A lot of places I've see that sort of crap is only accessible via ATV after a long car drive. A lot of adults never grow up and continue to use the world as their personal trash bin until the day they die.
Cletus putting up threatening signs isn't very based, and I'd rather encounter people who are just driving out for a nice day hike or weekend rather than someone who would unironically say "citidiots", like you own the woods or some shit. If you want to see fewer people, go somewhere else, otherwise stfu.
I've never had problems with trespassers. I'm too far away from cities I guess. Neighbors are few and far between and the ones that are here aren't going to tresspass without asking you first. The bigger problem is family members pestering me to hunt.
>family members pestering me to hunt.
You have land and a big family and you're complaining on PrepHole about it.
Just putting it into words what an ungrateful douche you are.
They are cousins and stuff not immediate family. I don't hear from them unless they want a favor. I hunt ocassionally but generally I'm sort of down on it tbqh. Not once has one ever said "hey can I go dig up a x seedling." "Can I go take some pictures etc." If they texted and said hey let's go look for a Magnolia seedling or a Willow Oak seedling not only would I let them but I go with them. Anyways, what pesters me the most about it is they have land of their own kek.
I have non family members/neighbors that have free reign because they are friends and don't always have their hand out.
Nah, frick that, some family are freeloaders. I have an uncle that tried to cause a big stink because I told him he couldn't park in my driveway to trespass and poach deer off my neighbors property.
Lol that little bastard has been in that pond for three years now he follows the fishing lures splashing off the dock. I can go snap you another one in about 10 mins if you want.
it's too much to write on my phone but I encourage you to do some research on composition and go for a very similar image. what makes your image work so well is the line of the alligator, the line of the leg, and the large structural shapes of color (the green shadow and reflected sky on the water). you'll have to wait for a day with similar cloud coverage, as I think a clear day wont be bright enough, and an overcast day is too much. good luck anon, there is a beautiful picture there and I hope you can capture it.
>sign that reads like a local facebook complaint >waah my grandkids are scared of dogs and my shoe may get dirty from the poopoo
Exact opposite of based. Go tremble in fear over a domesticated animal some more.
Animals are fundamentally innocent, anon. You're good.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>Bases his understanding of animals on walt Disney
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
The Bible, dribbling moron. Something about the apple of knowledge of good and evil - something animals clearly have no concept of, whether you believe in the Bible or not. Ergo: fundamental innocence.
Not everything is a pop culture reference, nerd.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
The behaviour of many animals indicates that they do indeed have a rudimentary conception of morality.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Which one of us believes in Disney stories again?
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
The behaviour of many animals indicates that they do indeed have a rudimentary conception of morality.
Not to mention that a little while ago you said that dogs have an ability to tell whether or not a person is good or a bastard. Now you're saying that animals have no concept of good and evil. Think before you say stupid shit, you just might avoid saying stupid shit.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>saying an animal is innocent is the same as saying it has knowledge of good and evil
Alright, I know you're arguing for the sake of arguing now. Do you think a bear sins when he mauls a man to death?
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
What you actually said is that dogs liking the other anon indicates that he's good. If dogs have no concept of good and evil, how could their behaviour towards him tell us whether he's good or evil?
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>what you actually said is this thing i made up
No, what that anon actually asked is: >does this mean I have a good soul or are dogs bastards and I have a bastard soul?
and what I actually said is: >Animals are fundamentally innocent, anon.
Your thoughts are not my problem. A bear mauling a man doesn't make it a bear that has knowledge of good and evil, nor does it mean the bear is no longer innocent. The bear is just a bear. That's my view on animals and morality, not whatever you think my view is or want my view to be for your argument.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Mate, there's no point in lying when the posts are available for all to see. This is how the exchange went in reality:
dogs love me, even dogs that "don't usually like people" love me, does this mean I have a good soul or are dogs bastards and I have a bastard soul?
>dogs love me, even dogs that "don't usually like people" love me, does this mean I have a good soul or are dogs bastards and I have a bastard soul?
Animals are fundamentally innocent, anon. You're good.
Animals are fundamentally innocent, anon. You're good.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Lol, you're reading my "you're good" in that post as "you're morally good". It's a colloquialism, ESL anon. It means "nah dude you're fine".
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Oh yeah, right, responding "you're good" to someone pondering whether or not he is morally good totally has nothing to do with morality. Stupidity is a bummer but dishonesty is a shame. Shame on you.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
I don't know what more I can do for you Anon. I've laid out my views more clearly for you and I've spotted exactly where you misunderstood me. If you want to be mad, do so, but it's no business of mine.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
I suppose you're right, although I've gotta say that omitting the "you're good" bit from the quote looked like you were trying to twist what you had said. But it appears I misunderstood you. And sorry that I was a bit antagonistic. Have a good night.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
It's alright man, no worries. Just turns out we were on the same page after all. Have a good one!
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
I would argue an instinctual animal is incapable of being innocent inso far as it is completely incapable of the complex thoughts which manifest in consciously making a decision which violates a moral imperative. Or rather, how can you be innocent if you don't have the capacity for evil.
An animal motivated by instinct is opersting on a hardwired impulse taught to it by the brutality and perfection of the natural world. I suppose they are innocent to the extent that they have no capability to commit evil. It's simple mind is not clouded by by complex notions other than basic urges desires and instincts. Humans on the other hand are truly sentient, have complex motivations, emotional responses, self reflection, and are imbued with an understanding of moral imperatives. I believe this associative self reflection is what creationists refer to when they say people are made in the "image of god." It is a godlike quality like a tiny little drop of "Godness" and is referr3d to wheb the creator is called the "I Am." Some might rather envision it as the black obelisk coming down on 2001 space odyssey. This associative ability for complex thought and self reflection is what makes us capable of evil. Although next to humans, I think dogs are the closest animal to us as far as this "associative" conceptualization- like they have a very very primitive form of it. If we have a drop of "Godness" then we are to God as dogs are to us in this way.. even though I'd say the gulf between us and some creator would be far greater than between us and dogs.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>I suppose they are innocent to the extent that they have no capability to commit evil.
That's what my thoughts on this are. People are considered innocent until proven guilty. Animals cannot be anything but innocent, since animals fundamentally cannot be guilty (of a crime or a sin for that matter). They have no concept of evil (or good for that matter), so how could they be acting in a way that is not innocent - however animalistic, basal and impulsive that behavior may be? Acting true to their nature is a boon only animals have - or burden depending on how you look at it.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Nta, I think the dog's ability to detect things in humans comes from two places 1. Instinctual tendencies developed by long periods of time operating as social animals with other canines and 2. A modest period of being genetically modified as human companion animals. I think No. 1 is most of it though- the human modification was really more to pick out the animals that had tendencies that did not clash with human cohabitation.
Anyways, what you'd be looking for is an animal that is able to detect cues on whether a person is "in" or "out" from a pack perspective, and I think they are pretty decent with detecting aggressive human postures etc.
Most of the time we say a dog is able to "know" if a person is "bad," I think it has more to do with the dog picking up on cues toeard that person from the humans in it's group. While not being "evil detectors" it's still a fairly complex and impressive trait for an animal to have though.
Having said that I have seen some fairly uncanny responses from dogs to certain types of people over the years.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>Having said that I have seen some fairly uncanny responses from dogs to certain types of people over the years.
Same, but I usually chalk it up to dogs noticing if a person seems "off", in the same way we can notice how drug users or people with mental issues aren't all there. Dogs are probably just better at it.
They see you as a sexual target.
It's obvious you're giving signals of having high-estrogen which is also common for people that aggressively defend beasts.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
I always wonder what part of the Quran it is that tells folk to hate dogs, or is it just that Quranistan is such a shit hole that all dogs are strays.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>what part of the Quran it is that tells folk to hate dogs
None. It's one of those things where people think their cultural prejudice has religious backing.
hate tourists shitting up my village but so far I haven't thought of tactics other than letting my dog roam freely and turning off the power to my neighbour's pension whenever there's annoying guests
anyone have a solution to frick with people that drive quads/atv's I'd really like some input
>anyone have a solution to frick with people that drive quads/atv's I'd really like some input
strong fishing line strung between two trees at neck height
Well, the city council here figured they should set up a mountainbike trail to attract more larpers. Didn't take long for the first accidents to happen, including one that ended with a dead dog. Then suddenly, by strange coincidence, a number of trees fell across that trail, and some wires appeared out of thin air... Long story short, that trail is "closed" now - they can't legally stop people from using it, but they have giant warning signs and roadblocks on it, and even if some citygay makes it past those, there's still a dozen or so trees across the path at head height. And trees like those have started to appear on all the trails leading away from the parking spots in the area, forcing those mountain bikers to either go cross-country (which is hard, considering how steep our mountains are) or get of their bikes every few hundred meters to haul it past another obstacle.
And as an added benefit, it also keeps out any "hikers" who're afraid to climb over a couple trees.
>gets into the asswreker9001 >straps self in >pushes the start button >pushes the "This will wreck your ass, are you sure you wish to continue?" button >"oh no! I'm getting my ass wrecked, how did this happen!"
> locals are friendly > hate FIBS with a passion no mear out of state mortal could possibly fathom > tons of forest, lakes and rivers > DNR are total bros if your local boy > got on first name basis with them after working a deer registration station > free to frick about as you please.
Locals are the ones leaving beer cans, dumping trash, and lighting sofas in fire.
My condolences that you live in appalachia
there's trash if you go to poor black neighborhoods, and if you go to poor white neighborhoods
But it's not the same sort of trash, is it?
trash is still trash
Why do you lie?
You think people travel from out of town to chuck an old toilet off the side of the road or to dump a truck bed full of trash in the forest?
Beer cans and bonfires, sure. But they’re still locals. And the household and construction debris isn’t teenagers, it’s “adults.”
Frick I hate fly tippers. It's getting worse and worse to
same, beer cans everywhere, cutting ancient protected trees, shooting everything that moves that crosses their path, etc.
A lot of places I've see that sort of crap is only accessible via ATV after a long car drive. A lot of adults never grow up and continue to use the world as their personal trash bin until the day they die.
Usually high school kids being pricks, at least from my experience. They’re at the age they think they run everything so don’t care about nature
Cletus putting up threatening signs isn't very based, and I'd rather encounter people who are just driving out for a nice day hike or weekend rather than someone who would unironically say "citidiots", like you own the woods or some shit. If you want to see fewer people, go somewhere else, otherwise stfu.
t. cidiot
I've never had problems with trespassers. I'm too far away from cities I guess. Neighbors are few and far between and the ones that are here aren't going to tresspass without asking you first. The bigger problem is family members pestering me to hunt.
Looks frickable.
>family members pestering me to hunt.
You have land and a big family and you're complaining on PrepHole about it.
Just putting it into words what an ungrateful douche you are.
They are cousins and stuff not immediate family. I don't hear from them unless they want a favor. I hunt ocassionally but generally I'm sort of down on it tbqh. Not once has one ever said "hey can I go dig up a x seedling." "Can I go take some pictures etc." If they texted and said hey let's go look for a Magnolia seedling or a Willow Oak seedling not only would I let them but I go with them. Anyways, what pesters me the most about it is they have land of their own kek.
I have non family members/neighbors that have free reign because they are friends and don't always have their hand out.
Nah, frick that, some family are freeloaders. I have an uncle that tried to cause a big stink because I told him he couldn't park in my driveway to trespass and poach deer off my neighbors property.
I'm just letting you know, I'm a photographer and you missed a once in a lifetime photo right there by getting your finger right up on the lens
Lol that little bastard has been in that pond for three years now he follows the fishing lures splashing off the dock. I can go snap you another one in about 10 mins if you want.
it's too much to write on my phone but I encourage you to do some research on composition and go for a very similar image. what makes your image work so well is the line of the alligator, the line of the leg, and the large structural shapes of color (the green shadow and reflected sky on the water). you'll have to wait for a day with similar cloud coverage, as I think a clear day wont be bright enough, and an overcast day is too much. good luck anon, there is a beautiful picture there and I hope you can capture it.
Went back and checked. I had some other shots from that day.
Take a deep breath and go touch some grass, moron
>says he's a photographer
>doesn't know how to crop
Many such cases
that is an awesome picture anon
>sign that reads like a local facebook complaint
>waah my grandkids are scared of dogs and my shoe may get dirty from the poopoo
Exact opposite of based. Go tremble in fear over a domesticated animal some more.
You’re right about the complaining, but dogs are dirty fricking trash and both they and their owner should be shot
>dogs are dirty fricking trash
Are you one of those men in dresses who lay down on the floor six times a day?
Dogs can tell who doesn't have a soul, and as a vacant husk, it agitates him greatly.
dogs love me, even dogs that "don't usually like people" love me, does this mean I have a good soul or are dogs bastards and I have a bastard soul?
Animals are fundamentally innocent, anon. You're good.
>Bases his understanding of animals on walt Disney
The Bible, dribbling moron. Something about the apple of knowledge of good and evil - something animals clearly have no concept of, whether you believe in the Bible or not. Ergo: fundamental innocence.
Not everything is a pop culture reference, nerd.
The behaviour of many animals indicates that they do indeed have a rudimentary conception of morality.
Which one of us believes in Disney stories again?
Not to mention that a little while ago you said that dogs have an ability to tell whether or not a person is good or a bastard. Now you're saying that animals have no concept of good and evil. Think before you say stupid shit, you just might avoid saying stupid shit.
>saying an animal is innocent is the same as saying it has knowledge of good and evil
Alright, I know you're arguing for the sake of arguing now. Do you think a bear sins when he mauls a man to death?
What you actually said is that dogs liking the other anon indicates that he's good. If dogs have no concept of good and evil, how could their behaviour towards him tell us whether he's good or evil?
>what you actually said is this thing i made up
No, what that anon actually asked is:
>does this mean I have a good soul or are dogs bastards and I have a bastard soul?
and what I actually said is:
>Animals are fundamentally innocent, anon.
Your thoughts are not my problem. A bear mauling a man doesn't make it a bear that has knowledge of good and evil, nor does it mean the bear is no longer innocent. The bear is just a bear. That's my view on animals and morality, not whatever you think my view is or want my view to be for your argument.
Mate, there's no point in lying when the posts are available for all to see. This is how the exchange went in reality:
>dogs love me, even dogs that "don't usually like people" love me, does this mean I have a good soul or are dogs bastards and I have a bastard soul?
Animals are fundamentally innocent, anon. You're good.
Lol, you're reading my "you're good" in that post as "you're morally good". It's a colloquialism, ESL anon. It means "nah dude you're fine".
Oh yeah, right, responding "you're good" to someone pondering whether or not he is morally good totally has nothing to do with morality. Stupidity is a bummer but dishonesty is a shame. Shame on you.
I don't know what more I can do for you Anon. I've laid out my views more clearly for you and I've spotted exactly where you misunderstood me. If you want to be mad, do so, but it's no business of mine.
I suppose you're right, although I've gotta say that omitting the "you're good" bit from the quote looked like you were trying to twist what you had said. But it appears I misunderstood you. And sorry that I was a bit antagonistic. Have a good night.
It's alright man, no worries. Just turns out we were on the same page after all. Have a good one!
I would argue an instinctual animal is incapable of being innocent inso far as it is completely incapable of the complex thoughts which manifest in consciously making a decision which violates a moral imperative. Or rather, how can you be innocent if you don't have the capacity for evil.
An animal motivated by instinct is opersting on a hardwired impulse taught to it by the brutality and perfection of the natural world. I suppose they are innocent to the extent that they have no capability to commit evil. It's simple mind is not clouded by by complex notions other than basic urges desires and instincts. Humans on the other hand are truly sentient, have complex motivations, emotional responses, self reflection, and are imbued with an understanding of moral imperatives. I believe this associative self reflection is what creationists refer to when they say people are made in the "image of god." It is a godlike quality like a tiny little drop of "Godness" and is referr3d to wheb the creator is called the "I Am." Some might rather envision it as the black obelisk coming down on 2001 space odyssey. This associative ability for complex thought and self reflection is what makes us capable of evil. Although next to humans, I think dogs are the closest animal to us as far as this "associative" conceptualization- like they have a very very primitive form of it. If we have a drop of "Godness" then we are to God as dogs are to us in this way.. even though I'd say the gulf between us and some creator would be far greater than between us and dogs.
>I suppose they are innocent to the extent that they have no capability to commit evil.
That's what my thoughts on this are. People are considered innocent until proven guilty. Animals cannot be anything but innocent, since animals fundamentally cannot be guilty (of a crime or a sin for that matter). They have no concept of evil (or good for that matter), so how could they be acting in a way that is not innocent - however animalistic, basal and impulsive that behavior may be? Acting true to their nature is a boon only animals have - or burden depending on how you look at it.
Nta, I think the dog's ability to detect things in humans comes from two places 1. Instinctual tendencies developed by long periods of time operating as social animals with other canines and 2. A modest period of being genetically modified as human companion animals. I think No. 1 is most of it though- the human modification was really more to pick out the animals that had tendencies that did not clash with human cohabitation.
Anyways, what you'd be looking for is an animal that is able to detect cues on whether a person is "in" or "out" from a pack perspective, and I think they are pretty decent with detecting aggressive human postures etc.
Most of the time we say a dog is able to "know" if a person is "bad," I think it has more to do with the dog picking up on cues toeard that person from the humans in it's group. While not being "evil detectors" it's still a fairly complex and impressive trait for an animal to have though.
Having said that I have seen some fairly uncanny responses from dogs to certain types of people over the years.
>Having said that I have seen some fairly uncanny responses from dogs to certain types of people over the years.
Same, but I usually chalk it up to dogs noticing if a person seems "off", in the same way we can notice how drug users or people with mental issues aren't all there. Dogs are probably just better at it.
They see you as a sexual target.
It's obvious you're giving signals of having high-estrogen which is also common for people that aggressively defend beasts.
I always wonder what part of the Quran it is that tells folk to hate dogs, or is it just that Quranistan is such a shit hole that all dogs are strays.
>what part of the Quran it is that tells folk to hate dogs
None. It's one of those things where people think their cultural prejudice has religious backing.
They hate dogs cause the mongolnigs fricked their ass so hard
hate tourists shitting up my village but so far I haven't thought of tactics other than letting my dog roam freely and turning off the power to my neighbour's pension whenever there's annoying guests
anyone have a solution to frick with people that drive quads/atv's I'd really like some input
>anyone have a solution to frick with people that drive quads/atv's I'd really like some input
strong fishing line strung between two trees at neck height
side by sides should be banned
Signs like these are produced by boomers and ex-weekend warrior cidiots who moved there within the past few years.
I live in the city but from what I've gathered it's not too uncommon to snipe feral and free roaming cats in the countryside.
Well, the city council here figured they should set up a mountainbike trail to attract more larpers. Didn't take long for the first accidents to happen, including one that ended with a dead dog. Then suddenly, by strange coincidence, a number of trees fell across that trail, and some wires appeared out of thin air... Long story short, that trail is "closed" now - they can't legally stop people from using it, but they have giant warning signs and roadblocks on it, and even if some citygay makes it past those, there's still a dozen or so trees across the path at head height. And trees like those have started to appear on all the trails leading away from the parking spots in the area, forcing those mountain bikers to either go cross-country (which is hard, considering how steep our mountains are) or get of their bikes every few hundred meters to haul it past another obstacle.
And as an added benefit, it also keeps out any "hikers" who're afraid to climb over a couple trees.
bump
>"hey can you clean up after your dog? its kinda nasty how it shits everywhere"
>this enrages the dogfricker
>[unearthly screeching of an empty shell]
kek.
>if you don't like stepping in dog shit it means you have no soul
>being this desperate to string together some kind of response.
the creative sterility of the empty shell, LOL.
i live near ruby ridge so judge for yourself
I'm ruled by HOA's who think they own the fricking beach and ocean as we cater to the ultra wealthy. Welcome to the panhandle of gulf coast Florida...
>gets into the asswreker9001
>straps self in
>pushes the start button
>pushes the "This will wreck your ass, are you sure you wish to continue?" button
>"oh no! I'm getting my ass wrecked, how did this happen!"
> locals are friendly
> hate FIBS with a passion no mear out of state mortal could possibly fathom
> tons of forest, lakes and rivers
> DNR are total bros if your local boy
> got on first name basis with them after working a deer registration station
> free to frick about as you please.
God I fricking love northern WI!