>is absolutely mogged by USFS and BLM

>is absolutely mogged by USFS and BLM
why do they suck so much

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >suck so much
    They dont. They do the best they can with the limited respources they have. They have very different purpose and goals than the NF and BLM. Taken together all 3 are great.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      fair, but the NPS goals is lame. they're literally just designed around sightseeing

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Which keeps a great deal of normies off of BLM and USFS lands, it's perfect.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        You're worse than stupid: you're cancer.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          nice argument, idiot

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Argument
            Seems more an astute observation.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              shitty observation, idiot

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >NPS goals are sight seeing
                They aren't. There is only one goal: land preservation. The idea that forests exist for the amusement and profit of man is a core tenant of the demon worshipers.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >profit
                you might be confused

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >profit
                >forests
                >confused
                You have yet to make a coherent point so the only thing that would confuse is if you were actually able to describe any sort of coherent idea: which you can't.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                i wasn't the other anon, but the NPS isn't profitable. hence, my only (and unquivocally correct) point is that you are confused when you suggest that national parks "exist for the... profit of man"

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >no link
                >no source
                ahahahhahaha
                Aahhahahahahhahah
                hahahhahah
                hahah

                wait, ok, what? again were you talking about?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                uppon further review I think you replied to the wrong post.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >is hereby reserved and withdrawn from settlement, occupancy, or sale under the laws of the United States, and dedicated and set apart as a public park or pleasuring-ground for the benefit and enjoyment of the people
                >which purpose is to conserve the scenery and the natural and historic objects and the wild life therein and to provide for the enjoyment of the same in such manner and by such means as will leave them unimpaired for the enjoyment of future generations.

                you're wrong bud

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >no link
                >no source
                you're serious?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                those are quotes from the act that established yellowstone and the national park service, respectively. if only there were a way for you to highlight that text, enter it into some sort of tool that searches a world wide web, and determine where it may have come from. of course, such a function doesn't exist, otherwise you'd very obviously be comically obtuse

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >no link no source
                go back to reddlt.
                I'm not looking shit up that you clearly cant even do yourself.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >maybe if i say the super based oldgay line, people won't recognize how stupid i'm being
                also, i clearly did look it up myself

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >demands a link to readily accessible public documents
                >tells others to go back
                Pot calling the kettle black.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                the source was explicitly provided. asking for a link when you've been given a source, then complaining that it wasn't sourced? lmao

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >mogged
      First, you're clearly an idiot that's never been anywhere.
      Second: you very obviously live on the east coast.

      BLM is awful--it all should be rolled over to national parks. Everything you think you know about forestry is a corporate lie.

      >limited resources
      WTF do you think they need moron? The whole purpose of the NPS was to set aside land to be left the frick alone. The less services the better--frick tourists crying about no cell service and not being able to take doggo anywhere off trail.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Everything you think you know about forestry is a corporate lie.

        ATTENTION! THIS IS THE HEMP CONCRETE homosexual. DO NOT REPLY TO HIS HIPPIE SCHIZO POSTS.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        BLM by and large just leaves shit alone where I live.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >leaves shit alone
          Until they don't

          >Everything you think you know about forestry is a corporate lie.

          ATTENTION! THIS IS THE HEMP CONCRETE homosexual. DO NOT REPLY TO HIS HIPPIE SCHIZO POSTS.

          What's wrong with Hemp Concrete mrs. reddlt spacing?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Paragraph break
            >Reddit spacing

            You have to go back

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              the source was explicitly provided. asking for a link when you've been given a source, then complaining that it wasn't sourced? lmao

              >demands a link to readily accessible public documents
              >tells others to go back
              Pot calling the kettle black.

              >maybe if i say the super based oldgay line, people won't recognize how stupid i'm being
              also, i clearly did look it up myself

              those are quotes from the act that established yellowstone and the national park service, respectively. if only there were a way for you to highlight that text, enter it into some sort of tool that searches a world wide web, and determine where it may have come from. of course, such a function doesn't exist, otherwise you'd very obviously be comically obtuse

              >no link
              >no source
              I love that nothing makes you morons seeth more than asking for the source of something you quoted. My guess is you pulled it from an exerpt from a website and never read the actual document which is why I'm asking for the source.

              If you cant support your argument: don't bother making it and lying about where you got the information from.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                hey moron, you were told where the quotes came from. that's what a source is. you're using words that you don't understand. you're btfo yourself

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Why don't you stop "guessing" and Google it instead of demanding a source and not looking into it like a homosexual Redditor.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Just source and proove my argument for me bro
                Thanks for conceding you're moronic and don't have an argument.

                >WTF do you think they need moron?
                Money. There is a huge backlog of repairs and maintenence. moron.

                >Forest repairs are expensive!!!
                .. gr8 b8

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                You were given a source, just not a link. Lazy Redditor.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >I don't know how to link a source: the post
                The quote was pulled from god knows where. The fact that you cant link it but link your source proves you're an idiot.

                I get it--you don't have a clue how to vet sources and quoted wikepedia because you're a moron.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Since nobody else will placate your autism, here you go little guy.
                https://www.nps.gov/parkhistory/online_books/anps/anps_1c.htm
                https://www.nps.gov/pipe/learn/management/nps-organic-act-of-1916.htm
                While I do agree that the core goal should be land preservation, it is specifically outlined in establishing documents that the amusement of the public is a principal of the NPS.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I think he was doing the thing where you double down and pretend to be especially moronic instead of just admitting that you were wrong

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Not them but if you make a claim and don't post the source you're an imbacil by every metric. This is just you coping with being a midwit.
                You're literally making the "just substantiate my argument for me" and pretending it doesn't make you look moronic.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                He was given a source, just not a link. The anon cited which documents they were from when asked. PrepHole isn't an academic paper you pseud.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Source was cited. Quotes were searchable. Have a hard time believing more than one anon is this desperate/stupid

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Fun fact
                Most of you idiots pull quotes from magazines and Wikipedia without ever reading the source material.
                I see why dude asked for the original source and you don't even realize you just got dabbed on and proved dude right.
                Pottery.
                I suggest you actually read this lamo
                I'm embarrassed for you

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                How did I get "dabbed on?" I gave him exactly what he wanted an proved his original argument wrong.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                My friend just ignore the morons. They're infesting the board, but if you don't give them what they want, they go away.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                You type like a moron.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                i haven't seen someone post this poorly in a while. whether it's shitposting, pretending to be stupid, or actually being stupid. just embarassing

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >I can quote something and not link the source
                Lol
                Holy shit you're a Black person aren't you.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Why are you still going? You've been dismantled and mocked by multiple posters

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >WTF do you think they need moron?
        Money. There is a huge backlog of repairs and maintenence. moron.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >we need money repair nature's potholes!
          that kinda goes against the core principles of conservation doesnt it?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >That kinda goes against the core principles of conservation doesnt it?
            no. The NPS goal is preservation not conservation. Thats why things like Alcatraz are part of the NPS holdings.

            >Just source and proove my argument for me bro
            Thanks for conceding you're moronic and don't have an argument.
            [...]
            >Forest repairs are expensive!!!
            .. gr8 b8

            >Forest repairs are expensive!!!
            frick off with your disingenous bullshit. There is infrastucture that needs to me repaired and maintained.

            https://www.nps.gov/subjects/infrastructure/maintenance-backlog.htm

            >NPS goals are sight seeing
            They aren't. There is only one goal: land preservation. The idea that forests exist for the amusement and profit of man is a core tenant of the demon worshipers.

            >They aren't. There is only one goal: land preservation.
            Bullshit. This is the mission of the NPS:

            Our Mission
            The National Park Service preserves unimpaired the natural and cultural resources and values of the National Park System for the enjoyment, education, and inspiration of this and future generations. The National Park Service cooperates with partners to extend the benefits of natural and cultural resource conservation and outdoor recreation throughout this country and the world.

            For the enjoyment and benefit of the People- except morons like you.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Because all three agencies serve different purposes?

      FPBP

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    They hype diversity and inclusion garbage instead of hiring white people who want to work in parks. Look at the demographics of a FS fire team.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >They hype diversity and inclusion
      So? only white people are allowed to work? Whats wrong with including people? why do you care about someone's skin color so much?

      >instead of hiring white people who want to work in parks
      Bullshit. The NPS is 85% white. I worked in Yellowstone. it was 98% white.

      Are really this cucked by your own insecurities that this what you complain about?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Look at their social media platforms, they push diversity/climate change propaganda set down by the white house instead of doing their job as a steward of the land. Giving them funding is a mistake because they'll spend it on inconsequential bullshit other than maintaining the parks for the large crowds they drive in.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >they push diversity/climate change
          So?
          >instead of doing their job as a steward of the land.
          Bullshit. Thats just moronic reeeeeing on your part.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Go back

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >derps out cope
              frick off

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              lel @ u

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            There's some very fundamental reasons to not want a "diverse" environment. There's millions of dollars in tax payer resources that go to paying the salaries of diversity tsars that do jack shit. It's all just anti-white propaganda. If we were truly equal there wouldn't need to be quotas and handicaps for them to be accepted. They're different.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Hey I'm familiar with the story on the right.
              The pile of frick in the picture was 16 or 17 at the time of arrest. He wasn't charged as an adult. Since this case happened in Minnesota, if you're not tried as an adult, the default is to close your criminal record at the age of 18. So he was given that sentence as part of a plea deal. Said plea deal included the strictest piece of probation as an adult you could ever consider, going on until he's cold in the ground. AKA that if he gets so much as a parking ticket or blows a 0.01 on his daily scheduled breathalyzer, his ass is looking at 30 years in the state's "frick-you-in-the-ass" prison.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >It's all just anti-white propaganda.
              as opposed to the meme you posted lol

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >n-no you
                He's right. "Diversity" simply means fewer white people. If there are too many white people, it's not diverse enough. If there are no white people, it's extremely diverse, even if it's 100% some other race. You know this. Why deny it?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >fewer white people
                So? why are you so cucked by skin color?

                >how was the meme he posted anti-white propaganda?
                I didnt clarify...he posted his own propaganda while complaining about propaganda. Its hypocritical and moronic

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >So?
                So you know what it is, stop pretending you don't.

                >why are you so cucked by skin color?
                Your question makes no sense.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >You know what it is
                Yes, your fear of others who have different skin color than you.
                >Your question makes no sense.
                >t.smoothbrain
                lmao

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >minority that thinks asking a hypothetical question is the epitome of intellect

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                You're not smart enough to play these sorts of games. Clearly some bad genetics at play here.

                >coping this hard
                lmao

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I don't think you know what that word means

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >doubles down on moron
                your opinion doesnt matter.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                You're not smart enough to play these sorts of games. Clearly some bad genetics at play here.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I thought diversity hires meant hires not based on merit but rather skin color and gender. At its core, the idea is rotten. Minorities shouldn't just be given free jobs. That's stupid and leaves the land in incompotent hands(which reinforces racist and sexist stereotypes, btw). They should be given free education for said jobs instead. It's not one or the other. You can have a diverse workforce and an economically stable one. They don't need to be unskilled. However, everybody likes the quick bandaid "let's just force jobs instead" solution so the politicians can cover their asses. It's pathetic slow-everybody-else-down-and-push-over-old-ladies-to-win-the-race behavior.

                >But anon! Education is the same thing! You're getting in the way of more qualified white people from getting educated!
                This is still a better solution than having people with two brain cells getting jobs they cannot handle for the sake of diversity. At least with education if they frick it up, then they're not ruining the outdoors in the process.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >let's handicap our most capable people because muh social inequality
                Any non-merit based system is race to the bottom. Chopping off your leg is hardly better than chopping off your arm.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                ...how was the meme he posted anti-white propaganda?
                The point is to highlight that anti-white propaganda exists.
                Not to BE anti-white propaganda.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          The people maintaining the parks aren't the ones running social media accounts.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >climate change propaganda
          moron.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Bro, if they'll "spend it in inconsequential bullshit other than maintaining the parks" then why are the parks currently maintained? Riddle me that, you fricking dip.

          I was at Zion last week and it isn't the garbage infested hellhole that your moron brain imagined it was when you saw them talking about climate change

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >They hype diversity and inclusion
      So? only white people are allowed to work? Whats wrong with including people? why do you care about someone's skin color so much?

      >instead of hiring white people who want to work in parks
      Bullshit. The NPS is 85% white. I worked in Yellowstone. it was 98% white.

      Are really this cucked by your own insecurities that this what you complain about?

      Look at their social media platforms, they push diversity/climate change propaganda set down by the white house instead of doing their job as a steward of the land. Giving them funding is a mistake because they'll spend it on inconsequential bullshit other than maintaining the parks for the large crowds they drive in.

      fair, but the NPS goals is lame. they're literally just designed around sightseeing

      They are underfunded, they offer an unrealistic wage to their employees, they operate on a budget that would've been considered outdated forty years ago, and they're a department devoted to land conservation (a political topic that no party truly gives a frick about).
      Jfc you guys are idiots.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        i see you making this claim but not really backing it up with anything

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        The NPS could be almost entirely run by volunteers. Yes, that's why the NPS exists at all is land conservation.

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Most park rangers get paid next to nothing and you have to pay for your own LEO training if you dont have it if that tells you anything lmao

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    You already know the answer

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      they're both cute

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I don't see the problem with either

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        i think the girl on the left is actually cuter. probably less likely to be a thot too.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          The one on the right was hired as a barracks bunny 100%

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Should be renamed the No Phun Service, I hate these frickers so much.
    >Welcome to your public land, that'll be $35 plus tip
    >Oh sorry, we're closed between 5 PM and 9 AM.
    >That trail? No it's closed because it rained 2 weeks ago and morons might get hurt.
    >That trail's closed too, we're paving it to make it wheelchair accessible.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Everyone forgets about USACE and USBR public lands... we exist! We're better than the fat ugly women at NPS!

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Any USACE or USBR lands in the southwest you'd recommend?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Define southwest. People seem to love Abiquiu in NM and Alamo Lake in AZ, but I'm in CA so I have not been to the southwestern USACE properties. USBR only has decent properties in CA, they've contracted out the rest to NPS or third parties.
        Pic unrelated, just a different USACE project near me.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          I'm in Utah, anywhere in the Four Corners or Nevada is a reasonable drive. I haven't been to Abiquiu or Alamo Lake but I'll have to check them out. Thanks, anon.

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    "The service thus established shall promote and regulate the use of the Federal areas known as national parks, monuments, and reservations hereinafter specified by such means and measures as conform to the fundamental purpose of the said parks, monuments, and reservations, which purpose is to conserve the scenery and the natural and historic objects and the wild life therein and to provide for the enjoyment of the same in such manner and by such means as will leave them unimpaired for the enjoyment of future generations."

    Lol, imagine being ESL and thinking this isn't a conservation commitment. If you read the subsequent articles of the legislation it is all about not doing material extraction. Thanks for still not posting a source for the legislation and just a reference to the thing you're quoiting. Public education clearly doesn't teach you morons how to vet information--which is why I asked where you got it.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Imagine being ESL and not realizing that nobody argued that conservation wasn't explicitly one of the goals of the NPS. Your own quote unambiguously states that it's not the only goal. You've confused yourself it seems. Have a lovely evening.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        In some fairness to him, the post he originally responded to did make the claim that THE goal was sight-seeing.

        However, nobody past that point made any such claim and was instead focused on his own point about them having a singular goal.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        The dudes whole point was the NPS was established for sight seeing. The you're moronic and the irony is palpable.

        >is hereby reserved and withdrawn from settlement, occupancy, or sale under the laws of the United States, and dedicated and set apart as a public park or pleasuring-ground for the benefit and enjoyment of the people
        >which purpose is to conserve the scenery and the natural and historic objects and the wild life therein and to provide for the enjoyment of the same in such manner and by such means as will leave them unimpaired for the enjoyment of future generations.

        you're wrong bud

        purpose is to conserve the scenery and the natural and historic objects and the wild life therein and to provide for the enjoyment of the same in such manner and by such means as will leave them unimpaired for the enjoyment of future generations.

        This is about conservation you mouth breathing moron. I asked you to post the source because the legislation makes it even more obvious.

        So this is me dabbing on a moron yet again.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          i was only responding in relation to this post (

          >NPS goals are sight seeing
          They aren't. There is only one goal: land preservation. The idea that forests exist for the amusement and profit of man is a core tenant of the demon worshipers.

          ) which unambiguously claims that land preservation is the only goal. That's incorrect, and even your own sources corroborate that. NPS is meant to preserve land for the enjoyment of people, which is incompatible with your claim in the cited post. I wasn't the anon who brought up sight-seeing. Obviously parks aren't equivalent of roadside attractions, but they are meant to offer accesss to mostly undisturbed nature.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Your claim was as follows.
      >There is only one goal: land preservation. The idea that forests exist for the amusement and profit of man is a core tenant of the demon worshipers.
      The quote and subsequent links was never to argue that conservation and preservation is not a goal of the NPS. It was to counter your claim that it was the only goal, and that amusement was not a goal. This claim has been soundly debunked.

      If you think nps.gov is not a sufficient source for discussing the nps, you are a complete pseudointellectual. It's embarrassing. The reason I even placate your desire for a link is because I wanted to see what you would do with it. I expected the goalpost to shift, but denying your own words and the validity of the source is pathetic.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I love that you're agreeing with me.

        The moron pulled a quote from thin air and when I asked for where he got it--for this very reason--bitches started crying like Black folk asked to pay taxes.

        tl;dr The NPS was established for preservation and the rest is brown people and children spewing reddlt tier "logic"

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Your ability to comprehend and communicate is truly subhuman.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            So National parks aren't for conservation? I missed the part where you used your adult words to actually communicate anything relevant to that assertation.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              I already did and you ignored everything I said because of your bruised ego. You've shifted the goal post from "there is only one goal" to pretending that anyone but one idiot is saying that conservation isn't a goal at all. Everybody agrees that that is a goal. Your claim that was challenged was that the NPS does not also serve to amuse the public, which is wrong.

              I really can't tell if you are either a manipulative, compulsive liar or deeply stupid.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >no YOU"RE SHIFTING THE GOAL POSTS
                nice projection.
                so national parks aren't for conservation?
                try again.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >ignored almost everything I said once again
                I'll make this as clear as possible so you can't deny and ignore then.

                Your claim then
                >national parks are only for conservation
                Your claim now
                >national parks are for conservationan

                The keyword here is the only difference anybody cared about and you know it. I see what you're doing you ASPD specimen.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *