Iraq sent weapons to Syria as reveales by the Syrian civil war and enriched uranium was found in Iraq which was then sent to a power plant in Canada.
Also, the US gave some weapons to Iraq since the US exchanged weapons for hostages with Iran. Most weapons came from the USSR.
>Iraq sent weapons to Syria
Yeah, so? That was before 2003. >the USSR
Sure, but the USSR didn't invade Iraq "for having WMDs." If the US was legitimately concerned about countries in the middle east possessing chemical weapons it should have invaded Syria in 2003 instead of making up lies about Iraq.
Then what about all those soldiers who got injured dealing with chemical weapons caches? >B-b-but those were old!
Yes, that's the nature of caches. It's something you store so you can use later.
>they didn't have chemical weapons
They didn't have an active program. They still have a shitton of surplus that they stored and used around. US soldiers got injured by unknowingly disposing shells laced with chemical weapons.
Depends on the chemical in question, but it can. For instance tear gas is technically a chemical weapon, but is definitely not a WMD seeing as how it's suitable for riot control. Sarin and VX on the other hand are a bit more serious.
Si senor! The entire range of NBC weaponry is synonymous with WMDs >Nuclear >Biological >Chemical
Nowadays you might come across CBRN instead of NBC >Chemical >Biological >Radioactive >Nuclear
They make the difference between R and N to allow a clearer approach because there's a difference between stuff thats "just" radioactive and a nuke detonation which gives many more headaches.
Yeah
so whats this meme about iraq not having WMDs?
They are just historylets who just seethe at America.
Arab apologists.Think holocaust or nanking deniers. If they had their way Saddam would be emperor of all Middle East and Africa
Aluminum tubes
Aluminum death tube
The internet is not just some big truck you dump something on. It's a series of tubes!
The media lied about lying.jews do this all the time.
They didn't have any chemical weapons at the time that claim was made, they'd gotten rid of all of them. There is no evidence to the contrary.
Also America and Israel sold Iraq the precursor chemicals required to make their weapons, with full knowledge that they would use them on Iran.
Iraq sent weapons to Syria as reveales by the Syrian civil war and enriched uranium was found in Iraq which was then sent to a power plant in Canada.
Also, the US gave some weapons to Iraq since the US exchanged weapons for hostages with Iran. Most weapons came from the USSR.
>Iraq sent weapons to Syria
Yeah, so? That was before 2003.
>the USSR
Sure, but the USSR didn't invade Iraq "for having WMDs." If the US was legitimately concerned about countries in the middle east possessing chemical weapons it should have invaded Syria in 2003 instead of making up lies about Iraq.
USSR dissolved in 1991 and they were busy with another conflict in the 80s
Then what about all those soldiers who got injured dealing with chemical weapons caches?
>B-b-but those were old!
Yes, that's the nature of caches. It's something you store so you can use later.
>they didn't have chemical weapons
They didn't have an active program. They still have a shitton of surplus that they stored and used around. US soldiers got injured by unknowingly disposing shells laced with chemical weapons.
They didn’t
The homie bought aluminum tubes!
Do I need to tell you what the frick you can do with an aluminum tube?
Yes.
Yes Saddam
>chemical weapons
even better than nuclear
best in combination
Depends on the chemical in question, but it can. For instance tear gas is technically a chemical weapon, but is definitely not a WMD seeing as how it's suitable for riot control. Sarin and VX on the other hand are a bit more serious.
You absolutely can use Sarin and VX for riot control.
The US should restart M55 rocket production and fill them with our remaining VX stockpile and give it to Ukraine.
>NBC
>Nuclear
>Biological
>Chemical
it's in the name
Si senor! The entire range of NBC weaponry is synonymous with WMDs
>Nuclear
>Biological
>Chemical
Nowadays you might come across CBRN instead of NBC
>Chemical
>Biological
>Radioactive
>Nuclear
They make the difference between R and N to allow a clearer approach because there's a difference between stuff thats "just" radioactive and a nuke detonation which gives many more headaches.
Would you like to know more?
[YES] - [NO]
[YES]
Ask Google you fricking moron.
Bullets are propelled by a chemical reaction, so they can be loopholed to be WMD's
Chemicals are WMDs the phrase, but they are not weapons of mass destruction the word.
my poor lungs