Federal courts have struck down the ATF 'ghost gun' regulation. 80% kits are back on the table.

Federal courts have struck down the ATF 'ghost gun' regulation. 80% kits are back on the table.

I don't care if you think this is political, it's important news for the gunsmiths on here.

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Based, I guess

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Doesn’t proving in court that lowers aren’t firearms just make it easier to regulate and restrict because it sets president that they don’t fall under the 2nd amendment?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >precedence**
        I’m very dyslexic

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >precedence**
        I’m very dyslexic

        No? Why would you think that.

        The homosexual ATF tried to redefine a gun as 'whatever we say it is'. Obviously that is a dangerous circumstance, and fortunately they have been BTFOd by a court that knows its arse from its head. They're scum and will try to enforce it in the short term anyway, but one step at a time.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Idk. Wouldn’t make sense that if you have the right to bear arms, that you would want as many things as possible to count as ‘arms’. So it would fall under the same protection. Especially with how many states are going constitutional carry and the rise of ‘originalists’

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            2nd ammendment is absolutely no protection at all unless it has the force of the courts backing it up, it is not law in and of itself within a common law system. Its a constant struggle.

            Pedophile democrats and their gun grabbing ATF lackeys tried to bring 'literally anything' into their jurisdiction and were proven false.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            As a firearm they fall under the ATF which isn't friendly to us. Setting unfinished firearms outside any current gun laws, it would require an act of Congress to regulate them. Since a random piece of pipe would fall under any definition of unfinished firearm, there's no law that can regulate them.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Lowers are firearms. Unfinished lowers aren't lowers.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Lowers are firearms
          ATF wants you to believe this despite the fact that lowers don't meet the definition of firearm. They dropped charges against this guy because his defense would have gutted the Gun Control Act of 1968 if he were found not guilty.
          https://archive.is/B2ycb

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Shit the frick up, dude. We want lowers to be the serialized part.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              ARs wouldn't HAVE a serialized part, NO part of an AR fits the definition. It wouldn't become a gun at all until you assembled it.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >ARs wouldn't HAVE a serialized part
                No, you'd see the laws being almost immediately rewritten and potentially ending up worse than they are today, because even among people who vote Republican the idea of people being able to buy a gun without a serial number or background check over the internet and have it shipped to their door won't be popular.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Access to firearms parts and ammo is constitutionally protected as they are a prerequisite to bearing arms.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        No because legally they’re a block of metal and trying to make every block of metal that’s vaguely shaped like an AR lower is impossible

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        It removes them from the ATFs jurisdiction. Not that they should be making defacto laws anyways.
        If they want to regulate lowers they will need to regulate blocks of metal in general

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Congress would need to pass a law doing so, which they won't

        Who even cares anymore? If you were to pay any attention to Supreme Court rulings beyond just the basic "hurr we're winning" you'd see it becoming increasingly clear that the good days are numbered, and things are going to flip hard the other way soon.

        Supreme Court fricking overturned Roe v Wade and blackpillers still will b***h about it

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        The key point is that if they aren't firearms than the ATF has no jurisdiction on them. Congress could possibly do so but it's unlikely and would probably be unenforceable.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >we live in an age where you can directly tell the President to frick off

      what a time to be alive

  2. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Not gonna listen to what some judge says.
    I am still gonna regulate 80% receivers and close businesses selling ghost guns, sorry.

  3. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >(you)

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo brooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooos he said (you) and a small chin oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Reeeeeee don talk bout gun stuff on my board
      >guuuuuuys the homosexuals put a ruuuuuuuule
      >guys its been so many years we goooot to folllllow it

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      ughhh i forgor this isnt a ukraini/russian politics thread so it isnt allowed

  4. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    The difference is one serves a purpose outside of firearms. That’s why it was easier to ban brass knuckles than knives.
    I don’t know what other purpose you could argue in good faith an incomplete receiver has

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >I don’t know what other purpose you could argue in good faith an incomplete receiver has
      Sure, a Polymer80 frame has no real value outside of the fact that you can modify it into a working gun, but the legal arguments falls more on what would you call a 'readily convertible' firearm. There's nothing in legislation defining the term, and the courts have been all over the place. Currently you can argue a block of aluminum or a steel pipe can be considered readily convertible. The ATF tried to use "We know what a readily convertible firearm is when we see it" but the court wasn't having it.

      https://gununiversity.com/readily-converted/

  5. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Anything going on with the arm brace ban?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Depends how long you haven't been paying attention, FPC & GOA got injunctions against the ban but only for their members but that was a month ago. NRA tried to get one too but their usual tactic of show up a day late and a dollar short got them burned and the judge told them to pound sand.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Kinda lost interested in the hobby, sadly. so i haven't really been keeping up. thanks, anon!

  6. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >summary judgement

    something tells me this is just an activist judge trying to pull some shit and it will be walked back on appeal.

  7. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Who even cares anymore? If you were to pay any attention to Supreme Court rulings beyond just the basic "hurr we're winning" you'd see it becoming increasingly clear that the good days are numbered, and things are going to flip hard the other way soon.

  8. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Whatever makes it easier to kill children, I'm all for it

  9. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    While this is a good ruling the truth is that America won't be free until all 3 letter agencies are disbanded and their leadership jailed on treason charges

    I live in scenic Montana in the deep south of America's heartland and the war in Ukraine has made the price of buckwheat very expensive.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Montana
      >the deep south of America's heartland
      based and Canada belongs to America pilled

  10. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    How the frick does the ATF and NFA even get enforced, literally just don't comply or hang around snitches.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Women.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >just never shoot your gun so no one else can see that you're violating the law
      What's the point of even having the gun then?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Who said anything about not shooting, if you're part of a shooting club with a charter develop an anti federalist culture and ostracize LE and snitches.

        If you own land then don't worry

        I'd you're at a public range and someone asks for a tax stamp tell them to frick off, ATF field agents don't exist outside their air conditioned offices.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >if you're part of a shooting club, develop the exact culture that will attract attention of those enforcing the laws

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            >private property, no trespassing, where's your warrant? Frick off

            Simple as

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              You do realize they'd just get someone to join and frequent the range, just like they get people to infiltrate and join militias.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Most of the private shooting clubs near me aren't open to new members and their books are closed. It doesn't seem too far fetched to have a group of 20 dues paying members who chip in to maintain a private club similar to how most hunting leases are operated. Just vet your members and have thorough background checks conducted. Feds are lazy idiots like the rest of us and the idea that they're super spies or extremely intelligent is flawed, hell they work for the government!

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >It doesn't seem too far fetched to have a group of 20 dues paying members who chip in to maintain a private club
                I guess if you just want a shitty bare bones range.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *