I just learned that there are people who hate the meat target. It's just an autistic boomer doing weird tests with guns, I don't get the vitriol
I just learned that there are people who hate the meat target.
I just learned that there are people who hate the meat target. It's just an autistic boomer doing weird tests with guns, I don't get the vitriol
k
Because that's just unnecessary and a waste of good meat. Also you can't make a comparison between pork chops and human flesh, a pig is significantly bulkier and has bigger bones.
Pretty sure Paul says not to draw any real conclusions from his tests or try to use them in arguments and it's more for a controlled demonstration
>Pretty sure Paul says not to draw any real conclusions from his tests or try to use them in arguments
Then it is useles and he is irrelevant. Find better heros to worship kiddies!
it's fricking youtube dude no one is worshipping this idiot, we're just watching some weird old man shooting meat. What's going on, anon?
I don't worship him, he's just a funny guy I watch sometimes. Not a hero. Why do you assume things incorrectly?
>im just a normal everyday guy who sees someone have an opinion i disagree with then immediately makes a thread on /k/ about it.
>then i reply to everyone who disagrees with me pretending to be disinterested
Wrong board
Go back
>a consistent medium for comparative ammunition testing is useless and irrelevant
>enjoying content is hero worship
you've got a lot of learning to do, kid.
>Paul says not to draw any real conclusions from his tests
he says that but then still gets uppity when people criticize anything he does. saying 'uhhhh these aren't scientific!' while also saying he does meat targets because gel is done to death is stupid. paul is just autistic and hates it when people disagree with him despite him trying to play the stoike
If it doesn't have bones in it I don't care about your medium.
Ok so it should do even better on a man, sounds like a useful test then.
>pig is significantly bulkier and has bigger bones.
Holy manlet
How is it a "waste" of meat? We aren't exactly starving in the western world, there's more than enough meat to go around. Are you suggesting it should have been shipped to africa instead?
My mom always taught me not to waste food. It's basic behaviour for civilized people. People who waste food are vulgar simpletons who can't understand the value of things. Also bragging about your perceived richness is actually what a Black person would do.
Any my parents raised me to not be cruel to animals, but I still snap the necks of rodents on the regular when I'm doing an animal study. Spending a resource isn't wasting it, you dumb Black person, or do you get equally affronted when Mythbusters used to use pig carcasses for testing things?
>shoot meat
>"duhhh, how is it a waste when I can just buy more?"
>"btw, I kill rats sometimes"
You're proving that anon's point with your edgelord consumerist rambling.
I don't think it matters. The amount of meat wasted on a meat target is inconsequential, and not in the way something like littering is "inconsequential" where there are masses of people doing it. There's Paul and maybe a few of his followers making meat targets. It really doesn't matter. If you wanna talk about waste look at how many subsidized school lunches get thrown out in the US, it's crazy
It shouldn't have been raised and butchered so a boomer can have satiate his low-iq psychopathic Black person impulses.
You and him both deserve a gas chamber.
>not the heckin piggerino nooooooo
Hows it going tacticool troon, you will never be a woman
>Also you can't make a comparison between pork chops and human flesh
Don't tell the ballistics gel guys about this because the original 10% ballistics gel formula was developed based on its similarity to gunshot wounds in pig muscle
Derived from testing on LIVE pigs. Not porkchops.
>NOOO A CHILD COULD HAVE EATEN THAT $30 IN PORK AND ORANGES
non ironically. all that pork is like 200 bucks in canada, and where i come from oranges are still delicacies for the rich
> An African could have eaten all that meat, Shasta soda, and flannel
>t. Meat target
Wait till you gays find out what Gelatin is made out of.
>I just learned that there are people who hate the meat target.
where did you learn that?
Stumbled on a screenshot of troonygf complaining about them on twitter
The logic is real simple.
1. Serious scientific tests are done against cubes of gelatin because gelatin is highly replicable, even though people aren't very much like cubes of gelatin.
2. Paul knows he isn't publishing scientific results for replication and comparison so he shoots more realistic objects like his meat targets or guys in the woods that looked at him funny
3. This enrages the midwit, because they're very smart and know about some of the methods of serious science, and if they were Paul, they would cargo-cult imitate those methods.
One whole comment, you must be paul
>even though people aren't very much like cubes of gelatin.
If the sole point of validity for gel testing is being replicable then why do gelatin results match up so well with autopsy results?
>more realistic objects like his meat targets
>long dead frozen and thawed meat
>oranges
>leather jacket for skin
lmao
It’s even funnier when you realize all the youtube jelly tests are useless for scientific purposes because very few people actually calibrate the gel and use it at the proper temperature.
jelly tests can tell you if something sucks, but otherwise are sort of useless. Humans aren’t made of uniform blobs of gelatin.
Post screen shot
Theres a bit more but this is the gist of it. I'm thinking about making my own "improved" meat target with day of slaughter pork ribs and peeled oranges or grapes, then comparing results
And who invited the /misc/
spazoids to my thread? And why does this guy
think I'm samegayging?
Of course the troon hates Paul
All his criticisms are uprooted by watching the actual video. It's clear he didn't and just hates Paul because he's popular with the "alt-right" (anyone outside the weird leftyguns box aka most gun content watchers)
they're just b***hing about it not being ukraine related
Shooting meat seems really wasteful.
How many bodies does this dude have on him? I've gotten conflicting information.
Three confirmed.
>But people seem to accept testing weapons on impoverished Christians in Europe
so this IS a slide thread.
>Some guy makes videos about guns and uses raw meat as targets, offended
so far the only person whos been 'offended' is the one person OP mentioned.
The steppemutt rape horde did a fine job of dehumanizing themselves on their own
>the glowBlack person shills can't even stay out of wholesome Paul threads now
nu/k/ is so moronic
>8th post by OP
No. Frick off.
Its because morons take the results as gospel because paul said "the results look a lot like i see on game" and think that .357 or 10mm will blow a 3" hole through organs since it exploded the orange lung tissue real good. Meat target is kinda cool and fun, not even full moron from a "will it expand reliably though?" point of view. Although IWBA spec heavy clothing tests already exist for that reason and are a lot more reproduceable.
I didnt even read what you said, you need to go back to plebbit, homosexual.
He actually owns multiple firearms and have used them to shoot people, something the majority of /k/ never will, ofc some get irrationally mad.
every person hes shot has been unarmed and drunk.
his drive by video is kino. what a chad car of his
All the cheerleaders coming out to defend their internet boyfriend
If there's one thing I've learned over the years, it's that noguns and nofuns hate him. Someone saying they disagree is Paul is enough reason yo filter and walk away.
He makes really informative videos but something tells me that this guy can be tracked easy.
Paul making nu-k seeth just by existing.
As long as the meat target maintains a consistent composition it can do just fine as a (series of) testing medium(s). What makes people mad isn't the target itself, but rather people being prone to misinterpretation, and blaming Paul for using a target so prone to it given how hard it was to get the internet to understand ballistics gel tests.
Plus idiots entertain themselves by getting mad about stuff.
I propose anyone complaining about the validity of the meat target volunteer themselves as a more accurate representation
I've never seen the meat target as a way to quantitatively measure the performance of a gun, so much as to dispel fuddlore around certain cartridges being ineffective. If it works on the pork target, it'll probably work on the long-pork target as well
Autistic spergs online who like to represent themselves as "THE SCIENCE" b***h about it because it's an "inconsistent medium" and "not repeatable." What they willfully refuse to allow themselves to admit is that neither of those things were ever the point of the meat target and if you wanted to see empirical scientific ballistic testing in calibrated test media there are 20 other channels that you could watch for that. Paul has said as much before. The point isn't to prove effectiveness scientifically, the point is to test the affects of bullets in a novel and interesting way on a target that is inconsistent by design, because most things you are going to be shooting are not of consistent density in the first place. No two people or two deer or two bears are the same.
>test the affects of bullets
bullets don't have feelings
It's a difficult word to use, but it's been used correctly.
>The affect of an object cases an effect in another object.
it's "effects"
the effects the bullets have on the target
ESL
The bullet affects the target.
The target feels the effect.
They are two different words with related but opposite meanings. You affect someone. They are effected.
>doubling down on ESL moronation
please stop, you're embarrassing yourself
I'm really not though.
No, the point is to introduce deliberate inconsistency so nobody can make a clear high-resolution statement about whether product A or B is better than the other.
Why do that? Because Harrell's gimmick is father figure for dadless zoomers. Eliminating clear differences enables all ego's to stay safely coddled and unruffled, to make his audience feel smart and successful without driving them off through optimization or harsh facts.
Paul has definitely made conclusions that ammo was inadequate based on meat target results before, mostly in the case of poor expansion. And that makes sense because it's easy to see why calibrated gel would facilitate expansion better than a hard sudden hit to muscle and bone followed by traveling a foot through soft tissue and mostly empty space until exiting through muscle and bone again. Which is exactly what shooting someone or something in the chest would be like.
Why are you this upset, anon? It's honestly moronic of you
Yep, a lot of people spend their valuable hate on things that don't matter. It is better to use all your hate on a few focused things rather than sprinkling it around carelessly.
For instance, what is a good thing to use my hate against?
I can't hate for you, anon. That's part of your life journey.
Boomers and women
>I don't get the vitriol
It's the internet.
I'll go a step further than you, I think the meat target is an excellent test. Reputable handgun hollowpoints exhibit perfect performance on the meat target (complete penetration, no/minimal over penetration). This implies the test article is likely very much like the intended target. Otherwise, I'd expect poor performance from reputable ammunition(massive over/under penetration)
What the frick happened K, y'all used to be smart and can't see what's going on right in front of your snot shooter...
Paul likes cooking, he's a sneaky old vet and hustles. The meat target is pork and oranges...
It's a tax write-off for making Carnitas. All he has to do is pull the lead out and boom! 20lb of piping hot, tender sweet shredded pork.
Also since carnitas is cooked for a long time, even if the raw meat was left out for a few hours, it'll still be safe after slow/pressure cooking.
I miss it already bros
boring thread
post more edits
Black folk
I think people get pissy because everyone is going by ballistic gel standards and Paul is more or less making up his own.
Either way, both gel and the meat target are just simulations. I don't think it's a big deal
I once had someone tell me that removing a three inch deep, ten by ten inch square of someone's chest wouldn't reliably stop them or was a "psychological stop" because it wouldn't pass FBI gel penetration standards.