Implessive, china numba wan, duck plane chassis kill all white devil planes
It's still image for ants, literally unreadable without 400% zoom. KYS you Black person and go back to whatever shithole site you crawled out since you are clearly not from here.
here's a hint
any time ANYONE speaks with authority on the capabilities and deployment of a bleeding-edge front-line technology, they are attempting to engage in a form of manipulation
this goes for any 'side' or motivation and should immediately cue you to disregard literally anything said by that person
and when it's some social media nobody leaving a comment on something you should already be primed to assume that person is 14 years old/indian/chinese/actually functionally moronic/attempting to troll
the real question is why the frick are you combing through year old youtube comments?
>here's a hint
any time ANYONE speaks with authority on the capabilities and deployment of a bleeding-edge front-line technology, they are attempting to engage in a form of manipulation
This implies that subject matter knowledge and the desire to communicate it are impossible. I have seen you* make this comment before. It's fine as a heuristic but elevating it to a central tenet of your belief system is literally just a feel-good pseudo street-smart way to beg the question of human inquiry.
*I could couch my statement in uncertainty to be more persuasive to you by casting these prior instances as you *or* someone with similar beliefs, but that would be disingenuous, because I am certain.
>This implies that subject matter knowledge and the desire to communicate it are impossible.
correct
the subject matter is not able to be known as we are discussing state secrets of the highest level, and to imply even a fraction of truth could possibly be obtained shows either your own moronation, naivete, or willingness to troll
Bleeding-edge frontline stuff is not all state secrets of the highest order. You've shifted the goalpost for yourself to defend a narrower claim. >to imply even a fraction of truth could possibly be obtained shows either your own moronation, naivete, or willingness to troll
You have grown cynical and weary of egocentric manifestations of >t. knower personas on the internet. You have reduced the problem of considering new information, in turn, because cognitive miserdom is easier than giving a shit. In short, your pattern-matching has become lazy because you frequent low-information cesspools.
This is not epistemically shrewd behavior. It's a coping strategy for reasoning under uncertainty.
you shifted the topic away from >the capabilities and deployment of a bleeding-edge front-line technology
which just cannot be known to any certainty to have any sort of use beyond dumb baseless speculation
>"wow another westoid cope thread" >thread is actually about Chinese coping about thee inferiority of their military tech in comparison to the US, which had developed better tech decades before
The Chinese have developed Duck Lift technology /k/ommandos, the West has fallen
By duck he means canard, his MTL is failing him, and, while it is hard to analyze an aircraft from just images (small changes in airfoil design and in-flight flexing of parts can cause big differences) the canard design of the J-20 straight up sacrifices aerodynamics for stealth as the canards are in-line with the delta wing. This is sub-optimal, anyone familiar with such aerodynamics understands offsetting them above and at a certain distance in front of the wing allows for improved high alpha as well as cruise performance, seen in aircraft like Rafale and the Chang's own J-10 (copied from the Lavi). Just from that one can understand this is an ESL Chang with no understanding of the subject.
>the canard design of the J-20 straight up sacrifices aerodynamics for stealth as the canards are in-line with the delta wing.
There is no difference for stealth.
As for aerodynamics there are different approaches for canard. When canard sits higher and doesn't interact with win or another design when canards vortex interacts with wing like vortex from LEX
>there is no difference in stealth
Wrong, having misaligned surfaces is worse for stealth, this is well known >when canard sits higher and doesn't interact with win
Not what I'm talking about and you need significant x and z separation to uncouple the canard vortex from the wing vortex. This is also the most sub-optimal design. >another design when canards vortex interacts with wing like vortex from LEX
Yes, that's what I'm referring to and in all kinds of CFD and wind tunnel studies an optimal position was found above and almost starting to overlap with the wing. The Chang design exhibits a sub-optimal arrangement, which they are likely well aware of given the J-10 like I said.
>carbon fiber and graphene skin
Holy shit I'm not going anywhere near that thing. It's like they went out of their way to make the biggest health hazard possible.
>oh yeah?!? Well our plane has carbon fiber (oooooh) a-and graphene! (Aaaaahhhh) and... and... SUPER material STEALTH skin!!!! (Wow!) >typed the cat pfp >on the internet >and then edited a year ago
I mean this without a shred of irony or humor OP, have a nice day
>duct
implessive
>short take off no landing ability
pfft
Makes me chuckle every time.
Implessive, china numba wan, duck plane chassis kill all white devil planes
It's still image for ants, literally unreadable without 400% zoom. KYS you Black person and go back to whatever shithole site you crawled out since you are clearly not from here.
What's this? A greentext for ants?
Fricked up the image, but you should get the gist
https://youtube.com/shorts/E-qIVYoVnAs
I
here's a hint
any time ANYONE speaks with authority on the capabilities and deployment of a bleeding-edge front-line technology, they are attempting to engage in a form of manipulation
this goes for any 'side' or motivation and should immediately cue you to disregard literally anything said by that person
and when it's some social media nobody leaving a comment on something you should already be primed to assume that person is 14 years old/indian/chinese/actually functionally moronic/attempting to troll
the real question is why the frick are you combing through year old youtube comments?
>here's a hint
any time ANYONE speaks with authority on the capabilities and deployment of a bleeding-edge front-line technology, they are attempting to engage in a form of manipulation
This implies that subject matter knowledge and the desire to communicate it are impossible. I have seen you* make this comment before. It's fine as a heuristic but elevating it to a central tenet of your belief system is literally just a feel-good pseudo street-smart way to beg the question of human inquiry.
*I could couch my statement in uncertainty to be more persuasive to you by casting these prior instances as you *or* someone with similar beliefs, but that would be disingenuous, because I am certain.
>This implies that subject matter knowledge and the desire to communicate it are impossible.
correct
the subject matter is not able to be known as we are discussing state secrets of the highest level, and to imply even a fraction of truth could possibly be obtained shows either your own moronation, naivete, or willingness to troll
Bleeding-edge frontline stuff is not all state secrets of the highest order. You've shifted the goalpost for yourself to defend a narrower claim.
>to imply even a fraction of truth could possibly be obtained shows either your own moronation, naivete, or willingness to troll
You have grown cynical and weary of egocentric manifestations of >t. knower personas on the internet. You have reduced the problem of considering new information, in turn, because cognitive miserdom is easier than giving a shit. In short, your pattern-matching has become lazy because you frequent low-information cesspools.
This is not epistemically shrewd behavior. It's a coping strategy for reasoning under uncertainty.
you shifted the topic away from
>the capabilities and deployment of a bleeding-edge front-line technology
which just cannot be known to any certainty to have any sort of use beyond dumb baseless speculation
You're just restating your cope
Super material! I'm thoroughly implessed!
>youtube comment screenshot thread
>super material stealth skin and metamaterials
implessive
>word salad
yeah
>duck lift
OH YEAH WELL THE LEAFS ALREADY HAVE GOOSE LIFT TECHNOLOGY TAKE THAT CHANG
wow another westoid cope thread
>"wow another westoid cope thread"
>thread is actually about Chinese coping about thee inferiority of their military tech in comparison to the US, which had developed better tech decades before
The Chinese have developed Duck Lift technology /k/ommandos, the West has fallen
All of it. It's like you asked a War Thunder player to write a fanfic without using the wikis
By duck he means canard, his MTL is failing him, and, while it is hard to analyze an aircraft from just images (small changes in airfoil design and in-flight flexing of parts can cause big differences) the canard design of the J-20 straight up sacrifices aerodynamics for stealth as the canards are in-line with the delta wing. This is sub-optimal, anyone familiar with such aerodynamics understands offsetting them above and at a certain distance in front of the wing allows for improved high alpha as well as cruise performance, seen in aircraft like Rafale and the Chang's own J-10 (copied from the Lavi). Just from that one can understand this is an ESL Chang with no understanding of the subject.
>the canard design of the J-20 straight up sacrifices aerodynamics for stealth as the canards are in-line with the delta wing.
There is no difference for stealth.
As for aerodynamics there are different approaches for canard. When canard sits higher and doesn't interact with win or another design when canards vortex interacts with wing like vortex from LEX
>there is no difference in stealth
Wrong, having misaligned surfaces is worse for stealth, this is well known
>when canard sits higher and doesn't interact with win
Not what I'm talking about and you need significant x and z separation to uncouple the canard vortex from the wing vortex. This is also the most sub-optimal design.
>another design when canards vortex interacts with wing like vortex from LEX
Yes, that's what I'm referring to and in all kinds of CFD and wind tunnel studies an optimal position was found above and almost starting to overlap with the wing. The Chang design exhibits a sub-optimal arrangement, which they are likely well aware of given the J-10 like I said.
Every single word including the bits you wrote
The J20 is a huge flying barn door with a radar signature the size of a Chinese housing bubble.
>beehive melon matt for quieting operation
Given that it's Chinese, all of it.
THIS THE CHINESE CENTURY, WHITE BOY.
THE DUCK LIFT WILL ELEVATE THE MORALE OF THE BRAVE CHINESE PILOT AND BRING FORTH THE GOLDEN AGE OF THE CHINESE DRAGON.
canard means duck in french so that's probably what he was going for
>metamaterials
do you really need to ask?
>duck lift
Looks like BS, there's no way a cat has this much insight
nobody said it's a copy of an F22 or F35, that's moronic.
it's a copy of a Mig 1.44
They have nothing in common and J-20 aerodynamic prototype model is older than MiG 1.44
>take 1.44
>lower the wienerpit area to be inline with fuselage
>copy Raptor intakes
>claim it's a stealth plane becaise it's black
>carbon fiber and graphene skin
Holy shit I'm not going anywhere near that thing. It's like they went out of their way to make the biggest health hazard possible.
It's all true, Chinese duck technology is lightyears ahead.
>Duck lift
?feature=shared
>oh yeah?!? Well our plane has carbon fiber (oooooh) a-and graphene! (Aaaaahhhh) and... and... SUPER material STEALTH skin!!!! (Wow!)
>typed the cat pfp
>on the internet
>and then edited a year ago
I mean this without a shred of irony or humor OP, have a nice day
velly implessive