i just think it's really cute :3

i just think it's really cute :3

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Related

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I bet you have a Star Wars reference for everything, don't you homosexual?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I shot my photon torpedoes into your womprat mom' exhaust port, b***h ass homie

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Go back

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The plane is named after a George Lucas movie though

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    we should use them for combat

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They're thinking about it

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >challenges
      >delays
      How can you fail with a fricking trainer?

      Also I don't get why even have a dedicated jet trainer these days instead of using two seat versions of fighter planes. With fly by wire, fighters are not difficult to fly. T-7 is going to be about the same as any other modern fighter. Why have a dedicated trainer air frame instead of just more F-16D for commonality win?

      ...Unless T-7 is the new F-16. But then T-7 nose is too small for a good radar. T-7 is Boeing-Saab but they should FULLY unite with Sweden to build like billion Gripens for training and light fighter then send them all to Ukraine, then build another billion and send them to Taiwan. Make it the fighter of the free world. (F-16 is nice but the low intake makes it need an impeccably clean runway so Gripen it is)

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >>Also I don't get why even have a dedicated jet trainer these days instead of using two seat versions of fighter planes
        Because we don't want to pay $60M+ each for a trainer?
        T-7A is around $21M each.

        removing the combat systems from the F-16 doesn't magically make it significantly cheaper to produce, and trying to make a new cheaper F-16 using the same or similar manufacturing lines likey would take 5-8 years and cost your a billion dollars, and you'd still end up with a $40-50M F-16 derivative.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        the gripen intakes are about the same height off the ground as the f16 intake. f16 is just overwhelmingly marketed to countries that can afford massive airfields. lockheed doesnt really talk about it being able to take off from highways as much as the swedes because they make more money selling the support equipment with it.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          why can't they add a drop down grille and filtered side intakes like a MiG and let F-16s fly off any reasonably straight flat surface

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            HATO jets aren't made for real combat, they will be lucky to get off the ground.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >>Also I don't get why even have a dedicated jet trainer these days instead of using two seat versions of fighter planes
        Because we don't want to pay $60M+ each for a trainer?
        T-7A is around $21M each.

        removing the combat systems from the F-16 doesn't magically make it significantly cheaper to produce, and trying to make a new cheaper F-16 using the same or similar manufacturing lines likey would take 5-8 years and cost your a billion dollars, and you'd still end up with a $40-50M F-16 derivative.

        They would need to remove the useless radar and missile hardware than add some guns to make it a real cost effective plane.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          get the frick back in your grave Boyd you son of a b***h

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          A new design would be needed. Besides removing the worthless electronics it needs a second engine; like this:

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >jet engines
            useless overcomplicated crap, we should have stuck with props.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              All real air combat happens a subsonic speeds, you might be right for close range interceptors.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >not using flying stealth Himars

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      its not kino enough

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        SEXXXXXOOOOOOOOOO with frogfoot

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Y-ou too.

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    is it using F-16 landing gear?

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      tandem wienerpits ruin the look of smol planes

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        If they ever make a fighter variant it might be a single seater. But it's a jet trainer, it basically needs to be a 2 seater to do its job.

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    it looks like a F/A-18 made for twinks

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Perfect for me

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Pretty much every jet trainer looks good.

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    T-38 is cooler in every way.

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I agree. T-38s are some good looking planes but these little guys are a very worthy successor. Now if only they’d make a single-seater combat variant…

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Boeing
    Yikes

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Me too. Like a baby fighter jet.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *