Why do Ukrainian dragon's teeth look so flaccid and soft in addition to being visibly less girthy and erected to a lower height?
Why do Ukrainian dragon's teeth look so flaccid and soft in addition to being visibly less girthy and erected to a lower height?
easy
It's a lot easier to stop a golf cart
They're small but you still shouldn't attempt to run them over even with a tank.
they have loops on them, you can just chain them up and pull them out of the way
you can hook them up as the artie comes down
so then they use precious ammo to blow them up for russians, and then the russians send more fodder in
good effort
All dragon's teeth have loops on specifically to stop you from just moving one or 2 out of the way. A cable is run through them all to keep the line intact.
Sounds like a good theory Ferris. Now show me these cables on
there were photos of these cables.
is still under contrtuction
>Cut cable
Static defenses only hinder so defenders can react.
They're "supposed" to be attached to a huge concrete foot or floor making them virtually impossible to move without blowing them to pieces one at a time.
Slavs of course are natural lazy cheats, and just put down the "caps", thinking that's "good enough".
Those are both Russian though.
I remember someone posted images of Russian dragons teeth and they were hollow.
You've got to make some compromises when your dragon's teeth aren't hollow.
I've seen a lot of Russian toblerones that looked no bigger than bottom image.
I need more pictures of toblerones standing next to things to be convinced of a systematic difference.
picrel Russian, late 2022
failed to post pic
so this is a bait thread obviously, but real talk, is there a need for them to be that large? it seems to make more sense to have them be as big as they need to be to accomplish the job they're for, and no bigger. it's a waste of resources and logistics.
Most of their bulk is in the underground concrete that stops you from just pulling the line apart.
wait, so there's a concrete footer that runs under all of them? given the ring on top, I assumed they were mobile and could be repositioned.
digging in makes sense I guess, so maybe it's two different design approaches to the problem, then? the bigger ones are interconnected, the smaller ones use the rolling/digging in principle?
There isn't.
Most are actually hollow too.
>wait, so there's a concrete footer that runs under all of them? given the ring on top, I assumed they were mobile and could be repositioned.
Depends on if we're talking the Russian variant or the proper variant.
It's an old debate how effective these are when they're so small, and when they're not dug deep into the ground and connected together.
If you try try to drive straight over them, the Russians had a video I can't find trying to show it digs itself into the ground like picrel. The Ukrainians also put out a video where they drove straight over an isolated one with one track of an IFV.
Assuming you have to stop to demolish them, they already did most of their job, but big/entrenched/connected will obviously cause a much bigger delay.
they are all getting connected together with a steel hawser threaded through steel loops you see on their sides
>when you nut vs she keeps suckin
This organic post has convinced me Russia isn't losing.
those are russian pidormyds, not dragon's teeth
By not being hollow for starter
>I literally cannot stop thinking about wiener
Because they work and we're not build by corrupt puccians who stole the concrete and made them from paper. Get better bait Padheet