>Pros:
$450-$500
Folds in a manner that maintains an easily stowable profile
Factory (Gen 2) sights are actually decent
Can be ordered as Glock mag or multi-mag to use 92, CZ75, M&P, SW59, P320, P226 or TP9 mags with a catch swap
Mature product with several internal and external enhancements from original iterations
Has an aftermarket if there is something you want to change further >Cons:
Screwed together clamshell design
It's a blowback 9/40
Top rail is useless for anything but offset/dangler mounts or low profile switches if you want to maintain foldability
Mature product with several internal and external changes that can confuse repairability or upgrades
The aftermarket is just as cocaine fueled as Keltec
>the recoil was shit
lmfao, if you think the recoil on a keltec sub2k is "bad" you are a femoid, terminally-online gay bitch who gets all their info from gun-tubers
for a 9mm it is pretty bad... I have a 40 version and the cheek slap is a bitch. It's not like I'm getting 300winmag performance out of it...
I'd probably buy the S&W side foldy one though so you can easily mount optics...
I don’t understand the outcry for blowback guns. When I bought my Bersa Thunder .380 everyone on /k flipped their tits that about the recoil I’d suffer. It literally shoots like a .22. I pretty much ignore any and all complaints about recoil on /k.
My wife's bersa380 sucks more to shoot than my ruger LCP...
This is deeply cringe. If you need more baby padding you can always get a brass buffer and neoprene tube cover. Maybe a nice pink recoil pad and some training wheels to bolt on the forend for a bipod
>the recoil was shit
lmfao, if you think the recoil on a keltec sub2k is "bad" you are a femoid, terminally-online gay bitch who gets all their info from gun-tubers
This is deeply cringe. If you need more baby padding you can always get a brass buffer and neoprene tube cover. Maybe a nice pink recoil pad and some training wheels to bolt on the forend for a bipod
Bruh, it's a rear aperture and a fiberoptic front post. And the fuck do you mean that a 9mm blowback full size rifle has bad recoil? What kind of decrepit genetic monstrosity of a body do you have? Do you have muscular dystrophy? Are you 139th generation in the genetic incest Hapsburg dynasty? Are you able to resist a light breeze without crumbling to dust and blowing away in the wind like a desiccated leaf? Are you able to read without your face pressed to a screen?
Do it, they're fun, cheap, and cheap to shoot. A 9mm or 40 out of a 16" barrel is pretty serious too and the sight radius is long enough to be quite effective.
I had one for a few years. It is a jammy piece of shit. Fun to take to the range sure, but if you want a survival/bugout gun there are far better options. I would never trust a sub 2000 with my life unless I had absolutely no pther choice.
Don't buy a Gen 1. My Gen 1 is the biggest piece of shit out of the 20+ guns I own but it never jams. The front sight broke off, the rear sight broke off, the pistol grip is plastic molded together at the seam and it is separating to where I can pull the two halfs apart and see a big gap that splits the grip in half all the way up and will probably explode someday. The rear stock is loose and can screw around like an AR with a loose castle nut. I cannot get it to jam no matter what though, with all ammo types even my shitty underpowered handloads, the internal blowback system is flawless. This is after only 500+ .40 rounds and light use
I actually own one and it's a fucking kick to shoot. It's just fucking cool. My only complaint is that as a 6'6" guy it's near impossible to get a sight picture without resting the stock over my shoulder, but I've had that issue with plenty of scoped rifles. Other than that it's good to go and I got mine in 2017 for 300.
>Pros:
$450-$500
Folds in a manner that maintains an easily stowable profile
Factory (Gen 2) sights are actually decent
Can be ordered as Glock mag or multi-mag to use 92, CZ75, M&P, SW59, P320, P226 or TP9 mags with a catch swap
Mature product with several internal and external enhancements from original iterations
Has an aftermarket if there is something you want to change further
>Cons:
Screwed together clamshell design
It's a blowback 9/40
Top rail is useless for anything but offset/dangler mounts or low profile switches if you want to maintain foldability
Mature product with several internal and external changes that can confuse repairability or upgrades
The aftermarket is just as cocaine fueled as Keltec
Huge pro is that you can get one for literally $299 right now
Where?
I don’t understand the outcry for blowback guns. When I bought my Bersa Thunder .380 everyone on /k flipped their tits that about the recoil I’d suffer. It literally shoots like a .22. I pretty much ignore any and all complaints about recoil on /k.
My wife's bersa380 sucks more to shoot than my ruger LCP...
shush zoomer
post wrists
Just ask your wife’s boyfriend to take you to the gym manlet. Also no shit an LCR has more kick, it’s the size of my thumb.
How come almost every gun is made in Miami/Florida?
cocaine
They used to all be made in California but the garden gnomes won there.
You can get the cooler one
I fucking wish I could bro
I wish I could
If you want one now is the time to get one https://www.keltecweapons.com/sub2000-rebate/
Didn't care for mine. The sights were shit, the recoil was shit, felt like shit in hands.
>the recoil was shit
lmfao, if you think the recoil on a keltec sub2k is "bad" you are a femoid, terminally-online gay bitch who gets all their info from gun-tubers
for a 9mm it is pretty bad... I have a 40 version and the cheek slap is a bitch. It's not like I'm getting 300winmag performance out of it...
I'd probably buy the S&W side foldy one though so you can easily mount optics...
This is deeply cringe. If you need more baby padding you can always get a brass buffer and neoprene tube cover. Maybe a nice pink recoil pad and some training wheels to bolt on the forend for a bipod
Bruh, it's a rear aperture and a fiberoptic front post. And the fuck do you mean that a 9mm blowback full size rifle has bad recoil? What kind of decrepit genetic monstrosity of a body do you have? Do you have muscular dystrophy? Are you 139th generation in the genetic incest Hapsburg dynasty? Are you able to resist a light breeze without crumbling to dust and blowing away in the wind like a desiccated leaf? Are you able to read without your face pressed to a screen?
Do it, they're fun, cheap, and cheap to shoot. A 9mm or 40 out of a 16" barrel is pretty serious too and the sight radius is long enough to be quite effective.
I had one for a few years. It is a jammy piece of shit. Fun to take to the range sure, but if you want a survival/bugout gun there are far better options. I would never trust a sub 2000 with my life unless I had absolutely no pther choice.
Don't buy a Gen 1. My Gen 1 is the biggest piece of shit out of the 20+ guns I own but it never jams. The front sight broke off, the rear sight broke off, the pistol grip is plastic molded together at the seam and it is separating to where I can pull the two halfs apart and see a big gap that splits the grip in half all the way up and will probably explode someday. The rear stock is loose and can screw around like an AR with a loose castle nut. I cannot get it to jam no matter what though, with all ammo types even my shitty underpowered handloads, the internal blowback system is flawless. This is after only 500+ .40 rounds and light use
>folds the wrong way
>breaks in half after a year or so
I actually own one and it's a fucking kick to shoot. It's just fucking cool. My only complaint is that as a 6'6" guy it's near impossible to get a sight picture without resting the stock over my shoulder, but I've had that issue with plenty of scoped rifles. Other than that it's good to go and I got mine in 2017 for 300.