this, you can see in this frame that everyone is wearing a UPT Vector skydiving rig - no one skydives and it's not mentioned - the only reason they are wearing them is because they actually filmed this in midair
this was one of the biggest movie stunt flops probably ever. rappeling onto another plane in the air is sick, i'll give them that, but breaking the smaller plane up in mid air was not a cool sequence. it doesn't make sense and it didn't have any stakes or danger. if they blew it up with a bomb it would have been fricking wicked. instead its this very technically difficult and completely lame stunt that serves no narrative purpose in the film that could be cut out entirely
also it was so cringe that people still meme on it, what, 12 years later? the movie was so bad it created baneposting
Nolan tries to use as minimal greenscreen and CG as possible. Probably something like 85-95% of his movie will be practical effects, depending on the film. When he does use CG, it's usually *very* good. The blackhole for Interstellar, for instance, was a very complicated process that Nolan had physicist Kip Thorne on-hand to consult with and it wound up being genuinely insightful for physicists and astronomers.
It wasn't meant to ENTERTAIN you shitlib. It was meant to be a documentary about what would happen if Occupy Wall St. was allowed to continue unhindered.
>Not as great as he's alluded to be.
Yeah, because most people who acclaim Nolan are applauding his...fight choreography.
I don't care if people don't like something, but when you say you don't like something and your reason is moronic, you make everyone everywhere who also hates the same thing look as moronic as you do.
>CIA >"We lost an agent in a plane crash, go find out what happened" >Well we found the plane's fuselage 20 miles from it's wings, which seem to have been pulled off and the plane continued flying without them >Also we found a dead guy who had two people's blood in his system for some reason >Hmm, sounds like an accident.
Yes. First people in film to do it was back in cliff hanger without the plane falling apart. The CIA has done this. They'll extract someone from something like a glider or have them attached to a balloon they grab. It's pretty old technology. They have been taking people's deaths in plane crashes since the 70s.
It was a real plane that was really wrecked as depicted on screen. They filmed all interior shots and exterior closeups in a hangar, then flew it out over some jungle. When the sky was clear enough stuntmen dangled down and attached cables to concealed hardpoints and dragged the plane by the tail until the wings broke off. The tail was blown off and two stuntmen got into the empty plane for the final shot. If you look closely none of the other characters that were in the last interior shots are visible when the plane is dropped because those scenes were shot separately in the hangar set.
It was one of the most expensive and dangerous scenes in cinema history because Nolan is that much of an autist.
The place that they wrecked was apparently a prop, which makes sense. The wing carrythrough structure is the strongest part of the aircraft, capable of supporting several times the aircraft weight. It doesn't make sense that the wings would shear off there, the fuselage would fail first.
impressive. I imagine the hull was stripped of any and all redundant weight, though. Else you would shift the center of gravity way behind the center of lift very suddenly. That can't be good... A c130 has Beeg control surfaces.
It doesn't matter whether something in a movie is not believable after the fact, just like it doesn't matter in a relationship whether your love makes sense. Embrace the joy of the moment.
no. the CG of the big plane would shift back enough to reduce the pitch control arm enough to make it impossible to contrast the now divergent pitch up movement (caused by the CG being behind the CP)
>we need this to look like a natural plane crash >wings get separated from the fuselage miles away >fuselage spikes nose first into the earth like a lawn dart
Would probably cause the plane to crash, without any survivors.
That's a big plane....
bump
Obligatory "...for you"
how fricking original
SO FRICKING FUNNY
10 years with the same fricking spam joke
UPVOTED xDDDDDDD
yeah
you don't belong here
someone get this hothead out of here
you will never be a real woman
lmao it did work in real life, don't you know about visionary nolan's work ethics?
this, you can see in this frame that everyone is wearing a UPT Vector skydiving rig - no one skydives and it's not mentioned - the only reason they are wearing them is because they actually filmed this in midair
>Who could do it?
They'd have to be a big guy to pull it off.
>could this work in real life?
Yes, but it would be extremely painful.
this was one of the biggest movie stunt flops probably ever. rappeling onto another plane in the air is sick, i'll give them that, but breaking the smaller plane up in mid air was not a cool sequence. it doesn't make sense and it didn't have any stakes or danger. if they blew it up with a bomb it would have been fricking wicked. instead its this very technically difficult and completely lame stunt that serves no narrative purpose in the film that could be cut out entirely
also it was so cringe that people still meme on it, what, 12 years later? the movie was so bad it created baneposting
>implying baneposting is bad
Someone get this hot head out of here.
bump
>the movie was so bad
it was?
>I heard Bane is in the sewers
>send all of our police into the sewers to find him now
>oh no all the police are trapped
Bane steals all of Bruce Wayne's money by attacking a single stock exchange office because obvious fraud protection doesn't exist.
yeah, i guess it was
The movie did suck. I'm glad someone else said it.
Yeah I have to wonder what the crash report experts thought when they found both wings and the tail over mile away from the rest of the plane
>So the plane lost both wings and tail somehow managed to continue forwards at a steady pace before nose diving?
What the frick? They actually hanged an airplane from an another airplane? I thought they just hung it from a crane and used greenscreen?
Nolan tries to use as minimal greenscreen and CG as possible. Probably something like 85-95% of his movie will be practical effects, depending on the film. When he does use CG, it's usually *very* good. The blackhole for Interstellar, for instance, was a very complicated process that Nolan had physicist Kip Thorne on-hand to consult with and it wound up being genuinely insightful for physicists and astronomers.
They developed an entirely new renderer for that scene AFAIK
I think that's true, I definitely remember they had to have a whole specialty rendering program to input known physics data and stuff
>but have you heard of his brother Dolan ?
Dude's a total quack.
Nolan is pretty good but have you heard of his brother Dolan ?
Bane?
It wasn't meant to ENTERTAIN you shitlib. It was meant to be a documentary about what would happen if Occupy Wall St. was allowed to continue unhindered.
They didn’t fly so good. Who wants to try next?
>Being a hothead
>In here
Yeah can someone get this guy out?
TDK Trilogy gets worse with every entry. Batman Begins was capeshit kino,
I like TDKR due to how surreal and dumb it is.
Nolan's fight choreography and fights suck donkeydick, samething happens througout Dunkirk multiple times. Not as great as he's alluded to be.
>Not as great as he's alluded to be.
Yeah, because most people who acclaim Nolan are applauding his...fight choreography.
I don't care if people don't like something, but when you say you don't like something and your reason is moronic, you make everyone everywhere who also hates the same thing look as moronic as you do.
yes, but they would expect one of us in the wreckage
Which one? I didn't get to bring any friends
extracting a target would happen at the airport. unless you were being sneaky nobody capable would care about the negative press.
>CIA
>"We lost an agent in a plane crash, go find out what happened"
>Well we found the plane's fuselage 20 miles from it's wings, which seem to have been pulled off and the plane continued flying without them
>Also we found a dead guy who had two people's blood in his system for some reason
>Hmm, sounds like an accident.
Yes. First people in film to do it was back in cliff hanger without the plane falling apart. The CIA has done this. They'll extract someone from something like a glider or have them attached to a balloon they grab. It's pretty old technology. They have been taking people's deaths in plane crashes since the 70s.
it wouldn't fly so good
>could this work in real life? who could do it?
How do you think it was shot?
>How do you think it was shot?
before throwing it out of a plane
the structure wouldn't hold. maybe if it was under a chopper and really well tied up (not like this).
It was a real plane that was really wrecked as depicted on screen. They filmed all interior shots and exterior closeups in a hangar, then flew it out over some jungle. When the sky was clear enough stuntmen dangled down and attached cables to concealed hardpoints and dragged the plane by the tail until the wings broke off. The tail was blown off and two stuntmen got into the empty plane for the final shot. If you look closely none of the other characters that were in the last interior shots are visible when the plane is dropped because those scenes were shot separately in the hangar set.
It was one of the most expensive and dangerous scenes in cinema history because Nolan is that much of an autist.
The place that they wrecked was apparently a prop, which makes sense. The wing carrythrough structure is the strongest part of the aircraft, capable of supporting several times the aircraft weight. It doesn't make sense that the wings would shear off there, the fuselage would fail first.
Negative G's dude
impressive. I imagine the hull was stripped of any and all redundant weight, though. Else you would shift the center of gravity way behind the center of lift very suddenly. That can't be good... A c130 has Beeg control surfaces.
Stop the baneposting right this instant or something might manifest in reality again.
We don't want a repeat of last time now do we?
Do you feel in charge?
I feel like I'm CIA. If i I take your mask off, it will be quite painful for you.
It would be extremely painful
bump
no
The kinda crew you need would have to be very loyal, way more than a hired gun.
mogged
a big guy could
It doesn't matter whether something in a movie is not believable after the fact, just like it doesn't matter in a relationship whether your love makes sense. Embrace the joy of the moment.
So what you're saying is it doesn't matter if the movie is believable. What matters is the enjoyment?
If I pulled that stunt off, would you die?
For you.
no. the CG of the big plane would shift back enough to reduce the pitch control arm enough to make it impossible to contrast the now divergent pitch up movement (caused by the CG being behind the CP)
>we need this to look like a natural plane crash
>wings get separated from the fuselage miles away
>fuselage spikes nose first into the earth like a lawn dart
It's was a Boeing EMB-110.
EMB-110 should have been built by Embraer
Theatricality and deception are powerful agents
For the uninitiated, but we are initiated, aren't we anon?
Baneposting was the last great PrepHole contribution. Sad to see it almost entirely gone now.
yeah, thats how prigo survived
Have we started the hot dog stand?
>they expect one of us the the wreckage
You had one fricking job.
Why did CIA need to use a hired gun? Shouldn't the agency have issued him a gun if he needed one?
The bigger question is why he would shoot a man before throwing him out of a plane
Well at least you can talk
That's because I am the big guy of these men, CIA