First Abrams Destroyed In Ukraine

https://www.reddit.com/r/Military/comments/1b0iozx/first_m1_abrams_destroyed_in_ukraine_photo/

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    F

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Sorry, forgot pic

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Cope more loser

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    My opinion about the machine Is influenced by that furry dude Who made 13 years of video essays on how bad the tank Is. Besides him being a furry some of his observations are so well sourced that , even if i would want to counter It I Just don't know how

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Also reddit big brain at work

    Tank Is cooking in its own fuel and ammo for hours/days

    "We can repair It"

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >if Russia can't make a recoverable tank, no one can!
      >what are blowout panels?
      >what are armored fuel bulkheads?
      ok moron

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Wait you really think that the tank (that Is engulfed in its own jet fuel(great idea that engine) Will roll again? Yeah sure...

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          you are completely ignorant of how tanks and engines work, please do not post here again

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            No no please go ahead. Tell me how a tank that burns for days in his own jet fuel will surely be used again After some repair.

            It's over the tank Is gone. Deal with It with some dignity for Christ saie

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              just stop, this is genuinely pathetic

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Ok then, educate me. Tell me how It Will be repaired since "i am pathetic".

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Doesn't Need to, the shock will frick It for good, and i am saying this with all the ignorance you can Imagine. I don't even know what kind of shit the armor and structure Is made off. But there Is no way in Heaven that tank Is coming back. You can't bath in burning jet fuel for hours/days and be able to be repaired.

                how is the tank "burning" in its own fuel?
                you don't know how this works, do you?
                you played War Thunder a bit and think you know how tanks work?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                You are talking like fricking vaush

                I asked you how would you repair a tank that has been hit and that Is cooking on its own fuel.

                Go ahead

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                ... it's not "cooking".
                I'm not wasting my time on this.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                You swap the damaged bits. Diesel fuel does not burn all that hot. The body and metal armor will be fine.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >You swap the damaged bits. Diesel fuel does not burn all that hot. The body and metal armor will be fine.
                >t. most educated vatnik metallurgist
                please nobody tell him, it'll be funnier when he finally figures it out

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >I can fix her

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >I can(not) fix her

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                You can't fix what's not broken

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                wtf why is her eotech rusty?
                It's this the power of the fabled western metallurgy?*~~*~~)

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Damn straight.
                Low temperature fire does not frick with the big exspensive parts.
                Strip it to bare hull and rebuild.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Unironically what happens at Lima. There were hundreds of graveyard Abrams from Iraq that were all burned out looking from fuel and ammo fires. They got stripped down, sandblasted to bare metal and refurbed into brand new ones.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Jet fuel can’t melt steel moron.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                mmmm roast tank

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                You're not asking for an honest explanation, you're asking for some form of validation of your false premise. Your premise is moronic, and to be resoundingly rejected. You are then to be chemically sterilised. In a just world.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                1. Extinguish fire.
                2. Remove from field and send to divisional shop.
                3. Replace busted fuel tanks.
                4. Replace powerpack.
                5. Fix the blowout panels and bustle.
                6. Fix whatever outer hull damage there is.

                There. Done. Will take under a week in the divisional shop.

                https://i.imgur.com/j8Zgduo.jpg

                >You swap the damaged bits. Diesel fuel does not burn all that hot. The body and metal armor will be fine.
                >t. most educated vatnik metallurgist
                please nobody tell him, it'll be funnier when he finally figures it out

                Again, you literal subhuman moron: Western MBTs and the Abrams in particular came back repaired from FAR WORSE than a bit of diesel burning on the roof and inside a compartmentalized fuel tank.

                Now kindly rope yourself out of shame.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                You deglaze the burnt bits with a little madeira, ez

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Easy: drain the blood of several dozen mobiks and slather the burned parts with the blood. The Abrams thirsts for russoid blood as its sustenance and will repair itself. If you have to use poojeet indian blood, only as a last resort, the manuals say that proportionally speaking you’ll need several thousands worth of Indians worth of blood since their blood is of an inferior quality and only a smaller fraction of their blood can be used to slather the burned parts. Hope that clears up your misunderstanding of tank repair.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                It will be repaired because suggesting otherwise is not permitted

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              Abrams engines can use diesel, jet fuel or ordinary gasoline. It's much more likely to have been diesel as it simplifies logistics.
              Pajeets wouldn't know that, of course .

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              >burns for days in his own jet fuel
              esl detected

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >engulfed in its own jet fuel
          yet the armor is somehow not melting.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Doesn't Need to, the shock will frick It for good, and i am saying this with all the ignorance you can Imagine. I don't even know what kind of shit the armor and structure Is made off. But there Is no way in Heaven that tank Is coming back. You can't bath in burning jet fuel for hours/days and be able to be repaired.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              lurk more

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              >the shock
              From what, you absolute mong? Because newsflash, western MBTs and the Abrams in particular have survived shock from far worse than anything that could have hit this thing.

              >and i am saying this with all the ignorance you can Imagine
              You sure are.

              >muh burning jet fuel
              Doesn't actually do shit when it can't get into the tank proper, moron.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              >You can't bath in burning jet fuel for hours/days and be able to be repaired.
              What did he mean by that?

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              What is it with those weird capitalizations in your sentence?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Jet Fuel can't even melt steel beams

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Jet fuel is just about the same thing as diesel, and burns like diesel. You're thinking of gasoline.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          This may shock a clueless subhuman moron like you, but modern western MBTs have in fact survived worse and returned to the battlefield after repairs.

          No no please go ahead. Tell me how a tank that burns for days in his own jet fuel will surely be used again After some repair.

          It's over the tank Is gone. Deal with It with some dignity for Christ saie

          >burns for days
          How does it burn for days exactly, you clueless subhuman moron? Hint: Ain't enough fuel in there for that.

          The tank is in a repairable state from what can be gathered from the footage. Deal with it, or slit your throat out of shame if that's what's needed to get you to stop humiliating yourself with these clueless moron takes of yours.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >jet fuel
          Well, we know that it can melt steel in a building so I'm sure it can melt RHA as well.
          .
          .
          .
          /s

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Do you think Ukraine has the industrial output to produce state-of-art sensors that those thanks use and require to operate?
        This is not a T-55 that all you need to do is replace gaskets, o-orings, and run a brand new wiring that has less wires than a 90's Opel Corsa.
        Every person with half a brain, and knowledge about tanks warned against sending Abrams to Ukraine because Ukraine simply doesn't have the logistics to keep those tanks working. They will break out, or get stuck in mud (too heavy) and will be captured.
        And let's not forget that with the price of single Abrams, you can buy two dozen soviet clones that will perform the same function.

        Now you have it. The symbol of American power was destroyed either by someone who barely knows how to read or by a mine deployed by a fricking helicopter.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Do you think Ukraine has the industrial output to produce state-of-art sensors that those thanks use and require to operate?
          No, but the US, France, Germany, Britain and most other NATO nations do. You think they're not getting spare parts and logistics help along with the tanks? Hell, didn't they send multiple leopards back to get repaired in Germany (Even if the Germans embarrassed themselves by having the tanks get held up in the factory)

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Do you think a contained fuel fire in the back of the tank does anything to those sensors? Do you think the Ukrainians didn't receive plentiful spare parts to go along with those tanks?

          Oh wait, you absolutely did. Because you're a braindead, subhuman zigger shill and you have literally less than zero knowledge about tanks. Kys.

          >And let's not forget that with the price of single Abrams, you can buy two dozen soviet clones that will all die uselessly together with all their crews where the Abrams survives and fulfills its mission.
          FTFY.

          >Destroyed
          You mean to wrikte "lightly damaged" there. Unless you were lying again, of course.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            We saw the same shit with the Leos and brads, get damaged in combat, towed away repaired and back in action. meanwhile a T90 turret goes into orbit when hit with a 5.56

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            I will help you to read what happened in the image.
            Do you see the OP picture? It was taken from a remote-controlled drone. This drone probably just dropped a thermobaric grenade inside the tank (which is extremely used by both sides to prevent recovery of abandoned tanks)

            So yeah, every computer, sensor, and wiring are gone.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              Uh huh. Only of course the crew compartment looks to be entirely intact, which rather completely contradicts your wishful thinking. So yeah, every computer, sensor and wiring remain intact.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >you can buy two dozen soviet clones that will perform the same function.
          from whom, exactly? most civilized countries got rid of those shitboxes ages ago, those who haven't probably can't afford to replace them with better tanks.
          besides, they already have plenty of tanks that barely saw any action, the only instance of documented losses was at the start of the counteroffensive last year.
          past that point we barely saw any of those new military aid vehicles in combat with the exception of the bradley.
          ukraine either is waiting to give russia enough losses from attrition to not give them a chance to repel the next large scale attack or it's having bad manpower shortages.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >reddit account
      >tiktok notification
      This isnt nearly the own you think it is

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Rispondi
      Total Terrone Death can't come soon enough.
      >faceberg, tiktok, and reddit accounts
      Also normalgays get out.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I am banned from reddit, could not help myself, used tik tok like two times.

        I only use PrepHole and yt of you count It as social

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >having a reddit account in the first place
          >keeping installed an app you only used two times yet still spams you with notifications
          Nah, frick off finocchio.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's over lads. The west is beaten how will we ever recover?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yes? That's what you do, you fix things.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Why doesn't Ukraine just build a service center?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I'm guessing they might already have one, maybe they should be building a parts plant instead

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        They have, in Poland and Romania.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        REPAIRING
        REPAIRING
        INSUFFICIENT FUNDS
        HARVESTER UNDER ATTACK

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >HARVESTER UNDER ATTACK
          Oh God the memories, it's like god fricking PTSD hearing that.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            LOW POWER

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Lost their con yard in the opening days of the war; no new buildings until someone sends them an MCV. Also, they're Nod and can only receive vehicles by airdrop.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >reddit
      >tiktok
      >faceberg
      lol, lmao. please begone you fricking homosexual.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Actually has a reddit account
      >Phoneposting
      >Notifications from Faceberg and Tiktok
      >ESL
      Get off this board.

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    is that era on the sides or some kind of spaced armor?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's ERA.

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Too bad that one Abrams won't return the baltic sea to the monke.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      More leeches, great.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Leeching...what exactly?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          i think shes talking about how almost none of those companies contribute at least 2% gdp to miltary thus making them leeches or however the burger is fried

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >The gulf of brotherhood is between the balls and the double-headed dick
      What did he mean by this?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Fraternity is stored in the balls

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    [...]

    https://i.imgur.com/iegeUc8.png

    Also reddit big brain at work

    Tank Is cooking in its own fuel and ammo for hours/days

    "We can repair It"

    [...]

    too obvious guys

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    M5A2 when?????

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Atleast it wasn’t taken out by a bmp kek

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous
      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous
      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous
      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        that guys ping is in the 4 digits.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      No it was, the gunner who did it has the Warhammer Eagle on his BMP.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Bradley is a chad-tier name, I always knew people who doubted it were fools.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >t. Brad

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      on the other side it probably was taken out by cheap chinese plastic quadcopter drone so not great either

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      imagine being that poor ukie mobik seeing a tank rolling in your general direction and hopelessly blasting it with your tiny gun. That explosion must have feel like being born again.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      There's no way a 25mm cannon took out a T-90 dude. Disabled, maybe. But you cannot destroy an MBT with anything less than an RPG/ATGM or tank round.

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Great! Now the whole board will be unusable for at least a month. They should have kept the tank off the frontline till the next offensive.

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >redditor
    >trannies out of nowhere
    Your hard drive must look interesting

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >1 abram is a tragedy.
    >4000 t90 is a statistic.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      That's literally more then all t90s ever produced you alright deshawn

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        t90 is just a tarted up t72

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          And the M1A2SEP is just a tarted up M1A2. Which is just a tarted up M1A1. Which is just a tarted up M1.

          Two can play this game.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            No one has claimed a modernized Abrams is anything but an Abrams. Black folk and rashiaboos always claimed the t90 is some kind of wunderwaffle.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            That's why they're all called the M1

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            At least the US never tried to pretend the M1A1 and M1A2 were completely different tanks.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              Then why do they have different model designations? Congratulations you just played yourself.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                They don't though.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            I know which tank I'd much rather play that game in.

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    That entire thread was full of cum/chug/gers b***hing about troons. If it stayed on topic, it would have been fine.

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Challenger popped it’s turret though. Atleast the abrams blowout panels worked as advertised.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Restrain yourself fart sniffer

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        We are friends today. Resume scheduled activities when this all dies down

  15. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Abrams showed up and started fighting like the leo did. Challenger is a glorified SPG that they clearly dont want to use in frontline action. but whatever

  16. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    What's so special about Abrams? It's just a tank. It's hilarious how ziggers hype it up to be some invincible wunderwaffe.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous
      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >articles Citing each other
        >maybe one of which actually says it probably is a game changer
        >only post 1 loss out of the 6 months its been delivered
        Remember when you guys did this shit with the Bradley to only have it destroying russian armor? The meme is not going to age well.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >moving the goalposts

          your hyped up wunderwaffe is garbage and burns just like anything else you sent to ukraine

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            it's as good as new, soon it will again join the two dozen US managed to deliver in 2 full years

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >moving goal post
            When did i do that? All you're doing is creating a strawman also samegayging like

            [...]

            To create more strawmans doesn't do you any good.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >This moron seriously thinks that weaponry that is a game changer is impossible to be destroyed

            /pol/homosexuals literally think a T-72 brought back to 1941 would have singlehandedly pushed back the entire German invasion kek

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Regurgitating obvious clickbait headlines as if they prove something.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >moronic journalists being moronic
        What do you think this proves? The media is full of humanities graduates who failed upwards. It's a good tank, but "game changer" is just stupid hype.
        On the other hand, we have seen some actual game changers in this war so far, namely HIMARS used in tandem with drone spotters and Patriot being used in an aggressive role to send Russian jets on their eternal flight.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Congrats, you get a third tank for the pictures.
        Start photoshoping angles.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          They still milk this one despite Challenger destruction

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Of course, pic related, but I haven't seem them in a while, are they really still popping up?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Visually documented losses:
        >RuAF: 2759 tanks of various sorts (of which destroyed: 1803, damaged: 148, abandoned: 269, captured: 539)
        >Abrams M1A1: 1
        But lets be sensible here: it's all but certain that the RuAF will eventually have evidence of a *second* M1A1 kill, and it's likely going to take place after mere hundreds of Russian tank losses instead of the thousands suffered so far. Given a sufficient amount of time, the Russians might even manage to score a documented mobility kill on a HIMARS unit.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Well yeah, if your tanks aren't ever exposed are you even using them? It's not magic, you drive over a big enough mine or whatever and you're done. Hatches look like they could be popped, hopefully the crew got out, the tank did it's job. However, this is /k/ and the boot is on the other foot in this situation. The Americans can expect a certain amount of mockery, as has been dished out to every other nation on planet earth every day. The heavy moderation of this specific topic just poor sportsmanship

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        It's funny cause it's true

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        These headlines don't say what you think they say.

  17. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    What does any of that have to do with a destroyed tank?

  18. 2 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous
  19. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Damn that sucks that an Abrams got blown up, this surely will turn the tides of the war and is much worse than
    Tanks (2759, of which destroyed: 1803, damaged: 148, abandoned: 269, captured: 539)
    Armoured Fighting Vehicles (1220, of which destroyed: 823, damaged: 34, abandoned: 94, captured: 269)
    Infantry Fighting Vehicles (3496, of which destroyed: 2466, damaged: 139, abandoned: 272, captured: 619)
    Armoured Personnel Carriers (400, of which destroyed: 268, damaged: 18, abandoned: 21, captured: 93).

  20. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Russia has destroyed Abrams
    >Ukraine/USA haven't destroyed one single T-14

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >t14 would have to exist outside of parade grounds first

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        1-0 in my book

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          1-0 would require existing, 0-0 is more reasonable

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Ukraine is not striking military parades directly yet

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      No need for Ukraine to destroy one. The T14 destroys itself.

  21. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >america is deleting my threads
    >this is unconscionable

  22. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    well frick that didn't take long
    when was teh m1150 taken out, Friday?

  23. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Emotional projection
    I accept your concession

  24. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >sits upon thousands of turret tosses
    >claims 1 (one) lost abrams as a crushing victory
    Ok moron

  25. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >1 Russia - 0 US
    …in the dissolving nation contest.

  26. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Monkey model!

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Monkey takes all models and puts them on display in his themepark as trophies

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous
  27. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    NOOOOOOOOOOOO

  28. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >you arent supposed to post the whole script at once baljeet

  29. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >reddit

  30. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Send in the next wunderwaffe

  31. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Ukraine run out of tanks
    ESL/10
    I hope your supervisor assrapes you in the supply closet for shoddy work.

  32. 2 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/NlqKdjF.jpg

      It's over lads. The west is beaten how will we ever recover?

      I wonder which of these 2 memes will be deleted

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        The one made by brown hands.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Radioactive?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Technically the hull contains depleted uranium. It's radioactive, in that if you stood next to it for around a million years or so you might get a chest X-ray's worth.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          https://i.imgur.com/PBZO0ud.png

          Yeah, ok. But Uranium-238 has a half life of 4.468×10^9 years, meaning it's 2.5 times less radioactive than the Potassium-40 found in bananas

          Interesting thing, DU is so dense and stable that it's pound for pound the best radiation shielding we have (lead needs about 3 times the thickness for the same effect), so the layer of DU in the Abrams' Chobham armour makes it technically radiation resistant.
          Furthermore, U-238 decays via alpha decay and alpha particles can be stopped by a sheet of paper, so it's unlikely that the crew get anything higher than a background exposure.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            shit is still toxic af

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              Yeah, as all heavy metals are. Which also makes it about as dangerous as lead.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              so is the lead in every bullet and primer you fire. A soldier in the field firing full auto is getting exposed to way more toxic heavy metals than a tank crew sitting comfy inside their DU shell.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            lmao ziggers are making fun of the DU armor, yet their guys are literally dug in trenches near Chernobyl and have been getting radiation sickness

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          It is not. First of all, by law only US Abrams can have DU armor. Second of all, there's no proof that any more than a couple dozen Abrams were given that armor.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous
        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah, ok. But Uranium-238 has a half life of 4.468×10^9 years, meaning it's 2.5 times less radioactive than the Potassium-40 found in bananas

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >less radioactive than the Potassium-40 found in bananas

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            https://i.imgur.com/GdP89xw.jpg

            >less radioactive than the Potassium-40 found in bananas

            It was never about the Donbas, it was never about the banana. For every dead Russian a million bananas rise from his corpse. With all that potassium the monke finally has everything he needs to construct a weapon far more power full than the tzar bomb. And we are not ready.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Radioactive?

      >radioactive
      These Abrams are exports, so they have tungsten armor. Terrible meme made by someone who knows nothing about vehicles.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Current score: ~10k:1 in favour of the "60 ton radioactive coffin"

  33. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >tanks aren't obsolete because I say so

  34. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    g-guys it was a russian tank, not an abrams

  35. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    1 Abrams is a tragedy, a hundred T90s is a statistic
    >José Stallone

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Remember when we got stoked about a T-90M getting blasted? Good times.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        The first t90-m loss we saw visually got destroyed by carl gustaf.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah, wild times. Now it's just a statistic when another one promotes its crew to cosmonauts.

  36. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Did anyone really expect different? The cope cage+ERA+drone jammer combo used by Russian tanks was developed from years of experience in the SMO.

    Sending an abrams without any of that onto the battlefield is basically a free kill.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >cope cage+ERA+drone jammer combo
      >Implying any of these actually worked

  37. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Wait thats it? One grainy photo?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Well, what did you expect?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        i bet that theyre not releasing the video yet because it would show the ammo exploding, and then the crew all safely evacuating after 10 or so seconds, because the smoke coming from the hatches is actually most likely halon and not a fire

        Idk, I expected a video from multiple angles before people trusted the word of a nation thats been caught lying and falsifying evidence a triple digit number of times in this war. I'm not saying there's no way that they destroyed an Abrams, the whole indestructible wonderwaffe thing is russian nonsense, but this could just be some random photo with flames photoshopped in. I see absolutely no reason for them JUST to upload a picture of their screen instead of recording their screen while the drone flies around it

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      i bet that theyre not releasing the video yet because it would show the ammo exploding, and then the crew all safely evacuating after 10 or so seconds, because the smoke coming from the hatches is actually most likely halon and not a fire

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      with the way its being spammed too, my zigger sense is telling me the crew evacuated safely, those little fires went out quickly, and the things probably salvageable still. If they hard killed the thing theyd be spamming the video showing it

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      When you fight as efficiently and devastatingly as Hamas and the Russians you don't have time to post aftermath photos.

  38. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Arent these m1a1s just with some optics upgrades and some export design modifications (i.e. not as cool as American operated ones)?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      The ones Ukraine has are likely M1A1SAs, which are basically the same ones the US sold to Saudi Arabia.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        So the pidors have managed to do worse than yemenis
        granted it was the saudis operating those tanks

  39. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Tanks (2759, of which destroyed: 1803, damaged: 148, abandoned: 269, captured: 539)
    In the other corner, a damaged Abrams tank. 3rd year of the 3 day SMO to denazify Ukraine

  40. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >this is totally true
    >source. I was the 1000 soldiers

  41. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >and Ukrainian military surrendered over 1000 soldiers
    May we see them?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      No, they go to school in Canada.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      they all died on the A-50's crash

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >May we see them?
      No, my dad works for Nintendo.

  42. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >one abrams tanks gets damaged
    >the Russians take a suburb of Donetsk
    >into the 3rd year of the 3 day SMO
    >>Just decided I would come back here a year later having been completely vindicated, The front is now wide open, and Ukrainian military surrendered over 1000 soldiers.
    lel, lmao even

  43. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >The front is now wide open

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Meant to post the Donetsk one, not that it's much better.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >that frontline near Bakhmut

  44. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Is there a long term plan for sending tanks to Ukraine? It's mostly now just the US sending abrams, right?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      We only gave Ukraine 31 Abrams, most (if not all) of which are already in country.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Better than nothing but doesn't seem like much at all. Does the US not have many tank plants / depots for this sort of refurbishment?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          We have one tank plant which is in Lima, Ohio. There used to be another one in Detroit but it was closed in the 90s.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          We have four thousand abrams in stockpile, I don't think a refurbishment is that big of a priority, Also we still have factories producing abrams

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >have a whole stockpile of shit you will never realistically use
            >only give 31 tanks to ukraine
            Fricking burgers.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              We have rules about exporting certain systems, including DU armor. Those 4,000 M1s are US Army stock, not export models. Any Abrams going to Ukraine first has to be stripped down to the bare steel and then rebuilt.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                [...]
                abrams need to be export-ready meaning no DU armor. takes a long time to get new contracts ready, to then have old abrams sent over to the one tank plant in lima, ohio where refurbishment needs to take place. also a massive backlog of existing orders that need to be considered

                How many of those ancient M1s even came with DU, all of them?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                again the m1s sitting in the desert are not usable without refurbishment. mothball storage is to keep the hulls of the tanks (that require extremely expensive facilities to make) in one spot without rotting. if you just gave them to ukraine ukraine would lose its fricking mind and turn it into an international incident.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                All the models produced since 1988 have DU, and most of the early models have had DU added during modernization.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              they're good literally forever anon, the hulls are just... metal. the tanks, not the hulls, the actual tanks, aren't really usable on short notice. the hulls are fine indefinitely though, and the hulls are what new tank production would be limited by anyway.

              they're basically good on abrams hull production for the next 40+ years, maybe 2-3 if a full scale war breaks out. the us government isn't going to drop that advantage just to give ukraine several hundred/thousand m1s. i'm sorry but if you think it's feasible, it's really not.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              I never understood this. Why not give Ukraine 100 M1 abrams? We can just make more like wtf.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Several reasons.
                1. Ukraine doesn't need or want main battle tanks.
                2. They are incredible expensive, like, a new hospital in the US tier of expensive.
                3. If sending 30 M1 did frick all, why send 100 would change anything?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Can't make more engines.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >We can just make more like wtf
                they haven't been made since more than two decades ago. everything is taken from existing storage and refurbished

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                The HULLS haven't been made, because there's NO NEED TO.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                US has severe backorders from Egypt and Taiwan, many of them paid already. The Ukrainian platoon jumped the queue.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >The Ukrainian platoon
                It's a battalion actually.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >have a whole stockpile of shit you will never realistically use
            >only give 31 tanks to ukraine
            Fricking burgers.

            abrams need to be export-ready meaning no DU armor. takes a long time to get new contracts ready, to then have old abrams sent over to the one tank plant in lima, ohio where refurbishment needs to take place. also a massive backlog of existing orders that need to be considered

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >have a whole stockpile of shit you will never realistically use
            >only give 31 tanks to ukraine
            Fricking burgers.

            The US isn't allowed to export Abrams with the normal armor package, and they only convert them into export models on a per-order basis. So when Ukraine wanted tanks first the plant had to finish doing Abrams for Taiwan or Poland or whoever, and then they had to start putting them together for Ukraine. That's the delay. Doing a frame-off restomod of hundreds of tanks probably isn't something they wanted to deal with for a war where tanks have been less important then missiles or arty.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      We sent the Abrams in order to convince Scholz to OK giving Leos

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I take that as a "no", then

  45. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    why is ukraine sending single tanks? they should attack with multiple tanks along with air support...

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      What's easier to hit one tank with an artillery barrage or a whole platoon of tanks with an artillery barrage.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        They should be operating in pairs, or at least in conjunction with an IFV like the Bradley.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          What are they even doing in daylight. The best advantage of this US stuff is thermals.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            They might be out there in response to a Russian attack.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >why doesn’t the enemy allow us to fight under optimal conditions?

  46. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Great, the board is already unusable. The pajeets won't shut up for days.

  47. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    US tech showing that it's fricking worthless, again. Probably got destroyed by a T-72

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Low quality bait

  48. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Looking at the image the blowout panels did their thing but there seems to be smoke coming from the hatches. Could be halon from the fire suppression system, dear god I hope the Ukies aren't doing sandy shit and propping the ammo doors open rendering the blowouts useless. If they're running with crew hatches open that could also be an issue for dropper drones which we've seen drop grenades right into hatches on Russian tanks plenty of times. At the very least the driver absolutely would've made it out though. Hopefully it can be recovered and the MIC can do MIC things. Otherwise it's sure to end up in some museum in Moscow where you're never told how many Russians this whole clusterfrick got killed assuming they can actually get it out of the field.

    Just like with everything else as predicted the first time an Abrams even possibly gets knocked /misc/, vatniks, and poos start spamming the board about it. It'd be nice if for the duration of the war posting on /misc/ would instantly 2 day you from /k/ and vice versa. Unfortunately that just means they'd still run through every VPN IP they could to make a post that lasts a grand total of a couple minutes at most before being deleted.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I think the most likely reason for the smoke from the hatches is that the tank couldn't be secured by the Russians so after disabling it they kept attacking it. The hatches of course would be left open after the crew bailed.

  49. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >destroyed
    >blowout panel went off

    this is what a destroyed tank looks like

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Did it run over a mine?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        You can see something come from the left and hit it right before it blows up

  50. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Rajesh, get back to the phones. I need help with my Dell.

  51. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Ah yes, the metodichka.

    We have to remind everyone that no matter what NATO and the EU sends into Ukraine it's not impervious to damage or being outright destroyed, hence, no amount of help will ever be enough in fact, this also plays into Russia's favor since it also means that their army is effective enough to stop such materiel from going anywhere, whilst stopping any possible claims that the equipment sent is outright indestructible.

    Fine, have at it, even if the Arabs managed to frick up the export version too, even if Russia has lost half of its old soviet stock and is about to mobilize more meat and create the T55 mod 2023 and even if we are about to see another Bakhmut electric boogaloo.

    The frontlines are still not moving vatnik, your economy is in shambles, your military is the laughing stock of the world to the point where Armenia has told you to frick off, your country is leasing territory to China and pleading India to keep buying its oil for peanuts and the effects of this are going to reverberate for the next generations to come, whose future has burst into flames in what can only be called a vanity project of living in denial for the collective inability of a whole society to understand that the Soviet Union is gone, and none of its former members want anything to do with it, much less with the Russians that lead it.

    Sure, keep burning fat and bleeding off for everybody's entertainment, but one day Russia is going to have to go through one hell of a reality check.

  52. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    It appears that the majority of the damage is centralized in the rear section, implying the ammo compartment was hit.
    It looks like the blowout panels did their job as there's not a lot of smoke coming from the forward hatches.
    Given the lack of damage to the crew compartments, the majority of the tank's systems should still be functional, though it does appear that the engine was likely also damaged.
    It's recoverable, but it wont be back on the line for some time.

  53. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    xaxaxa amerikkkan wunderwaffle from year 1980 we finally destroy after 10 months*~~) stupid western globohomosexual zog technology is inferior*~~)) the eyebrows have been raised and balls have been dropped*~~

  54. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Boy I wonder how many hundreds of times we'll get to see this image.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Oh I'm ready for the:
      >MORE ANGLES
      >MORE FILTERS
      >MORE CUT OUTS

  55. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >reddit link
    As expected.

  56. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >a few shots
    aren't m1 cannons good for literally thousands of rounds???

    yeah they do kek
    >Originally the gun had an EFC barrel life of ~1,500 rounds,[26] but with recent advances in propellant technology, the average life has increased even further

    why would you lie about something so easy to disprove holy frick

  57. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    zisters, why don't evil HATO tanks explode?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      That might be a world record turret toss there.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >seven somersaults with three right turns, piked
      Technical note 9/10
      >Didn't stick the landing
      -1 penalty
      Execution note 6/10 (a bit sloppy)
      Total score 7/10

  58. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >only one still image from one angle
    I can't believe you morons are falling for this, you know damn well that if it was real they'd have taken a triple digit number of pics and videos

  59. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    The moronic shills from both sides are out in full force now.
    Anyways, how'd it get killed? Any indications from someone who knows better than me? Curious if it was a drone.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Considering how nobody has posted this supposed “video evidence” of it, they’re definitely stirring the pot.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/bBCdGmP.jpg

        >Anyways, how'd it get killed?
        Thats the thing, we dont know. Ziggers who filmed it with the drone are not sharing the video with us for some "good" reason.
        I would really like to see the footage.

        I saw a video on Twatter but it looks like it cuts after the Abrams is shown. Feel free to give it a look and try to verify it.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Anyways, how'd it get killed?
      Thats the thing, we dont know. Ziggers who filmed it with the drone are not sharing the video with us for some "good" reason.
      I would really like to see the footage.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        It's likely that the tank was abandoned and damaged or destroyed by the same drone that took this picture.
        Abrams are notorious for getting stuck in mud due to their weight. In the American defense, it was a tank built to fight in middle eastern cities. Which, ironically, causes the diesel turbine to overheat, and were rarely used there because older parts of cities had narrow roads and the Abrams could get stuck too easily.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >it was a tank built to fight middle eastern conflicts
          It was originally built to fight in the European theaters. However, its continuous upgrades lead to it gaining more weight.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >it was a tank built to fight in middle eastern cities
          It was made for a possible soviet invasion in the 1980s in which it would have had to perform against long columns of tanks and constant artillery in tight axes.

          Although its understandable since it has spent 30 years since its inception playing in the sandbox and receiving more and more adaptations and training for that environment, to the point where the popular image of the tank is more brown than green.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >it was a tank built to fight in middle eastern cities
          So you literally have no fricking clue what you're talking about. Good to know.

  60. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >They got their border security
    Wasn't it just a promise that Biden would "do something about it" if the crossings exceeded some huge amount per day and in exchange governors wouldn't be able to pull an Abbott anymore AND if they wanted to take the feds to court over failure to secure the border it had to be done in hard blue DC? Stop trying to deflect you lying little communist eunuch.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yes it was.

  61. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    It's a real one, tho. And it's intact and in repairable condition. Seethe and dilate more about it, /misc/ filth.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >reduced armor
      >all instrumentation past 1990's removed
      >real
      who are you fooling, zigger

  62. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    You would think they would have taken million angles of it with tons of videos.
    They recorded a video of this exact tank driving near the drone. Did it fricking drive away with blowout panels activated?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I'm betting the crew just waited for the ammo to burn out before getting back in and driving it off.

  63. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >So that's why they say /k/ope, top lel entire glowBlack person squadron at hand

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      you're brown

  64. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    I'm sure it must make you feel oh so very special fooling yourself into believing it's the CIA making you look like an idiot rather than random PrepHole anons.

  65. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    [...]

    >samegayging this hard

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      prove it, zogbot

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        How am i a zogbot if i am not russian? I denounce the russian federation and their support for telmud.

  66. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >nu/misc/ can't even make a proper bait
    Many such cases. Sad!

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      he cant even samegay properly. Easily detectable at this point because of the repeated patterns.

  67. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    [...]

    .jpg
    This timestamp is from Friday, 5. May 2023 00:20:12.351
    I guess it goes without saying, but this /misc/Black person is using the filename anonymizer so we don't notice it's just him spamming the same images

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      that's just good opsec anon, it prevents people from simply looking up your filenames with the archive. i don't blame him for that. he's still a fricking idiot though.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >he doesn't use PrepHole-x
      newbie or phonegay?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        ...he does use PrepHolex, that's what he's saying. the filename anonymizer is a feature of PrepHolex.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          You thinking that a randomized filename is notable implies that you do not use PrepHole-x. That's what I'm mocking. The apparent fact that you don't use it.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >install PrepHole X
            >tick the option to hide your filenames because you're a newbie afraid of le epic archive detectives and don't want anything to be traced back to your other posts
            >can't even spell the frickiing name of the extension right
            Ok newbie, I really don't care

            >I-I totally know what that extension is called, that's why I referred to it in such a vague and unfamiliar way

            kek pathetic
            No more (you)s

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            what the frick are you even talking about? i'm not that guy, and i do use PrepHolex.

            >install PrepHole X
            >tick the option to hide your filenames because you're a newbie afraid of le epic archive detectives and don't want anything to be traced back to your other posts
            >can't even spell the frickiing name of the extension right
            Ok newbie, I really don't care
            [...]
            kek pathetic
            No more (you)s

            i think using the filename anonymizer is a good thing. there are schizos here who will try to dox you irl, this place isn't safe at all so any slight improvement in opsec is a good thing. i don't know why that guy is so fricking angry about someone pointing out he uses PrepHolex though.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        You mean the extension with the filename anonymizer I just fricking mentioned?
        Been using it for like 15 years at this point, never felt the need to be a little baby b***h hiding his filenames

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >I-I totally know what that extension is called, that's why I referred to it in such a vague and unfamiliar way

  68. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    What's stopping the US from fast-tracking more M1s to Ukraine? Surely existing orders to other countries can wait as lower priority, maybe throw in a few extras as compensation to sweeten things out?

  69. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Post Snake Island
    Post 1st Guards Tank Army
    Post 4th Guards Tank Division
    Post 3rd Army Corps
    Post Northern Front
    Post Hostomel x3
    Post Moskva
    Post Odessa landings
    Post zig zag trenches with grenade sumps & basic fortifications
    Post missiles that hit their target
    Post Russian soldier that hasn't had their butthole resized
    Post negative HIV test
    Post relatives over the age of 62
    Post encrypted comms
    Post unexpired rations
    Post undeflated spare tire
    Post tourniquets with windlass mechanism
    Post optics
    Post NVGs
    Post AA systems that don’t get mogged by drones
    Post living VDV & Spetznatz with all limbs intact
    Post SIM card (not the game)
    Post sugar
    Post bread
    Post cheese
    Post eggs
    Post non defaulted currency
    Post raw goods processing industry
    Post domestic semiconductor manufacturing
    Post Nord Stream pipeline
    Post Baltic Sea control
    Post river crossings without double digit casualty rates
    Post aircraft not routinely gibbed by MANPADs
    Post sensor suites in a non-potato resolution
    Post competent NCO corps
    Post bridges & pontoons
    Post control of the Black Sea
    Post Russians being cool with returning to a pre-industrial agrarian economy
    Post Finland & Sweden now being NATO members
    Post how you feel about being dependent on North Korea & Iran because not even China wants your money more than they enjoy seeing more dead conscriptovich kino
    Post how Russians feel about being viewed as slightly better than North Korea
    Post families receiving money for the death of their sons & fathers
    Post any positive outcome Russian can expect even if they 'win'
    Post Lyman
    Post Izyum
    Post Kharkiv
    Post Kherson
    Post commercial shipping insurance
    Post Robotyne
    Post Prigozhin
    Post Crimean S-400
    Post airbases & ammo depots NOT on fire
    Post Kilo submarine & landing vessel
    Post Sevastopol drydocks
    Post IL76 with POW corpses
    Post 20% of Black Sea Fleet
    Post landing vessel with Iranian drones
    Post ICBM factory
    Post Wagner in Africa
    Post Tsezar Kunikov w/ crewmen
    Post A-50 x2

  70. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >footage of abrams blowing up random shit releases a week before a photo of an abrams being allegedly destroyed
    >FIRST ABRAMS IN COMBAT BTFO ALREADY ANOTHER WIN FOR REDDIT

  71. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Well why would i cope? Abrams is an equipment that will be lost. The thing i'm curious about is why russians record a video of abrams moving and being recorded by this drone, but the aftermath is only a still photo, they obviously were recording it.
    So i'm curious.

  72. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >my country lost when your rulers decided supplying Ukraine with means win the war when it was feasible was not in their interest, too risky
    >and yes, russians will post their victory soonish, you'll cope with stale muh 3 day SMO bullshit, and everyone will be happy except the people stuck with the bill - Ukrainians, Poles, Baltics
    seething thirdie

  73. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Yes, they are the real ZOG. You being butthurt about doesn't change that. Stop being immerse about the illusions of a trad russia.

  74. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    [...]

    >what goes on in Russia does not make your nation any more gentile ruled
    If you ignore that invading and annexing neighboring countries thing.

  75. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >the fricking "i'm a ukrainian!!!" guy again
    this bait is stale

  76. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >and yes, russians will post their victory soonish, you'll cope with stale muh 3 day SMO bullshit, and everyone will be happy except the people stuck with the bill - Ukrainians, Poles, Baltics
    save this post for future mockery efforts
    >what goes on in Russia does not make your nation any more gentile ruled
    "muh Jooz" doesn't change the fact that Puccia is losing Valeriy

  77. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >whats going on in russia
    Russia killed more white people than any other nation for the past 50 years. Losing 100k Europeans(if we believe that russians are white) in a year is not good. Especially if your goal is to appease to the delusions of restoring the old empire that was once ruled by the people you hate.

  78. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Ah yes, the one or 2 villages is totally going to change the outcome of those loses, anon. Explain to me the significance of that town?

  79. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    it'll take more than a shitpic to convince me

  80. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Post avdiika
    lmao even, crowing over a literal trash heap you took after expending thousands of men and hundreds of vehicles
    >Day 733 of US Special Decartelification Operation in Mexico
    >The tactical feint towards Ciudad ran out of gas after 2 hours of driving, then the soldiers traded all the reserve fuel for fentanyl and Honduran hookers
    >Cuba closed the Straits of Florida and the Yucatan Channel to all American warships from entering or leaving the Gulf of Mexico
    >Pararescue bravely sacrificed themselves during the Battle of the Gulf of Mexico to hold a taco stand for a few days, we lost track of precisely how many upon emergency water landing.
    >Navy Seals quickly crossed the Rio Grande but got lost in the sun and dug into the Trinity Nuclear Test site for 5 weeks. Thanks to Belle Delphine's bathwater it's estimated that 1/10 will survive their cancers
    >Biden has been riding around Delaware and Maryland on a train, getting massages from McKayla Maroney after jazzericizing in his technogym.
    >During the Siege of El Merida (8mo. 20,000 MIA) Guy Fieri snapped and drove across the United States in his militarized RV to coup Biden with crowds of civilians and military cheering while his Chef Wars Boys kept shooting down 10% of the United States working helicopters and an AWACS before Biden finally got off his train and flew to the Yukon to negotiate
    >Biden then then gives a bizarre 2 hour long interview-lecture on why Canada started WW1 to Piers Morgan.
    >Two companies worth of marines lost to cluster munitions when gathered for an address by their commander on the importance of not bunching up together in an active war zone.
    >Military influencer posts about it on TikTok only to be bullied by Steve Doocy into giving themselves a shotgun lobotomy.
    >eight F/A-18 Super Hornets and two AWACS are claimed to have been destroyed in a matter of days following the US advance into the town of Guachochi

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Two companies worth of marines lost to cluster munitions when gathered for an address by their commander on the importance of not bunching up together in an active war zone.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Biden then then gives a bizarre 2 hour long interview-lecture on why Canada started WW1 to Piers Morgan

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        The idea of Biden talking for two whole hours is unbelievable.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          He didn't say Biden would do it coherently.

  81. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    It's depressing that Russia is taking nearly five months to capture a village 7km from their border and is then bragging about it.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >nearly five months
      Ten years. Ten years its been on the front line, and for the last two it had suffered almost daily attacks.

  82. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Please at least someone tell me it got recovered.

  83. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Biggest difference is that the crew has a better chance to survive and be interviewed to see what went wrong.
    Most obvious answer would be the tank got caught by a drone, which any tank now is vulnerable to.

  84. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    To show up with an Abrams in 2024 is like showing up with a WW1 tank in WW2. Technology has advanced. No jammer, no aps, no top armor within a couple km of the frontline?
    The US army predicted that this would be the outcome 20 years ago when they came up with the mgv program to replace the m1.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Actually, the first program to replace the Abrams was cancelled in 1993. There was a second replacement program which got cancelled in 2007 and a third that was cancelled in 2014.

  85. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >1 image
    >1 angle
    Every fricking time

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Are you ready to see it reposted for the next month?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous
      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        it do be like that

  86. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Nice CGI effects vatnik

  87. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    For hopefully self-evident reasons, Russian military slang for tanks has been 'graves' since WW2. 'A grave for three brothers.'

  88. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >ousts herself as someone using reddit.
    Ziggers, everyone.

  89. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Mathematically, DU can never be truly depleted, there will always be trace amounts of U-235 hanging around in it. This means that DU produces a hair more than background radiation. Most people don’t know shit about radiation, so it’s fertile ground for people with an axe to grind to spin tall tales about how the DoD gives its soldiers cancer for shits and giggles.

  90. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >has actually made an account to reddit
    Ziggers, everyone.

  91. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    stop smearing shit everywhere and you won't be banned and deleted constantly

  92. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Brags about using reddit
    Ziggers, everyone.
    You dont belong to this site.

  93. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Where's the video and why are people taking this seriously

  94. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Why does every zigger supporter look like a pedophile?

  95. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Can they recover it? Will America force Ukraine to just HIMARS it so ziggers can't haul it back to Moscow intact?

    If it's in Avdiika then it was probably damaged during the retreat

    If it's in the south then they can just tow it away

  96. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    You are still redditor, being banned there will not change it

  97. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >no aftermath
    So either it's fake or they just caused a few flames on the OUTSIDE lmao, but no catastrophic damage. Otehrwise you bet they wouyld be doing victory laps and spamming a full webm everywhere instead of a cope screenshot.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *