i heard they already got rights for cutting down forests in siberia? they will probably put some chinese workers there and then in ~15 years say its a Han-chinese region since 5000BC so it should rightfully go to china.
why?
It is proven russia is shit tier county with abysmal economy and army.
If anything NATO should be investing in navy (China), economy (to counter China's influence in Africa) or downsizing.
Russia has proven itself weak. USA probably already knows how to disable Russian nukes reliably.
So that 300,000 is an occupation force after russia has exhausted itself against Ukraine.
no matter how incompetent is russia can 100% over saturate missile defences and nuke every western country. ballistic missiles aren't some crazy sci-fi technic, and even chinas 300 missiles are enough to wipe out nations. you people have to understand that each ICBM contains up to 14 warheads you have to intercept, of which a single one might wipe out a city. though usually its around 4 and the rest are dummies to confuse defenses. at ~6k missiles even 10% operational are enough to lay waste to the west. the only "defence" that exists is that hopefully russians don't want the habitable regions of their country to become a glass desert.
we have absolutely no idea how good american missile defense systems are. For all we know they have a really powerful system that has already solved MAD
So you think the other NATO members are going to start pulling their weight when it comes to the rent? 2% of GDP must go to NATO defense
https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2022/3/pdf/220331-def-exp-2021-en.pdf
NATO won't even get into a war with Russia. Watch Lithuania get nuked and NATO doing nothing.
Unless Israel is attacked NATO won't do shit.
You did it wrong moronic newbie
great NCIS enhance
Uncle Sam won't even bother looking at where the missile is headed before he gives the green light to end the human race, starting with moscow ofc
>End the human.
>Starting with Moscow.
How since no human lives in that cursed land.
Ok, zoomer
More like Russia will never have the balls to touch NATO.
Who's this post for? Even genuine Russians don't believe this.
You are a sad, lonely, little man.
t. Woman
>at where the missile is headed before he gives the green light to end the human race, starting with moscow ofc
Are you ready to dig up your parents corpses while your town is in ruins?
Do. It.
My parents do not live in russia and russian nukes do not even work
Everything isn't about Israel and israelites anon.
Israel is not even in NATO
Watch russia collapsing, and China doing nothing,
besides annexing the Siberia afterwards
i heard they already got rights for cutting down forests in siberia? they will probably put some chinese workers there and then in ~15 years say its a Han-chinese region since 5000BC so it should rightfully go to china.
So why aren't you vatBlack folk nuking Lithuania already? Come on, motherfrickers, do it already. I WISH A Black person WOULD!
>weapons
>Armies aren't weapons
they arent, they use weapons
What's the point of having a pict rail on the side of a stock?
>he doesn't put a light mount on his stock for his Mentos
ngmi
>Europeans to boost rapid response unit with 300000 more americans and american money
ftfy
This isn't going to kill more vatniks. Nato nations need to train more ukrainian soldiers and give them more heavy artillery and mlrs
>from 40,000 to 300,000
>Estimated wartime strenght of Finland is 200,000
>Sweden probably can scrap together 60,000
Well, that solves that mystery...
why?
It is proven russia is shit tier county with abysmal economy and army.
If anything NATO should be investing in navy (China), economy (to counter China's influence in Africa) or downsizing.
Russia has proven itself weak. USA probably already knows how to disable Russian nukes reliably.
So that 300,000 is an occupation force after russia has exhausted itself against Ukraine.
no matter how incompetent is russia can 100% over saturate missile defences and nuke every western country. ballistic missiles aren't some crazy sci-fi technic, and even chinas 300 missiles are enough to wipe out nations. you people have to understand that each ICBM contains up to 14 warheads you have to intercept, of which a single one might wipe out a city. though usually its around 4 and the rest are dummies to confuse defenses. at ~6k missiles even 10% operational are enough to lay waste to the west. the only "defence" that exists is that hopefully russians don't want the habitable regions of their country to become a glass desert.
we have absolutely no idea how good american missile defense systems are. For all we know they have a really powerful system that has already solved MAD
We know exactly how good it is. It is only good enough for countering North Korea in perfect conditions, somewhat. End of the Story.
that's only what the pentagon briefs to the public
Why do you have to be so autistic???
If anything your comment can be taken as argument that NATO should downsize even more
So you think the other NATO members are going to start pulling their weight when it comes to the rent? 2% of GDP must go to NATO defense
https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2022/3/pdf/220331-def-exp-2021-en.pdf