spiritually won WW1 >European power and cultural base essentially destroyed
Yep, that is a victory to the barbarians of Germania who've made it their mission to destroy Europe since antiquity
letting the first post down with a retarded take. the only one who spiritually won ww1 was poland that managed to formally exist again. everyone else bar the americans, was spiritually crushed, it took germany over a decade to recover spiritually recover. Britian has never recovered. russia hasnt either. Austria-hungry ceases to exist, the ottomans were broken, france handled it the best of the initial combatants but half their country was devastated.
DA, this is what I've been sayings! A tank is a tank comrade! T-55 is good enough for the Ukraine!
if they could produce them fast enough then the ammo and equipment needed to kill them then yes.
>Germany makes the best weapons in the world.
debatable. germans are autists who can make something work even if it requires extreme complication, but more often than not the tradeoffs of that complication aren't worth the features or performance >And yet it's never won a war. Does that seem right to you?
assuming we're not going to quibble over a pretty outsized claim, yeah kinda. being an autistic tinkerer doesn't mean you'll actually use those tools the best. besides, germany has a history of forgetting things like 'production volume' and 'logistics' matter more than space magic
>germans are autists who can make something work even if it requires extreme complication, but more often than not the tradeoffs of that complication aren't worth the features or performance
This one right here. Germans can go ultra mega autistic over technical stuff, but that just increases production time and costs more. Sometimes demanding "The Very best" is not the right answer. Sometimes wanting "Good enough" is the way to go, if it still does the job and can be made faster and cheaper.
Wars are waged not only on battlefields, but also on the production base. Being able to out-produce your enemy in war material tends to win wars. And german autism just causes long production times and anal-retentive quality control. Meanwhile, some other nations can produce "good enough" stuff from the factory lines like it was fucking candy.
Isn't that evident? They were never able to produce them in as massive volumes as tje opponents. You may have very precise or reliable weapons, but one weapon cannot compare to million guys with sticks. See tje current war in Ukraine - both sides struggle with financing. Therefore it is appropriate to ask what do you consider best - as the weapon winning a war are simple, mass produced and cheap...
Wars are rarely won by pure firepower alone. Look at Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, would you call the invasions there a "success" for the US and NATO? They won many battles with absolutely overwhelming military tech, but they still lost the war. And that's just one small recent example.
Germany is just the result of Prussia going on a winning streak for the latter half of the 19th century. The German Empire was basically just Prussia and friends.
after the napoleonic war germany(was prussia) has had its thinking done by cowards(few exceptions) and its fighting done by fools( few exceptions again)
Germany won the cold war.
Expanded territory by 30%. Kicked out Russia. Restored reputation. Dominates Europe economically and politically.
All of this without firing a single shot.
Also many former enemies became German Allies.
>won against Russia in WW1 >literally gives birth to the Soviet Union because a communist revolution sounded like a good plan to force a capitulation
Germany won but all future generations lost. They deserve a hundred Dresdens for that.
>against Russia in ww1
winning against one enemy within a war is not the same as winning a war or else we would say the Nazis won like 15 wars before losing one >France in the 1800s
that wasn't Germany
the main wars Germany itself has won are colonial wars, maybe the boxer rebellion
>Germany makes the best weapons
?? >Has never won a war
?? Are we strictly talking about 20th and 21st century unified Germany? Because there was a time when Prussia utterly embarrassed the 193rd French empire
The Prussian people were German by ethnicity, there's a reason why the capital of Prussia was the spiritual and cultural capital of the German empire. Which raises another question. Why was the world okay with a total ethnic replacement in Königsberg under Soviet occupation?
>The Prussian people were German by ethnicity
That wasn't the question though >Why was the world okay with a total ethnic replacement in Königsberg
bc the krauts started 2 world wars, you get what you fucking deserve tbh, nowadays every eastern euro country wants their russians to fuck off so they don't get used as an excuse for the next "special military operation"
similarly few countries were sympathetic when France lost a shitload of territory after Napoleon lost
Prussian martial culture is too dangerous to be left intact. When exposed to Hohenzollern gullibility or Austro-Bavarian autism it becomes a gas that expands to fill all under-defended volume. Think of how dangerous it would have been if left intact to adapt to communism?
German mercenaries were hired by kingdoms all over the world to fight wars.
Even by the British to fight the Patriots.
That famous painting of Washington crossing the Delaware?
They loaded up paddle boats in the dead of night, just before the ass crack of dawn to cross the river on boats and attack an isolated Hessian garrison. A surprise attack, compromised enemy, good plan. But it was December 25, 1776.
It was Christmas.
>At about 11 p.m. on Christmas, Washington's army commenced its crossing of the half-frozen river at three locations. The 2,400 soldiers led by Washington successfully braved the icy and freezing river and reached the New Jersey side of the Delaware just before dawn.
He is taking his men on an unconventional night raid to slaughter German mercenaries in their sleep on Christmas, because he was just savage and brutal like that.
But they were mercenaries anyways, loyal to money, and Washington did whatever it took, within reason.
He was smart, but absolutely ice cold and seeking total brutal victories.
He also sought the favor of God, and trusted in Him for victory.
Which is how he beat the most powerful military in the world.
And became the first president of the United States.
I'm really curious what USA v. China will look like. I give the technological edge to US since their equipment has been battle tested and is being used but I'm really curious if they'll be overwhelmed by the sheer number of zergs
It makes perfect sense, when you consider that the krauts (and the West Franks too) have abandoned their natural place in the world as Helot tier labourers for their Nordic and Med superiors.
They also came up with some shit to be able to wage a war in first place against all odds. >WW1 >No colonies to get ammonuim nitrate for explosives, shells and bullets
No problem, we got a dude named Fritz who comes up with a method how to generate it out of thin air >WW2 >No fuel
No worries bro, we just figured a way to liquify coal that we have in abundance and turn it into diesel and kerosin
If germany needed to wage war again they would have came up with some other shit to overcome some major obstacle and still fight against all odds
Germany spiritually won WW1
>Germany makes the best weapons in the world.
Proofs?
Cope
spiritually won WW1
>European power and cultural base essentially destroyed
Yep, that is a victory to the barbarians of Germania who've made it their mission to destroy Europe since antiquity
*WWII
What does that even mean?
It means in all ways except physical Germany is a wolf.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_victory
Germany was the moral victor of both world wars.
When the Detroit Lions hang with a much better team and then lose at the end, they win spiritually
letting the first post down with a retarded take. the only one who spiritually won ww1 was poland that managed to formally exist again. everyone else bar the americans, was spiritually crushed, it took germany over a decade to recover spiritually recover. Britian has never recovered. russia hasnt either. Austria-hungry ceases to exist, the ottomans were broken, france handled it the best of the initial combatants but half their country was devastated.
if they could produce them fast enough then the ammo and equipment needed to kill them then yes.
>*starts WW2 out of butthurt about losing WW1*
>BTFO by a girl pretending to be a fucking SHIP
lol ignored
strange way to spell Italy
What did they mean by naming a Black dude after a Confederate general?
>Germany makes the best weapons in the world.
debatable. germans are autists who can make something work even if it requires extreme complication, but more often than not the tradeoffs of that complication aren't worth the features or performance
>And yet it's never won a war. Does that seem right to you?
assuming we're not going to quibble over a pretty outsized claim, yeah kinda. being an autistic tinkerer doesn't mean you'll actually use those tools the best. besides, germany has a history of forgetting things like 'production volume' and 'logistics' matter more than space magic
>germans are autists who can make something work even if it requires extreme complication, but more often than not the tradeoffs of that complication aren't worth the features or performance
This one right here. Germans can go ultra mega autistic over technical stuff, but that just increases production time and costs more. Sometimes demanding "The Very best" is not the right answer. Sometimes wanting "Good enough" is the way to go, if it still does the job and can be made faster and cheaper.
Wars are waged not only on battlefields, but also on the production base. Being able to out-produce your enemy in war material tends to win wars. And german autism just causes long production times and anal-retentive quality control. Meanwhile, some other nations can produce "good enough" stuff from the factory lines like it was fucking candy.
DA, this is what I've been sayings! A tank is a tank comrade! T-55 is good enough for the Ukraine!
>if you dismiss one extreme then you must support the opposite extreme
hello direction-brain
Isn't that evident? They were never able to produce them in as massive volumes as tje opponents. You may have very precise or reliable weapons, but one weapon cannot compare to million guys with sticks. See tje current war in Ukraine - both sides struggle with financing. Therefore it is appropriate to ask what do you consider best - as the weapon winning a war are simple, mass produced and cheap...
a black man is named after a Confederate commander. Does this seem right to you?
Small arms don’t win wars
Wars are rarely won by pure firepower alone. Look at Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, would you call the invasions there a "success" for the US and NATO? They won many battles with absolutely overwhelming military tech, but they still lost the war. And that's just one small recent example.
they beat the French and the Austrians a few times. If you count the HRE then they beat the Italians a few times.
>they beat the French and the Austrians a few times
>WE WUZ GERMANY
Germany didn't exist then
Germany is just the result of Prussia going on a winning streak for the latter half of the 19th century. The German Empire was basically just Prussia and friends.
>Germany makes the best weapons in the world
They really don't
after the napoleonic war germany(was prussia) has had its thinking done by cowards(few exceptions) and its fighting done by fools( few exceptions again)
Germany won the cold war.
Expanded territory by 30%. Kicked out Russia. Restored reputation. Dominates Europe economically and politically.
All of this without firing a single shot.
Also many former enemies became German Allies.
>forced to absorb 20 million low skill low iq immigrants
>winning
Ok dude. Wiedervereinigung was a mistake.
T H I S
not to forget
>absorbed their gnomish anti-family doctrine
Sad but true.
Agreed, absorbing Eastern Germany was a mistake
Fuck Ossies
Germans have autistic engineer brain not autistic warrior brain. Combine the two and you'd have an unstoppable force
won the franco prussian war
germany is a beta provider: the country
>And yet it's never won a war
LMAO what kind of bullshit is this? Germany won bunch of wars, against Russia in ww1 and France in the 1800s for example
>won against Russia in WW1
>literally gives birth to the Soviet Union because a communist revolution sounded like a good plan to force a capitulation
Germany won but all future generations lost. They deserve a hundred Dresdens for that.
I see WW2 as the gift to europe for the thirty years war.
That's honestly kind of fair, ngl
>against Russia in ww1
winning against one enemy within a war is not the same as winning a war or else we would say the Nazis won like 15 wars before losing one
>France in the 1800s
that wasn't Germany
the main wars Germany itself has won are colonial wars, maybe the boxer rebellion
overengineered, overpriced
kraut autism causes them to cut their own throats every time.
>Germany makes the best weapons
??
>Has never won a war
?? Are we strictly talking about 20th and 21st century unified Germany? Because there was a time when Prussia utterly embarrassed the 193rd French empire
>And yet it's never won a war.
The Danish wars and franco-German War come to mind.
You're just a historically illiterate moron.
>Danish wars
wasn't Germany fighting them
>franco-German War
no such war happened
both were won by Prussia, not Germany
The Prussian people were German by ethnicity, there's a reason why the capital of Prussia was the spiritual and cultural capital of the German empire. Which raises another question. Why was the world okay with a total ethnic replacement in Königsberg under Soviet occupation?
>The Prussian people were German by ethnicity
That wasn't the question though
>Why was the world okay with a total ethnic replacement in Königsberg
bc the krauts started 2 world wars, you get what you fucking deserve tbh, nowadays every eastern euro country wants their russians to fuck off so they don't get used as an excuse for the next "special military operation"
similarly few countries were sympathetic when France lost a shitload of territory after Napoleon lost
Prussian martial culture is too dangerous to be left intact. When exposed to Hohenzollern gullibility or Austro-Bavarian autism it becomes a gas that expands to fill all under-defended volume. Think of how dangerous it would have been if left intact to adapt to communism?
Franco-german war created the 2nd reich.....
>Franco-german war
Again, no such war exists
It was the Franco-Prussian war
Didn't they win against Denmark
German mercenaries were hired by kingdoms all over the world to fight wars.
Even by the British to fight the Patriots.
That famous painting of Washington crossing the Delaware?
They loaded up paddle boats in the dead of night, just before the ass crack of dawn to cross the river on boats and attack an isolated Hessian garrison. A surprise attack, compromised enemy, good plan. But it was December 25, 1776.
It was Christmas.
>At about 11 p.m. on Christmas, Washington's army commenced its crossing of the half-frozen river at three locations. The 2,400 soldiers led by Washington successfully braved the icy and freezing river and reached the New Jersey side of the Delaware just before dawn.
He is taking his men on an unconventional night raid to slaughter German mercenaries in their sleep on Christmas, because he was just savage and brutal like that.
But they were mercenaries anyways, loyal to money, and Washington did whatever it took, within reason.
He was smart, but absolutely ice cold and seeking total brutal victories.
He also sought the favor of God, and trusted in Him for victory.
Which is how he beat the most powerful military in the world.
And became the first president of the United States.
just like my other favourite garden gnome-worshiping freemasons, like FDR and churchill!
>da jooz!
I like how in your autistic retelling of this story every American already knows, the Hessians somehow became just “Germans”.
Germany doesnt make the best weapons in the world nor has ever done so.
Yes because in war, quantity > quality.
I'm really curious what USA v. China will look like. I give the technological edge to US since their equipment has been battle tested and is being used but I'm really curious if they'll be overwhelmed by the sheer number of zergs
It makes perfect sense, when you consider that the krauts (and the West Franks too) have abandoned their natural place in the world as Helot tier labourers for their Nordic and Med superiors.
They also came up with some shit to be able to wage a war in first place against all odds.
>WW1
>No colonies to get ammonuim nitrate for explosives, shells and bullets
No problem, we got a dude named Fritz who comes up with a method how to generate it out of thin air
>WW2
>No fuel
No worries bro, we just figured a way to liquify coal that we have in abundance and turn it into diesel and kerosin
If germany needed to wage war again they would have came up with some other shit to overcome some major obstacle and still fight against all odds
best is sometimes offset by cost and complexity - why people buy more toyotas in a week than rolls royces? is yaris better than silver shadow?