It's a rubber gun that exists to be yeeted into the dirt without breaking a blank-firing gun or whatever. It's not meant to be seen from that close for that long and whoever grabbed it for that shot should be embarrassed.
Ive never seen that b4 anon. How insane is that?
A fake rubber gun modeled after a cucked Colt sporter rifle. In a movie thats suppose to represent a FA Colt M16A4.
>for personal gain
What's the problem with this? What's the point in jumping through the legal and bureaucratic gauntlet if you can't gain anything from it?
Kinda weird to have a "well-regulated militia" clause that isn't supposed to mean anything
7 months ago
Anonymous
It's supposed to justify and explain the actual law. "A well-regulated militia being necessary..." is not a requirement, merely a design consideration.
7 months ago
Anonymous
A well regulated militia is one that supplies it’s own muskets, initial stock of shot and powder, boots, and pioneering tools.
7 months ago
Anonymous
>its own select-fire 5.56 rifles, fighting load of magazines and ammo, armor, NV, and extra socks and ibuprofen
7 months ago
Anonymous
It's not weird. Back in the 1800s the Rhode Island constitution had a free speech amendment that started with the preamble "The liberty of the press being essential to the security of freedom in a state, [...]".
That doesn't mean that only the press has free speech, it's merely an example that is meant to reinforce why it's important that everyone has free speech.
In a lot of historical texts you have to look for similar use of words and phrases to avoid falling for the trap of interpreting things according to a modern meaning.
For example some have tried to argue that "bear arms" means serve in a country's military, but Debrett's 1797 Collection of State Papers Relative to the War Against France contains the passage: >The inhabitants of the villages, who shall take arms against the French, shall be shot, and their houses burnt, as shall likewise all who bear arms without permission from the French generals.
Bearing arms clearly means carrying weapons. Unless the French generals were habitually giving permission to villagers to fight against them.
Stuff may seem "weird" today but it made perfect sense back then.
7 months ago
Anonymous
>anon exposes his public school 'education' level
It's a standard rhetorical pattern of the time. The clause prefaces the statement with a reinforcing example. E.g. 'weighing 500lb of blubber, anon's mom is a whale'.
Read some 1700s-1800s works.
7 months ago
Anonymous
Well-Regulated, means in proper working order, in modern English: a regulated gas line -> controlled flow of gas. British Infantry at the time were called Regulars, - trained professorial soldiers.
>A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state.
It means the militia must be in proper working order, trained, armed.
additionally, the full text of the 2nd >A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Who has the right to bear arms? The Militia or the People?
additionally, the militia according to the militia act of 1792 includes all white men between 18-45, who are REQUIRED to own a musket, knapsack, and 24 musket balls and enough powder to shoot them. You were required to have a gun and ammo.
7 months ago
Anonymous
"Regulated" also means "put together in a way where they're unlikely to get out of control." One of the Federal Papers explains their plan for things, the militias would be composed of federal officers from out of state and local enlisted men, so that the officers could coordinate national defense etc. and wouldn't be motivated to use the militia to invade and conquer another state, but the men would be locals who'd refuse to do anything tyrannical to their own communities if a bad federal government got into power.
7 months ago
Anonymous
>Federal Papers
Shit, I mean Federalist Papers
7 months ago
Anonymous
1. the Federalists were tyrants-in-waiting who are the root cause of our current problems
2. in any case, the "well-regulated militia" bit is, again, just a justification for why "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed"—the people's right isn't contingent on serving in a militia, well-regulated or not
7 months ago
Anonymous
the militia is regulated by including every abled bodied man of the people, the state cannot call up an army to oppress the people if the people are the state's militia.
Out of the 10 original amendments 5 of them directly reference "the people" or "the rights of the people" only in one do people wonder what they meant when they said "the rights of the people - shall not be infringed" every other one everyone agrees they mean it down to the last man. Its absurd to think they didn't mean me, you, him, them, he, they, everyone. Its every citizen
>declare one of the most sacred rights of Americans null and void >instantly trigger civil war >it's 100 million gun owners vs (presumably) a military of 3 million with dubious loyalties at best, many might be inclined to simply stand aside to let you be Ceaușescu'd rather than fight an utterly hopeless battle against their own countrymen
The complete absence of logic of these people never ceases to amaze me.
I'm deliberately ignoring the fact that any such conflict would invariably spiral out of control and turn into a settling of old scores against liberals in general as well. It would rapidly go from "kill the gun grabbing tyrants", to "kill anyone in a BLM shirt", "kill anyone with a rainbow flag", "kill anyone who voted to remove Confederate war memorials", "kill anyone who voted for Biden", "kill anyone who doesn't speak fluent English", "kill anyone with the wrong skin color", and so forth.
most of the military are gun owners if not gun nuts outright, and the oath of enlistment is sworn to uphold the constitution. safe to say most will absolutely not be doorkicking on US soil and grabbling guns
most of the military are gun owners if not gun nuts outright, and the oath of enlistment is sworn to uphold the constitution. safe to say most will absolutely not be doorkicking on US soil and grabbling guns
>cope. military would definitely kick your shit in
7 months ago
Anonymous
>hit that group later with a moab
well atleast thry got to write on their grave stones "we won a battle before we got vaporized". Thats basically winning, right
7 months ago
Anonymous
>moves
what now, mr law man?
7 months ago
Anonymous
yes. You will move. at all directions at once
7 months ago
Anonymous
>we won a battle before we got vaporized
You mean the entire job of infantry?
7 months ago
Anonymous
>Afghanistan broke before the Guard did
7 months ago
Anonymous
>The Ubited States is Chaos
It all makes sense
7 months ago
Anonymous
not even "good" Chaos, we're clearly on team Nurgle/Slaanesh
>and I saw at once before me a Great Golden Path, and the end of that path was clouded with visions of a great and bloody jihad waged across the universe in my father's name
Why are you reminding me this fricking moron exists. I haven't thought about him since 2016 or whenever it was. Who the frick keeps up with his twitter?
https://i.imgur.com/RDEchBp.png
He's not necessarily wrong. We just don't know what it means.
Everyone knows what it fricking means, it's obvious, and that's why there's so much frickery to try to pin it down to be something other than what we all know it is.
Did fricking Larry REALLY need a Swiss full auto rifle. I'm not talking about his 2nd A right. But someone like Larry could have easily gotten %90 of the guns in the market of every flavor and if he was felling the "fun switch itch" he could have one or two guns "retouched" 😉 while in his property, and then quickly "legalized".
My puzzlement comes from him being such a consoom freak he fricking had import an illegal boomstick, putting himself in a frickton of trouble. I'm betting that with all the lawyer money, he could have bought a trip to Europe and fired all what he wanted.
his guns were imported for "law enforcement demos" and they have text messages from LAV that are explicit about how no LE agency cares about X gun and they're 100% for his collection
obviously under the 2A no gun is illegal, but per the unconstitutional laws that are on the books currently he's fricked
Okay so all he had to do was spend half a day at a firing range with a bored cop and he would of be fine? i get complaining about regulations and shit, but this seems like the EASIEST regulation to comply to and he fricked it up?
he literally could of just filmed himself having a shoot with the local pd, edited, released it and made money on youtube over it. How do you frick that up
i'm honestly surprised more ffl/sot holders don't get popped like this, there's so many "guntubers" showing off their "armory" full of post samples lol.
The illegal imports aren't the real issue here. He has secondary charges of espionage and conspiracy to commit espionage. He illegally sold the TDP's of many big name firearms to the Russians in exchange for TDP's of Russian & other small arms. Based off the publicly released court documents, it appears Kalashnikov USA used these illegally gained TDP's to begin production of their AK pattern rifles, and several of these MP5 clones that have hit the market are a result of these dealings as well. Vickers and several of his buddies were set to lead Kalashnikov USA, so he was definitely out to profit.
Holy shit that's way more based than I thought. KUSA has been a Russian dirty money operation for a long time but I had no idea the TDP wasn't just freely given since the guy who owned KUSA got "gifted" a million dollar property by the then global sales director of KC back when they were still coming in as Saigas.
>it appears Kalashnikov USA used these illegally gained TDP's to begin production of their AK pattern rifles, and several of these MP5 clones that have hit the market are a result of these dealings as well
based
Talking about the active duty ones. Guy on the far right. Was taken in Afghanistan c. 2011. I've never seen a fat SEAL or Ranger after retirement. Not gonna say they're inherently more disciplined.
Far right has camo in his armpits and looks like he's wearing side plates, so it's probably just a PC+inboard radio+side pl8s+insulation layer or equiv
Both SEALs and Rangers are fitness nuts. With Rangers being more obsticle course fit. Seals being beach fit.
Devgru and Delta ride around on helicopters all day while spending time in shoothouses and parachuting.
Completely different standards.
Id argue SAS is the real "all rounded" Soldiers.
Most SAS are very tall and lean like cross country runners.
Just my 2cents
homies go hard on their bodies and get out basically broken. why do you think all the brovets are roided? they can't do real exercise without pumping their body full of chemicals to push past their injuries.
It's even dumber than that. The Delta guy was carrying chamber empty hammer down. The AR-15 can't go on safe with the hammer down. He eventually got fed up with Steele and made the quip.
AM I BEING DETAINED?
Ha...it's funny because Larry Vickers was in delta and he imported full auto Swiss rifles....
you dont say
thank god they got that fat b***h, larry. More like delta FARCE, or delta FART LMAO.
Crummy looking prop
What the literal frick.
Why is the auto sear pin the size of a dime?
Lmao, what other hidden gems are out there in movies
Here are some https://www.imfdb.org/wiki/Non_Guns
It's a rubber gun that exists to be yeeted into the dirt without breaking a blank-firing gun or whatever. It's not meant to be seen from that close for that long and whoever grabbed it for that shot should be embarrassed.
probably modeled after one of the old colt "sear block" rifles
Ive never seen that b4 anon. How insane is that?
A fake rubber gun modeled after a cucked Colt sporter rifle. In a movie thats suppose to represent a FA Colt M16A4.
He may be fat, annoying, and grifty but we have a common enemy. Abolish the ATF.
It's the ATF's fault him and his corrupt buddies were using legal loopholes to import guns to sell for personal gain?
Yes
>for personal gain
What's the problem with this? What's the point in jumping through the legal and bureaucratic gauntlet if you can't gain anything from it?
> shall not be infringed
"legal loopholes" are just licking the boot in a way the boot doesn't approve of
>Well this is my tariff, sir
>this here's my sot sarn't
Who's this gay?
Glowie agent. Adam Lanza was his previous alias
>knobgobbler
expected
He's not necessarily wrong. We just don't know what it means.
Considering it was written by a bunch of domestic insurgents, I think we have a pretty good idea what they meant.
A more realistic title is "we're running out of mental gymnastics tricks to let us pretend the 2a doesn't mean what it means"
Kinda weird to have a "well-regulated militia" clause that isn't supposed to mean anything
It's supposed to justify and explain the actual law. "A well-regulated militia being necessary..." is not a requirement, merely a design consideration.
A well regulated militia is one that supplies it’s own muskets, initial stock of shot and powder, boots, and pioneering tools.
>its own select-fire 5.56 rifles, fighting load of magazines and ammo, armor, NV, and extra socks and ibuprofen
It's not weird. Back in the 1800s the Rhode Island constitution had a free speech amendment that started with the preamble "The liberty of the press being essential to the security of freedom in a state, [...]".
That doesn't mean that only the press has free speech, it's merely an example that is meant to reinforce why it's important that everyone has free speech.
In a lot of historical texts you have to look for similar use of words and phrases to avoid falling for the trap of interpreting things according to a modern meaning.
For example some have tried to argue that "bear arms" means serve in a country's military, but Debrett's 1797 Collection of State Papers Relative to the War Against France contains the passage:
>The inhabitants of the villages, who shall take arms against the French, shall be shot, and their houses burnt, as shall likewise all who bear arms without permission from the French generals.
Bearing arms clearly means carrying weapons. Unless the French generals were habitually giving permission to villagers to fight against them.
Stuff may seem "weird" today but it made perfect sense back then.
>anon exposes his public school 'education' level
It's a standard rhetorical pattern of the time. The clause prefaces the statement with a reinforcing example. E.g. 'weighing 500lb of blubber, anon's mom is a whale'.
Read some 1700s-1800s works.
Well-Regulated, means in proper working order, in modern English: a regulated gas line -> controlled flow of gas. British Infantry at the time were called Regulars, - trained professorial soldiers.
>A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state.
It means the militia must be in proper working order, trained, armed.
additionally, the full text of the 2nd
>A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Who has the right to bear arms? The Militia or the People?
additionally, the militia according to the militia act of 1792 includes all white men between 18-45, who are REQUIRED to own a musket, knapsack, and 24 musket balls and enough powder to shoot them. You were required to have a gun and ammo.
"Regulated" also means "put together in a way where they're unlikely to get out of control." One of the Federal Papers explains their plan for things, the militias would be composed of federal officers from out of state and local enlisted men, so that the officers could coordinate national defense etc. and wouldn't be motivated to use the militia to invade and conquer another state, but the men would be locals who'd refuse to do anything tyrannical to their own communities if a bad federal government got into power.
>Federal Papers
Shit, I mean Federalist Papers
1. the Federalists were tyrants-in-waiting who are the root cause of our current problems
2. in any case, the "well-regulated militia" bit is, again, just a justification for why "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed"—the people's right isn't contingent on serving in a militia, well-regulated or not
the militia is regulated by including every abled bodied man of the people, the state cannot call up an army to oppress the people if the people are the state's militia.
>arguing with israelites is just like arguing with anyone on the Internet
fascinating
Out of the 10 original amendments 5 of them directly reference "the people" or "the rights of the people" only in one do people wonder what they meant when they said "the rights of the people - shall not be infringed" every other one everyone agrees they mean it down to the last man. Its absurd to think they didn't mean me, you, him, them, he, they, everyone. Its every citizen
>declare one of the most sacred rights of Americans null and void
>instantly trigger civil war
>it's 100 million gun owners vs (presumably) a military of 3 million with dubious loyalties at best, many might be inclined to simply stand aside to let you be Ceaușescu'd rather than fight an utterly hopeless battle against their own countrymen
The complete absence of logic of these people never ceases to amaze me.
I'm deliberately ignoring the fact that any such conflict would invariably spiral out of control and turn into a settling of old scores against liberals in general as well. It would rapidly go from "kill the gun grabbing tyrants", to "kill anyone in a BLM shirt", "kill anyone with a rainbow flag", "kill anyone who voted to remove Confederate war memorials", "kill anyone who voted for Biden", "kill anyone who doesn't speak fluent English", "kill anyone with the wrong skin color", and so forth.
most of the military are gun owners if not gun nuts outright, and the oath of enlistment is sworn to uphold the constitution. safe to say most will absolutely not be doorkicking on US soil and grabbling guns
cope. military would definitely kick your shit in
>cope. military would definitely kick your shit in
>hit that group later with a moab
well atleast thry got to write on their grave stones "we won a battle before we got vaporized". Thats basically winning, right
>moves
what now, mr law man?
yes. You will move. at all directions at once
>we won a battle before we got vaporized
You mean the entire job of infantry?
>Afghanistan broke before the Guard did
>The Ubited States is Chaos
It all makes sense
not even "good" Chaos, we're clearly on team Nurgle/Slaanesh
Wow, as it keeps going, it only gets better & better... That sounds great! I'm all in!
Finally, a revolution I can get behind.
>and I saw at once before me a Great Golden Path, and the end of that path was clouded with visions of a great and bloody jihad waged across the universe in my father's name
>and eventually there were only straight whites under 50 who didn't vote for Biden left in America
Oh no~ Hahaha~
Why are you reminding me this fricking moron exists. I haven't thought about him since 2016 or whenever it was. Who the frick keeps up with his twitter?
Everyone knows what it fricking means, it's obvious, and that's why there's so much frickery to try to pin it down to be something other than what we all know it is.
Did fricking Larry REALLY need a Swiss full auto rifle. I'm not talking about his 2nd A right. But someone like Larry could have easily gotten %90 of the guns in the market of every flavor and if he was felling the "fun switch itch" he could have one or two guns "retouched" 😉 while in his property, and then quickly "legalized".
My puzzlement comes from him being such a consoom freak he fricking had import an illegal boomstick, putting himself in a frickton of trouble. I'm betting that with all the lawyer money, he could have bought a trip to Europe and fired all what he wanted.
>need
The consoom bug bit him hard
his guns were all legal
his guns were imported for "law enforcement demos" and they have text messages from LAV that are explicit about how no LE agency cares about X gun and they're 100% for his collection
obviously under the 2A no gun is illegal, but per the unconstitutional laws that are on the books currently he's fricked
Okay so all he had to do was spend half a day at a firing range with a bored cop and he would of be fine? i get complaining about regulations and shit, but this seems like the EASIEST regulation to comply to and he fricked it up?
he literally could of just filmed himself having a shoot with the local pd, edited, released it and made money on youtube over it. How do you frick that up
i'm honestly surprised more ffl/sot holders don't get popped like this, there's so many "guntubers" showing off their "armory" full of post samples lol.
The illegal imports aren't the real issue here. He has secondary charges of espionage and conspiracy to commit espionage. He illegally sold the TDP's of many big name firearms to the Russians in exchange for TDP's of Russian & other small arms. Based off the publicly released court documents, it appears Kalashnikov USA used these illegally gained TDP's to begin production of their AK pattern rifles, and several of these MP5 clones that have hit the market are a result of these dealings as well. Vickers and several of his buddies were set to lead Kalashnikov USA, so he was definitely out to profit.
Which firearms?
Holy shit that's way more based than I thought. KUSA has been a Russian dirty money operation for a long time but I had no idea the TDP wasn't just freely given since the guy who owned KUSA got "gifted" a million dollar property by the then global sales director of KC back when they were still coming in as Saigas.
>it appears Kalashnikov USA used these illegally gained TDP's to begin production of their AK pattern rifles, and several of these MP5 clones that have hit the market are a result of these dealings as well
based
KUSA binary trigger AN94 clone when?
>This is my import permit, Sir.
*Wiggles trigger finger*
Real talk why are there so many fat Delta Operators? Water contamination at Ft. Bragg? Legit question.
They're basically the soldier equivalent of Olympic athletes and eat accordingly, and when they EOS they keep eating that way out of habit and explode
Talking about the active duty ones. Guy on the far right. Was taken in Afghanistan c. 2011. I've never seen a fat SEAL or Ranger after retirement. Not gonna say they're inherently more disciplined.
Far right has camo in his armpits and looks like he's wearing side plates, so it's probably just a PC+inboard radio+side pl8s+insulation layer or equiv
Both SEALs and Rangers are fitness nuts. With Rangers being more obsticle course fit. Seals being beach fit.
Devgru and Delta ride around on helicopters all day while spending time in shoothouses and parachuting.
Completely different standards.
Id argue SAS is the real "all rounded" Soldiers.
Most SAS are very tall and lean like cross country runners.
Just my 2cents
homies go hard on their bodies and get out basically broken. why do you think all the brovets are roided? they can't do real exercise without pumping their body full of chemicals to push past their injuries.
>come on sir, its just some bakelite furniture let it go
>Serious warfighters getting ready to stack bodies with impunity
>Bald desk pilot complains about where a man's finger is
What was his problem?
It's even dumber than that. The Delta guy was carrying chamber empty hammer down. The AR-15 can't go on safe with the hammer down. He eventually got fed up with Steele and made the quip.