Houthis shoot down Second Us Drone, Video

https://twitter.com/VerumReports/status/1723837497447182626

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    358? is that confirmed? last time was a Buk iirc

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      That's what the video says, im sure it was a Buk

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Buk
        More than likely Kub, I don't think they have Buk

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          Would Wagner have given them Buks? I remember there was all the propaganda about Wagner giving hezbollah Buks

  2. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    >0.3% PK
    >against a drone as agile as a flying brick
    Rofl

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      That's an insult to bricks.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      >358 missiles

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        >ALART

  3. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    iran makes missiles with video feed?

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      That's what the video says, im sure it was a Buk

      >Buk
      More than likely Kub, I don't think they have Buk

      It was a slow moving loitering anti-air missile and yes it has a camera on the front

  4. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Seems like people are getting tired of the US flying military drones in their neighborhood

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      It was in international waters
      Houthis are shooting down drones outside of their own airspace

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        So? Israel is shooting down Houti missiles outside their airspace.

        Lesson learned: don't fly drones near an active war.

  5. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Is 358 a type of missile or...?

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yes its the missile type

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        Does that say 358? I thought the numbers we use came from Arabic

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          Oh, oh no, not at all. We call our numbers "Arabic numerals" because they got to europe through arabic merchants. And actually even at that, it should be said they got to SPAIN through arabic merchants, it would be the christian spaniards who would actually carry them to itally and popularize them there, (most notably St Isisore of Seville and some pope whose name I forgot), and then it would be the italians that got the numbers to look close to how they do nowadays to some degree, and even then the real "arabic numerals" we use nowadays come from 16th century germany after they were modified for the printing press.

          The system itself also doesn't come from the arabs. It actually started in flipping India of all places (bloody poos) not that it really matters because while they get the pride of making a base 10 decimal system with 0 in it... That's about as similar to the modern system as it gets until the Spaniards and Italians either invented or reintroduced (from the greek system) most mathematical operations we use nowadays. Hell its not until Fibonacci (yes that one) went full autist translating every type of latin and greek mathematical equation he could to them that everyone else figured out they were as useful as they are, mofo practically invented 90% of the system.

          Arabs and middle easterns use what the medievals called "eastern arabic numerals" aka the numerals actually native to the arab peninsula. And yeah... they're bad. Like real bad. Tells you something when the POOS are more advanced than that by comparison.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's an iranian missile closer to a cruiser missile than an actual SAM. It shares some avionics with the shaheds and probably with the Sadid-1 (maybe related to the toophan-TOW) missiles.

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        Tho the yemeni one is apparently made of spare parts from wish

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          heh. no. The USN seized several '358' being smuggled from iran.
          Page 7:
          https://www.centcom.mil/Portals/6/Documents/Reports/20FEBslides.pdf

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            Iran exports they don't smuggle.

            • 7 months ago
              Anonymous

              It's done illegally hiding weapons in civilian ships as cover.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                The military doesn't have to deliver weapons.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                What's on board? What are you hauling?
                >declare something other than your actual cargo on the manifest
                Text book smuggling

            • 7 months ago
              Anonymous

              It's smuggling if the country is exporting embargoed goods

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                >embargoed
                Iran and Yemen consent, chud.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                who?

            • 7 months ago
              Anonymous

              The Iranians illicitly export arms to the Houthi in violation of a UN embargo. That makes it smuggling.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      No they fired 358 missiles at 1 drone

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        You jest, but the Blackbird intercept over the USSR was 50+ missiles for 1 plane IIRC.

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          are you implying the soviets shot down an SR-71?

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            Are you talking about the U-2?

            Delusional

            >Over the course of its reconnaissance missions during the Vietnam War, the North Vietnamese fired approximately 800 SAMs at SR-71s, none of which managed to score a hit

            NV SAMs:
            >The Soviets provided the V-75 (SA-2 GUIDELINE) missile system as the primary air defense system. They supplemented this with anti-aircraft guns and possibly some S-125 'Neva'(SA-3 GOA) missiles.

            > When it was first used on a large scale, in 1965, the SA-2 destroyed about ten fighter-bombers for an estimated 150 Guidelines launched: an average of one kill for every fifteen missiles. By November 1968 one aircraft was being shot down for every 48 missiles fired. During Linebacker II one aircraft was destroyed for roughly every 50 Guidelines fired.

            Fugg it was an U2, am drunk.

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          Are you talking about the U-2?

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          Delusional

          >Over the course of its reconnaissance missions during the Vietnam War, the North Vietnamese fired approximately 800 SAMs at SR-71s, none of which managed to score a hit

          NV SAMs:
          >The Soviets provided the V-75 (SA-2 GUIDELINE) missile system as the primary air defense system. They supplemented this with anti-aircraft guns and possibly some S-125 'Neva'(SA-3 GOA) missiles.

          > When it was first used on a large scale, in 1965, the SA-2 destroyed about ten fighter-bombers for an estimated 150 Guidelines launched: an average of one kill for every fifteen missiles. By November 1968 one aircraft was being shot down for every 48 missiles fired. During Linebacker II one aircraft was destroyed for roughly every 50 Guidelines fired.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      >ywn be a operator piloting a predator being pursued by 358 missiles in a middle east hotbed

      Why even live

  6. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    I hope that some kind of model number and not the number of attempts XD

  7. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    it's over guys... they shot an unmanned drone with the maneuverability of a fat guy on a scooter down... the US has officially been put on fraud status...

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      Second drone shot down*

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      Uhh USA-hegemony bros why some 3rd world shitskins can shoot down our drones over international waters and go unpunished? Surely USA military might is able to deter any hostile actions in the region right?

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        I think we should go full boots on the ground nation building in Iran!

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          And Yemen, and Iraq too since their militias have been uppity lately. Maybe also Lebanon and Syria too to clean them from Iranian proxies.
          One carrier group per each country should be enough right?

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            Chinese hands typed this post.

            • 7 months ago
              Anonymous

              What are you some pinko commie shitskin?
              A 1000 marines would be able to roll over entire middle east. One carrier group and the entire region would be begging not to flatten them back to the stone age

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          Iraq already explored that theme. Iran will be a deconstruction of the nation building genre.

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        Oh please. If the US did respond militarily you'd be crying about it.

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        It’s our own fault, we let Russia get away with being moronic, and now every shitskin hive from Mali to Delhi thinks they can do it on purpose. Someone’s gonna have to get a JDAM down their throat to set the record straight.

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Surely USA military might is able to deter any hostile actions in the region right?
        We can always cut off the $688 million worth of humanitarian aid we've been annually providing to Yemen since 2015.

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        >and go unpunished?
        USN will delete the sam unit responsible, other responsible units such as radars, and maybe some targets of opportunity in the area. Just like they did after the Mason incident. It's kinda lame and non-escalatory, but I guess USA doesn't want to get involved

        >deter

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          >USN will delete the sam
          Oh like the US blew up an unrelated red pickup truck after the Bagram Air Base bombing

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            I already admitted it's lame and non-escalatory, what more do you want? Do you want me to move my own goalposts for you?

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        few dozen towelheads got bombed to smithereens in their safehouses, but nice to see thirdies still value blowing shit up over their own lives

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        >It's against my policy to sweat the small stuff.

  8. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Impressive video quality from missile's seeker

  9. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    This is most likely the 2022 shot down of a saudi predator, since you can see in the footage it's over land.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      maybe

  10. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    at least using actual aa missiles and not just ramming them with their f-5s

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      Wouldn't using their F-5s be a massive risk?

  11. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    About 0.2793296089% accuracy if my back-of-the-napkin math is correct. Is this typical for air defense?

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      >)
      yes

  12. 7 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous
  13. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    I don't think threat warning receivers would notice this since it's not rocket powered.

  14. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Blankethead boys finna be surprised when the next one shoots back

  15. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Still no actual news of this second shoot down. I'll wager it's old footage from 2022. Here's the aftermath

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      man those guys must really like us if they're praying to our trash

  16. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Houthis are too dumb to operate such systems. What group of "advisors" are there with the ? Russians? Iranians?xxnmay

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      War thunder gamers

  17. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    And US will take it like a b***h. LMAO buckbroken nation

  18. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    We don't fly MQ-1s anymore we retired them five years ago. It's either Saudi or UAE.

  19. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    So we can assume that these weapons are already in Iraq.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      yeah

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        Its just resting.

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          >starts walking slowly

  20. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's funny how we're letting them shoot down these obsolete antiques, letting them get overconfident before hitting them with the tic-tacs.

  21. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    both of these drones are from the UAE. theyre Predator XP variants. i think the antenna is different.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      >monkey model!

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        whats your point?

  22. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/filename/israeli-foreign-legion/page/1/
    Which mental illness is this?

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      when you are so mindbroken by constant defeat, all you are left with is to seethe on a designated containment board

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/YStcW3x.png

      [...]

      >Serb flag
      why am I not surprised

  23. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

  24. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    >claiming victory over a 90's observation drone that doesn't even try to hide itself
    Do Thirdies really?

  25. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    You can 3D print an anti aircraft missile.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      but can you download the files is the real question.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      Not a good one. The G-tolerances on missiles are insane because they have to be. 3d printed materials will warp and destroy themselves under significant load.

  26. 7 months ago
    Anonymous
  27. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    97

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *