How to is it different and okay for when UK invades the smaller, weaker sovereign nation of France to conquer and steal clay? Even worse, when condemned by Pope and Christendom (ancestor of HATO) and told they must no more bully the French or be excommunicate? Explain to me please how is okay.
We're no longer in the fricking dark ages, there's this expectation of people not behaving like savages.
>he's never been around Black folk
dude, stop marginalizing black privilege and show some respect for the American national animal.
Because rulers are not divine? Do you want to go back to believing that your ruler is divine?
How is any English bastard divine!?
None of the rulers of england were actually english
Uh, am I moronic or was France not the largest, richest and most powerful nation in Yurop until like the end of Napoleonic wars?
Well, Spain was richer in the 16th century, and also larger if we include the Two Sicilies and the Netherlands as well (let alone the American colonies).
Anyways,
>England
>Scotlandless
>Walesless
>Irelandless
>With only pitiful Calais
>Bigger than France
>m-muh UK
OP is a moron.
>How to is it different and okay for when
France smaller than Britain? I'm starting to suspect that OP is moronic, and this is a slide thread.
leave moron, shoo! Away with you!
Back then France was much smaller than the UK. It was a war of unjust aggression. In defiance of God's chosen Pope.
>Back then France was much smaller than the UK
>Back then
>the UK
Because God is English and hates continentals.
Might makes right, Copenik
Lol remember when UK and France invaded Russia and bullied them out of Crimea.
Why is Russia such a victim bros? Sad.
That was never the case, even before the sea level rose and sank Doggerland. Wherever you're getting you're information it's wrong, and so are you.
>Wait, so England was completely in the right and the French were just seething
That is the history of the last thousand years or so of Anglo-Frankish relations. The rump state of Western-Frankia must return the counties of Occupied Trans-Channel England.
Do you think Macron has trouble meeting the gaze of Her Royal Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, knowing at any moment the Royal Navy could end his puny "independence" and return him to the status of a mere courtier should her whims turn towards the reestablishment of Angevin supremacy?
I'd like to imagine he does, but he probably lacks the sort of self respect and levels of introspection necessary to feel that kind of shame.
Imagine him puffing his narrow chest and looking in the mirror, calling himself Jupiter, when at any moment SAS Redcoats could burst through the windows and frog-march him to the Tower of London to share a cell with the mouldering remains of the Princes.
For historical beauty it shouldn't be a team of SAS professionals. It should be a rather motley crew of volunteers from a few rural small towns (with one of the younger knights leading the team), wearing and carrying whatever gear they could put together from what was lying around at home, and - in terms of payment - authorised to keep anything they could carry home with them from that little jaunt.
Who was actually in the right in this conflict? What did the bongs even invade over in the 1300s? All I know is le ebin Crecy meme.
>charles iv of france dies without an heir
>edward iii of england is his nephew and closest male relative
>england says edward should inherit
>french nobles say frick off we dont want an english king and crown charles' cousin instead
>hundred years war starts
There's some cope involved about whether or not inheritance passing along female lines but that was ultimately irrelevant.
Wait, so England was completely in the right and the French were just seething about even though IIRC the English nobility at the time was descended from Normans and Angevins and married mostly French princesses?
Yes, pretty much.
>England was completely in the right
Welcome to all of history.
>bans guns
Ruh roh England
>The most hated Prime Minister since the she-demon represents the last 2000 years of history.
>This is what American education does to a MF
Depends which side you choose, the English king had a valid claim on the French throne, and the French nobility were so offended, that they broke traditional inheritance practice in order to keep the King French.
Atleast I think that’s how it went, I may be conflating different parts of the 100 years war so go read a book on it.
>when UK invades the smaller, weaker sovereign nation of France to conquer and steal clay?
Are you talking about the Angevin Empire here? That wasn't an invasion, and it wasn't France either.
>How to is it different and okay for when UK invades the smaller, weaker sovereign nation of France to conquer and steal clay?
It was a sort of annual tradition back then
I don't care in either case.
Ukraine will suffer the same fate as Russian conscripts.
Bootyhole reeming on national proportions