Yeah of course you can. If a .22lr can punch straight through the skull of a cow, thirty rounds from a spitzerized projectile moving at mach 2 will absolutely drop this hollow boned homosexual unless you shoot them all directly into his ass.
this
you probably won't kill an elephant with one shot from your peashooter but if you keep firing you'll hit something important, at least the shrapnel will
a full auto magdump to the dino's head should absolutely finish it off so as long as you can fire full auto without dropping the fricking thing or spraying it to a comical degree you should be fine
Why wouldn't you be able to kill one with an AK? Worst case you dump a few mags into it. Bullets frick up flesh and smash bone no problem. If you're really worried start with the legs to destroy the bones and it's ability to walk then finish floppy off with a dump to the head or side.
>Followup shots at vulneravle areas would frick up a dino pretty bad.
A LOT easier said than done against a fast-moving behemoth carnivore hell-spawn rushing you in a surprise close encounter predation kill-or-be-killed scenario. Nerves, downright fear and an unsteady aim are almost guaranteed.
If you were trying to hunt it with like a bolt action rifle or it somehow was already attempting to hunt you and was close, this would be more of a possibility. A predator the size of a Giganotosaurus would probably not be that interested in actively-hunting human-sized prey tho so you'd probably be the one hunting it in which case, shooting it many times from range with a 30-rnd magazine provides you a significant advantage. If you had one shot and a smaller magazine, maybe it would kill you.
People only think 7.62x39 is shit because nobody shoots anything but the cheapest dogshit steelcase commercial ammo. Also the OP premise is silly because the AK-47 has an effective range of at least 200 yards. If you're within close range, then obviously the dino would frick you up, but you could absolutely kill one by magdumping into its head or chest cavity from a fair distance.
No people think it's shit because it icepicks right through your target which is a problem for humans and small land animals. The cheapest dogshit surplus steel cored 7.62 is actually the best against large animals; that steel core will stay together and icepick right past muscle and into vitals.
Steel-core M43 7.62x39 hasn't been sold in years because the ATF dubbed it "armor-piercing handgun ammunition" just like they later did for surplus 5.45x39 7N6. All the commercial Russian steelcase 7.62x39 you could buy off the shelf prior to Biden banning it like Wolf, Tulammo, etc. was lead core.
in reality lizards are fricking stupid primitive animals and they would probably freak out and start biting at the air if you shot it because it thinks another lizard is attacking it. it has no concept of what a bullet is.
Oh, look, it's another can I kill x with a gun, wherein x is something that isn't real, or current alive. KYS FGT, this shit is gayer than starting another Ukraine thread.
Probably not.
Guns are aight but shit like bears, rhino's, hippo's or elephants, when in a rage, will absolutely ignore them and tear you in half in a mad rage, unless you've got something high in stopping power (and that needs to be a .50 Cal or Elephant gun to make a real difference), or with a lot of bullets (and hope it is incapacitated before it reaches you with its charge, as effectively you're just throwing pebbles really fast into it).
A fricking dino would almost definitely frick your shit up if you only have an ak-47. Even if a round is able to potentially do damage and not get lodged in the meat or the bone, it's still going to ignore it while charging you down. Remember, this thing is going to have a huge amount of bone in the skull, and not much brains. 7.62X39 is good, but not designed for a hands-breadth of calcium metal crystals in a DFCT lattice.
Also that was a world record brown bear, and the bullets were lead RN 22 long(not LR)
From the rifle fired it had about the same velocity as a 22lr stinger from a 4" revolver, but even lighter weight bullet lol
We only consider bears to be a threat because people are expected to face them with pistols. Add in an actual assault rifle and it becomes a whole new ball game. Meanwhile, a .30-06 is considered suitable for shooting through elephant skulls.
>a lot of bullets
You mean, like what you would expect from an AK?
Or its dick so it can't rape you. I am honestly surprised noone has posted this yet. >Shoot its dick off, dodge a couple baby arm swipes, and just bayonet it in the heart like a real man. The real question is: what are you going to hunt with your remaining 29 bullets? Probably a couple packs of raptors (at night to make it fair for them)?
Dinos didn't have dicks. They had cloacae just like modern birds and reptiles. Only mammals have external dicks. Pic related is proof that dinos didn't have dicks.
If its a troony just give it some rope and wait for a day or two. Either way, I don't see why an AK is even necessary. A true master of verbal judo could flip it unconscious using just their words.
7.62x39 over penetrates and ice picks extremely hard, which is normally bad for shooting humans, but I think it'd be good for reaching inner tissues on a large theropod.
>magdumps into it's fricking skull
Rhinos, Hippos, and African Elephants get killed all the time by 7.62x39, is it ethical or humane? Frick no, but in reality a Giganotosaurus would give absolutely zero shits about humans and a couple flashbangs or CS gas would actively avoid humans. Movies/Books about dinosaurs made them out to be monsters, but the fact is that they ARE animals, and carnivores tend to be very risk adverse, as a minor injury can cause them to starve to death.
How is AI not going full autism on mass and velocity of the bullet and its impact on muscle and bone? It reads like some generic shit a half educated highschool kid would say.
It's almost like "AI" isn't actually an artificial intelligence but a fricking word generator that slaps shit together in a way that sounds professional but with zero understanding of the subject. It'll only try to do math if you force it to use a format that typically has a lot of calculations, but all the math will be nonsense garbage because it's just plugging in random numbers.
Because it's not Artificial Intelligence, it's a Large Language Model. It doesn't "know" anything. You would have to feed it that information about theropod muscle and bone density before asking it that question.
People need to understand that "AI" is just looking for a pattern. "What's the pattern of an interesting response to that question".
Not truth, not information, just something that "looks similar to an answer"
>the mans ability to maneuve, aim and sustain the firepower of the AK-47 would also be limited in such a high-stress and dangerous situation
Maybe if he's a fricking idiot who doesn't train
Shoot the lizard's eyes out, that'll fricking do it
I think the AI is probably right on this one. There's a good reason crocodile hunting is done with special safari rounds rather than standard rifle cartridges, and even then you have to be really careful with shot placement to get a clean kill. Spraying an even bigger reptile with a load of 7.62 will just make it angry and alert it to your presence.
>There's a good reason crocodile hunting is done with special safari rounds
Virtually any bullet will punch right through a crocodile's skull, the most common weapons used to hunt them are shotguns, AKs, and 308s.
Yes, he could.
These hypotheticals are fricking useless however.
A harpy eagle can hypothetically run its claws through a human's skull like its butter. Crush it like you'd crush a soft fruit.
You could also hypothetically kill it with a stick.
Of course a commie weapon wouldn't be able to.
Now a 1911, that there's some stopping power. Knock that lizard down easy with an extra dose of 45.
=================================
God, Guns, and Country!
Proud American who misses the good ol' days.
If you don't like it, leave!
Proud veteran, US navy 1960/04 - 1960/06
Purple heart recipient
WWJD
some /k/ommando whose hunted very large (african) game thought about this and figured it would be no more difficult to kill the largest dinosaurs than to kill an elephant, simply due to the fact that dinos had hollow bones. The herbivores built to withstand apex predators might be more difficult to take down, but the carnivores would be fairly straightfoward to kill. Raptors in particular would be easily killed with assault rifles.
Probably not with an AK. More like an elephant gun at minimum or something like a 50cal machine gun.
Yeah of course you can. If a .22lr can punch straight through the skull of a cow, thirty rounds from a spitzerized projectile moving at mach 2 will absolutely drop this hollow boned homosexual unless you shoot them all directly into his ass.
they poach elephants with AK's it'll be alright
Not saying it wouldn't kill the Dino, but when poachers do it to elephants they are usually in groups.
Being a single man makes the odds worse.
You have no idea how bad africans are at shooting.
WRONG GIF SHIT
i expected him to get hit a second time
Nog poachers mag dump elephants and rhinos all the time. It's just a fricking animal, not a movie monster.
this
you probably won't kill an elephant with one shot from your peashooter but if you keep firing you'll hit something important, at least the shrapnel will
a full auto magdump to the dino's head should absolutely finish it off so as long as you can fire full auto without dropping the fricking thing or spraying it to a comical degree you should be fine
You can't defeat Giganotosaurus carolinii. Grow up.
Why wouldn't you be able to kill one with an AK? Worst case you dump a few mags into it. Bullets frick up flesh and smash bone no problem. If you're really worried start with the legs to destroy the bones and it's ability to walk then finish floppy off with a dump to the head or side.
According to modern /k/ 7.62X39 is basically anemic and no more deadly than an average handgun round
In actuality it would probably work just fine because you have 30 tries and it penetrates bretty gud before it tumbles.
This.
The AI forgets that you can shoot wounds too. Followup shots at vulneravle areas would frick up a dino pretty bad.
>Followup shots at vulneravle areas would frick up a dino pretty bad.
A LOT easier said than done against a fast-moving behemoth carnivore hell-spawn rushing you in a surprise close encounter predation kill-or-be-killed scenario. Nerves, downright fear and an unsteady aim are almost guaranteed.
Real life isnt an anime.
In real life the animal gets hit 20 times before it even knows what happened to it.
If you were trying to hunt it with like a bolt action rifle or it somehow was already attempting to hunt you and was close, this would be more of a possibility. A predator the size of a Giganotosaurus would probably not be that interested in actively-hunting human-sized prey tho so you'd probably be the one hunting it in which case, shooting it many times from range with a 30-rnd magazine provides you a significant advantage. If you had one shot and a smaller magazine, maybe it would kill you.
People only think 7.62x39 is shit because nobody shoots anything but the cheapest dogshit steelcase commercial ammo. Also the OP premise is silly because the AK-47 has an effective range of at least 200 yards. If you're within close range, then obviously the dino would frick you up, but you could absolutely kill one by magdumping into its head or chest cavity from a fair distance.
No people think it's shit because it icepicks right through your target which is a problem for humans and small land animals. The cheapest dogshit surplus steel cored 7.62 is actually the best against large animals; that steel core will stay together and icepick right past muscle and into vitals.
Steel-core M43 7.62x39 hasn't been sold in years because the ATF dubbed it "armor-piercing handgun ammunition" just like they later did for surplus 5.45x39 7N6. All the commercial Russian steelcase 7.62x39 you could buy off the shelf prior to Biden banning it like Wolf, Tulammo, etc. was lead core.
in reality lizards are fricking stupid primitive animals and they would probably freak out and start biting at the air if you shot it because it thinks another lizard is attacking it. it has no concept of what a bullet is.
Idiot.
Oh, look, it's another can I kill x with a gun, wherein x is something that isn't real, or current alive. KYS FGT, this shit is gayer than starting another Ukraine thread.
Dumb threads like this have been /k/'s bread and butter forever, gayosaurus. Also...
r/wojak lost.
aren't theropod bones kinda spongey inside like modern bird bones?
a few rounds to the legs would severely hobble it
Probably not.
Guns are aight but shit like bears, rhino's, hippo's or elephants, when in a rage, will absolutely ignore them and tear you in half in a mad rage, unless you've got something high in stopping power (and that needs to be a .50 Cal or Elephant gun to make a real difference), or with a lot of bullets (and hope it is incapacitated before it reaches you with its charge, as effectively you're just throwing pebbles really fast into it).
A fricking dino would almost definitely frick your shit up if you only have an ak-47. Even if a round is able to potentially do damage and not get lodged in the meat or the bone, it's still going to ignore it while charging you down. Remember, this thing is going to have a huge amount of bone in the skull, and not much brains. 7.62X39 is good, but not designed for a hands-breadth of calcium metal crystals in a DFCT lattice.
moron
Also that was a world record brown bear, and the bullets were lead RN 22 long(not LR)
From the rifle fired it had about the same velocity as a 22lr stinger from a 4" revolver, but even lighter weight bullet lol
Double moron
We only consider bears to be a threat because people are expected to face them with pistols. Add in an actual assault rifle and it becomes a whole new ball game. Meanwhile, a .30-06 is considered suitable for shooting through elephant skulls.
>a lot of bullets
You mean, like what you would expect from an AK?
WM Bell dropped Elephants right where they stood with one shot from a 7mm rifle, and even a .275.
A mag dump into the leg will leave it unable to move and then at that point you can finish it off at your leisure.
I'd say its samrter to aim at its tooths so it cant bite you.
Or its dick so it can't rape you. I am honestly surprised noone has posted this yet.
>Shoot its dick off, dodge a couple baby arm swipes, and just bayonet it in the heart like a real man. The real question is: what are you going to hunt with your remaining 29 bullets? Probably a couple packs of raptors (at night to make it fair for them)?
Dinos didn't have dicks. They had cloacae just like modern birds and reptiles. Only mammals have external dicks. Pic related is proof that dinos didn't have dicks.
If its a troony just give it some rope and wait for a day or two. Either way, I don't see why an AK is even necessary. A true master of verbal judo could flip it unconscious using just their words.
barneygay what are you doing here
>at that point you can rape it at your leisure
FTFY
7.62x39 over penetrates and ice picks extremely hard, which is normally bad for shooting humans, but I think it'd be good for reaching inner tissues on a large theropod.
>magdumps into it's fricking skull
Rhinos, Hippos, and African Elephants get killed all the time by 7.62x39, is it ethical or humane? Frick no, but in reality a Giganotosaurus would give absolutely zero shits about humans and a couple flashbangs or CS gas would actively avoid humans. Movies/Books about dinosaurs made them out to be monsters, but the fact is that they ARE animals, and carnivores tend to be very risk adverse, as a minor injury can cause them to starve to death.
How is AI not going full autism on mass and velocity of the bullet and its impact on muscle and bone? It reads like some generic shit a half educated highschool kid would say.
It's almost like "AI" isn't actually an artificial intelligence but a fricking word generator that slaps shit together in a way that sounds professional but with zero understanding of the subject. It'll only try to do math if you force it to use a format that typically has a lot of calculations, but all the math will be nonsense garbage because it's just plugging in random numbers.
Because it's not Artificial Intelligence, it's a Large Language Model. It doesn't "know" anything. You would have to feed it that information about theropod muscle and bone density before asking it that question.
People need to understand that "AI" is just looking for a pattern. "What's the pattern of an interesting response to that question".
Not truth, not information, just something that "looks similar to an answer"
>the mans ability to maneuve, aim and sustain the firepower of the AK-47 would also be limited in such a high-stress and dangerous situation
Maybe if he's a fricking idiot who doesn't train
Shoot the lizard's eyes out, that'll fricking do it
Blow one of its knees out, easy
I think the AI is probably right on this one. There's a good reason crocodile hunting is done with special safari rounds rather than standard rifle cartridges, and even then you have to be really careful with shot placement to get a clean kill. Spraying an even bigger reptile with a load of 7.62 will just make it angry and alert it to your presence.
>There's a good reason crocodile hunting is done with special safari rounds
Virtually any bullet will punch right through a crocodile's skull, the most common weapons used to hunt them are shotguns, AKs, and 308s.
.22lr kills far more crocs than anything else.
>Giganotosaurus carolinii
They only eat dark meat.
You must be thinking of the "dinosaur with 500 teeth"?
I'm not joking, google "dinosaur with 500 teeth"
Yes, he could.
These hypotheticals are fricking useless however.
A harpy eagle can hypothetically run its claws through a human's skull like its butter. Crush it like you'd crush a soft fruit.
You could also hypothetically kill it with a stick.
Shoot it in the knees/feet until it can't walk / run. Then line up a heart / lungs / brain shot at your convenience.
Do not get close to it for a while after it's down / dead. Reptile nerves can fire after brain death for a while.
I wouldn't give it a 100% certainty either way.
Run the scenario 1000 times, sometimes the Dino will die, sometimes the man.
What chat generator are you using? I’ve been using deep ai but the intrusive ads are annoying me and want to know what alternatives there are?
Of course a commie weapon wouldn't be able to.
Now a 1911, that there's some stopping power. Knock that lizard down easy with an extra dose of 45.
=================================
God, Guns, and Country!
Proud American who misses the good ol' days.
If you don't like it, leave!
Proud veteran, US navy 1960/04 - 1960/06
Purple heart recipient
WWJD
some /k/ommando whose hunted very large (african) game thought about this and figured it would be no more difficult to kill the largest dinosaurs than to kill an elephant, simply due to the fact that dinos had hollow bones. The herbivores built to withstand apex predators might be more difficult to take down, but the carnivores would be fairly straightfoward to kill. Raptors in particular would be easily killed with assault rifles.
>shoot at legs until dino stops moving very well
>full auto into its skull
Yes if you pumped its lungs full of lead, but it would probably kill you before it died.
Bones aren't bulletproof.
Could dinosaurs be weaponized?