're a woman or a troony
A speeding bullet doesn't distinguish height
Short men are genetically superior to taller men especially when they are super athletic.
We're going to genetically engineer all men to be small and super athletic in a few years as well, but that's a different conversation. Anyway you're a brainlet and an incel
>Fun fact; they'd all be better at their jobs if they were bigger.
So why didn't the other taller guys around them do better than them? That's a pretty dumb argument to say in this context.
If everyone carries 40kg of kit amd you're in the light infantry the bigger taller guys will be less exhausted carrying a smaller proportion of their bodyweight. The manlets will also need to flail their legs in rapid beetle-like strides to keep up.
In actual combat with sprinting between cover small people will tire from the higher percentage of weight. In the situational awareness of "can't see shit" everyone is equal.
Short people only have the smaller target minor advantage and the ability to crawl through a smaller hole to reposition.
Counterpoint, taller people carry more of their own body weight plus gear. Small people have less body to carry around. But you're still the smallest target in a shooting war not the biggest and that speaks volumes. Strength can be obtained, size cannot
Smaller people also suffer harder in cold climate because they have a worse body volume to surface area ratio.
Ever played Goldeneye?
Oddjob is hax.
it sound interesting
>X is hax
>X is broken
>X is neither a bug, a hack, nor broken
>Often X isn't even unbalanced compared to other meta options
Scientist 2
That is pretty short. Roughly 5'3" 120lb in American units.
That makes you tall enough to meet requirements for entry into the US military, although you would need to bulk up a couple of KGs to meet minimum weight.
In terms of doing stuff, it will be a challenge to climb obstacles, keep pace in a march (short legs) and carrying the complete combat load. Especially since you are underweight, you probably lack muscle mass which would make you particularly vulnerable to physical injuries and strain from carrying all the gear and body armor that's standard issue to a grunt.
In terms of combat, you are a smaller target which is a great thing. Manipulating certain weapons may be tricky due to their weight and size, although you aren't so small that it would be difficult per se. A assault rifle with an adjustable length stock such as an M4 Carbine would probably do the trick just fine.
You would probably be a very good armored vehicle crewman. Endurance and carrying weight long distances is less of an issue since you have a vehicle for that. You'd still have to lift heavy objects frequently which would be a challenge, but not insurmountable so long as you learn to do it in a safe manner. Your smaller stature would actually be a huge benefit in the cramped interior, since taller/fatter crewmen normally struggle to get in/out and work in such a confined space.
My advice, bulk up and get good at lifting things without hurting yourself then aim for a job in an AV or maybe aircraft (they can get pretty tight as well). You could do pretty well specifically because of your height.
many thanks
5'3 and 55kg is a perfectly healthy BMI. It's only underweight by the standard of obese amerimutts and their rascal scooters
It's not about being healthy, it's about being useful
There are middle schoolers I'd sooner put to work than OP's twink ass. He wouldn't even be able to open the door to an APC
>55kg
Can you carry your entire bodyweight?
yes ,its very easy for me to carry my body
who are quoting, newfren?
Audie Murphy was 5'2"
strength is probably more of a problem
Post bussy you bawd
I'm sorry, anon. I'm a manlet too, but the reality isn't good.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/200802/the-returning-soldier-effect-i-why-are-more-boys-born
Being in combat is bad for your health.
Being short doesn't mean much except you're probably weaker and tire sooner because you have a higher percentage of carried gear by body weight.
I'd say it is advantage.
I'm a relatively tall guy, more target to shoot.
Endurance is more importance than strength in modern war, strength still has its place in carrying gear and hand-to-hand combat.
Running, carrying loads, hiking long distances, and still being able to ready up and place shots accurately at the drop of a hat.
>can I be a good soldier with that size?
no but you would make a good boywife
homosexual groomer degenerate
Leviticus 18:22
OP'S ONLY 18 YEARS OLD YOU SICK FRICK!
I've never understood /misc/ going all in on the groomer thing when so many of them are moeshitters and e-girlgays. It reminds me of them supporting the Taliban as anti-pedo due to the bacha bazi stuff despite the Taliban forcibly marrying girls under 12 to adult male fighters for sex.
This is a man, you can even see his stubble in the right pic. YWNBAW
i knew it XD
was pretty spelled out in my post that my image would be a twink
Why are there so many gays on the internet? They invade every space trying to claim that liking an athletic or healthy woman is the same as being gay.
>boo hoo im from PrepHole and why are there so many degens here?
>Why are there so many gays on the internet? They invade every space trying to claim that liking an athletic or healthy woman is the same as being gay.
They arent gay, they are people who like to troll insufferable I-am-better-than-you christians by pretending to be gay.
>I was only pretending to be a homosexual
Sounds like what a homosexual would say.
No, it offers you an advantage.
Smaller target and has to dig less.
>inb4 boomer/fudd lore
It's common sense
Historically manlets always got the shit end of the stick. From ball gunning in ww2 to crawling vc tunnels in nam. Nowadays you'd probably get shoved into some claustrophobic deathtrap again.
The tunnel rats were volunteers and were some hardcore motherfrickers
Excuse my colorful language, the tunnel rates were just super hardcore and the chose to go into the tunnels, to protect their friends.
The best quality of a soldier is courage.
>tunnel rats were just super hardcore and the chose to go into the tunnel
Cowards can't comprehend that a man would willingly face the danger, the darkest depths of human brutality, to fight out of bravery and honor and duty. Which is courage.
>Manlets get forced into the worst and most dangerous tasks
>99.8% of manlets just die because the task was a suicide mission
>A manlet occasionally succeeds at the suicide mission and earns a medal of honor
>This means manlets are superior at combat
Nah
i can imagine you've got a 99% chance of being below 18. i remember a lot of teenagers obsessing over their height when i was that age.
it's okay anon, your physicals characteristics aren't the end all be all, you can still succeed with your lesser genetics, there's no need to obsess over them. this isn't even meant to be a jab, i seriously mean it, being this insecure will go away with time man, stop worrying so much.
You would be an ideal tunnel rat.
If manlets truely made better soldiers then child soldiers would still be en vogue. Being a smaller target being an advantage is like saying taller soldiers have an advantage because they can see over walls and bushes better. It's such a small thing its negligible. While the better endurance and strength of someone who isn't a manlet is always useful.
Being average height and lean is BIS. You just need to be big and strong enough to carry your gear comfortably, anything more is a waste of calories.
>calories
What is your country fricking too poor to feed its soldiers? Caloric needs are not relevant in any first world military
>moron doesn't understand the concept of not always being supplied during a peer war
lol
>logistics is so shot he can't even feed his soldiers
So you're telling me you're losing the war then
Won't matter how tall or short you are when you're dead
>Unnarmed
Big is better
>Wielding swords and spears
Size matters much less, and small might be slightly better
>Wielding swords and spears with heavy plate armor
Size dominates, small guys don't stand a chance
>Guns
Size doesn't mean shit
>another veiled homosexualry thread
>is being short in combat bad?
Can you still shoot a gun?
I know an older man who is former SAS and he's small and worth, so it's probably fine
I don’t know but I struggle to see Tinks in boarderlands 3
Squad machinegunner material, right there.
Most dangerous guy, behind enemy lines paratrooper SF type bullshit
was a small, thin guy.
They can crawl into anything, camouflage into anything etc...
interesting
Manlet rage makes a good fightin soldier
i had a midget in my company who was just a tad bit taller than his FN MAG
he did fine, only problem was taking over his foxhole
i'd say the low weight is worse than the manlet height just lift some weights and you'll be fine
Only men make good soldiers so at 160cm you don’t cut it.