Here's a crazy thought, if you combined the entire world's blue water naval fleet in a war against the United State, 2 out of the US's 10 Nimitz-class aircraft carriers could win the battle in just under 6 hours.
Here's a crazy thought, if you combined the entire world's blue water naval fleet in a war against the United State, 2 out of the US's ...
The massive submarine furrball would be incredibly kino though
Where would you even have the room for such a fleet battle? Is the Pacific even big enough?
>Is the Pacific even big enough?
Each ship greater than 1000 tons would probably have 1000 square miles to itself. Never forget: earth is a water world.
Ships can strike that far with datalinks these days
I don't think you have any idea how large the ocean is
the world is flat just force them into one of the corners and push them off
>status: delusional
Status: turd worlder.
States: United
No, you'd need them to be supported by their own battle groups, probably with even more support. They'd get raped by the hundreds of subs coming at them otherwise.
Maybe I'm being too generous and OP is just a moron but I assume whenever someone says "a carrier" they're probably referring to an entire carrier group, because a carrier doesn't really function alone
>strike groups
Agreed, when someone says 'carrier' Inthink of the groupbthat sustains it. When we talk about any army or groud force we assume logics, vehicles, etc.
>hundreds of subs
The US has more military subs than the rest of the world put together. it has 70 total.
>2 out of the US's 10
ish. It would need a strike group or resupply. while each Nimitz has a carier air wing, which is pretty spectactular already, it only has a couple dozen missiles, and the entire air wing has probably 4 short range sorties and 1-2 long range before they're all out of kabooms and fuel.
Happy to learn different, but that's the best of my knowledge.
Hell of a first day, not so much on Day 2 without resupply
>The US has more military subs than the rest of the world put together. it has 70 total.
Are you moronic? Do you think the entire world has fewer than 140 military subs?
Yup. just went and counted, its 69 active duty
>including Russian subs lololololol
>its funny because they're not actually active
subs worldwide and 70 US
Lmao, the world is a fricking joke compared to the US
Delusional. If two full carrier strike groups went to break a blockade of Taiwan I'd wager 25% odds one is sunk, better for both being mission killed eventually and having to retreat.
Ok chink, keep telling yourself that.
I feel like carriers will have the same narrative cycle as Leopards in recent days
>"These carriers are INVINCIBLE"
>Carrier gets sunk
>"Carriers get sunk all the time, this is war we'll just make more"
>same narrative cycle as Leopards
there wasn't you stupid zigger, everyone (at least on this board) knew that western tech is just better, not 'invincible'.
C'mon everyone was salivating at the thought of Western tanks arriving and decimating the battlefield
>C'mon everyone
you need to stop looking at normies on twatter anon
US military: "We're underfunded"
Several dozens of kamikaze drone boats at a target could make a difference.
Prove it.