Yeah, they're different things. NATO is less involved in actual warfighting than OP seems to imply. SACEUR for example, despite being nominally in charge of every military unit under NATO's umbrella, has little involvement in how things get done and by whom, and more what gets done.
Well, if they're in English then I can safely say pretty well.
More importantly, where is the Russian doctrine lacking, and how can the Ukies exploit it?
Yes.
Frick commies
I don't understand most things
About military strategy or in general?
Spread homosexualism and other forms of degeneracy through force
so you mean freedom, literally nothing wrong with that
God I wish.
Femboy army when?
Those are two separate things. They share similarities, but they are quite different.
That’s why OP says “NATO/US”
Yeah, they're different things. NATO is less involved in actual warfighting than OP seems to imply. SACEUR for example, despite being nominally in charge of every military unit under NATO's umbrella, has little involvement in how things get done and by whom, and more what gets done.
Outspend everybody?
Is that basically it?
It is aligned with what Israel (The US) wants.
>you will buy jaffa oranges and sodastreams or lose your livelihood
impressively vile country
israel does literally nothing wrong
>have pallets
>remove vatnik
>bottom text
Salute the flag and kneel to the cross are its main tenets
Not at all
AFAIK it boils down to be about 20-40 years in advance to its opponents... seems purrty gud if you ask me.
Yes.
us doctrine:
>be able to fight two wars on oposite sites of the planet and win both
nato doctrin:
>make sure nobody hurts/attacks members with millitary
Secure the existence of israeli people and a future for israeli children and create generations of White orphans.
good