Was going to say this. No one even cares about South America, so it’s the best place for war. They are too moronic to have a functioning army, much less trained soldiers. Meaning they will be neutral only since they are moronic Black folk
People say Australia is a remote, unpopulated continent with poor soils. That's South America.
Australia is way beyond its carrying capacity and it has superb logistics.
South America has shit logistics, it's far away from almost every continent, it's relatively underpopulated (plenty of free space), its soils are shit-tier (Brazil produces food because of heavy investments in soil engineering) and its peoples don't care about things happening in far, far away places.
So the answer is South America. Even Northern South America is really far, far way from the world and winds are not really helpful.
This... unironically this is the elite fallout shelter from all the disasters that are coming. There are many signs pointing to bunkers being built there. Think about it: >completely cucked subservient locked down population vax maxed serfs. >Southern Hemisphere >Isolated island that can be locked down to prevent peasants from traveling there.
This... unironically this is the elite fallout shelter from all the disasters that are coming. There are many signs pointing to bunkers being built there. Think about it: >completely cucked subservient locked down population vax maxed serfs. >Southern Hemisphere >Isolated island that can be locked down to prevent peasants from traveling there.
this has been said so much that I wouldn't be surprised if the nukes start flying that NZ gets hit with a few dozen for good measure.
It's what I would do if I was like China or Russia and being attacked by the U.S. and EU.
People say Australia is a remote, unpopulated continent with poor soils. That's South America.
Australia is way beyond its carrying capacity and it has superb logistics.
South America has shit logistics, it's far away from almost every continent, it's relatively underpopulated (plenty of free space), its soils are shit-tier (Brazil produces food because of heavy investments in soil engineering) and its peoples don't care about things happening in far, far away places.
So the answer is South America. Even Northern South America is really far, far way from the world and winds are not really helpful.
Vou voltar
https://i.imgur.com/WBJUJqX.jpg
100% it's New Zealand and its not even close, South America is a fricking dump ethnic shithole which could turn into total anarachy if WW3 comes. New Zealand is a majority white country with temperate climate and can sustain themselves easily due to low population and lots of farms. There is a reason all the billionaires in the world buy bunkers in New Zealand and not anywhere else
You will frick the sheep & be happy
Kek why do u homosexuals want to live any
Way? Earth is a fricking prison
Rules by israelites and the demiurge
Jesus christ wake the fuuck upp
There is a good chance that Swiss will be safe, being the neutral territory that welcomed the corrupt elite of all 3rd world counties and ~~*bankers*~~
But I imagine the spiritual mess that place is, specially because of calvinism/lutheranism (look at how it’s protestant brother, US, is doing)
There is a good chance that Swiss will be safe, being the neutral territory that welcomed the corrupt elite of all 3rd world counties and ~~*bankers*~~
But I imagine the spiritual mess that place is, specially because of calvinism/lutheranism (look at how it’s protestant brother, US, is doing)
switzerland will not be safe, most likely. that's why they've been building nuke bunkers for decades, they know it's lights out everywhere. at this point, nukes are ~80 years old, most of switzerland will not survive what's coming
Don't fall for the south america meme. The nuker will want to cleanse the earth so that they can be king. Any populated area is sussy.
Go to an unpopulated area that is protected by mountain ranges on each side to protect from nuclear blasts.
Highlands of the UK will be pretty safe, I reckon
Mind you...remember how in WWII they got people to move in city kids into their nice quiet country homes?
These days those "city kids" would be violent feral shitskins
But I suppose you could kill them and bury them somewhere, and just tell the agency they ran off, you might get a slap on the wrist for improper care for letting them "run off" but hey, that's not that bad
Probably won't even get that if there's a literal third world war underway, really
Mexico. How do I know this? Because they are taking unprecedented steps in recent weeks to secure their borders. They know an influx of Americans is coming in the next 5 years. Emigration from the US to Mexico is already at record high numbers.
A literal prophecy affirms if Israel was built before the second come of Christ it will be destroyed, anon.
The modern and satanic Israel is one of the less safe places on earth in this era. Another confirmation is the current war to kill moved by israeli proxies to kill ukrainian population and build a second Israel (this one more familiar to the khazaria heh)
Any of the islands around me
It mostly depends on your connections
If you are well known and got a few strong friends you'll be fine
I don't expect bikers to feel scared of a WW3 nor gangs in general
A lone wolf? You'll be dead within 2 weeks
The thing is, WW3 won't happen, you'll see demons before that happens
15 Those who walk righteously and speak what is right, who reject gain from extortion and keep their hands from accepting bribes, who stop their ears against plots of murder and shut their eyes against contemplating evil-
16 they are the ones who will dwell on the heights, whose refuge will be the mountain fortress. Their bread will be supplied, and water will not fail them.
Isaiah 33
3 Strengthen the feeble hands, steady the knees that give way;
4 say to those with fearful hearts, "Be strong, do not fear; your God will come, he will come with vengeance; with divine retribution he will come to save you."
Isaiah 35
4 See, the enemy is puffed up; his desires are not upright - but the righteous person will live by his faithfulness"
Habakkuk 2
16 Then those who feared the Lord talked with each other, and the Lord listened and heard. A scroll of remembrance was written in his presence concerning those who feared the Lord and honored his name.
17 "On the day when I act," says the Lord Almighty, "they will be my treasured possession. I will spare them, just as a father has compassion and spares his son who serves him."
18 And you will again see the distinction between the righteous and the wicked, between those who serve God and those who do not.
Malachi 3
27 Zion will be delivered with justice, her penitent ones with righteousness.
28 But rebels and sinners will both be broken, and those who forsake the Lord will perish.
Isaiah 1
100% it's New Zealand and its not even close, South America is a fricking dump ethnic shithole which could turn into total anarachy if WW3 comes. New Zealand is a majority white country with temperate climate and can sustain themselves easily due to low population and lots of farms. There is a reason all the billionaires in the world buy bunkers in New Zealand and not anywhere else
Live near oil wells and river.
Large underground tanks of high octane gas.
Close to junkyard, workshop full of high performance engine and racing parts.
One million rounds of ammunition.
When it hits the fan go out with friends and family wearing crazy masks to raid everyone within 200 miles for any needed supplies.
>Hypothetically if ww3 breaks out which place on earth will be safe?
the us. ameriisraelites always fight their wars on a different continent using proxys. at the moment using hohols to fight russians.
>two secret Soviet programs, "Mercury" and "Volcano", aimed at developing a "tectonic weapon" that could set off earthquakes from great distance >US Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen, said..."they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tectonic_weapon#Reports
tsunamis and massive flooding are HIGHLY LIKELY
elevation is key
15 Those who walk righteously and speak what is right, who reject gain from extortion and keep their hands from accepting bribes, who stop their ears against plots of murder and shut their eyes against contemplating evil-
16 they are the ones who will dwell on the heights, whose refuge will be the mountain fortress. Their bread will be supplied, and water will not fail them.
Isaiah 33
3 Strengthen the feeble hands, steady the knees that give way;
4 say to those with fearful hearts, "Be strong, do not fear; your God will come, he will come with vengeance; with divine retribution he will come to save you."
Isaiah 35
4 See, the enemy is puffed up; his desires are not upright - but the righteous person will live by his faithfulness"
Habakkuk 2
16 Then those who feared the Lord talked with each other, and the Lord listened and heard. A scroll of remembrance was written in his presence concerning those who feared the Lord and honored his name.
17 "On the day when I act," says the Lord Almighty, "they will be my treasured possession. I will spare them, just as a father has compassion and spares his son who serves him."
18 And you will again see the distinction between the righteous and the wicked, between those who serve God and those who do not.
Malachi 3
27 Zion will be delivered with justice, her penitent ones with righteousness.
28 But rebels and sinners will both be broken, and those who forsake the Lord will perish.
Isaiah 1
>Got a bunker with a few decades of food and water? How many do? So yeah, everyone dies.
food is relatively inexpensive. those who can afford to build a sturdy bunker can afford to stockpile decades worth of food. food can also be grown hydroponically. water can be recycled, that's assuming there isn't access to an underground source (these sources do exist)
>Hypothetically if ww3 breaks out which place on earth will be safe?
New Zealand. That's why all the elites are buying property there. That's also why they are trying to take all the guns away.
Yes anywhere where there isn’t a military base and lots of trees will be good.
A nuclear fallout would actually drop Earth’s temperature quite a bit so Cali would be more bearable.
Yes anywhere where there isn’t a military base and lots of trees will be good.
A nuclear fallout would actually drop Earth’s temperature quite a bit so Cali would be more bearable.
this is ww3, not ww2
california will be underwater, earthquaked, nuked, and much more
A literal prophecy affirms if Israel was built before the second come of Christ it will be destroyed, anon.
The modern and satanic Israel is one of the less safe places on earth in this era. Another confirmation is the current war to kill moved by israeli proxies to kill ukrainian population and build a second Israel (this one more familiar to the khazaria heh)
underground maybe. settlements on the land will be obliterated and washed away
Anywhere outside of major cities and away from military bases really. Nukes aren’t what most people think and modern ones only irradiate a small area for a short time (just don’t grow crops there or drink groundwater) and virtually no fallout.
Plus anti missile systems are probably a shit ton better than most people believe them to be, so likely very few nukes would make it through
If the Earth were not actually flat (ridiculous I know), probably the Southern Hemisphere would be *somewhat* in better shape. If nukes start flying you will probably see Europeans in boats trying to flee to Africa, as ironic as that may be.
The only correct answer to this question is: not “where,” but “what?” Many answers here are pointing to developing countries and usually neutral states like Switzerland. The problem with these answers is that they fail to address the problem of access to food. When the War gets going, dodging nukes will be the least of your worries. The big three will romp throughout the world, confiscating crop yields, tractors, and processing equipment. Even if the farm equipment is not confiscated, parts will be impossible to get, so food production will quickly grind to a halt in faraway places.
But the real question is, how do you guarantee that YOU will have access to food?
The answer is, you must be an essential person. Obviously, all politicians and leaders fall into this category. Let’s face it: You don’t, and won’t. Soldiers (infantry) are not exempt from a food crisis. Engineers, mathematicians, physicists, doctors, lawyers, and technicians will be given ample rations, with their families. Military leadership both civilian and military will have food. Iron workers, truckers, welders (me), machine operators, heavy equipment operators, and similar industrial workers (not assembly workers) will have food rations. Educators are not likely to have much food; they will probably have starvation rations.
The simple answer is that you will have as much food as you are important to the war effort. If you are some kind of code breaker or computer scientist for example you will never be hungry. If you assemble planes or trains or trucks, you will have food and transportation and security.
If you aren’t already in any of these industries or jobs, you are doomed. Even if you find some verdant land to escape to, you will almost certainly be deported the instant food becomes scarce.
wtf is wrong with these proportions. her head is shooped to be like 50% smaller hahahahaha
Mild microencephalopathy is one of the most prestigious fetishes.
True you look taller and have more heroic proportions.
>ywn have a red headed Christina Hendricks milf sex slave
I spit in the face of God, cruel bastard piece of shit
Behold the heroic look lmfao morons
Fr fr, b***h looks like a goomba from the mario movie
hahahahhahahahahha Black person funny
ahahahhahahaha man that movie was a trip
Its a man
No, men have larger heads and no hips or breasts
She was in the Brazil olympics.
There's nothing wrong with her. You're either a jealous troony, a jealous fatass hag, or an actual homosexual that wouldn't have sex with her.
Revelations 3:9
on Earth? lol
nowhere
get the frick off the planet while you still can
tpbp
Southwest South America, and that's basically it.
we're gonna be hopping the wall soon 🙁
Bomb Panama Canal and southern part of SA becomes hot zone
I don't think most warships can get through it anyway, can they?
south america
Was going to say this. No one even cares about South America, so it’s the best place for war. They are too moronic to have a functioning army, much less trained soldiers. Meaning they will be neutral only since they are moronic Black folk
People say Australia is a remote, unpopulated continent with poor soils. That's South America.
Australia is way beyond its carrying capacity and it has superb logistics.
South America has shit logistics, it's far away from almost every continent, it's relatively underpopulated (plenty of free space), its soils are shit-tier (Brazil produces food because of heavy investments in soil engineering) and its peoples don't care about things happening in far, far away places.
So the answer is South America. Even Northern South America is really far, far way from the world and winds are not really helpful.
New zealand
This... unironically this is the elite fallout shelter from all the disasters that are coming. There are many signs pointing to bunkers being built there. Think about it:
>completely cucked subservient locked down population vax maxed serfs.
>Southern Hemisphere
>Isolated island that can be locked down to prevent peasants from traveling there.
this has been said so much that I wouldn't be surprised if the nukes start flying that NZ gets hit with a few dozen for good measure.
It's what I would do if I was like China or Russia and being attacked by the U.S. and EU.
Get inside.
underrated
parts of Alaska. maybe some Caribbean islands if you're okay with Black folk
I hope it will be save here.
go to the middle of the Alps and you should be good.
Let me bunk with you Black person
I don't think so
Vou voltar
You will frick the sheep & be happy
Life is good, amerimutt
There is a good chance that Swiss will be safe, being the neutral territory that welcomed the corrupt elite of all 3rd world counties and ~~*bankers*~~
But I imagine the spiritual mess that place is, specially because of calvinism/lutheranism (look at how it’s protestant brother, US, is doing)
this anon is right.
switzerland will not be safe, most likely. that's why they've been building nuke bunkers for decades, they know it's lights out everywhere. at this point, nukes are ~80 years old, most of switzerland will not survive what's coming
What the frick is that thing
It's Turkey you fricking morons
South America. Don’t come. Africa might be as well but there are Black folk there.
Imagine how quickly the population of Africa will crash once the rest of the world isn't showering them with gifts.
nowhere. but it won't happen.
Southern Cone
Any city with less than 100 000 people.
nope
Don't fall for the south america meme. The nuker will want to cleanse the earth so that they can be king. Any populated area is sussy.
Go to an unpopulated area that is protected by mountain ranges on each side to protect from nuclear blasts.
So Chile and Argentina.
So South America.
This homie finna take all the muttified argue kraut pussy and land fo hisself frfr on god
mountain ranges also protect from massive tsunamis, wink wink
I had no idea these 3 mountain ranges touched at 1 point
I wanna move to some small comfy island like azores. Nobody's nuking that + it's harder for nigs to get there
Highlands of the UK will be pretty safe, I reckon
Mind you...remember how in WWII they got people to move in city kids into their nice quiet country homes?
These days those "city kids" would be violent feral shitskins
But I suppose you could kill them and bury them somewhere, and just tell the agency they ran off, you might get a slap on the wrist for improper care for letting them "run off" but hey, that's not that bad
Probably won't even get that if there's a literal third world war underway, really
>Australia
Yes, it would be up to them to rebuild society. God help us.
Mexico. How do I know this? Because they are taking unprecedented steps in recent weeks to secure their borders. They know an influx of Americans is coming in the next 5 years. Emigration from the US to Mexico is already at record high numbers.
Aberystwyth is one of the safest places in the world during atomic war.
Israel
A literal prophecy affirms if Israel was built before the second come of Christ it will be destroyed, anon.
The modern and satanic Israel is one of the less safe places on earth in this era. Another confirmation is the current war to kill moved by israeli proxies to kill ukrainian population and build a second Israel (this one more familiar to the khazaria heh)
That's the point
Greenland
another good idea
the idea is you need to be FAR FAR out of the way, far from any population center or masses of desperate people
https://pol.foundation/Happening.html
Georgia. The closer to Russia - the better
>which place on earth will be safe?
The ten seconds of the afterlife.
Any of the islands around me
It mostly depends on your connections
If you are well known and got a few strong friends you'll be fine
I don't expect bikers to feel scared of a WW3 nor gangs in general
A lone wolf? You'll be dead within 2 weeks
The thing is, WW3 won't happen, you'll see demons before that happens
Basically Canarias, Azores and Madeira?
The Baleares, Sardegna and Corsega seem to be pretty OK too if you go to the Euro-Remote route.
see
Arctic areas, islands off of land masses. In Canada, places like Newfoundland or anywhere above a latitude of 50.
I would avoid anything volcanic, wink wink
There’s some paper floating around saying in the event of a nuke holocaust, Australia would be strongest in the era of rebuilding
anything south of the equator isn't targeted
>which place on earth will be safe?
you can't hide from Gods wrath, repent sinner.
15 Those who walk righteously and speak what is right, who reject gain from extortion and keep their hands from accepting bribes, who stop their ears against plots of murder and shut their eyes against contemplating evil-
16 they are the ones who will dwell on the heights, whose refuge will be the mountain fortress. Their bread will be supplied, and water will not fail them.
Isaiah 33
3 Strengthen the feeble hands, steady the knees that give way;
4 say to those with fearful hearts, "Be strong, do not fear; your God will come, he will come with vengeance; with divine retribution he will come to save you."
Isaiah 35
4 See, the enemy is puffed up; his desires are not upright - but the righteous person will live by his faithfulness"
Habakkuk 2
16 Then those who feared the Lord talked with each other, and the Lord listened and heard. A scroll of remembrance was written in his presence concerning those who feared the Lord and honored his name.
17 "On the day when I act," says the Lord Almighty, "they will be my treasured possession. I will spare them, just as a father has compassion and spares his son who serves him."
18 And you will again see the distinction between the righteous and the wicked, between those who serve God and those who do not.
Malachi 3
27 Zion will be delivered with justice, her penitent ones with righteousness.
28 But rebels and sinners will both be broken, and those who forsake the Lord will perish.
Isaiah 1
etc
can someone tell me everything i need to know about asian massage parlors? i want to have sex.
Thai ladybois give the best hand jobs
Little Saint James
Africa. It will be the same shit show as always.
Catch dems fish homie!
there's no fish there it's just her pussy stank
idk rich people are buying properties in NZ and Greece so id start there.
Russia
> which place on earth will be safe?
probably not georgia.
Stewart Island, below the south, south of New zealand. Untouchable.
parts of stewart island have ancient (geologically stable) granite too, iirc
campbell island and auckland island are also worth looking into
100% it's New Zealand and its not even close, South America is a fricking dump ethnic shithole which could turn into total anarachy if WW3 comes. New Zealand is a majority white country with temperate climate and can sustain themselves easily due to low population and lots of farms. There is a reason all the billionaires in the world buy bunkers in New Zealand and not anywhere else
all five eyes nations will be glassed
Unironically Moscow
kek, there's two of them now. where's the frenchbro with his doodles?
most of Africa, just like with covid
Live near oil wells and river.
Large underground tanks of high octane gas.
Close to junkyard, workshop full of high performance engine and racing parts.
One million rounds of ammunition.
When it hits the fan go out with friends and family wearing crazy masks to raid everyone within 200 miles for any needed supplies.
it's the apocalypse, armageddon, not mad max movie
Parts of Southern Africa wont be that bad
another good possibility. south africa is geologically stable
But not politically, afyer the race war maybe
politically/tribally problematic, true
My house
Bring food, drink, guns, and vidya
South Africa and South America
South America is the promised land, in concrete the so called Southern Cone. Comfy af
Antartica, far south of southern american, the polynesian islands near New Zealand
another possibility
the problem is, it's somewhat obvious now that bunkers exist down there, so it will be targeted
She hasn't rendered properly yet. You can see the ground she's touching is still pixellated and loading.
>Hypothetically if ww3 breaks out which place on earth will be safe?
the us. ameriisraelites always fight their wars on a different continent using proxys. at the moment using hohols to fight russians.
The woods or probably some irrelevant nation no one gives a frick about.
southeren hemisphere minus Australia, New Zealand and the surrounding area
volcanic regions could be a problem
>volcanic regions could be a problem
listen to this lads and pay attention
>two secret Soviet programs, "Mercury" and "Volcano", aimed at developing a "tectonic weapon" that could set off earthquakes from great distance
>US Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen, said..."they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tectonic_weapon#Reports
tsunamis and massive flooding are HIGHLY LIKELY
elevation is key
Switzerland with the israeli bankers or Monaco.
Iceland
Israel
underground maybe. settlements on the land will be obliterated and washed away
Nowhere. Everyone dies from nuclear winter in a real WW3 exchange.
no
>what is a bunker
Got a bunker with a few decades of food and water? How many do? So yeah, everyone dies.
>Got a bunker with a few decades of food and water? How many do? So yeah, everyone dies.
food is relatively inexpensive. those who can afford to build a sturdy bunker can afford to stockpile decades worth of food. food can also be grown hydroponically. water can be recycled, that's assuming there isn't access to an underground source (these sources do exist)
>Hypothetically if ww3 breaks out which place on earth will be safe?
New Zealand. That's why all the elites are buying property there. That's also why they are trying to take all the guns away.
>which place on earth will be safe?
Well, probably not Israel
>gif related
cryptid hours
Kek why do u homosexuals want to live any
Way? Earth is a fricking prison
Rules by israelites and the demiurge
Jesus christ wake the fuuck upp
Any location that doesn't require a global division of labor economy. If you've got that you're golden.
Chile
South of Chile
East Russia (around the Baikal sea) should be rather safe too
South Africa. Central Russia. Parts Western US. Canada. Southern Asia.
Hard to tell though.
Northern California is alright, isn't it? North of Redding. Still might have to deal with fallout, but the forests will be kind to you.
Yes anywhere where there isn’t a military base and lots of trees will be good.
A nuclear fallout would actually drop Earth’s temperature quite a bit so Cali would be more bearable.
this is ww3, not ww2
california will be underwater, earthquaked, nuked, and much more
>@onestar_xx
It's real HAHAHA
>Hypothetically if ww3 breaks out which place on earth will be safe?
Bikini bottom.
underrated
>China Is Planning a Massive Sea Lab 10,000 Feet Underwater
>manned
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-06-07/china-pushes-plan-for-oceanic-space-station-in-south-china-sea
>Hypothetically if ww3 breaks out which place on earth will be safe?
whereever the elites will be hiding
Israel
see
factually, go have a nice day for posting moronic women. you and everyone else who does that.
"In Portugal, the dogma of the faith will always be preserved"
Anywhere outside of major cities and away from military bases really. Nukes aren’t what most people think and modern ones only irradiate a small area for a short time (just don’t grow crops there or drink groundwater) and virtually no fallout.
Plus anti missile systems are probably a shit ton better than most people believe them to be, so likely very few nukes would make it through
If the Earth were not actually flat (ridiculous I know), probably the Southern Hemisphere would be *somewhat* in better shape. If nukes start flying you will probably see Europeans in boats trying to flee to Africa, as ironic as that may be.
In her pussy
I know where I"m headed
mongolia
eipsten island
>Hypothetically if ww3 breaks out which place on earth will be safe?
The elites live in Switzerland.
So I'm guessing Switzerland.
The only correct answer to this question is: not “where,” but “what?” Many answers here are pointing to developing countries and usually neutral states like Switzerland. The problem with these answers is that they fail to address the problem of access to food. When the War gets going, dodging nukes will be the least of your worries. The big three will romp throughout the world, confiscating crop yields, tractors, and processing equipment. Even if the farm equipment is not confiscated, parts will be impossible to get, so food production will quickly grind to a halt in faraway places.
But the real question is, how do you guarantee that YOU will have access to food?
The answer is, you must be an essential person. Obviously, all politicians and leaders fall into this category. Let’s face it: You don’t, and won’t. Soldiers (infantry) are not exempt from a food crisis. Engineers, mathematicians, physicists, doctors, lawyers, and technicians will be given ample rations, with their families. Military leadership both civilian and military will have food. Iron workers, truckers, welders (me), machine operators, heavy equipment operators, and similar industrial workers (not assembly workers) will have food rations. Educators are not likely to have much food; they will probably have starvation rations.
The simple answer is that you will have as much food as you are important to the war effort. If you are some kind of code breaker or computer scientist for example you will never be hungry. If you assemble planes or trains or trucks, you will have food and transportation and security.
If you aren’t already in any of these industries or jobs, you are doomed. Even if you find some verdant land to escape to, you will almost certainly be deported the instant food becomes scarce.
Siberia
>Siberia
Like no one will nuke the polar bears. They are the single biggest threat to humanity because of global warming.
SAGE
ITS THE israeliteS