>Tripled the speed of death rates >Ukraine War, six months, maybe 70,000 battlefield deaths all together >WWI with bolt actions >30,000 dead in a day >Battle of Antioch or Cannae with swords and spears, 40,000-60,000 dead in a few hours
War has gotten less deadly as a % of the population steadily over the centuries. France had 40 million people in 1914 and lost 1.5-1.7 million people in a horrifically large war.
France had 16 million people in 1560 and lost 2-4 million in the Huguenot autism, and even this is considered a foot note because right after the Thirty Years War killed a significantly higher proportion of all of Europe's population than both World Wars combined, depopulating large areas. This was accomplished with primitive, slow loading fire arms, swords, and lots of pikes.
Unless dems strong arm 10 republicans with blackmail, there’s a small amount of dem senators that won’t vote or get it to 60 votes, instant death for the AWB.
good, skeletons should be freed from their prisons of flesh and organs
What’s the cope going to be when the AWB dies in committee and the Supreme Court shreds all the state-level ones?
considering the steps states are taking to """"comply"""" with Bruen I imagine there will be a ton of opposition at first, maybe even attempts to get 2A repealed in their state constitutions and eventually a push on a federal level. think the current favorite for new AG in my state went on record saying 2A should be done away with altogether.
A ton of states have basically 2A in their constitutions. My state just cucked up a mag limit and we literally have "The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." with no preamble or qualifications as a standalone part of the state constitution. They can't even pretend the militia thing matters because that part of the sentence isn't there, so instead they just don't mention it at all in the state senate and hope no one else does either while they try to pass a long series of bans and restrictions.
many state constitutions, if not all of them, have some degree of 2A in their text. repealing at the state level would be very easy for a good handful of states with dem dominated legislatures
>repealing the 2A from state level constitution
Irrelevant cause the 2A at federal level supersedes state level, and any attempt at modifying the 2A to support shit like the NFA,AWB, MG ban show these states and the feds are scared shitless.
Regardless there’s no way in hell they’ll modify the 2A anyway, there wasn’t even support to revive the AWB in 2013 with a Dem senate majority.
I know that, the state likely knows that, and by god does the supreme court know that. But we live in a world of long drawn out legal battles, injunctions and corrupt bodies of government that know how to drag out court cases as long as possible to stymy the rights of good people. Just look at what New York is currently doing, if the various firearms rights orgs fail to get a preliminary injunction for their upcoming requirement bullshit (I heard a judge will rule before the law goes into effect in September), it will be the rule of law in New York to do all sorts of unconstitutional bullshit for a minimum of a whole year unless the Supreme Court expresses immediate, unprecedented interest in solving the problem for them. My state, should it decide to suddenly repeal 2A and revoke all licenses to own guns, would surely start going out and enforcing regardless of federal supremacy unless they were made to stop. If they could get away with it, they totally would, and just because it's tyrannical and wrong doesn't mean they'll weaponize the slowness of the courts to give the illusion of a mandate.
>maybe even attempts to get 2A repealed in their state constitutions and eventually a push on a federal level. think the current favorite for new AG in my state went on record saying 2A should be done away with altogether.
if they're going for the nuclear option (get rid of the 2A entirely), then they know their traditional ways of passing gun control, like AWBs, are fricked thanks to Buren. Good.
Trying to repeal the 2A at state level would get them slapped down hard fast by the Supreme Court and the current political climate is so partisan there's no way any new amendments to the constitution can be passed, much less one as controversial as explicitly repealing the 2A.
>repealing the 2A from state level constitution
Irrelevant cause the 2A at federal level supersedes state level, and any attempt at modifying the 2A to support shit like the NFA,AWB, MG ban show these states and the feds are scared shitless.
Regardless there’s no way in hell they’ll modify the 2A anyway, there wasn’t even support to revive the AWB in 2013 with a Dem senate majority.
The current Supreme Court is going to cuck any attempt at touching the 2A.
The current decision in standing is any arm in common use today cannot be banned. The EPA decision denied executive branch agencies from interpreting law creatively.
They're also originalists, which means no one is going to make creative interpretations with the meaning of 2A or succeeding decisions.
I’ve seen first hand was 556mm can do to one of gods creatures. It literally can blow of body parts of deer when they are shot. They’re designed for war. War is an ugly thing very little of you know anything about beyond your video games and movies. Real war is gruesome and brutal. Just a single shot from a M16A4 can legitimately twist around inside your body leaving a cavity that can’t be sutured. Why is it people idolize something designed to destroy life if you’re all supposedly “pro life”? Baby’s matter but children learning together peacefully in a school don’t? Bit ironic.
If 5.56/.223 rifles actually blew deer into pieces then there would be so many people shooting deer for sport to simply watch them explode into bits, so much that American deer populations would likely go extinct.
The recent bruin decision is basically BTFOing gun control in lawsuits across the country and the awb has no shot of passing even if it does hit the senate floor.
A picture is worth 1000 words, and this is a typical 5.56 wound. This fat moron shot himself at a 2 gun match today. Not sure if he lost the leg but they flew his fat ass to the hospital. Unfortunately I had to work today so I missed the match but my buddy sent me the gore pics. :^)
High and tight is never wrong, but is sub optimal when you have such a clear wound
Frick are you talking about the upper inner thigh is where the Femoral is closest to the skin, easiest to block off for any wound
While it doesn't matter in a civilian setting where he can be flown out and taken to a facility quickly, a tourniquet should be placed a few inches above the wound. Suck to turn an easy below the knee amputation into an above the knee amputation if bleeding can be controlled with a tourniquet right above the wound.
You guys aren't medics, are you? Tourniquets go above the wound. There's a real change that tourniquets will result in a limb being severed. One time a furry guy bound his forearms so that his hands would swell up and become "paws". He lost his hands. We don't want to lose more limb than necessary.
Yea you are a straight up moron. There is absolutely no chance a tq in this situation would result in a limb being severed. It has to be on for more than 8 hours for that to even be a possibility. High and tight is what is still taught for most people.
You put the TQ above the wound not at the thigh every single time. Otherwise you would put the TQ at the fricking armpit if someone got their arm shot, you don't do that either, it is junctions area you pack it and leave it.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Yes it is optimal to place it a few inches above the wound, but if someone gets their arm shot people can and do put the TQ at the fricking armpit. It is called high and tight and is an obvious way for morons who aren't actual medics effectively apply bleed control.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Anon
Yes it is optimal to place it a few inches above the wound, but if someone gets their arm shot people can and do put the TQ at the fricking armpit. It is called high and tight and is an obvious way for morons who aren't actual medics effectively apply bleed control.
is right, in addition if structural integrity allows you should pack an extremity wound as well. This place needs more medic threads.
>It has to be on for more than 8 hours for that to even be a possibility.
If a tourniquet is on for two hours, your limb is gone.
2 years ago
Anonymous
That's not true anon, tourniquets can be left in place for at least 5 hours before tissue damage starts to set in.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Hear it from a US military surgeon who has been practicing for 24 years.
?t=998
2 years ago
Anonymous
Home boy's wrong and behind the times. 2 hours is optimal however not an absolute, cell death begins around that time and tracks at a different rate depending on circumstances.
2 years ago
Anonymous
[...]
that is completely incorrect. 8 hours is the number given nowadays.
>I've been proven wrong! >What will i do? >Double down!
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2660095/
Go on, leave your tourniquet on for 8 hours.
If the necrosis doesn't cause your limb to go, which it will, you'll have a useless piece of meat from the nerve and muscle damage hanging off your body.
In any case it will cause irreversible damage that indicates amputation.
2 years ago
Anonymous
ok so damage starts at 2 and is finished by 6 hours, where amputation is required. So 6 hours.
2 years ago
Anonymous
[...]
that is completely incorrect. 8 hours is the number given nowadays.
Home boy's wrong and behind the times. 2 hours is optimal however not an absolute, cell death begins around that time and tracks at a different rate depending on circumstances.
Uptodate says
"Use of a tourniquet is acceptable to stop hemorrhage in cases of amputation or severe extremity injury when other measures have not successfully controlled bleeding. Tourniquets should be released periodically (eg, every 45 minutes) when possible to avoid prolonged ischemia and possible tissue loss."
The 2 or 6 or 8 hours may only apply if you don't periodically release it.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Hear it from a US military surgeon who has been practicing for 24 years.
?t=998
that is completely incorrect. 8 hours is the number given nowadays.
[...]
You guys aren't medics, are you? Tourniquets go above the wound. There's a real change that tourniquets will result in a limb being severed. One time a furry guy bound his forearms so that his hands would swell up and become "paws". He lost his hands. We don't want to lose more limb than necessary.
My buddy who took the photos literally is an EMT and did two infantry tours in Iraq, by the time he got over to the stage the guy was TQ'd and he said it looked good enough. And a helicopter was coming so there was zero risk of the TQs being on too long.
The great thing about self-inflicted injuries like this is that you know the guy absolutely deserved it. If he endangers himself he could have just as well endangered others, just lucky nobody else was the victim of stupidity.
Id rather die from a AR15 wound then having the same maniac ram a rebar though my guts then beat me to death with it. Modern weapons were invented to be as human as possible, >McBath is all wet.
flannel daddy tried to get an expansion channel to match 1' and even a 50 couldn't do it.
I swear to god congress people should have to pass a litmus test before they're allowed in the fricking doors.
Enough firepower to destroy several cities with a single magazine. It's called the AR15 because each bullet shoots 15 antimatter rockets as submunitions.
Like 5
as powerful as she says
now come and take it
More powerful than a woman
Where the frick can I get a bolter?
Uintah Precision
> tripled the speed of death rates
Truly wonderful the mind of a child is.
>Tripled the speed of death rates
>Ukraine War, six months, maybe 70,000 battlefield deaths all together
>WWI with bolt actions
>30,000 dead in a day
>Battle of Antioch or Cannae with swords and spears, 40,000-60,000 dead in a few hours
War has gotten less deadly as a % of the population steadily over the centuries. France had 40 million people in 1914 and lost 1.5-1.7 million people in a horrifically large war.
France had 16 million people in 1560 and lost 2-4 million in the Huguenot autism, and even this is considered a foot note because right after the Thirty Years War killed a significantly higher proportion of all of Europe's population than both World Wars combined, depopulating large areas. This was accomplished with primitive, slow loading fire arms, swords, and lots of pikes.
England famously managed to kill 1% of its entire male population in a day.
Guns slow down deaths by making people spread out, instead of closing to melee range in groups of tens of thousands.
What's the cope going to be when the AWB passes the senate?
The AWB that requires 10 republicans to join in that they don't even have all 50 dems on board for? That AWB?
Unless dems strong arm 10 republicans with blackmail, there’s a small amount of dem senators that won’t vote or get it to 60 votes, instant death for the AWB.
I heard they can blow the skeleton right out of a persons body
>only the skeleton
>not the lungs too
9mm chads rise up
good, skeletons should be freed from their prisons of flesh and organs
considering the steps states are taking to """"comply"""" with Bruen I imagine there will be a ton of opposition at first, maybe even attempts to get 2A repealed in their state constitutions and eventually a push on a federal level. think the current favorite for new AG in my state went on record saying 2A should be done away with altogether.
>maybe even attempts to get 2A repealed in their state constitutions
what
A ton of states have basically 2A in their constitutions. My state just cucked up a mag limit and we literally have "The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." with no preamble or qualifications as a standalone part of the state constitution. They can't even pretend the militia thing matters because that part of the sentence isn't there, so instead they just don't mention it at all in the state senate and hope no one else does either while they try to pass a long series of bans and restrictions.
many state constitutions, if not all of them, have some degree of 2A in their text. repealing at the state level would be very easy for a good handful of states with dem dominated legislatures
I know that, the state likely knows that, and by god does the supreme court know that. But we live in a world of long drawn out legal battles, injunctions and corrupt bodies of government that know how to drag out court cases as long as possible to stymy the rights of good people. Just look at what New York is currently doing, if the various firearms rights orgs fail to get a preliminary injunction for their upcoming requirement bullshit (I heard a judge will rule before the law goes into effect in September), it will be the rule of law in New York to do all sorts of unconstitutional bullshit for a minimum of a whole year unless the Supreme Court expresses immediate, unprecedented interest in solving the problem for them. My state, should it decide to suddenly repeal 2A and revoke all licenses to own guns, would surely start going out and enforcing regardless of federal supremacy unless they were made to stop. If they could get away with it, they totally would, and just because it's tyrannical and wrong doesn't mean they'll weaponize the slowness of the courts to give the illusion of a mandate.
better hope you have an originalist justice in charge of your circuit
>maybe even attempts to get 2A repealed in their state constitutions and eventually a push on a federal level. think the current favorite for new AG in my state went on record saying 2A should be done away with altogether.
if they're going for the nuclear option (get rid of the 2A entirely), then they know their traditional ways of passing gun control, like AWBs, are fricked thanks to Buren. Good.
Trying to repeal the 2A at state level would get them slapped down hard fast by the Supreme Court and the current political climate is so partisan there's no way any new amendments to the constitution can be passed, much less one as controversial as explicitly repealing the 2A.
>repealing the 2A from state level constitution
Irrelevant cause the 2A at federal level supersedes state level, and any attempt at modifying the 2A to support shit like the NFA,AWB, MG ban show these states and the feds are scared shitless.
Regardless there’s no way in hell they’ll modify the 2A anyway, there wasn’t even support to revive the AWB in 2013 with a Dem senate majority.
The current Supreme Court is going to cuck any attempt at touching the 2A.
The current decision in standing is any arm in common use today cannot be banned. The EPA decision denied executive branch agencies from interpreting law creatively.
They're also originalists, which means no one is going to make creative interpretations with the meaning of 2A or succeeding decisions.
Thats a double edged sword. Then you're fighting a skeleton, and they have advantage against piercing damage
I love how Garandthumb has a boxer’s fracture and tries to play it off like he didn’t punch anything
Where'd the fracture come from?
beating his wives
Excessive jerking off.
He probably punched something harder than his hand. I had the same injury when I punched a tree earlier this year
Wood shouldn't be harder than bone, though.
Black person, when you punch an oak tree, and only the pinky makes contact with it, your hand is fricked
What? People don't chop trees with their fists where you live?
homie lives in minecraft
He punched a child in the face, their skulls are getting stronger.
His wife's smart mouth
I got that injury from an autistic fit of tard rage. Probably the same.
It's a common injury sustained from donkey punching
The shilling is worse than usual in the newest video. I downvote and turn off any video that mentions the scam Sonoran Desert Institute
About 10 boxes.
I’ve seen first hand was 556mm can do to one of gods creatures. It literally can blow of body parts of deer when they are shot. They’re designed for war. War is an ugly thing very little of you know anything about beyond your video games and movies. Real war is gruesome and brutal. Just a single shot from a M16A4 can legitimately twist around inside your body leaving a cavity that can’t be sutured. Why is it people idolize something designed to destroy life if you’re all supposedly “pro life”? Baby’s matter but children learning together peacefully in a school don’t? Bit ironic.
The school shootings will continue until home schooling is the norm again
>Bit ironic
Hahahaha he doesn't have a gun!
If 5.56/.223 rifles actually blew deer into pieces then there would be so many people shooting deer for sport to simply watch them explode into bits, so much that American deer populations would likely go extinct.
>556mm
>mfw no 22 inch quad turret for home defense
What’s the cope going to be when the AWB dies in committee and the Supreme Court shreds all the state-level ones?
Mass dilation and 41%ing
Gonna be Uber cope from the Federal government when the NFA and Hughes gets shredded every single rifle in my house will be select fire.
currently trying to figure out how to make my lever gun select fire
I think you could get a small electric motor to cycle the action for you as long as you hold the trigger
You'd probably need stepper motors and positional sensors. Also some sort of control box. So you're not just ejecting live rounds.
If the rifle can slam-fire, you could just hold the trigger and let the motor work the lever, I don't think that would be too difficult to do
Just take your normal gas-operated full-auto lever gun, and add a selector for semi.
quick run down?
The recent bruin decision is basically BTFOing gun control in lawsuits across the country and the awb has no shot of passing even if it does hit the senate floor.
>McBath
Irish women look like THAT?
dios mio...
an ir*shman did this...
>b***h has Lebron's hairline
Hahaha, no wonder she's mad at the world
take it back
I want to shop her face into Goatse's butthole but I don't want to look at her face for that long.
i loved her in pink floyd the wall
She could play as an orc in a lord of the rings movie.
Or a dwarf queen in the new show
As powerful as five gerbils the size of a medium sized Welsh corgi.
stronger than a M61 Vulcan
A picture is worth 1000 words, and this is a typical 5.56 wound. This fat moron shot himself at a 2 gun match today. Not sure if he lost the leg but they flew his fat ass to the hospital. Unfortunately I had to work today so I missed the match but my buddy sent me the gore pics. :^)
Why are the tourniquets set so high up? Bunch of boomer idiots
Nothing wrong with high and tight, my guy.
Not him
High and tight is never wrong, but is sub optimal when you have such a clear wound
While it doesn't matter in a civilian setting where he can be flown out and taken to a facility quickly, a tourniquet should be placed a few inches above the wound. Suck to turn an easy below the knee amputation into an above the knee amputation if bleeding can be controlled with a tourniquet right above the wound.
Frick are you talking about the upper inner thigh is where the Femoral is closest to the skin, easiest to block off for any wound
You guys aren't medics, are you? Tourniquets go above the wound. There's a real change that tourniquets will result in a limb being severed. One time a furry guy bound his forearms so that his hands would swell up and become "paws". He lost his hands. We don't want to lose more limb than necessary.
You talking about that homosexual who put dry ice on his hands?
That furgay froze his hands off.
you stupid fricking moron
Yea you are a straight up moron. There is absolutely no chance a tq in this situation would result in a limb being severed. It has to be on for more than 8 hours for that to even be a possibility. High and tight is what is still taught for most people.
You put the TQ above the wound not at the thigh every single time. Otherwise you would put the TQ at the fricking armpit if someone got their arm shot, you don't do that either, it is junctions area you pack it and leave it.
Yes it is optimal to place it a few inches above the wound, but if someone gets their arm shot people can and do put the TQ at the fricking armpit. It is called high and tight and is an obvious way for morons who aren't actual medics effectively apply bleed control.
Anon
is right, in addition if structural integrity allows you should pack an extremity wound as well. This place needs more medic threads.
>It has to be on for more than 8 hours for that to even be a possibility.
If a tourniquet is on for two hours, your limb is gone.
That's not true anon, tourniquets can be left in place for at least 5 hours before tissue damage starts to set in.
Hear it from a US military surgeon who has been practicing for 24 years.
?t=998
Home boy's wrong and behind the times. 2 hours is optimal however not an absolute, cell death begins around that time and tracks at a different rate depending on circumstances.
>I've been proven wrong!
>What will i do?
>Double down!
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2660095/
Go on, leave your tourniquet on for 8 hours.
If the necrosis doesn't cause your limb to go, which it will, you'll have a useless piece of meat from the nerve and muscle damage hanging off your body.
In any case it will cause irreversible damage that indicates amputation.
ok so damage starts at 2 and is finished by 6 hours, where amputation is required. So 6 hours.
Uptodate says
"Use of a tourniquet is acceptable to stop hemorrhage in cases of amputation or severe extremity injury when other measures have not successfully controlled bleeding. Tourniquets should be released periodically (eg, every 45 minutes) when possible to avoid prolonged ischemia and possible tissue loss."
The 2 or 6 or 8 hours may only apply if you don't periodically release it.
that is completely incorrect. 8 hours is the number given nowadays.
That looks like the exit. How'd he shoot himself at what looks like a 90 degree angle perpendicular to his leg?
That's the entry wound, king.
My buddy who took the photos literally is an EMT and did two infantry tours in Iraq, by the time he got over to the stage the guy was TQ'd and he said it looked good enough. And a helicopter was coming so there was zero risk of the TQs being on too long.
Why the frick is the TQ so high? lmao fricking moronic Boomers.
>gee bill
The great thing about self-inflicted injuries like this is that you know the guy absolutely deserved it. If he endangers himself he could have just as well endangered others, just lucky nobody else was the victim of stupidity.
What about the video from Buffalo where so many people thought it was fake because the bodily damage was so underwhelming.
Id rather die from a AR15 wound then having the same maniac ram a rebar though my guts then beat me to death with it. Modern weapons were invented to be as human as possible,
>McBath is all wet.
As powerful as 5, maybe 6 kindergarteners. If they were given sugar, 2 or 3 sounds about right.
The isometric Fallout games were apparently quite realistic then.
>he doesn’t know the first two were simulations of a post covid world that early google/darpa AI created
McBath is one of Bloombergs puppets.
Children's flesh and bone are way softer, I wonder what 5.56 does to the body of a non adult.
5.56 LITERALLY vaporizes children! Just like Thanos in my hecking Marvel movies!
flannel daddy tried to get an expansion channel to match 1' and even a 50 couldn't do it.
I swear to god congress people should have to pass a litmus test before they're allowed in the fricking doors.
Enough firepower to destroy several cities with a single magazine. It's called the AR15 because each bullet shoots 15 antimatter rockets as submunitions.
This can’t be real? Women should not be allowed in politics especially black women.
Reminder that c**ts like this defend Uvalde and non-action from police.
I can't even tell what's bait and what isn't in this fricking tourniquet discussion.
>many of the bodies no longer exist
stoppin powah
Oh boy, imagine what an AR-10 must be like.
A fricking disintegration beam
>'bout tree fiddy
This can't he a real post. A revolver with hollowpoints will do far more damage than an AR-15
t. call of duty developer
The entire Christchurch shooting is all over the internet and proves this wrong instantly upon observation.
>Many of the bodies no longer exist
Fricking cartels, man, they turned them into pozole. JAJAJAAJAJAJA
>many of the bodies no longer exist
I wonder if she has any awareness of her >implication