>dont leave home without muh cowitnessed optics setup in case I gotta take 75+yard headshots

>dont leave home without muh cowitnessed optics setup in case I gotta take 75+yard headshots
Name a gayer more retarded CC trend than pic related.

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Name a gayer more retarded CC trend than pic related.
    carrying anything other than a Sig, Glock, HK, CZ, or Beretta.

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >2023
    >newfags still think optics on pistols are about shooting at "long range"
    never change, nu/k/

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >looking for the micro reticle in a chaotic life or death situation
      Instinctive point shooting with solid grip/stance fundamentals is all you need for moronstolemywallet cqc bub. Im not looking at my irons during 7 yard speed drills. delta and the sas were doming retards with flashlight beams as ghetto speed rings during high stakes hostage rescue for christsakes.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Doesnt Train: The Post

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          No one that is ever good at anything needs to train.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >hurrr delta and SAS

        ...still 'aims' at 7yds retard

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This is why I just carry picrel and don't live in a gnomish state.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You need to lift weights.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      lemme get a look at them big ol titties anon

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    And unnecessary in a house, too, since in most houses a self-defense shot is going to be 15 feet or less, unless you are rich and have a mansion. A weapon light is infinitely more important than a red dot and raised irons.

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I thought pistol optics were about as fast of target acquisition as possible?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      In a self defense situation your reaction window can be as low as fractions of a second. You don’t need to be aiming a precise shot but taking a shot as soon as possible.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I'd rather that shot be both fast and accurate if possible.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Just point shoot. If they're too far to point shoot, chances are you can just get away.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I don't want to get away I want to kill someone

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      yep, better shot placement too

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      There is actually zero hard evidence that pistol optics offer any meaningful advantage within the distance, round count, and attacker count contexts of realistic defensive shootings. People get really focused on supposed theoretical advantages like faster target acquisition or target focused shooting without realizing that those "advantages" disappear when compared to a skilled shooter using irons. Then people like to bring up USPSA scores without realizing that a stage with 30 rounds fired, moving between four different positions of cover, and 15+ target transitions doesn't compare to defensive shootings. Or they just say "lol poor" for not consuming the latest trend. The only situation that red dots are proven to be unquestionably superior is at ranges beyond 25 yards, and it's up to you to decide if your chance of getting in that kind of shooting is worth switching to an optic.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >if I compare an amateur with a dot to a master with irons, the master wins! So irons are better!
        every time

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I never said that. You don't have to be a master to understand muscle memory and target-focused shooting with irons. I just said "skilled shooter with irons" because it seems that most people championing red dots are very new at shooting and never got good with irons before shooting with optics.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >because it seems that most people championing red dots are very new at shooting and never got good with irons before shooting with optics.
            getting fuddy in here

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Pistol optics is the ultimate zoomer and consoomer call sign.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Post a single gun you have worth more than $2000 to prove you're just not another pissy poortard

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Post a single gun you have worth more than $2000 to prove you're just not another pissy poortard

              Just because you're more comfortable with irons and are faster with them doesn't mean you are good with them

              Even if the people praising dots are 'new' that doesn't mean they're wrong

              Still nobody posting any hard evidence that red dots are superior to irons in the context of self defense shootings. Just "boomer", "poor", theoretical advantages. God I love being right. With so many people shooting with optics now, why can't I find just one video of someone doing a double Mozambique or similar drill with a clear advantage to the red dot?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You've never shot a gun. You've never even held a handgun to compare the sight pictures of an iron sight handgun to a RDS. Your entire argument relies on excluding any situation that requires aiming to be outside "the context of a self defense shooting."

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >hard evidence that red dots are superior
                Holy shit shut the fuck up. Just try one. Are you more accurate? If yes, then it's superior. If no, then it's not. Stop worrying about "muh statistics" bullshit you fucking zoomer gay.
                God damn
                In the words of Paul Harrell:
                >"You have to feel good about your gun. You have to feel confident with it."

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >z-zooomer!!!
                >watches guntubers and uses their word as gospel

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                tell me what about that is wrong.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Just because you're more comfortable with irons and are faster with them doesn't mean you are good with them

            Even if the people praising dots are 'new' that doesn't mean they're wrong

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Lots of PDs are getting them now. And I know that doesn't automatically mean they're important or relevant, but it does say something.

        Myself I shot with irons all my life and only just started with pistol optics this year, so I'm still a little faster with lining up irons, but I'm practicing with an ACSS reticle- it's nice that it grabs your eye and has you naturally get the reticle aligned.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >red dots being more competitive in every single situation isn't proof

        Where do you mouth breathers even come from, you're like the moron tactical instructors, unable to grasp logic just what ever your head cannon says goes

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Then people like to bring up USPSA scores without realizing that a stage with 30 rounds fired, moving between four different positions of cover, and 15+ target transitions doesn't compare to defensive shootings
        Who the fuck says I carry for defense? I carry in case I encounter someone worth trading lives for.

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I am unironically faster with a dot than irons at any range, and I won't let some salty poors tell me I'm not.

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Risers on everything for everything

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    dots for duty/competition, irons for ccw/hd. simple as.

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >no nods

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *